What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (1 Viewer)

I still don't get why Fox News is so all in for Zimmerman. I understand why they won't jump on Travon's side (NRA support, not siding with black civil rights people, not wanting to offend core white audience, etc) but they have to realize that Zimmerman is trash whether he did nothing wrong or he is guilty as ####

 
I still don't get why Fox News is so all in for Zimmerman. I understand why they won't jump on Travon's side (NRA support, not siding with black civil rights people, not wanting to offend core white audience, etc) but they have to realize that Zimmerman is trash whether he did nothing wrong or he is guilty as ####
It's news.Any of the networks would have loved to have this interview.
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.

Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still don't get why Fox News is so all in for Zimmerman. I understand why they won't jump on Travon's side (NRA support, not siding with black civil rights people, not wanting to offend core white audience, etc) but they have to realize that Zimmerman is trash whether he did nothing wrong or he is guilty as ####
It's news.Any of the networks would have loved to have this interview.
Zimmerman would only talk to Fox because he thought it would help him. But he's so bad that even Hannity's softballs tripped him up.
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
:lmao: That all you got? I guess so, after that catastrophe.
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
:lmao: That all you got? I guess so, after that catastrophe.
I have not defended his character. I have defended his rights. There was a reason I have been of the opinion I would not want him to take witnessness stand.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao:Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
:lmao: That all you got? I guess so, after that catastrophe.
I have not defended his character. I have defended his rights. There was a reason I have been of the opinion I would not want him to take witnessness stand.
i said it before and i`ll say it again...id be ashamed to defend this creep in any way, shape or form. He`s repulsive
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
:lmao: That all you got? I guess so, after that catastrophe.
I have not defended his character. I have defended his rights. There was a reason I have been of the opinion I would not want him to take witnessness stand.
Unfortunately, he'll have to take the stand. Where the prosecution will cut him to shreds, not that they'll need to. I'm starting to think that no reasonable jury could find him credible. If he's not credible, Murder 2.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao:Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Make a different thread about it, guys.
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.

Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
:lmao: That all you got? I guess so, after that catastrophe.
I have not defended his character. I have defended his rights. There was a reason I have been of the opinion I would not want him to take witnessness stand.
Unfortunately, he'll have to take the stand. Where the prosecution will cut him to shreds, not that they'll need to. I'm starting to think that no reasonable jury could find him credible. If he's not credible, Murder 2.
Unfortunately??? I can't wait. :lmao:
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.

Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
:lmao: That all you got? I guess so, after that catastrophe.
I have not defended his character. I have defended his rights. There was a reason I have been of the opinion I would not want him to take witnessness stand.
Unfortunately, he'll have to take the stand. Where the prosecution will cut him to shreds, not that they'll need to. I'm starting to think that no reasonable jury could find him credible. If he's not credible, Murder 2.
Unfortunately??? I can't wait. :lmao:
Unfortunately for him. :lmao:

 
I still don't get why Fox News is so all in for Zimmerman. I understand why they won't jump on Travon's side (NRA support, not siding with black civil rights people, not wanting to offend core white audience, etc) but they have to realize that Zimmerman is trash whether he did nothing wrong or he is guilty as ####
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.Of course that could change after tonight but they aren't really known for admitting to jumping on the wrong team.
The thing about our laws is they are suppose to be applied to everyone equally, even unlikeable idiots.
What makes you think this isn't already acknowledged?
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.
I know right. He should have gone on Al Sharpton's show on MSNBC for this interview! It's not like he's extremely supportive of Martin or has held dozens of rallies with his family or anything.
 
Yeah but you have to be naive as hell to not see that Fox News has been extremely supportive of Zimmerman in the handling of this.
I know right. He should have gone on Al Sharpton's show on MSNBC for this interview! It's not like he's extremely supportive of Martin or has held dozens of rallies with his family or anything.
Fox is tentatively supportive, because of the gun angle, and because he shot a black kid. But Zimmerman's a little brown himself, so they haven't gone all out.
 
Even if this had tuned out better for Zimm, there is no way doing a pre-trial TV interview could possibly be a good thing for the Defense.

I just don't understand why this interview happened.

 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao:Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Where have you taken your self defense class?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao:Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Where have you taken your self defense class?
What does that have to do with anything? TIA
 
So let's get down to the key question here:

Let's say the trial happens, and the state doesn't produce any new evidence. So the best they can do is suggest that Zimmerman murdered Martin, but they can't really PROVE it. And they can't disprove the possibility that it was self-defense. However, when Zimmerman takes the stand (assuming that lawyers like Christo are right and he has to take the stand) the cross-examination is brutal, and Zimmerman is tripped up at every turn and the jury becomes convinced that Zimmerman is a scumbag, idiot, and liar.

Will that be enough for 12 jurors to convict? Or will at least a few of them say, "He may be all of those things, but we still have no proof that it wasn't self-defense." ?

 
So let's get down to the key question here: Let's say the trial happens, and the state doesn't produce any new evidence. So the best they can do is suggest that Zimmerman murdered Martin, but they can't really PROVE it. And they can't disprove the possibility that it was self-defense. However, when Zimmerman takes the stand (assuming that lawyers like Christo are right and he has to take the stand) the cross-examination is brutal, and Zimmerman is tripped up at every turn and the jury becomes convinced that Zimmerman is a scumbag, idiot, and liar. Will that be enough for 12 jurors to convict? Or will at least a few of them say, "He may be all of those things, but we still have no proof that it wasn't self-defense." ?
From my expert lawyering knowledge from watching TV, I think if Zim takes the stand you'll be hearing a lot of "objection relevancy" from his lawyer when asked irrelevant questions not pertaining to the case.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao: Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Right because smashing a computer does not escalate the situation, for all you know if you were in that room and you didn't actually see him smash the computer you might think he was taking a swing at someone, but of course you would have thought to yourself, yeah it must have been an accident. I find it interesting that you think you need to hear a gun shot before you start shooting. Let them shoot first and then ask questions/shoot later? Good luck with that.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao: Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Right because smashing a computer does not escalate the situation, for all you know if you were in that room and you didn't actually see him smash the computer you might think he was taking a swing at someone, but of course you would have thought to yourself, yeah it must have been an accident. I find it interesting that you think you need to hear a gun shot before you start shooting. Let them shoot first and then ask questions/shoot later? Good luck with that.
I think it's interesting that you think I said somewhere that they needed to shoot first and still won't own up to completely flopping while trying to slam me for my word choice. I said my opinion would change based on the tone and disposition of the robbers.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao: Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Right because smashing a computer does not escalate the situation, for all you know if you were in that room and you didn't actually see him smash the computer you might think he was taking a swing at someone, but of course you would have thought to yourself, yeah it must have been an accident. I find it interesting that you think you need to hear a gun shot before you start shooting. Let them shoot first and then ask questions/shoot later? Good luck with that.
I think it's interesting that you think I said somewhere that they needed to shoot first and still won't own up to completely flopping while trying to slam me for my word choice. I said my opinion would change based on the tone and disposition of the robbers.
Please be more vague about "get deadly" and "tone and disposition of the robbers": we have smashing things (possibly people if you can't see what is being smashed because they told you not to move) with a bat not deadly enough and actually using a gun too deadly so I'm guessing they need to tell you "THIS IS GOING TO GET DEADLY" for you to take action. You know what forget it, your blinders are on so tight you won't see daylight.

 
So let's get down to the key question here: Let's say the trial happens, and the state doesn't produce any new evidence. So the best they can do is suggest that Zimmerman murdered Martin, but they can't really PROVE it. And they can't disprove the possibility that it was self-defense. However, when Zimmerman takes the stand (assuming that lawyers like Christo are right and he has to take the stand) the cross-examination is brutal, and Zimmerman is tripped up at every turn and the jury becomes convinced that Zimmerman is a scumbag, idiot, and liar. Will that be enough for 12 jurors to convict? Or will at least a few of them say, "He may be all of those things, but we still have no proof that it wasn't self-defense." ?
From my expert lawyering knowledge from watching TV, I think if Zim takes the stand you'll be hearing a lot of "objection relevancy" from his lawyer when asked irrelevant questions not pertaining to the case.
The prosecution has some five different statements from Zimmerman about that night all relevant to the shooting and all straying from each other. Now they will subpoena the missing 40 minutes Fox edited last night to have a sixth long statement with inconsistencies. The prosecuting attorney is an emotional blowhard who will grind and grind and grind on every inconsistency. George is an emotional cold fish, who will stupidly insist everything he said makes sense. Juries hate cold fish.Florida jury = 6 members not 12, Tim. Only a small percentage of idiots are following this as close as we are. Normal people are starting to realize the media sold a lot of lies about George and they are moving in his direction in polls as someone posted here. This interview will probably help them turn that into some real momentum. And that's great, imo, because the race baiters who turned this thing into a national disgrace should be exposed and ridiculed before they get sued by George. So the interview will help George in the court of public opinion. He could have left out the God bit and done a lot better. :lol:The interview will probably prove to be a trainwreck in court though. I've taken to reading defense attorneys opinions and 90% think the interview was stupid and can't figure out O'Mara. I have to stop before I type too many words again.
 
'Jojo the circus boy said:
Yes I read the article I posted. I find it interesting though that you think you can tell the difference when it happens in real-time. Do you think he apologized after hitting the computer, or owned that smashing like, yeah I meant to do that, or perhaps do you think he tried to paint a positive description of the events that happened and said it was an accident when police filed a report when they arrested him? :rolleyes:
:owned: but won't even admit it. Call me out for my choice of words when it's straight from your article. :lmao: x10 that he told the cops it was an accident like that'll mitigate the armed robbery charges. Just admit you effed up and move on.
I'm pretty sure what I said went right over your head.
:lmao: Uh oh, guy smashed a computer, better turn this into a firefight! :lmao:Anyway, what were you saying about my choice of words again?
Where have you taken your self defense class?
What does that have to do with anything? TIA
Answer the question and I'll answer yours.
 
The state is now considering another motion to revoke bond since Zimmerman violated the order last night by using the Fox telethon to contact the Martins again. Lester very much agreed with me about how horrid the last contact was and made non contact a condition of bond. :lol:

Rules for FBGs who get caught killing someone justified or not.

1. Do not do interviews.

2. If you violate rule #1 because your attorney is a media whore, when asked if you regret killing, answer YES.

3. Avoid blaming deities.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The state is now considering another motion to revoke bond since Zimmerman violated the order last night by using the Fox telethon to contact the Martins again. Lester very much agreed with me about how horrid the last contact was and made non contact a condition of bond. :lol: Rules for FBGs who get caught killing someone justified or not.1. Do not do interviews.2. If you violate rule #1 because your attorney is a media whore, when asked if you regret killing, answer YES.3. Avoid blaming dieties.
More rules....If asked if you regret killing a kid... answer YES. (zimmerman rule)If asked if you are a pedophile... answer NO. (sandusky rule)stolen from elsewhere on the net
 
I'm twisting context a little but since I hate Zimmerman less than the state does I think this is possible. Answering the question about death threats, New Black Panthers, and morons like Spike Lee tweeting his address, George nobly suggested that if you do something wrong you should apologize. He apologized quite a bit last night. :unsure:

I now consider O'Mara part of the prosecution.

 
Barbwa Walters tried very hard for the interview Hannity got and is a little bitter about it. She reported this morning that it was in fact O'Mara pushing George into the interview. So O'Mara tried to set up a phone interview with her, and she refused. :lol:

The state has just filed the interview as evidence. Oy.

I now consider George part of the prosecution.

 
In the 8 days after O'Mara was hired leading up to the bond hearing where George misled the court about his finances, O'Mara did 18 television interviews. Some attorneys may have been a little more interested in their clients financial situation going into a bond hearing. Maybe they would have used the 8 days to gather some bank statements and whatnot for an official little nicely documented financial statement. Not O'Mara. He just believed George was broke despite George having previously told him about some 37 grand of donations he tried to transfer.

O'Mara confirms Zimmerman is running his own website... again.

Rule #5 -- Do not launch a website while facing murder charges.

 
O'Mara is actually decent inside the court room. Outside of the court room he is an idiot.
He's done legal analysis for Florida TV stations for years. He may really love media attention and what little fame it brings him. His reputation is/was great -- super educated, stickler for details, misses nothing, extremely honest and ethical, loved by judges, clients and greatly respected by prosecutors. Also, a devoted churchgoing born again Christian. I suspect he's spent his career dominating the minor leagues and this is proving a difficult step up in class for him. My gut tells me he's making this much harder than it has to be. He also just said Zimmerman is broke and there could be more interviews. :lol:
 
O'Mara is actually decent inside the court room. Outside of the court room he is an idiot.
He's done legal analysis for Florida TV stations for years. He may really love media attention and what little fame it brings him. His reputation is/was great -- super educated, stickler for details, misses nothing, extremely honest and ethical, loved by judges, clients and greatly respected by prosecutors. Also, a devoted churchgoing born again Christian. I suspect he's spent his career dominating the minor leagues and this is proving a difficult step up in class for him. My gut tells me he's making this much harder than it has to be. He also just said Zimmerman is broke and there could be more interviews. :lol:
Stop it, you're killing me :lol:

 
I'm twisting context a little but since I hate Zimmerman less than the state does I think this is possible. Answering the question about death threats, New Black Panthers, and morons like Spike Lee tweeting his address, George nobly suggested that if you do something wrong you should apologize. He apologized quite a bit last night. :unsure:I now consider O'Mara part of the prosecution.
Apparently the apology is still not good enough.
 
Apparently the apology is still not good enough.
Suppose your son is dead, and you believe he was murdered. The guy you think murdered your son won't admit to it and accuses your son of attacking him and trying to kill him, and claims he was forced to kill your son in self-defense. Then supporters of this man spread all kinds of BS over the internet attacking your son, claiming he was a "thug" and a "punk".Would YOU accept this man's apology?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm twisting context a little but since I hate Zimmerman less than the state does I think this is possible. Answering the question about death threats, New Black Panthers, and morons like Spike Lee tweeting his address, George nobly suggested that if you do something wrong you should apologize. He apologized quite a bit last night. :unsure:I now consider O'Mara part of the prosecution.
Apparently the apology is still not good enough.
When you say you'd do it all the same way again, no apology is ever going to work.
 
Apparently the apology is still not good enough.
Suppose your son is dead, and you believe he was murdered. The guy you think murdered your son won't admit to it and accuses your son of attacking him and trying to kill him, and claims he was forced to kill your son in self-defense. Then supporters of this man spread all kinds of BS over the internet attacking your son, claiming he was a "thug" and a "punk".Would YOU accept this man's apology?
Totally forgot all sarcasm goes out the window when entering this thread. apologies.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
'ATC1 said:
'Chaos Commish said:
I'm twisting context a little but since I hate Zimmerman less than the state does I think this is possible. Answering the question about death threats, New Black Panthers, and morons like Spike Lee tweeting his address, George nobly suggested that if you do something wrong you should apologize. He apologized quite a bit last night. :unsure:I now consider O'Mara part of the prosecution.
Apparently the apology is still not good enough.
When you say you'd do it all the same way again, no apology is ever going to work.
They only way it could have been worse is if he had answered "Yeah I would have double tapped!".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top