I'm the degenerate of the degenerates.Anyone around with leans on USC /Cal and/or Utah St./ UNLV? halftime?
I #### the bed on this game. Sorry bud. Pretty sure Indy was out drinking at asu all night.Looks like that Houston/Sac game hit 217 on the number...no loss by not playing it. OKC covered +6.5 easily. If PHX can keep hitting 3s our Indy/under may be in trouble...lots of time left, though.![]()
don't worry, i made it much worse trying to live bet. Why the hell are these mother ####ers shooting 3's and making them when the game has been over awhile ago.I #### the bed on this game. Sorry bud. Pretty sure Indy was out drinking at asu all night.Looks like that Houston/Sac game hit 217 on the number...no loss by not playing it. OKC covered +6.5 easily. If PHX can keep hitting 3s our Indy/under may be in trouble...lots of time left, though.![]()
. back to a few day break from gamblingthat game was just stupid, and the 4th Q was just senseless. I hate when bench players get in during a blow out and decide to show off and hit 3's for no reason at all. These idiots are up by over 20 points, and shooting 3's and running fast break offense.Never understand how you people bet the NBA.
Usually the only league I can profit from without tailing.Never understand how you people bet the NBA.
good call. and those games are just dangerous. there is nothing like playing that game for a few nights, and then driving the next day. You feel like you can just dominate the road like it is nothing.I been playing ps3 since before the game started. Me and my buddy been playing GTA 5 and I forgot to make any bets.![]()
This might as well be written in Swahili. No clue what's going on in this post.Also. Dr Vs magical putter. What a story. I think I'll buy the oracle just bc of that story.
Nice hit!I'm the degenerate of the degenerates.Anyone around with leans on USC /Cal and/or Utah St./ UNLV? halftime?
Jan 22, 2014 11:59:43 PM
2 Team Parlay #331052577
Basketball - College Halftimes (2H) Point Spread
(California @ USC) - 2nd Half
(792) USC +8 (-115) Jan 22/14@11:45p
Competitor: (791) California
Basketball - College Halftimes (2H) Point Spread
(Utah State @ UNLV) - 2nd Half
(790) UNLV +1 (-105) Jan 22/14@11:55p
Competitor: (789) Utah State
This might as well be written in Swahili. No clue what's going on in this post.Also. Dr Vs magical putter. What a story. I think I'll buy the oracle just bc of that story.
http://grantland.com/features/a-mysterious-physicist-golf-club-dr-v/This might as well be written in Swahili. No clue what's going on in this post.Also. Dr Vs magical putter. What a story. I think I'll buy the oracle just bc of that story.![]()
Sorry fellas. It's the last thing that was on my wine soaked mind last night. If you're so inclined to read something, check it out. It kinda shocked me that I was so insensitive about the situation that when I initially read the article it didn't alarm me at all and I thought it was well done. Reading some of the reaction has made me recoil about my own initial reaction.http://grantland.com/features/a-mysterious-physicist-golf-club-dr-v/This might as well be written in Swahili. No clue what's going on in this post.Also. Dr Vs magical putter. What a story. I think I'll buy the oracle just bc of that story.![]()
Crazy story on Grantland last week that was universally praised for 2 days before all hell broke loose on the interwebs.
Thanks. I just got back from a friends 40th, was half in the bag and wanted to bet something. That usually has a horrible outcome.Nice hit!I'm the degenerate of the degenerates.Anyone around with leans on USC /Cal and/or Utah St./ UNLV? halftime?
Jan 22, 2014 11:59:43 PM
2 Team Parlay #331052577
Basketball - College Halftimes (2H) Point Spread
(California @ USC) - 2nd Half
(792) USC +8 (-115) Jan 22/14@11:45p
Competitor: (791) California
Basketball - College Halftimes (2H) Point Spread
(Utah State @ UNLV) - 2nd Half
(790) UNLV +1 (-105) Jan 22/14@11:55p
Competitor: (789) Utah State
:frostyfive:
224000852-1 Pending 2 Team Teaser (ties win) Teaser tw 5fb & 4bk
Win 1/22/14 11:00pm College Basketball 790 UNLV -½ * vs Utah State
Pending 2/2/14 6:30pm NFL Football 102 Denver Broncos +4 * vs Seattle Seahawks
223976100-1 Pending 3 Team Teaser (ties win) Teaser tw 5fb & 4bk
Win 1/22/14 7:00pm College Basketball 724 Richmond +1 * vs Massachusetts
Win 1/22/14 7:00pm College Basketball 730 Michigan +1 * vs Iowa
Pending 2/2/14 6:30pm NFL Football 102 Denver Broncos +4 * vs Seattle Seahawks
Opening up my middle window from DEN +4 to SEA +10.
where are you teasing these....and are you just alternating Den and SEa?:frostyfive:
224000852-1 Pending 2 Team Teaser (ties win) Teaser tw 5fb & 4bk
Win 1/22/14 11:00pm College Basketball 790 UNLV -½ * vs Utah State
Pending 2/2/14 6:30pm NFL Football 102 Denver Broncos +4 * vs Seattle Seahawks
223976100-1 Pending 3 Team Teaser (ties win) Teaser tw 5fb & 4bk
Win 1/22/14 7:00pm College Basketball 724 Richmond +1 * vs Massachusetts
Win 1/22/14 7:00pm College Basketball 730 Michigan +1 * vs Iowa
Pending 2/2/14 6:30pm NFL Football 102 Denver Broncos +4 * vs Seattle Seahawks
Opening up my middle window from DEN +4 to SEA +10.
Just perused a number of opera singers doing national anthems at sporting events (non-sporting events tend to be much shorter).Over@AdamSchefter: Soprano Renee Fleming will sing the National Anthem as part of Super Bowl XLVIII pregame festivities.
Ok men - what do we know about him/her. We need a time.
Here's the sampling:
1:26
1:33
1:38
1:42
1:47
1:52
1:58
In short, all over the board. The 1:58 is here
That's a big number. Check out the 1:58. She wasn't exactly blasting through it...SUPER BOWL XLVIII SPECIALS - How long will it take Renee Fleming to sing the official US National Anthem?
From first note starts until she completes saying "Brave" for the 1st time.
5:30p
Over 2 minutes 25 seconds
EVEN
Under 2 minutes 25 seconds
-140
We get it. Pats fan that doesn't like Manning. Thanks for your inputI'm taking Seattle with whatever the final points are, Seattle ML, Under, and every combination of those three parlayed and teased.
I'll take under on every Denver team and player prop.
This might be the first Super Bowl that ends in a shut-out,
Seattle 35-0, with two defensive scores.
mostly 5dimes because they have more options and generally the best oddswhere are you teasing these....and are you just alternating Den and SEa?
So sportsbook won't let me do the deposit bonus b/c I have a current withdrawl outstanding. Sucks, but understandableFriendly reminder to those depositing at online sportsbooks. Call first or get on live chat and push for better bonuses. This time of year it's pretty easy to get really good bonuses.
If it wasn't being played in 10 degree weather with wind and maybe snow, I'd give them a chance. But with those elements and that defense, I don't see Denver being very productive,We get it. Pats fan that doesn't like Manning. Thanks for your inputI'm taking Seattle with whatever the final points are, Seattle ML, Under, and every combination of those three parlayed and teased.
I'll take under on every Denver team and player prop.
This might be the first Super Bowl that ends in a shut-out,
Seattle 35-0, with two defensive scores.
And the myth continues...If it wasn't being played in 10 degree weather with wind and maybe snow, I'd give them a chance. But with those elements and that defense, I don't see Denver being very productive,We get it. Pats fan that doesn't like Manning. Thanks for your inputI'm taking Seattle with whatever the final points are, Seattle ML, Under, and every combination of those three parlayed and teased.
I'll take under on every Denver team and player prop.
This might be the first Super Bowl that ends in a shut-out,
Seattle 35-0, with two defensive scores.
It's funny because nropp had a 10* revenge game last year.Interesting guest blog post on nropp's site today, dismissing the notion of trap games and revenge games. I like this, because I ignore things like revenge or trap games. Of course, he also dismisses smaller mismatches like a good offensive rebounding team vs. a bad defensive rebounding team, and I use that kind of stuff a lot in my analysis. Basically his research says the better team wins. But somehow it still seemed interesting to me.
Giving them a chance and suggesting they will be shut out are two different things. Right now the 10 day forecast looks like in the 30s with low chance of precip and winds under 10 mphIf it wasn't being played in 10 degree weather with wind and maybe snow, I'd give them a chance. But with those elements and that defense, I don't see Denver being very productive,We get it. Pats fan that doesn't like Manning. Thanks for your inputI'm taking Seattle with whatever the final points are, Seattle ML, Under, and every combination of those three parlayed and teased.
I'll take under on every Denver team and player prop.
This might be the first Super Bowl that ends in a shut-out,
Seattle 35-0, with two defensive scores.
This year too.It's funny because nropp had a 10* revenge game last year.Interesting guest blog post on nropp's site today, dismissing the notion of trap games and revenge games. I like this, because I ignore things like revenge or trap games. Of course, he also dismisses smaller mismatches like a good offensive rebounding team vs. a bad defensive rebounding team, and I use that kind of stuff a lot in my analysis. Basically his research says the better team wins. But somehow it still seemed interesting to me.
Dude, if you are serious, here are the Bovada.com margin of victory odds:I'm taking Seattle with whatever the final points are, Seattle ML, Under, and every combination of those three parlayed and teased.
I'll take under on every Denver team and player prop.
This might be the first Super Bowl that ends in a shut-out,
Seattle 35-0, with two defensive scores.
-31.5. Steamrolled right past 31.Line is Sea -30.5 right now because of the weather, right? Haven't looked.
Maybe they both lost, that would explain why they don't like them anymore.This year too.It's funny because nropp had a 10* revenge game last year.Interesting guest blog post on nropp's site today, dismissing the notion of trap games and revenge games. I like this, because I ignore things like revenge or trap games. Of course, he also dismisses smaller mismatches like a good offensive rebounding team vs. a bad defensive rebounding team, and I use that kind of stuff a lot in my analysis. Basically his research says the better team wins. But somehow it still seemed interesting to me.
Revenge games were an nropp thing. It seems like this guest of his is a bit more sophisticated.Maybe they both lost, that would explain why they don't like them anymore.This year too.It's funny because nropp had a 10* revenge game last year.Interesting guest blog post on nropp's site today, dismissing the notion of trap games and revenge games. I like this, because I ignore things like revenge or trap games. Of course, he also dismisses smaller mismatches like a good offensive rebounding team vs. a bad defensive rebounding team, and I use that kind of stuff a lot in my analysis. Basically his research says the better team wins. But somehow it still seemed interesting to me.
FML-31.5. Steamrolled right past 31.Line is Sea -30.5 right now because of the weather, right? Haven't looked.
I didn't realize the Broncos played in a dome.Line is Sea -30.5 right now because of the weather, right? Haven't looked.
Yeah this was a guest blog. And yes, he is 0-2 the last two years on 10 unit revenge games, as far as I know. I remember this year's because he was on WVU and I posted and played Gonzaga, then read his 10 unit play and was like, "Oh #### what am I missing" and then read his reasoning and it was 100% about revenge and 0% about the players and so I wasn't scared anymore.Revenge games were an nropp thing. It seems like this guest of his is a bit more sophisticated.Maybe they both lost, that would explain why they don't like them anymore.This year too.It's funny because nropp had a 10* revenge game last year.Interesting guest blog post on nropp's site today, dismissing the notion of trap games and revenge games. I like this, because I ignore things like revenge or trap games. Of course, he also dismisses smaller mismatches like a good offensive rebounding team vs. a bad defensive rebounding team, and I use that kind of stuff a lot in my analysis. Basically his research says the better team wins. But somehow it still seemed interesting to me.