Tennessee_ATO
Footballguy
Fitzpatrick is awful. The Jets would have seen more ROI on that deal if they just sold tickets to people to come watch them set $12M in cash on fire.
He got #paid. Never trust an overpaid ivy leaguerhonestly wth is wrong with fitz this year?
thats going to hurtHilton out of the game. . Questionable to return . . . Hammy
Yeah, I still have adams, julio, rodgers, ryan, booker, crosby, and denver split between my 2 LU's. But I am not planning on getting anything back at this point.Thank goodness I didn't play much this week. I've still got some hope -- Adams and Julio literally everywhere; Ryan in one-half of my cash; and Freeman/Booker lots of places. Maybe one of my GPPs will hit or something.
Dunno about that. Forte+Theo looks like an awfully good combo to me right now.That means 21-7% of the field built their cash lineups wrong.
LOL. Football manBooker questionable to return with a shoulder per redzone channel
I don't buy into that as rigid dogma, but I get that I'm an anomaly in that regard. I pivoted off of him to Forte in one of my lineups b/c I thought Forte was a better play. Theo is chronically underpriced, especially when he's competing w/ Zach "hands of stone" Zenner for touches. Sure, Booker was likely to be heavily owned, but unless there was a real good place to spend those savings (and I didn't see it personally) then I'm not sure he's the call if you aren't willing to not spend about $1000.In hindsight sure. But the fact hes 90% owned, which was fairly predictable, means regardless of what he does once the game starts it was correct to play him.
WtfBooker questionable to return with a shoulder per redzone channel
You cant predict injuries. Ware and Hilton are just bad luckCan someone explain to me where I went wrong with these LU's.. I felt they were solid..I know injuries happen.
rodgers, Booker, J. Rodgers, Evans, Julio, Hilton, Doyle, crosby, Pats Lowest owned played is 8% and that is aaron rodgers.
Ryan, Booker, ware, Julio, adams, evans, barnidge, bailey, denver Lowest owned 15 and 16%
I thought these were solid and again I am going to lose my ###. I feel like it's been like this every week for me. A solid LU and horrible results.
This.You cant predict injuries. Ware and Hilton are just bad luck
nobody is "chasing high ownership". there is a reason the guy is like 85% owned. you continue to post stuff that is flat out incorrect week in and week out and then when people suggest you may be wrong you refuse to acknowledge it. like a couple of weeks ago with your whole 'you need at least 20 pts from your qb' nonsense.I don't buy into that as rigid dogma, but I get that I'm an anomaly in that regard. I pivoted off of him to Forte in one of my lineups b/c I thought Forte was a better play. Theo is chronically underpriced, especially when he's competing w/ Zach "hands of stone" Zenner for touches. Sure, Booker was likely to be heavily owned, but unless there was a real good place to spend those savings (and I didn't see it personally) then I'm not sure he's the call if you aren't willing to not spend about $1000.
Obviously, if you think Booker outscores Forte or if you think Booker + whomever will score more than Forte + the cheap option to whomever, then it's a no-brainer. I'm just saying you can end-up w/ suboptimal lineups in the name of chasing high ownership. We make projections for a reason.
just to be clear youre not playing him BECAUSE hes 60%+ owned, its more that if 60%+ of the field is on the guy then theres probably a reason. in this case with booker its for all the expected reasons (so glaringly obvious that im not even gonna insult your intelligence by listing them). i mean fbg power grid show started off by mentioning him as the first topic after the intro like in a 'ok-this-is-so-obvious-lets-just-get-it-out-of-the-way-now' kinda way.I have to agree that Booker had to be played today in cash. Maybe not quit as much on FD as DK , but If he does well or does't do well you stay with 80% of the field. If Forte and Riddick does well you gain on everyone, but if they bust you are out of your cash games. I like the odds the other way. I'm still in it no matter what happens with Booker, not the case with the other two.
That being said I liked both of those guys this week also, and they could have been a nice combo with with Booker on either site.
I just feel in cash if you think a guy is going to be 60% plus owned, you probably need him in your LU. There is still room to wiggle usually with different guys still. I think to myself, if that player flops how many guys will have him. If 60% have him, than you are still in the game.
This week I think D. Adams fell into that category probably also. Montgomery would have for sure. Julio and Evans maybe also. Booker definitely!