What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (11 Viewers)

Early Packer backers are feeling fortunate now if they got 3 points or a +120 ML. It is now +1.5 and the ML is off at sportsbook.com

I like the Packers and the under 47 in that game.

 
3-1 yesterday. Let the good time roll...NFLRice over 77.5 yards rushingBoldin over 52.5 yards recBoldin over 3.5 receptionsLewis over 8.5 tacklesCharles over 69.5 yards rushingDerick Johnson over 7.5 tacklesRodgers over 22 completionsjames jones over 35.5 recmaclin over 57.5 recjones over avant rec -5.5NCAABSouth Flor +8Dayton -2.5
Added GB Props
Nice call on the Boldin Angle.
 
Early Packer backers are feeling fortunate now if they got 3 points or a +120 ML. It is now +1.5 and the ML is off at sportsbook.comI like the Packers and the under 47 in that game.
Where is the steam coming from?
Yeah, that line started acting like a Bowl game. Speaking of which, which we do we see this BC/Nevada going, if any?
The line was down to 1 for about 5 minutes. I ended up jumping on philly once it poped back to 1.5. Playing this for a middle.
 
Late to the party today. Nice job, Ravens backers...

On Packers O22 Team Total Points for Game -115. Not sure how I feel about the side, but the Eagles D is really banged up, and I like the odds of GB scoring 3 TD's and a FG this afternoon...

SLBD, tonight's College Game = Irresistible Force (Nevada Offense, especially the Rushing Offense) vs Immovable Object (BC Defense, especially the Run Defense). I love Nevada's Team and QB Colin Kaepernick, and he can chuck it pretty well if the running game gets bogged down. BC starts a Freshman QB, and the Game is being played within driving distance from Reno and the crowd is expected to be overwhelmingly partisan in favor of the Wolfpack. BC's D is good enough to keep them within a TD, and the line has moved to 8, but I think I'd rather buy Nevada down to -6.5, because I think what's going to happen is that Nevada will get an early lead, and never be forced out of their comfort zone, and that's going to put pressure on the young BC QB to make plays in a hostile environment. Probably taking Nevada, but not for much...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am kind of shocked with the Jets getting more then a td in New England. -7 was my line, 9 seems pretty good. Pats playing well but their defense is still kind of susceptible and the Jets o-line looked very good last night.

 
Bal prolly gets bout 2.5?
Pitt -3 -125 at 5 dimes. I think it's about right, I made it between 3.5 and 4.
I guess it's a short week to go on the road. That probably is worth something.
Yes, the teams are even. 3 pts for home field. An extra point for the extra week off?
Yeah, something like that. Seattle/Chicago will be a sharps dream. They shade this too low to get away from the public and they get lit up.
 
Late to the party today. Nice job, Ravens backers...On Packers O22 Team Total Points for Game -115. Not sure how I feel about the side, but the Eagles D is really banged up, and I like the odds of GB scoring 3 TD's and a FG this afternoon...SLBD, tonight's College Game = Irresistible Force (Nevada Offense, especially the Rushing Offense) vs Immovable Object (BC Defense, especially the Run Defense). I love Nevada's Team and QB Colin Kaepernick, and he can chuck it pretty well if the running game gets bogged down. BC starts a Freshman QB, and the Game is being played within driving distance from Reno and the crowd is expected to be overwhelmingly partisan in favor of the Wolfpack. BC's D is good enough to keep them within a TD, and the line has moved to 8, but I think I'd rather buy Nevada down to -6.5, because I think what's going to happen is that Nevada will get an early lead, and never be forced out of their comfort zone, and that's going to put pressure on the young BC QB to make plays in a hostile environment. Probably taking Nevada, but not for much...
Thanks for the input, love it when people explain their logic here, it only helps. So, the crowd thing, don't get it at all. Again, point me to ANY Bowl game that this has made a difference, much less one like this. All it says to me is that the school/team will be up for it, but we already know this about Nevada. I also don't get paying all the extra juice to get the line down, at all. I know you realize you can't win making a practice of that. No offense bud, but it makes even less sense with such a high-scoring offense and a game that's lined at 54. I know you have your reasons, just my .02, let's talk about the game more...I've watched Nevada plenty and know how good they are. This game's interesting to me in that it's kind of BC who can really prove something, just the opposite of what you'd think. Nevada made their statement time and again this year and everybody knows about Kaepernick. I don't know a ton about BC so I would love to hear more. I do know this -- back when they came out west and played CSU in PacBell Park, they really came to play. Sonny Lubick :goodposting: was playing younger players and stuff and BC was all business and it showed. Do they still have the same coach and are they fired up for this? I would think they'd be. They know everybody's watching and all...kind of a unique date/time for a lesser bowl and what a great spot against the #13 team who took down Boise State...and even a little east/west/conference or whatever thing. Lotta motivating factors there and nothing to lose, gotta love it, as long as they are taking it seriously. Really smells like an outright upset to me... Anybody have more on BC? :popcorn: Also love the winning streak coming in and the defense looked pretty stout during that stretch, something Nevada hasn't had to deal with... I'm obviously on BC tonight but thinking about going big, so would love to hear other takes.Football winding down and all, man this is fun :yes:
 
Late to the party today. Nice job, Ravens backers...On Packers O22 Team Total Points for Game -115. Not sure how I feel about the side, but the Eagles D is really banged up, and I like the odds of GB scoring 3 TD's and a FG this afternoon...SLBD, tonight's College Game = Irresistible Force (Nevada Offense, especially the Rushing Offense) vs Immovable Object (BC Defense, especially the Run Defense). I love Nevada's Team and QB Colin Kaepernick, and he can chuck it pretty well if the running game gets bogged down. BC starts a Freshman QB, and the Game is being played within driving distance from Reno and the crowd is expected to be overwhelmingly partisan in favor of the Wolfpack. BC's D is good enough to keep them within a TD, and the line has moved to 8, but I think I'd rather buy Nevada down to -6.5, because I think what's going to happen is that Nevada will get an early lead, and never be forced out of their comfort zone, and that's going to put pressure on the young BC QB to make plays in a hostile environment. Probably taking Nevada, but not for much...
Thanks for the input, love it when people explain their logic here, it only helps. So, the crowd thing, don't get it at all. Again, point me to ANY Bowl game that this has made a difference, much less one like this. All it says to me is that the school/team will be up for it, but we already know this about Nevada. I also don't get paying all the extra juice to get the line down, at all. I know you realize you can't win making a practice of that. No offense bud, but it makes even less sense with such a high-scoring offense and a game that's lined at 54. I know you have your reasons, just my .02, let's talk about the game more...I've watched Nevada plenty and know how good they are. This game's interesting to me in that it's kind of BC who can really prove something, just the opposite of what you'd think. Nevada made their statement time and again this year and everybody knows about Kaepernick. I don't know a ton about BC so I would love to hear more. I do know this -- back when they came out west and played CSU in PacBell Park, they really came to play. Sonny Lubick :excited: was playing younger players and stuff and BC was all business and it showed. Do they still have the same coach and are they fired up for this? I would think they'd be. They know everybody's watching and all...kind of a unique date/time for a lesser bowl and what a great spot against the #13 team who took down Boise State...and even a little east/west/conference or whatever thing. Lotta motivating factors there and nothing to lose, gotta love it, as long as they are taking it seriously. Really smells like an outright upset to me... Anybody have more on BC? :popcorn: Also love the winning streak coming in and the defense looked pretty stout during that stretch, something Nevada hasn't had to deal with... I'm obviously on BC tonight but thinking about going big, so would love to hear other takes.Football winding down and all, man this is fun :banned:
I think you have the book on BC Down. Good Front 7 on D. Good O line (they are O-Line U). No Skill what-so-ever other then Harris. QB is a disaster - thats the reason why an ACC team is down more then a TD vs a non BCS conferance team. I'd take BC before Nevada, just because I don't see a Nevada 17 point plus Blowout and I think its more likely that BC can hang with these guys. I think Nevada/Over and BC/Under is the way to play it.
 
Here are my thoughts on the CFB game:

Both teams have good motivation and situational angles here:

BC has won 5 straight - Nevada is wrapping up the best season in school history. If the wolfpack were going to letdown after beating Boise, they would have done it on the road as a 7.5 pt favorite @ La Tech the next week (they won by 18).

That said - from a SOS standpoint, BC blows them out of the water and I really like that Montel Harris will play and BC will be gauging the Pack with two good runningbacks and a solid defense. That's the recipe for a good dog. I played +8.5 -115

 
Bears -13?
A regular season game coming off a win over NO this is 11.5 at the worst. They have to protect middles on the 10. I think they start it as close to that as they can and pray.
I think this is a perfect storm for Vegas.People already underlay Chicago. They haven't bought them all year. They were already going to have to shade for the public there. Now they get a team that comes off a DD line winning SU and looked good in doing so over the super bowl champ. This will have tremendous public sway as well.Where this line opens will say a heck of a lot about who runs the town in the playoffs.
 
Bears -13?
A regular season game coming off a win over NO this is 11.5 at the worst. They have to protect middles on the 10. I think they start it as close to that as they can and pray.
I think this is a perfect storm for Vegas.People already underlay Chicago. They haven't bought them all year. They were already going to have to shade for the public there. Now they get a team that comes off a DD line winning SU and looked good in doing so over the super bowl champ. This will have tremendous public sway as well.Where this line opens will say a heck of a lot about who runs the town in the playoffs.
So what will be the sharp play?
 
Clorox said:
culdeus said:
culdeus said:
MarshallPlan said:
Bears -13?
A regular season game coming off a win over NO this is 11.5 at the worst. They have to protect middles on the 10. I think they start it as close to that as they can and pray.
I think this is a perfect storm for Vegas.People already underlay Chicago. They haven't bought them all year. They were already going to have to shade for the public there. Now they get a team that comes off a DD line winning SU and looked good in doing so over the super bowl champ. This will have tremendous public sway as well.Where this line opens will say a heck of a lot about who runs the town in the playoffs.
So what will be the sharp play?
I have to think they will look to get on sea as fast as possible at anything 10.5 or more and hope for huge public money to come with them.
 
Just read some numbers on free agent to be CB Nnamdi Asomugha of the Raiders. Check out these numbers:

14 Games Played (2010 season)

Thrown at 33 times (2.35 times per game)

Allowed 13 completions (.93 completions per game)

Allowed 205 yds (14.64 yards per game)

Allowed 0 TD's

Detroit Lions starting CB 2011 :thumbdown:

 
Just read some numbers on free agent to be CB Nnamdi Asomugha of the Raiders. Check out these numbers:14 Games Played (2010 season)Thrown at 33 times (2.35 times per game)Allowed 13 completions (.93 completions per game)Allowed 205 yds (14.64 yards per game)Allowed 0 TD'sDetroit Lions starting CB 2011 :goodposting:
If Detroit actually got him, that team will be a monster, even with their schedule. Only thing left would be Stafford not staying healthy. Crazy, that Detroit is this close finally, but they are. :goodposting:
 
Man did that one sting, was having a big week so I put even more on Philly. I know I know, but that's the way I do it sometimes, not as serious as many and there's only a handful left as far as I'm concerned. Not into hoops and bases will only be some season win totals, for the most part. So #### YOU Philly, and #### you And Reid! 3 hours of ways to lose a game. I can understand that any other month, it happens, but not in the playoffs, that was disgusting. You won't catch me trusting him in a big game again. McCarthy for that matter, is a conservative coach waiting to get bit, by the way...he's lucky to have Rodgers covering for him...

Anyway, let's hope BOSTON COLLEGE erases the memory quickly!!!!

LET'S DO THIS!!!! :thumbup:

 
So Fox radio was saying 68% of the bets were on the Saints yesterday, and 75% on the Colts. Vegas ate well.
They gave it all back to the public today. I didn't hear one person all week who liked the Chiefs, and nobody liked Philly other than Sonny.
There were probably a ton of KC teasers and most of the people I work with thought the Eagles would win this weekend. Not saying they make up the gambling public, but I'd guess books didn't get beat up too bad on the Eagles.
 
So Fox radio was saying 68% of the bets were on the Saints yesterday, and 75% on the Colts. Vegas ate well.
They gave it all back to the public today. I didn't hear one person all week who liked the Chiefs, and nobody liked Philly other than Sonny.
There were probably a ton of KC teasers and most of the people I work with thought the Eagles would win this weekend. Not saying they make up the gambling public, but I'd guess books didn't get beat up too bad on the Eagles.
asking just because I don't know: any idea what percentage of the handle is straight bets versus parlays and teasers? it seems to me that the vast majority of the money would be on sides.
 
Just read some numbers on free agent to be CB Nnamdi Asomugha of the Raiders. Check out these numbers:14 Games Played (2010 season)Thrown at 33 times (2.35 times per game)Allowed 13 completions (.93 completions per game)Allowed 205 yds (14.64 yards per game)Allowed 0 TD'sDetroit Lions starting CB 2011 :goodposting:
:rolleyes: Sorry bud, but I think Nnamdi will look just fine lining up across from Asaunte Samuel, asnd Demetri patterson can go back to being a dime back. i don't know if the Eagles will have the money needed for this, but it is certainly a need and would be fun for Nnamdi because teams would have to throw to him sometimes
 
I guess I thought Boston College would have practiced for this game? I liked that they had a ton of time to get their QB more reps.

My Nevada team total u31.5 will not survive long if this 2 first downs stuff keeps up (punt returns are lovely for team total unders too).

 
for the oregon backers who have an sia acct. -2.5 +158 and -2 +153. Pretty much all good bets if you just lay pts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top