Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (7 Viewers)
- Thread starter John Bender
- Start date
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
[icon]
Insoxicated
Cancer has eaten half my relatives alive.. Yet somehow this one has me cheering for the antagonist.
GG
lumpy19
Footballguy
Angry Beavers
Footballguy
Seattle getting steamed at RB. Up to 9.
Based on the first half stats posted earlier in the week taking GB +5 for the first half.
Also took Indy v. Sea SB at +300 cause I am convinced Indy wins.
Lastly, biggest bet of day on NE/ Indy over 53. I think that number may move up before game time. I see a shoot out here, with both teams in the 30's.
GLTA
AB
Based on the first half stats posted earlier in the week taking GB +5 for the first half.
Also took Indy v. Sea SB at +300 cause I am convinced Indy wins.
Lastly, biggest bet of day on NE/ Indy over 53. I think that number may move up before game time. I see a shoot out here, with both teams in the 30's.
GLTA
AB
Dan Lambskin
Footballguy
So are me and Ref the only guys on the Pats?
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
Anyone else have a book with any Blount props?
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
more short passes maybe, or teams could not pass much at all going into the wind if it's really that bad.
lumpy19
Footballguy
The Ref
Footballguy
Here is the problem... Everyone I know is on that bet. The only good thing in my book is they took sea out of the teaser window.
[icon]
Insoxicated
Clorox
Footballguy
I have a football rules question that is bugging me, so I thought maybe you guys could help. I looked online for answers but cannot seem to find anything definitive.
In my game yesterday, the QB lined up in the shotgun with a RB to his left. The QB took the snap and handed the ball in front of him to the RB. The RB completed a 50 yard pass. Is this play legal or illegal?
In my game yesterday, the QB lined up in the shotgun with a RB to his left. The QB took the snap and handed the ball in front of him to the RB. The RB completed a 50 yard pass. Is this play legal or illegal?
John Bender
Footballguy
Packers and Pats for me
Billy Bats
Footballguy
Good lord, Sapp and Irvin making fools of themselves. Now sadly, Eisen has joined in. Does this happen on a weekly basis?
The Ref
Footballguy
So the question boils down to were there two forward laterals. Unless the handoff was really and truly in front of the QB im guessing the play was legal. And by in front I mean like you would hand off to a WR who is running from the outside of a formation in the shotgun. If the QB turns to his left even slightly it's considered a lateral.
Clorox
Footballguy
I was the RB. The QB turned to the left to face me since I was running left to right, but I took the handoff running in front of the QB rather than behind him.
They ruled the play illegal. They said because I took the ball in front of the QB rather than him turning around handing it behind to me, it was a forward "lateral." The other team didn't even argue the play because they thought it was legal, too. But the refs overturned it.
The refs are #### and the rules change week-to-week. We obviously won't run it like that again, but I still am curious if it was the right call.
Last edited by a moderator:
Dan Lambskin
Footballguy
Rude any tackle props today?
Man In The Box
Footballguy
GB-17
SEA- 38
IND- 27
NE- 30
SEA- 38
IND- 27
NE- 30
comfortably numb
Footballguy
1Q
U10
Sea/gb
U10
Sea/gb
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
Tricky for sportsbetting.ag to not even offer Blount as a Pats first TD option
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
Still riding the SI post of GB and IND
then betlabs
GB 1st
IND, SEA 2nd
then betlabs
GB 1st
IND, SEA 2nd
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
hmm adams 37.5 +110 at RB
There were two thoughts on his unders. One what they did with Boykin in wk 1 and lined him up vs Sherman but also. He has had 3 or 4 decent games this year and each and every one of them he followed up with a 1 catch performance
There were two thoughts on his unders. One what they did with Boykin in wk 1 and lined him up vs Sherman but also. He has had 3 or 4 decent games this year and each and every one of them he followed up with a 1 catch performance
Code:
2 NYJ W 31-24 7 5 50 10.0 0 0 0 - 03 at DET L 7-19 3 2 11 5.5 0 0 0 - 04 at CHI W 38-17 3 2 18 9.0 0 0 0 - 05 MIN W 42-10 4 1 11 11.0 1 0 0 - 06 at MIA W 27-24 8 6 77 12.8 0 0 0 - 07 CAR W 38-17 1 1 21 21.0 1 0 0 - 08 at NO L 23-44 9 7 75 10.7 0 0 0 - 010 CHI W 55-14 2 1 10 10.0 0 0 0 - 011 PHI W 53-20 2 2 13 6.5 1 0 0 - 012 at MIN W 24-21 4 1 10 10.0 0 0 0 - 013 NE W 26-21 11 6 121 20.2 0 0 0 - 014 ATL W 43-37 4 1 6 6.0 0 0 0 - 015 at BUF L 13-21 4 1 6 6.0 0 0 0 - 016 at TB W 20-3 4 2 17 8.5 0 0 0 - 0DP DAL W 26-21 11 7 117 16.7 1 0 0 - 0The Ref
Footballguy
Well... Big difference between weekend refs and NFL NCAA quality obviously.
I would imagine that's frustrating.
ChainsawU
Footballguy
TELL ME ABOUT IT!! :fauxangry:
No man, I don't know. Although remember last week the Panthers went all the way up to 14 for two minutes at Pinny:TIME CAR SEA01/10 08:21 PM +13½ +100 -13½ -11001/10 08:20 PM +13½ -102 -13½ -10801/10 08:18 PM +14 -108 -14 -10201/10 08:18 PM +13½ +106 -13½ -11701/10 08:17 PM +13½ +103 -13½ -11401/10 08:16 PM +13½ +102 -13½ -112Sagarin's PURE POINTS predictor makes Seattle the best team out of the four playing today (that same number liked TCU the best out of all the NCAA teams at the end of the year). And he makes Seattle a 5-point favorite at home versus Green Bay. But it just goes to show you that no matter which way the steam goes, even at a book like Pinny and even with a team like Seattle, it's really hard to predict just based off that.
He made NE -3.65 fwiw..
Last edited by a moderator:
swirvenirvin
Footballguy
Clorox
Footballguy
It is, but we move on... So, you think it was a legal play? I thought it was but the ref laughed at me and said I obviously don't watch any football.
ChainsawU
Footballguy
I'm just jacked for the games dude. I dreamed about five different scenarios I need to check out first. I turned on NFLN when I woke up and all I hear is weather so far.
ChainsawU
Footballguy
Since 2001 AFC and NFC champions are both 11-2 ATS in the championship game. So if you like the favorites you might as well lay the points, because when they win this game they also cover the spread. Likewise for the dogs in this game. Might as well take the +ML.
Home team hosting the NFC Championship since '01: 7-6 SU and 5-8 ATS
Home team hosting the AFC Championship since '01: 9-4 SU and 7-6 ATS
Since 2007 the team hosting the NFC Championship is 3-4 SU and 2-5 ATS with three of those seven games going into overtime.
Since 2006 the Pats are 2-3 SU and 0-5 ATS in the AFC Championship game, scoring 34,21,23,13,16.
Home team hosting the NFC Championship since '01: 7-6 SU and 5-8 ATS
Home team hosting the AFC Championship since '01: 9-4 SU and 7-6 ATS
Since 2007 the team hosting the NFC Championship is 3-4 SU and 2-5 ATS with three of those seven games going into overtime.
Since 2006 the Pats are 2-3 SU and 0-5 ATS in the AFC Championship game, scoring 34,21,23,13,16.
Last edited by a moderator:
lines are pretty tough but I played these at 5d for the early game:
1u Wright O6.5 (-125)
.5u on each:
Burnett O7.5 (-105)
Hawk U5.5 (-130)
Peppers O3.5 (-115)
Chancellor O6.5 (-120)
Wagner O9.5 (+130)
EDIT: actually, I decided to bump all these besides Peppers up to 1u for me. odds got more favorable and I figured it's championship sunday so why not.
Last edited by a moderator:
Jene Bramel
Footballguy
Didn't see anything obviously juicy in the early games. With Rud here, but mostly action plays. On the Freeman over (and probably Collins over) in the late game.
Billy Bats
Footballguy
Seattle ML for me early. Wilson is 24-2 at home. If Green Bay wins outright then they can have my money. I'd much rather lose that way than on a garbage time, stupid football play td against the spread.
Zegras11
Footballguy
I'm on NE and SEA.
Both coaches usually have their teams much better prepared for games like these.
Rain is SEA is going to make it even harder for Rodgers and WR to move around. Nelson isn't 100%. he's had 68 yards or less in 4 of last 6. Lynch and Wilson are each going to run for 100+ yards.
Pats have run all over Colts this year and playoffs last year. Gray and Blount. If the Colts spent the week preparing for this, then Brady will have a field day. I don't think the Colts were tested to hard. CIN was missing Green and Hill was hurt during the game. Manning has been hurt for a month.
GL2A
Both coaches usually have their teams much better prepared for games like these.
Rain is SEA is going to make it even harder for Rodgers and WR to move around. Nelson isn't 100%. he's had 68 yards or less in 4 of last 6. Lynch and Wilson are each going to run for 100+ yards.
Pats have run all over Colts this year and playoffs last year. Gray and Blount. If the Colts spent the week preparing for this, then Brady will have a field day. I don't think the Colts were tested to hard. CIN was missing Green and Hill was hurt during the game. Manning has been hurt for a month.
GL2A
Last edited by a moderator:
Doctor Detroit
Please remove your headgear
Seahawks -7 2u
Colts ML
Colts/Pats OVER 51.4 1.5u
Tailing Swirv on Brady, LaFell, and Adams
glllllllllllll alllllllllll
Colts ML
Colts/Pats OVER 51.4 1.5u
Tailing Swirv on Brady, LaFell, and Adams
glllllllllllll alllllllllll
ChainsawU
Footballguy
The same 22 starters, kicker, and punter the Packers had in their first game at Seattle will be available Sunday. The Seahawks will be missing Zach Miller, Brandon Mebane, Derrick Coleman, Percy Harvin, Jordan Hill, Cassius Marsh, and Paul Richardson, *eta and Justin Britt.
GB 100/300
GB/IND 100/1300
GB 100/300
GB/IND 100/1300
Last edited by a moderator:
