What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

'Doctor Detroit said:
'Clorox said:
'Doctor Detroit said:
Blazin Four was Bengals, Skins, Packers and RavensI had already teased all those with the NCG under and every other way so maybe I'm ahead of the game for once. :unsure:
Espn showing Cowherd on Indy +7http://m.espn.go.com/wireless/story?storyId=8321809
Yeah I got some bad info. He was going back and forth all week on it and my buddy said he picked the Ravens.
I listened on the radio on Wednesday and he said to take the points in every game
 
Haven't been on since New Year's Day, hope some of you trailed Michigan/Rose Bowl UNDER and Michigan/Rose Bowl UNDER/Nebraska Teasers for $$$, and everyone's staying ahead of the books in the interim...In (small, but in) on Oklahoma ML, as well as Sooners +10 / UNDER 79.5 to hedge (7-pointer)...if those lines were to find their way to +3.5/U73.5, I'd throw a parlay at it, too, and put more on the ML and Teaser...In case I can't get on here prior to NFL, here's what I like, I will play all of these, just don't know for how much yet:Ravens -6.5 & -7 and the OVER 46 & 47 in the Colts/Ravens game - playing both of these straight as well as teased...IN on Redskins +9/Packers -2 Teaser and also Ravens/Packers Teaser and Ravens/Packers/Colts-Ravens OVER Teaser as well...If everyone and his brother jumps on the Bengals, and drives the Texans down to a FG or less, I'll play the Texans, but not for a bunch. Actually, I'm fairly certain that if that line tightens somewhat, I'd buy up to a point to get it down to a FG or less, just to have some action going early tomorrow.Good Luck!
Welcome back.
 
I played a little Cincy at 50/1 last week :bag:

I also apparently played TAMU -3 at some point. I don't remember placing this bet. Probably did it New Year's Eve.

For the weekend so far I'm on Cin ML and +4.5, GB -7.5, Sea/Was u46, and teasing Cin/GB/Was.

 
Gronkowski is 66 to 1 to win Super Bowl MVP at 5dimes. In.Also on USA (-.5) in the World Juniors tomorrow morning.
Gronk now at 45 to 1. Hernandez at 66 to 1.
Rude is a line-mover.
This is actualy a better bet then you would think. Brady won't win another SB MVP unless he throws 15 td's in the game. Brady had a huge falling out with cadalac in 2003 an that's why branch won it in 2004.So if you think the pats will be there this is a good bet.
 
The Lake Show really interets me tonight. Can't believe they're getting 4 1/2 against the Clippers. Yes, I'm well aware of what each has done this year. Moneyline is juicy, too.

This isn't not the reason I like it, but if there is any truth to what I heard about Howard and how he is only playing hard when he wants to and whatnot, then tonight will be one of those nights and that doesn't hurt.

 
This isn't not the reason I like it, but if there is any truth to what I heard about Howard and how he is only playing hard when he wants to and whatnot, then tonight will be one of those nights and that doesn't hurt.
Wouldnt surprise me. Ive heard the back isnt close to 100% so it makes it easy for him to drag ### as an excuse. His attitude from previous years also makes me think the pressure and expectations of LA are getting to him along with having KB as a teammate. I highly doubt he resigns
 
Gronkowski is 66 to 1 to win Super Bowl MVP at 5dimes. In.Also on USA (-.5) in the World Juniors tomorrow morning.
Gronk now at 45 to 1. Hernandez at 66 to 1.
Rude is a line-mover.
This is actualy a better bet then you would think. Brady won't win another SB MVP unless he throws 15 td's in the game. Brady had a huge falling out with cadalac in 2003 an that's why branch won it in 2004.So if you think the pats will be there this is a good bet.
Gronk now at 25 to 1
 
Just now catching up because I kept looking for the National Anthem, first. Fox didn't show the National Anthem. WTF, I like the National Anthem. :angry:

 
'Doctor Detroit said:
'Clorox said:
'Doctor Detroit said:
Blazin Four was Bengals, Skins, Packers and RavensI had already teased all those with the NCG under and every other way so maybe I'm ahead of the game for once. :unsure:
Espn showing Cowherd on Indy +7http://m.espn.go.com/wireless/story?storyId=8321809
Yeah I got some bad info. He was going back and forth all week on it and my buddy said he picked the Ravens.
I listened on the radio on Wednesday and he said to take the points in every game
Not a terrible idea. Figure at least 1 dog will win and probably 2 will win. So that leaves just 1 having to cover to make it profitable.
 
Just now catching up because I kept looking for the National Anthem, first. Fox didn't show the National Anthem. WTF, I like the National Anthem. :angry:
What Fox feed are you watching? Gatlin brothers sang it.
Not exactly sure, at buddy's place in LA, just put it on the main local one. He has DirecTV and every channel known to man but I just put it on 11 which is KTTV.
 
Just now catching up because I kept looking for the National Anthem, first. Fox didn't show the National Anthem. WTF, I like the National Anthem. :angry:
What Fox feed are you watching? Gatlin brothers sang it.
Not exactly sure, at buddy's place in LA, just put it on the main local one. He has DirecTV and every channel known to man but I just put it on 11 which is KTTV.
I'm watching DTV in Los Angeles on channel 11 and they showed it.
 
Hmm, I just recorded it and will have to search again later to make sure I haven't completely lost my mind.

 
So, I got to thinking about this future's bet that my buddy wants to place...

Right now, it looks like I can easily get 50-1, so 50 bucks wins 2500

But wouldnt it make more sense (in this instance and in almost any instance) to bet it all on the ML 4 times wouldnt it? I did some rough calculations, but this is an exercise for everyone's info imo

So Bengals are +185 in game 1...$50 to win $90 (Going to use some conservative rounding for the hell of it). So now you have $140

Bengals play Denver in game 2...They will be +8 or so and the Vikings are +330...so $140 to win (+300) $420...so now you have $560

Bengals play NE in game 3 or maybe Baltimore...

If its NE, they are +8 again...so $560 to win $1680...now you have $2240

If its Balt, they are probably +4 again...so $560 to win $924...now you have $1484

Assuming they are underdogs in the SB, which they would be against everyone except Minnesota and Washington imo...

Then obviously your $2240 or $1484 on the Bengals ML is certainly more than the $2500 you originally planned on winning.

What am I missing here? Are all futures bad bets?

 
DDigits, MP would be the first (and last) one to tell you that yes, this IS the right way to go. Almost always.

 
So, I got to thinking about this future's bet that my buddy wants to place...Right now, it looks like I can easily get 50-1, so 50 bucks wins 2500But wouldnt it make more sense (in this instance and in almost any instance) to bet it all on the ML 4 times wouldnt it? I did some rough calculations, but this is an exercise for everyone's info imoSo Bengals are +185 in game 1...$50 to win $90 (Going to use some conservative rounding for the hell of it). So now you have $140Bengals play Denver in game 2...They will be +8 or so and the Vikings are +330...so $140 to win (+300) $420...so now you have $560Bengals play NE in game 3 or maybe Baltimore...If its NE, they are +8 again...so $560 to win $1680...now you have $2240If its Balt, they are probably +4 again...so $560 to win $924...now you have $1484Assuming they are underdogs in the SB, which they would be against everyone except Minnesota and Washington imo...Then obviously your $2240 or $1484 on the Bengals ML is certainly more than the $2500 you originally planned on winning.What am I missing here? Are all futures bad bets?
Precisely why you should take the bet + the vig. He gives you $55 and you take the $50 and do what you said.
 
So, I got to thinking about this future's bet that my buddy wants to place...Right now, it looks like I can easily get 50-1, so 50 bucks wins 2500But wouldnt it make more sense (in this instance and in almost any instance) to bet it all on the ML 4 times wouldnt it? I did some rough calculations, but this is an exercise for everyone's info imoSo Bengals are +185 in game 1...$50 to win $90 (Going to use some conservative rounding for the hell of it). So now you have $140Bengals play Denver in game 2...They will be +8 or so and the Vikings are +330...so $140 to win (+300) $420...so now you have $560Bengals play NE in game 3 or maybe Baltimore...If its NE, they are +8 again...so $560 to win $1680...now you have $2240If its Balt, they are probably +4 again...so $560 to win $924...now you have $1484Assuming they are underdogs in the SB, which they would be against everyone except Minnesota and Washington imo...Then obviously your $2240 or $1484 on the Bengals ML is certainly more than the $2500 you originally planned on winning.What am I missing here? Are all futures bad bets?
Precisely why you should take the bet + the vig. He gives you $55 and you take the $50 and do what you said.
:lmao: @ squeezing an extra 5 bones from a buddy. Come on, gb!
 
Looked like a free play to me. DT was offsides.
Looked that way to me too. The interference call on the long pass was bs too. Can't tell which side I am on, huh? I hit the under 72.5 for a unit right before kickoff. That looks better now than 30 minutes ago. Will prob jump on 2h over.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top