Ilov80s
Footballguy
Yeah Leone movies tend to be long. Once Upon a Time in America is 226 minutes. Consider this make up time for months missed lol156 minutes??!!
Yeah Leone movies tend to be long. Once Upon a Time in America is 226 minutes. Consider this make up time for months missed lol156 minutes??!!
251 minutes if you get the Director's Extended cut blu ray which I found on Amazon a while ago for the insanely cheap price of $6.99.Yeah Leone movies tend to be long. Once Upon a Time in America is 226 minutes. Consider this make up time for months missed lol
Is that Netflix?I noticed Once Upon a Time in the West is streaming too. I'm giving that one a go tonight for some extra credit to start.
Cool and I see now The Good, The Bad and the Ugly is on NF. Lots of extra credit options!On Prime.
This movie has the distinction of being my most bought movie. I do believe I have bought this movie every time a new technology came out. At one time I said I was done buying movies because I would get a nice collection and the technology would change. This movie was the straw that broke the camels back when it came to buying movies.Cool and I see now The Good, The Bad and the Ugly is on NF. Lots of extra credit options!
Abbey Lincoln is dreeeemeeeeAs a little bit of a callback to the Juneteenth films, TCM is airing “Nothing But a Man” this afternoon. Highly recommend. It had poor distribution on its release in 1964, and, as a result, not well-known, but it is a pretty powerful movie on black life in America in the 1960s. Ivan Dixon incredible in it.
I saw it when they played it a couple months ago. Great film.As a little bit of a callback to the Juneteenth films, TCM is airing “Nothing But a Man” this afternoon. Highly recommend. It had poor distribution on its release in 1964, and, as a result, not well-known, but it is a pretty powerful movie on black life in America in the 1960s. Ivan Dixon incredible in it.
How did you watch it? I pulled it up on Prime but the quality was really bad. The Youtube version seems a little better. Maybe I was just getting some poor quality connection with Prime at the time.Death rides a horse was very good. I will wait to vote as I need to watch the other film first. This film brought me back to the days of three channels on the tv. This was a lot of what we watched.
Quality was really bad. I was thinking somebody needs to do something to save this film but I just thought that was how it was.How did you watch it? I pulled it up on Prime but the quality was really bad. The Youtube version seems a little better. Maybe I was just getting some poor quality connection with Prime at the time.
I've noticed Amazon Prime has zero quality control and will put out the worst possible copies of movies at times. Using the YouTube app on my smart tv it looked fine. That is definitely the way to watch this.Quality was really bad. I was thinking somebody needs to do something to save this film but I just thought that was how it was.
I was not aware of this. I will go the you tube route in the future.Ilov80s said:I've noticed Amazon Prime has zero quality control and will put out the worst possible copies of movies at times. Using the YouTube app on my smart tv it looked fine. That is definitely the way to watch this.
Most of the stuff on Prime is ok but I think the older and more obscure the movie, the bigger the risk.I was not aware of this. I will go the you tube route in the future.
Companeros isn't on Amazon any longer but there are streams available. It's a hoot.I watched a couple of Zapata Westerns in the past couple of months. They're an odd sub-genre of Spaghetti Westerns with a definite Marxist bent. They're always set in revolution-era Mexico and typically are a buddy story between a mysterious loner, usually a gringo paired with a Mexican bandit/revolutionary character. The plots usually pit the two protagonists as rivals at the beginning who eventually join forces and gain respect for one another. The villains are some combination of wealthy landowners, police/military and Catholic church figures.
Companeros stars Franco Nero as a the gringo nicknamed either "The Swede" or "Penguin" and Tomas Milian as a bandit who is consciously styled after Che Guevara. It was directed by Sergio Corbucci, the other Sergio of Spaghetti Western fame. It's a fun piece of entertainment featuring Jack Palance as a sadistic villain complete with mechanical hand, a pet falcon and an accent that's not of this planet.
Duck You Sucker is better known and is a bigger production. It's the last Western directed by Sergio Leone and has a more epic scope than Companeros. James Coburn plays the gringo (an Irish revolutionary) with Rod Steiger as a Villaesque bandit. You know what you're in for when watching a Leone movie. Duck You Sucker is a slight step down from TMWNN trilogy and Once Upon a Time but it's still worth watching.
Both films are available on Amazon Prime although Duck You Sucker is listed under its alternate title A Fistful of Dynamite. Amazon also has one of the first Zapata Westerns A Bullet for the General, which I have in queue. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a stream of the other early Zapata Western Classic The Big Gundown. I saw it a long time ago and thought it was terrific.
In my neck of the woods, we call that squirrel.... There's a French delicacy, Ortolan, where you eat a rare, small bird whole, in one bite. Supposedly, the crunching of each tiny bone is a huge part of the sublime exquisiteness of the experience...
I noticed lots of teeth in this movie.I actually don’t mind Steiger as a Mexican for some reason. He pulls it off as well as any white guy I’ve seen short of Eli Wallach. Also Coburn looks kind of studly in this movie. What Instagram filter did Leone use so that anyone with blue or green eyes looked like they had bright shimmering diamonds for eyes?
The opening few minutes Leone does some very extreme close ups but those are unflattering. When he does closeups on Coburn or Eastwood in other movies, he seems to get everyone’s eyes to look like they are Paul Newman.I noticed lots of teeth in this movie.
Ditto here.I started off hot with an extra credit, but I’ve been taking my judging duties in the FBG Movie Draft too seriously, and have been using my movie time to watch/re-watchsome movies for that. I’ll see if I can get in. Starting A Fistful of Dynamite now.
Beyond his fatal looks, charm & steel, Coburn's smile & sharp angles connect us to the the skulls we leave behind.I noticed lots of teeth in this movie.
As a whole, I was impressed. I hadn't looked at spaghetti westerns beyond the most famous Leone movies and Django. I liked all of them so I don't know why I never dug further. I thought both of these were super entertaining and I am glad @The Man With No Name picked them.I've always like Spaghetti Westerns for their skewed take on American mythology. On the whole, they're not much more unrealistic than classic Westerns although they take a lot of liberties especially with plotting.
I enjoyed Death Rides a Horse over the weekend. I haven't watched A Fistful of Dynamite for two years but I'm pretty sure both used a similar narrative gimmick of two mismatched protagonists hopscotching their way through the story. Van Cleef's Ryan was like a film noir hero seeking payback from his old gang while Bill was on a more traditional vengeance track like Charles Bronson in OUATITW. It was a lower budget production than A Fistful of Dynamite which showed mostly in the larger sequences. They could have done without the villagers but the filmmakers must have been working to a body count. I've seen John Phillip Law in other films and he wasn't terrible but the dubbing editor did him no favors in this one.
A Fistful of Dynamite was a better film but it may be a case of nostalgia making me forget the awkward parts. I think it was kind of slow in the middle but it's been a while. I'm sure Steiger was the best character in either film and he carried A Fistful of Dynamite. The explosions were definitely better as well.
They're very entertaining in their own strange way. Even the ones that take themselves seriously have moments of slapstick and unintentional comedy.As a whole, I was impressed. I hadn't looked at spaghetti westerns beyond the most famous Leone movies and Django. I liked all of them so I don't know why I never dug further. I thought both of these were super entertaining and I am glad @The Man With No Name picked them.
I think you have to be very comfortable with taking in comedy, violence and brutality at the same time and with equal consideration. It's so serious that it's not. It's lack of any serious qualities, helps make it more serious.They're very entertaining in their own strange way. Even the ones that take themselves seriously have moments of slapstick and unintentional comedy.
It's also fun to play "spot that guy" while watching. There are a bunch of character actors with interesting Western faces who pop up frequently in Italian film. He's not Italian but it was cool to see Anthony Dawson playing the bad guy with the four aces tattoo. Dawson acted in the first two 007 films including voicing Blofeld in that character's first movie appearance.
I can't imagine how these films were received when they came a half century ago. Modern audiences are accustomed to the combination of violence and lowbrow humor from watching horror films, Tarantino, exploitation films, etc.I think you have to be very comfortable with taking in comedy, violence and brutality at the same time and with equal consideration. It's so serious that it's not. It's lack of any serious qualities, helps make it more serious.
Last two months were so dead in here, I’m going to give a it a little time. Maybe aim for an October return.
Oh #### - more horror movies??!!!Last two months were so dead in here, I’m going to give a it a little time. Maybe aim for an October return.
We definitely doKarmaPolice said:I've forgotten what we did last year for horror, and how it went. Was it Let the Right One In and something else?
Didn't know if we even wanted to go that route again.