What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (4 Viewers)

Going big on Dallas +3 against the Magic tomorrow. Orlando's players haven't gelled yet and the Mavs are playing great basketball. The line seems kind of sketchy given all of this so I'm praying against Vegas trickery

 
You can get the Colts this week -3 at plus money. Do it. Now.

This is exactly the type of game where the Raiders piss down their leg. 27-13 Indy.

 
You can get the Colts this week -3 at plus money. Do it. Now.

This is exactly the type of game where the Raiders piss down their leg. 27-13 Indy.
Huge play:I agree with your pick as well, and I'm looking at Dallas this way too. Arizona has been floundering like a fish out of water lately. Dallas has way too much talent and I think the books are feeling stingy on Dallas after being let down by Wade Phillips

Arizona is in the bottom rung of NFL teams this season. I mean, come on, they just lost to Carolina by seven. They don't even stand a chance against Dallas' offense. Ware and the boys will have a field day in the Arizona backfield.

Dallas -7 (EVEN) 5 units [i want to end the NFL season with a bang]

Small play:

I haven't played the Seahawks this year at all, but I think this is a good game to get Hasselbeck back into shape. They've still got a good receiving corp., and the Buccs have been hit by injuries defensively. This is an even division matchup as far as I can tell. Tampa Bay wins it 20-17.

Seahawks +6

 
I always like chalks that can think like underdogs, and a 6-6 bowl team can fit into that mindset. Better SOS puts the Cards in line.

LOUISVILLE -2.5

 
Played southern miss ML tonight, 1/2u +125 and 1/2u +130

Utah +17 tomorrow night

ETA: tailing another poster on southern miss....utah is my play, i think it's real hard for boise to get up for this game. college kids looking at a definite BCS bowl, possible national championship appearance to the MAACO bowl

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legs

Jax

SF

NE

Oak

Den

SD

NO

7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :lmao:

 
Played southern miss ML tonight, 1/2u +125 and 1/2u +130Utah +17 tomorrow nightETA: tailing another poster on southern miss....utah is my play, i think it's real hard for boise to get up for this game. college kids looking at a definite BCS bowl, possible national championship appearance to the MAACO bowl
agree with both...but I'm gonna wait on Utah. I see 17.5 popped up at Bodog, and I can see people piling on BSU when they realize they are playing.did anyone get a chance to get down on my Italian Serie B draw bet yesterday. I don't want to say the fix was in.....but normally a draw bet odds are between +180 on up to +400. I'd venture to say that 75-85% of draw lines are between +200- +250, so +180 is quite low which is what I was getting in at. Pinny odds on the draw were at -150, and there was something like 4.2 million matched on European exchanges on the draw line, pushing it as low as -180 on some places. To put it in perspective Everton/Man City entire handle was about 2.5 million..... :lmao:
 
Played southern miss ML tonight, 1/2u +125 and 1/2u +130Utah +17 tomorrow nightETA: tailing another poster on southern miss....utah is my play, i think it's real hard for boise to get up for this game. college kids looking at a definite BCS bowl, possible national championship appearance to the MAACO bowl
agree with both...but I'm gonna wait on Utah. I see 17.5 popped up at Bodog, and I can see people piling on BSU when they realize they are playing.did anyone get a chance to get down on my Italian Serie B draw bet yesterday. I don't want to say the fix was in.....but normally a draw bet odds are between +180 on up to +400. I'd venture to say that 75-85% of draw lines are between +200- +250, so +180 is quite low which is what I was getting in at. Pinny odds on the draw were at -150, and there was something like 4.2 million matched on European exchanges on the draw line, pushing it as low as -180 on some places. To put it in perspective Everton/Man City entire handle was about 2.5 million..... :unsure:
I usually love jumping on your soccer plays, but couldn't find it :lmao: How does that work? Both teams agree to not score?
 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legs

Jax

SF

NE

Oak

Den

SD

NO

7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :lmao:
Can I please talk you out of this one? "Systems" are nice, but you have to make exceptions sometimes. OAK +9 sucks. They count on controlling the game with the run. Once Manning gets up a couple of scores - and he will - you are now relying on Jason Campbell.

 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legs

Jax

SF

NE

Oak

Den

SD

NO

7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :rant:
Can I please talk you out of this one? "Systems" are nice, but you have to make exceptions sometimes. OAK +9 sucks. They count on controlling the game with the run. Once Manning gets up a couple of scores - and he will - you are now relying on Jason Campbell.
No you can't. The fact that you even want to discuss this is ridiculous. How awesome have teasers been this entire NFL season....every week you pick and choose and every week I try and figure out how i'm going to get all this money offline. The number falls in the range, I'm playin it, even if God himself told me it was going to lose.
 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legs

Jax

SF

NE

Oak

Den

SD

NO

7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :rant:
Can I please talk you out of this one? "Systems" are nice, but you have to make exceptions sometimes. OAK +9 sucks. They count on controlling the game with the run. Once Manning gets up a couple of scores - and he will - you are now relying on Jason Campbell.
You're assuming they will abandon the run. The Colts run defense is terrible. I don't care how many TDs Peyton throws, if the Raiders stick with the run they will hang.
 
"Every week" is a bit of an exaggeration. I was concerned about K.C. last week if Croyle started. He didn't, so it was a moot point.

I think I only mentioned a game I would lay off one other time. Giants maybe, a few weeks ago? Anyway, good luck.

 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legs

Jax

SF

NE

Oak

Den

SD

NO

7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :rant:
Can I please talk you out of this one? "Systems" are nice, but you have to make exceptions sometimes. OAK +9 sucks. They count on controlling the game with the run. Once Manning gets up a couple of scores - and he will - you are now relying on Jason Campbell.
You're assuming they will abandon the run. The Colts run defense is terrible. I don't care how many TDs Peyton throws, if the Raiders stick with the run they will hang.
You're assuming Oakland's coaching staff is smart.
 
Leroy Hoard said:
I always like chalks that can think like underdogs, and a 6-6 bowl team can fit into that mindset. Better SOS puts the Cards in line.

LOUISVILLE -2.5
Completely agree with your angle here. Louisville is absolutely going to bring everything tonight. Its rare that I'm not sure if a CUSA school can match the energy of any BCS school head to head, but that will be the case tonight.Louisville 31-7 IMO

 
"Every week" is a bit of an exaggeration. I was concerned about K.C. last week if Croyle started. He didn't, so it was a moot point.I think I only mentioned a game I would lay off one other time. Giants maybe, a few weeks ago? Anyway, good luck.
The NFL market is much smarter than you or I. These teasers take advantage of the fact that the books lines are efficient. Unless you have a better argument than "I'm a raiders fan and they always choke in this situation" there's nothing to listen to. This money train isn't going to last forever, we're already seeing the demise with larger books preventing teases and adjusting the odds in their favor.
 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legs

Jax

SF

NE

Oak

Den

SD

NO

7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :excited:
Can I please talk you out of this one? "Systems" are nice, but you have to make exceptions sometimes. OAK +9 sucks. They count on controlling the game with the run. Once Manning gets up a couple of scores - and he will - you are now relying on Jason Campbell.
You're assuming they will abandon the run. The Colts run defense is terrible. I don't care how many TDs Peyton throws, if the Raiders stick with the run they will hang.
You're assuming Oakland's coaching staff is smart.
Fair enough.... you would probably know better than me on that one.
 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legsJaxSFNEOakDenSDNO7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :rolleyes:
Are you teasing all these together? What's the strategy you guys are using in here?
 
Lets see how the following plays do tonight:

Full Game Lines

NCAA Football:

Louisville -2

NCAA Basketball:

Northwestern +3

Austin Peay -2

1st Half Lines:

NCAA Football:

Louisville -1

NCAA Basketball:

Cincinnati -4.5

 
I like quite a few college hoops games tonight:

Tulsa +10

Miami OH +8

Northwestern +3 (favorite play of the night)

Miami FL -6

Mid Tenn State +13

K State -4

 
I made the Oakland/Indy game a pk yesterday just blindly guessing lines. I don't see how Indy (3-4 on the road) can be laying a fg to Oakland (5-2 at home). Oakland still has a chance at the playoffs and won't lay down here. The Colts really aren't playing very well, I don't think there's much of a difference between the two teams. And yes Indy has Peyton Manning, save that argument.

Here's why the line is off or at least my reasoning.

Oakland went to Jax 2 weeks ago and got 3.5. The line tells me both teams are even (slight edge to Jags at best).

Then, Indy laid 4 to Jacksonville last week. Once again line tells me they are even (slight edge to Indy).

Now on a neutral field Indy is -6. That number is out of nowhere and makes no sense. Indy pk or -1 seems like a good number.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i know this has probably been asked numerous times but... what book are you guys using? tired of going through my local guy.

 
lumpy19 said:
Can't wait for next week in the NFL, teaser legsJaxSFNEOakDenSDNO7 qualifiers already and still waiting on 3 more lines :blackdot:
Are you teasing all these together? What's the strategy you guys are using in here?
I have been doing 3 game teasers - which pay +180 at sportsbook.com - so for 7 games you would make 35 bets to cover all combinations. I think most people in this thread are doing 3 gamers or 2 gamers. You can't just follow lumpy's list blindly though - not all these games are in the basic system range at sportsbook.com (but they have the Bengals at +7.5, which would qualify - total of 4 games now in the range).
 
Leroy Hoard said:
I always like chalks that can think like underdogs, and a 6-6 bowl team can fit into that mindset. Better SOS puts the Cards in line.

LOUISVILLE -2.5
Completely agree with your angle here. Louisville is absolutely going to bring everything tonight. Its rare that I'm not sure if a CUSA school can match the energy of any BCS school head to head, but that will be the case tonight.Louisville 31-7 IMO
31-7? I know very little about these two teams but it's hard not to tail on all these Louisville picks.
 
Leroy Hoard said:
I always like chalks that can think like underdogs, and a 6-6 bowl team can fit into that mindset. Better SOS puts the Cards in line.

LOUISVILLE -2.5
Completely agree with your angle here. Louisville is absolutely going to bring everything tonight. Its rare that I'm not sure if a CUSA school can match the energy of any BCS school head to head, but that will be the case tonight.Louisville 31-7 IMO
31-7? I know very little about these two teams but it's hard not to tail on all these Louisville picks.
Agreed, I'm in.
 
Leroy Hoard said:
I always like chalks that can think like underdogs, and a 6-6 bowl team can fit into that mindset. Better SOS puts the Cards in line.

LOUISVILLE -2.5
Completely agree with your angle here. Louisville is absolutely going to bring everything tonight. Its rare that I'm not sure if a CUSA school can match the energy of any BCS school head to head, but that will be the case tonight.Louisville 31-7 IMO
31-7? I know very little about these two teams but it's hard not to tail on all these Louisville picks.
Agreed, I'm in.
In.
 
huge card

NCAAF

Louisville -3

NBA

Dall under 191

OKC -7

Memphis -7

NCAAB

cinc -8.5

Louisiana Tech +12

NHL

Washington -1.5

 
Double down on southern mississippi +2.5, too many people taking cardinals but line is moving other way.
I thought Lumpy and I were going to be the only ones on Southern Miss. I have em in a carry over teaser @ +8.5, a carryover parlay with them on the ml, and a straight play -2.5.College hoops tonight I like UNLV +3.5 and OK ST. -9.5. Austin Peay looks like a decent play too. Going the other way on Northwestern. I like the Johnnies -3. UCDAVIS for a small play as well.
 
I loved watching S. Miss. and playing overs in that conference all year. Fun football... fast break offense at it's best.

But I think the Cardinals have better athletes on defense than what USM is used to seeing in C-USA.

 
Lets see how the following plays do tonight:Full Game LinesNCAA Football:Louisville -2NCAA Basketball:Northwestern +3Austin Peay -21st Half Lines:NCAA Football:Louisville -1NCAA Basketball:Cincinnati -4.5
Will update as the Night Progresses1st Half Lines:NCAA Football:Louisville -1NCAA Basketball:Cincinnati -4.5 :lmao:
 
Leroy Hoard said:
I always like chalks that can think like underdogs, and a 6-6 bowl team can fit into that mindset. Better SOS puts the Cards in line.

LOUISVILLE -2.5
Completely agree with your angle here. Louisville is absolutely going to bring everything tonight. Its rare that I'm not sure if a CUSA school can match the energy of any BCS school head to head, but that will be the case tonight.Louisville 31-7 IMO
31-7? I know very little about these two teams but it's hard not to tail on all these Louisville picks.
Agreed, I'm in.
In.
Oops. Now praying for OVER.
 
Double down on southern mississippi +2.5, too many people taking cardinals but line is moving other way.
I thought Lumpy and I were going to be the only ones on Southern Miss. I have em in a carry over teaser @ +8.5, a carryover parlay with them on the ml, and a straight play -2.5.College hoops tonight I like UNLV +3.5 and OK ST. -9.5. Austin Peay looks like a decent play too. Going the other way on Northwestern. I like the Johnnies -3. UCDAVIS for a small play as well.
I'm out...lville -1.5 2h for me, hope lville doesn't win by 1
 
Congrats to the Cardinal backers last night. Good game overall, and that one southern miss t.d. was awesome(the one that made it 21-7). Game could have went either way. Favorites are 4-0 so far this bowl season.

 
BSU is 0-2 against non BCS schools in bowl games.

Backup QB in for Utah

I can't imagine Peterson doesn't have his team up for this game after that Nevada debacle. Yes they had BCS aspirations but I can't see him allowing the team to lay an egg.

This is such a tough one to call and 17 points is a lot, but BSU is the better football team for certain.

 
BSU is 0-2 against non BCS schools in bowl games.Backup QB in for UtahI can't imagine Peterson doesn't have his team up for this game after that Nevada debacle. Yes they had BCS aspirations but I can't see him allowing the team to lay an egg.This is such a tough one to call and 17 points is a lot, but BSU is the better football team for certain.
espn's take:WHO TO WATCH: Utah quarterback Terrance Cain. Sure, we could have listed Kellen Moore or Austin Pettis or Titus Young. But the story of the game could be how Cain performs as the starting quarterback in place of Jordan Wynn, who is out with a shoulder injury. Cain is 9-1 as a starter and more than capable of leading this team. He is more athletic than Wynn and could be a threat to run. But he also looked shaky in relief of Wynn against BYU in the regular-season finale, throwing two interceptions in eight pass attempts. WHAT TO WATCH: Tempers. The two teams already tangled during one pregame welcoming dinner, and Utah receiver DeVonte Christopher referred to Boise State as "Girlse State" on Twitter. So we should watch early in the game for any chippy play. It seems both teams are feeling a bit disrespected going into this game: Utah because it is the underdog; Boise State because it had no shot at getting an at-large BCS berth despite being ranked in the top 10 with only one loss. Both teams are going to have to be in control of their emotions from the beginning.
 
finding out SB converted two recent withdraws to "Debit Cards" for no reason.

:coffee:

not only does it tie up the money for longer (I submitted on November 30 and December 1), but now I have two pain in the ### debit cards to use.

 
the money laundering aspect of this bull#### is sooo fn annoying these days.

Anyone have suggestions as to how to convert 2 debits cards into cash I can actually deposit in a bank?

 
Please wait for a site operator to respond. You are currently customer 1 in queue. An agent should be available in 0 MinutesHello, my name is Joe Carey. I'll be assisting you today.Joe Carey: Hello Jason. \You: Good morning.Joe Carey: You can find this number underneath your name on your betting ticket when you login to your account on the main page of the website. I mean the customer ID numberYou: Is this my account number (____________)?Joe Carey: Good morning.Joe Carey: Yes./Joe Carey: Thank you.You: I got that off the withdraws page.Joe Carey: Awesome.You: I have submitted two withdraws: December 1 and December 8. Both appear as "sent" (and have for some time), but I haven't received a check or money wire.Joe Carey: We have two transactions this month, and both are Debit card withdrawals.You: Debit card? I didn't request debit cards.Joe Carey: And in case of Debit/Gift card it can take from 1 to 4 weeks for you to receive the plastic and once you have it you'll need to activate it,You: In fact, I received an email confirming one of the withdraws would be via wireYou: Why were they changed to debit card? I don't want debit cardsJoe Carey: We have a bank wire on October 5th.You: Right.You: But I did not request debit cards for these withdraws. If they are still being processed, I'You: d like them canceled and put through as 1 bank wire and one check as previously requested.Joe Carey: Please give me a moment to re check the systemYou: thanksJoe Carey: Thank you for your patience. I can see that a few month ago you made a request via Debit card.Joe Carey: It was added to your default method.Joe Carey: That's why the method changed \You: I specifically requested a check and a wire. Why would you guys use the default?Joe Carey: Unfortunately since we already sent the debit card we are not able to change the method,You: In fact, it was acknowledged in an email from you guys.You: When was the debit card sent?You: both of them. Dates please.You: Please remove debit card as my "default setting". Thanks.Joe Carey: But for future withdrawals you can contact us back, email, phone or Live Chat to change the method.Joe Carey: Sure.You: change it now.Joe Carey: I'll do that right away.Joe Carey: I'll send the requestYou: Any explanation why the default was used instead of the option I specifically selected?Joe Carey: As soon as I finished the chat.Joe Carey: Yes, please note that our system update that better method for you.You: What is the explanation?You: I specifically requested a check and a bank wire?Joe Carey: We have two check requestsJoe Carey: We sent the card on December 1st and December 8thYou: okay. Why were debit cards sent instead of checks?Joe Carey: Now please give me a moment to provide you with the explanation.Joe Carey: As I already inform you, we have your Debit card documents on file. Since you made the request, a few month ago, the system automatically add it to your default method, since it takes only 24 to 72 hours to get the money into the card,Joe Carey: That's why the system changed the method.You: I have never received a debit card from you. I have never requested a debit card from you.Joe Carey: Please don't be disheartened by this. I'll make the request now.Joe Carey: Please note that it takes us up to 4 weeks to finish the process.
:hey:thanks for nothing dickbag.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top