Flood control (1 Viewer)

[Otis]

For those of us FFAers who don't have the time to sift through threads throughout the day like we used to, we have learned to become very efficient -- sometimes banging out successive threads reads and postings within the 15 second cutoff for this new flood control thing. It really hurts us, in comparison to the Furleys of the world who have more time to do all their posting throughout the course of the day. Why should we be penalized for being incredibly efficient and banging out great content in a short session?

Just doesn't seem right is all. Thoughts?

 

[Giant Wooden Badger]

Maverick, I'm curious. Who was covering Cougar while you were showboating with this MiG?

 

[Otis]

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

 

[TLEF316]

agreed. Bandwidth is overrated anyways

 

[Otis]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

:subscribe:

 

[Moe Green]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

Who are you, Finless?

 

[GregR_2]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

I'm working on a program that will disable Nigel Tufnel's program.

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

I'm working on a program that will disable Nigel Tufnel's program.

My program has a ... firewall?

 

[Finless]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

Who are you, Finless?

Onlt room for one insider around here.

 

[Zow]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

 

[Disco Stu]

The flood control on searches is also annoying.

 

[GregR_2]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

I'm working on a program that will disable Nigel Tufnel's program.

My program has a ... firewall?

My program has a
. If you use a firewall on him you'll just make him mad.

 

[Otis]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

I'm working on a program that will disable Nigel Tufnel's program.

Updates?

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

I'm working on a program that will disable Nigel Tufnel's program.

Updates?

Flood control was disabled for about half an hour on July 15. Then, GregR implemented his program. I'm still trying to put something to combat it.

 

[Otis]

I'm working on a program that will disable flood control.

I'm working on a program that will disable Nigel Tufnel's program.

Updates?

Flood control was disabled for about half an hour on July 15. Then, GregR implemented his program. I'm still trying to put something to combat it.

Please keep us posted.

 

[Joe Bryant]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[Nigel Tufnel]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[Nathan R. Jessep]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

OOF

 

[Finless]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

OH SNAPS - LOL!!!

 

[Otis]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[Annyong]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[Mr Capicollo]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

OH SNAPS - LOL!!!

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Good zing in here, zinger.

 

[Ask the 8-Ball]

Why should we be penalized for being incredibly efficient and banging out great content in a short session?Just doesn't seem right is all. Thoughts?

Concentrate and ask again.

 

[mr. furley]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[Alias]

For those of us FFAers who don't have the time to sift through threads throughout the day like we used to, we have learned to become very efficient -- sometimes banging out successive threads reads and postings within the 15 second cutoff for this new flood control thing. It really hurts us, in comparison to the Furleys of the world who have more time to do all their posting throughout the course of the day. Why should we be penalized for being incredibly efficient and banging out great content in a short session?Just doesn't seem right is all. Thoughts?

Like a screen door in a hurricane!

 

[mr. furley]

in comparison to the Furleys of the world

hey

 

[nephilim]

it works better than IP banning...

 

[shuke]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[PatsWillWin]

The decline continues.

 

[drummer]

The decline continues.

 

[BassNBrew]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[shuke]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

JoeT> hey

 

[Mr. Pickles]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

JoeT> hey

One of the five greatest mysteries this board has ever seen.

 

[shuke]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

JoeT> hey

One of the five greatest mysteries this board has ever seen.

I'm on board with that.

 

[Zow]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

Seriously though, oof.

 

[proninja]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

 

[Homer J Simpson]

I've got to agree with Otis on this one...I get flood controlled a lot and I don't like it.

 

[bentley]

I've got to agree with Otis on this one...I get flood controlled a lot and I don't like it.

Agreed. DOWN WITH FLOOD CONTROL! I'd add DOWN WITH MY PANTS, but I'm already not wearing any.

 

[NCCommish]

I've got to agree with Otis on this one...I get flood controlled a lot and I don't like it.

I have to say I find it frustrating at times. I get on a roll and then bang flood controlled. Oh well we all have our crosses to bear.

 

[ScottNorwood]

I've got to agree with Otis on this one...I get flood controlled a lot and I don't like it.

Agreed. DOWN WITH FLOOD CONTROL! I'd add DOWN WITH MY PANTS, but I'm already not wearing any.

I actually need some flood control IN my pants

 

[Otis]

Is there a way we can floodcontrol blue magic so he can only post once a week?

 

[Gopher State]

For those of us FFAers who don't have the time to sift through threads throughout the day like we used to, we have learned to become very efficient -- sometimes banging out successive threads reads and postings within the 15 second cutoff for this new flood control thing. It really hurts us, in comparison to the Furleys of the world who have more time to do all their posting throughout the course of the day. Why should we be penalized for being incredibly efficient and banging out great content in a short session?Just doesn't seem right is all. Thoughts?

It keeps those crazy HAWKS under control

 

[nysportsfan]

complete agreement - not a big fan here and get the message ever other post or so

This pretty much closes this discussion doesn't it?J

Still funny.

 

[Raider Nation]

<_<

 

[shuke]

End this bull####.

 

[Otis]

Visionary IMO

 

[Otis]

You'd think this would have been somewhere near the top of our ombudsman's agenda.

 

[Tiger Fan]

You'd think this would have been somewhere near the top of our ombudsman's agenda.

Up early to work out GB?