I think it's funny that there has been this weird shift over the past 5-7 years with snow forecasting.
Professional mets have started to poo poo anyone who used long range models for forecasting. (Not saying this is the situation above.) They go out of their way to make sure the public knows that they don't believe the models and they'll wait until 24 hours prior to the storm to talk about it. But this is stupid. And I blame it on people wanting exact snow totals 7 days out.
Here in the northeast, we got hit with a storm in November and it shut the city down to a standstill. And the main reason why is because forecasters refused to talk about the fact there was a small possibility that it had the chance to be something big. I really think forecasters would be better off if they went over every possibility for a storm instead of trying to be the one outlet that called the snowfall totals correct.
Two days before that storm hit, I told my wife there was a small chance the forecasters were underplaying the potential of the snow. We both ended up working from home. But I didn't get the call right because I'm smarter than the pros. (I mean, I'm sure it played a small part.) I got it "right" because I didn't put all my eggs in the "70% chance it's not that bad" basket. Everyone who was following that storm knew there was a chance that the temps never got above freezing. And that there might not be a changeover midway through the storm. But they were so worried about picking the "right" outcome, they neglected to tell the public there was a good chance it could be a much bigger storm.
It's just strange to me.