Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch (4 Viewers)

[FootballDummy]

How dumb do you have to be to do something like this? Also reprehensible.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/13/us/florida-trayvon-martin-targets/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

 

[BustedKnuckles]

How dumb do you have to be to do something like this? Also reprehensible.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/13/us/florida-trayvon-martin-targets/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

sick

 

[pittstownkiller]

How dumb do you have to be to do something like this? Also reprehensible.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/13/us/florida-trayvon-martin-targets/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

This is the type of person when gun-control advocates say "trained professionals and the police", that you're putting weapons in the hands of.

 

[FootballDummy]

How dumb do you have to be to do something like this? Also reprehensible.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/13/us/florida-trayvon-martin-targets/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

This is the type of person when gun-control advocates say "trained professionals and the police", that you're putting weapons in the hands of.

Has nothing to do with gun control, it's just despicable. And he's not police anymore, and rightly so.

 

[poopdawg]

Here we go!!

 

[[icon]]

298 pages.

In conjunction with FBG (not really) we've decided to have a raffle... Everyone who posts on the 301st page will be given a life. ENTER EARLY. ENTER OFTEN!

 

[FootballDummy]

298 pages.In conjunction with FBG (not really) we've decided to have a raffle... Everyone who posts on the 301st page will be given a life. ENTER EARLY. ENTER OFTEN!

So, since you're a confirmed gun nut, do you endorse the Martin shooting targets? Just trying to get a pulse on the crazy.

 

[Underachievers]

Oh chit....someone else for Tayvon's parents to sue.

Have they gone back to work yet or are they still in such a state of grief that they are incapable of employment?

 

[pittstownkiller]

Oh chit....someone else for Tayvon's parents to sue. Have they gone back to work yet or are they still in such a state of grief that they are incapable of employment?

I must admit that I find your angle simplistic. The only recourse for the parents is to sue for money; you cannot honestly believe that they felt their son should have been shot, hell even the person that shot him knows that Martin should not have been killed. Stating anything besides that the Martin's would rather have their son alive more than money, is disgusting.

 

[jon_mx]

They lost a son tragically early, I am not going to judge their behavior. The people doing so do 't come across too well.

 

[Captain Quinoa]

Trayvon's parents just collected a cool million in a settlement. Have they gone back to work yet or are they still mourning and living off of Trayvon's good name?

That's a really ####ed thing to say. His parent's weren't bums waiting for someone to kill their son so they could live the high life - his mom had a $69k a year job and his dad was a truck driver. Despite my belief that Trayvon holds some responsibility in what happened there's no need to attack his parents.

Just curious is all. I know they quit their jobs shortly after his death (which is kind of odd in itself) and last I heard they were still not working. No need to work now though either way. The money train is just warming up for them.

whats YOUR life worth?

Never thought about it to be honest. My brother died while in the military though, and my parents received $50,000. I guess Travon's life was worth considerably more than a serviceman's. But that is one benefit of having a striking resemblance to Obama;s son. .

Wait, I missed something, how much more did the US "decide their lives were worth" and pay to Martin's family than they did to yours? Seems to me that you're still 50K up on them in that matter. Y'know, public vs private and such.

I am up nothing, but it was a great effort at spinning. BTW...my parents also continued to work, unlike Trayvon's.

Did your parents have to devote efforts to make sure that the person that murdered their child didn't walk? Or were they placed in the public eye, making them a spectacle at work? Were they followed by reporters?

Murdered? Did I miss something?

 

[Captain Quinoa]

Trayvon's parents just collected a cool million in a settlement.

Have they gone back to work yet or are they still mourning and living off of Trayvon's good name?

That's a really ####ed thing to say. His parent's weren't bums waiting for someone to kill their son so they could live the high life - his mom had a $69k a year job and his dad was a truck driver. Despite my belief that Trayvon holds some responsibility in what happened there's no need to attack his parents.

Just curious is all. I know they quit their jobs shortly after his death (which is kind of odd in itself) and last I heard they were still not working.

No need to work now though either way. The money train is just warming up for them.

whats YOUR life worth?

Never thought about it to be honest. My brother died while in the military though, and my parents received $50,000. I guess Travon's life was worth considerably more than a serviceman's. But that is one benefit of having a striking resemblance to Obama;s son. .

Trayvon.. was walking home after buying Skittles

That's very sweet but I don't think it quite paints the entire picture.

 

[mad sweeney]

Trayvon's parents just collected a cool million in a settlement.

Have they gone back to work yet or are they still mourning and living off of Trayvon's good name?

That's a really ####ed thing to say. His parent's weren't bums waiting for someone to kill their son so they could live the high life - his mom had a $69k a year job and his dad was a truck driver. Despite my belief that Trayvon holds some responsibility in what happened there's no need to attack his parents.

Just curious is all. I know they quit their jobs shortly after his death (which is kind of odd in itself) and last I heard they were still not working.

No need to work now though either way. The money train is just warming up for them.

whats YOUR life worth?

Never thought about it to be honest. My brother died while in the military though, and my parents received $50,000. I guess Travon's life was worth considerably more than a serviceman's. But that is one benefit of having a striking resemblance to Obama;s son. .

Trayvon.. was walking home after buying Skittles

That's very sweet but I don't think it quite paints the entire picture.

True, there was iced tea involved as well.

 

[pantherclub]

Trayvon's parents just collected a cool million in a settlement.

Have they gone back to work yet or are they still mourning and living off of Trayvon's good name?

That's a really ####ed thing to say. His parent's weren't bums waiting for someone to kill their son so they could live the high life - his mom had a $69k a year job and his dad was a truck driver. Despite my belief that Trayvon holds some responsibility in what happened there's no need to attack his parents.

Just curious is all. I know they quit their jobs shortly after his death (which is kind of odd in itself) and last I heard they were still not working.

No need to work now though either way. The money train is just warming up for them.

whats YOUR life worth?

Never thought about it to be honest. My brother died while in the military though, and my parents received $50,000. I guess Travon's life was worth considerably more than a serviceman's. But that is one benefit of having a striking resemblance to Obama;s son. .

Trayvon.. was walking home after buying Skittles

That's very sweet but I don't think it quite paints the entire picture.

Obviously not but its definitley at the core of the event.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Trayvon's parents just collected a cool million in a settlement.

Have they gone back to work yet or are they still mourning and living off of Trayvon's good name?

That's a really ####ed thing to say. His parent's weren't bums waiting for someone to kill their son so they could live the high life - his mom had a $69k a year job and his dad was a truck driver. Despite my belief that Trayvon holds some responsibility in what happened there's no need to attack his parents.

Just curious is all. I know they quit their jobs shortly after his death (which is kind of odd in itself) and last I heard they were still not working.

No need to work now though either way. The money train is just warming up for them.

whats YOUR life worth?

Never thought about it to be honest. My brother died while in the military though, and my parents received $50,000. I guess Travon's life was worth considerably more than a serviceman's. But that is one benefit of having a striking resemblance to Obama;s son. .

Trayvon.. was walking home after buying Skittles

That's very sweet but I don't think it quite paints the entire picture.

Obviously not but its definitley at the core of the event.

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

 

[jon_mx]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

 

[mad sweeney]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

Thank goodness you're here to put an end to pointless political spin. Er, wait...

 

[mad sweeney]

Trayvon's parents just collected a cool million in a settlement. Have they gone back to work yet or are they still mourning and living off of Trayvon's good name?

That's a really ####ed thing to say. His parent's weren't bums waiting for someone to kill their son so they could live the high life - his mom had a $69k a year job and his dad was a truck driver. Despite my belief that Trayvon holds some responsibility in what happened there's no need to attack his parents.

Just curious is all. I know they quit their jobs shortly after his death (which is kind of odd in itself) and last I heard they were still not working. No need to work now though either way. The money train is just warming up for them.

whats YOUR life worth?

Never thought about it to be honest. My brother died while in the military though, and my parents received $50,000. I guess Travon's life was worth considerably more than a serviceman's. But that is one benefit of having a striking resemblance to Obama;s son. .

Trayvon.. was walking home after buying Skittles

That's very sweet but I don't think it quite paints the entire picture.

Obviously not but its definitley at the core of the event.

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Zimmerman being there could be a wannabe unofficial rentacop can be attributed to one of his assault incidents. But a guy with a violent past and a history of overreactions(disproportionately against blacks) is ok, but a dumb kid doesn't get benefit of the doubt. You're nothing. Man up or go away.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve?

His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

 

[mad sweeney]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

 

[mad sweeney]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

 

[BustedKnuckles]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

one of many? 3 is many? once for being late to school(oh the horror) once for tagging WTF on a locker at school(gangbanger for sure ) and the last time was for having a glad bag with ''possible'' weed residue. Such a badass kid,im sure Zimmy did the world a favor.

 

[Captain Quinoa]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

I think the skittles could be very relevant.

 

[FootballDummy]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

one of many? 3 is many? once for being late to school(oh the horror) once for tagging WTF on a locker at school(gangbanger for sure ) and the last time was for having a glad bag with ''possible'' weed residue. Such a badass kid,im sure Zimmy did the world a favor.

3 times in 1 year is many... We've been over this before. It's not even close to the average..

 

[FootballDummy]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

one of many? 3 is many? once for being late to school(oh the horror) once for tagging WTF on a locker at school(gangbanger for sure ) and the last time was for having a glad bag with ''possible'' weed residue. Such a badass kid,im sure Zimmy did the world a favor.

3 times in 1 year is many... We've been over this before. It's not even close to the average..

Obviously he deserved to die.

 

[mad sweeney]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

one of many? 3 is many? once for being late to school(oh the horror) once for tagging WTF on a locker at school(gangbanger for sure ) and the last time was for having a glad bag with ''possible'' weed residue. Such a badass kid,im sure Zimmy did the world a favor.

3 times in 1 year is many... We've been over this before. It's not even close to the average..

Obviously he deserved to die.

Obviously. Those three vicious and scofflaw-esque suspensions of a teenage boy (usually the smartest, most mature demographic) paint a much more negative portrait than that of the frustrated wannabe cop with several assault arrests. Spray paint?!?! ZOMG!!!!

also, I believe that the preferred phrase is "got what was coming to him" or "did the world a favor".

 

[jon_mx]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

 

[FootballDummy]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

 

[jon_mx]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

 

[FootballDummy]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

 

[Christo]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

Who says he did?

 

[jon_mx]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

IMHO, Zimmerman was a db, but I have very serious doubts he started the physical contact. His actions provoked it, but as stupid as Zimmerman is, I doubt if he is that f-ing stupid.

 

[FootballDummy]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

Who says he did?

Who says he didn't? He was chasing Martin around after police told him not to.

 

[Christo]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

Who says he did?

Who says he didn't?

He did.

 

[jon_mx]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

Who says he did?

Who says he didn't? He was chasing Martin around after police told him not to.

So you admit you are stating things as facts which you have no idea what the truth is. And then you say things that are factually incorrect. The police did not tell Zimmerman anything, he was talking to a police dispatcher. The dispatcher told him, "we don't need you to do that."

 

[FootballDummy]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

Who says he did?

Who says he didn't?

You did.

 

[FootballDummy]

Such a pointless discussion. It doesn't matter if Martin was suspended. It does not matter if he was eating skittles and drinking tea. It does not matter what his parents are doing. All that matters is did Martin attack Zimmerman and put him in a position where it was reasonable to think his life was in danger? It is inclusive who started the assault, but since there was a gun involved the answer to the second part is probably yes. But it will be decided by a judge or jury. The non-sense being discussed here is just pointless political spin.

It is really not the complicated once you take off your skittle-colored glasses.

I think you need a little help with your logic. You're implying causation. Strangely, the rest of what you posted makes sense.

It was not Martin's fault there was a gun present. However, a fist-fight in which a gun is present is a deadly situation. In Zimmerman's mind it is some unknown thug who is kicking his ### and in Martin's mind it is some weird creepy guy who was following him. Neither party has any idea what the other guy is capable of. The presence of a gun in such a struggle has a good chance of not ending up good.

Which is exactly why Zimmerman shouldn't have initiated a struggle.

Who says he did?

Who says he didn't? He was chasing Martin around after police told him not to.

So you admit you are stating things as facts which you have no idea what the truth is. And then you say things that are factually incorrect. The police did not tell Zimmerman anything, he was talking to a police dispatcher. The dispatcher told him, "we don't need you to do that."

You say potato, I say patato. Fact: Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin after police advised him not to. Fact: Zimmerman killed Martin.

 

[Jojo the circus boy]

define "initiate struggle"?

this thread has fallen off the rails too many times already, should lock it until trial

 

[Jojo the circus boy]

You say potato, I say patato. Fact: Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin after police advised him not to said "we don't need you to do that". Fact: Zimmerman killed Martin.

ftfy

He didn't do anything illegal, he didn't break any laws.

 

[BustedKnuckles]

i feel like im reading page 20 again

 

[FootballDummy]

You say potato, I say patato. Fact: Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin after police advised him not to said "we don't need you to do that". Fact: Zimmerman killed Martin.

ftfy

He didn't do anything illegal, he didn't break any laws.

Except murder.

 

[PlasmaDogPlasma]

You say potato, I say patato. Fact: Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin after police advised him not to said "we don't need you to do that". Fact: Zimmerman killed Martin.

ftfy He didn't do anything illegal, he didn't break any laws.

Except murder.

Murder most foul

 

[Jojo the circus boy]

You say potato, I say patato. Fact: Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin after police advised him not to said "we don't need you to do that". Fact: Zimmerman killed Martin.

ftfy

He didn't do anything illegal, he didn't break any laws.

Except murder.

When did he think to do it, before he called 911?

 

[FootballDummy]

You say potato, I say patato. Fact: Zimmerman continued to pursue Martin after police advised him not to said "we don't need you to do that". Fact: Zimmerman killed Martin.

ftfy

He didn't do anything illegal, he didn't break any laws.

Except murder.

When did he think to do it, before he called 911?

Doesn't matter.

 

[Jojo the circus boy]

Actually it does.

The fact that he stopped following him when he was told to should matter as well. But obviously you knuckleheads didn't bother to even listen to the 911 call.

From the call released by the Sanford Police:


At 2:07, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, “He’s running.”

At 2:09, you can hear a car door open and an alarm begins that is undoubtedly the “door open, keys in ignition” warning on Zimmerman’s truck.

At 2:13, you can clearly hear the car door slamming shut, and the alarm stops.

At 2:17, Zimmerman’s voice wobbles and he starts breathing heavily into the phone, indicating that he has started running.

At 2:22, without any prompting other than the aforementioned noises and breathing, the dispatcher asks “Are you following him?” to which Zimmerman responds, “Yeah.”

At 2:26, the dispatcher says, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that,” to which Zimmerman responds, “Okay.”

Zimmerman proceeds to give the dispatcher his name. Then he says, “He ran.”

Zimmerman can still be heard breathing into the phone until about 2:39, at which point the heavy breathing stops entirely, a mere 13 seconds after the dispatcher asked him to stop following. A very calm and collected Zimmerman then proceeds to give the dispatcher his own information, directions and a description of his location for another 1 minute and 33 seconds.

The difference between someone running while on the phone and not running can be heard quite clearly, and I encourage readers to listen for themselves.

There’s another reason to believe that Zimmerman stopped following Martin: After he gives the dispatcher his personal address, at 3:35, he says, “Oh crap, I don’t want to give that all out. I don’t know where this kid is,” meaning he is worried Martin might hear where he lives. If Zimmerman doesn’t even know where Martin is, would it even be possible for him to still be following Martin at this point? Would it even be possible for him to have continued following Martin after hanging up the phone — a full two minutes after he first got out of his car and a minute and a half after he fully stops breathing heavily — unless Martin came back and revealed himself?

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/02/911-call-shows-zimmerman-stopped-following-martin-after-dispatchers-request-corroborates-story/

 

[BustedKnuckles]

Actually it does.

The fact that he stopped following him when he was told to should matter as well. But obviously you knuckleheads didn't bother to even listen to the 911 call.

From the call released by the Sanford Police:


At 2:07, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, “He’s running.”

At 2:09, you can hear a car door open and an alarm begins that is undoubtedly the “door open, keys in ignition” warning on Zimmerman’s truck.

At 2:13, you can clearly hear the car door slamming shut, and the alarm stops.

At 2:17, Zimmerman’s voice wobbles and he starts breathing heavily into the phone, indicating that he has started running.

At 2:22, without any prompting other than the aforementioned noises and breathing, the dispatcher asks “Are you following him?” to which Zimmerman responds, “Yeah.”

At 2:26, the dispatcher says, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that,” to which Zimmerman responds, “Okay.”

Zimmerman proceeds to give the dispatcher his name. Then he says, “He ran.”

Zimmerman can still be heard breathing into the phone until about 2:39, at which point the heavy breathing stops entirely, a mere 13 seconds after the dispatcher asked him to stop following. A very calm and collected Zimmerman then proceeds to give the dispatcher his own information, directions and a description of his location for another 1 minute and 33 seconds.

The difference between someone running while on the phone and not running can be heard quite clearly, and I encourage readers to listen for themselves.

There’s another reason to believe that Zimmerman stopped following Martin: After he gives the dispatcher his personal address, at 3:35, he says, “Oh crap, I don’t want to give that all out. I don’t know where this kid is,” meaning he is worried Martin might hear where he lives. If Zimmerman doesn’t even know where Martin is, would it even be possible for him to still be following Martin at this point? Would it even be possible for him to have continued following Martin after hanging up the phone — a full two minutes after he first got out of his car and a minute and a half after he fully stops breathing heavily — unless Martin came back and revealed himself?

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/02/911-call-shows-zimmerman-stopped-following-martin-after-dispatchers-request-corroborates-story/

You left out zimmy saying ''these punks always get away '' as he was pursuing trey...maybe thats when he decided this punk wasnt going to get away...one way or another

 

[FootballDummy]

Actually it does.

The fact that he stopped following him when he was told to should matter as well. But obviously you knuckleheads didn't bother to even listen to the 911 call.

From the call released by the Sanford Police:


At 2:07, Zimmerman tells the dispatcher, “He’s running.”

At 2:09, you can hear a car door open and an alarm begins that is undoubtedly the “door open, keys in ignition” warning on Zimmerman’s truck.

At 2:13, you can clearly hear the car door slamming shut, and the alarm stops.

At 2:17, Zimmerman’s voice wobbles and he starts breathing heavily into the phone, indicating that he has started running.

At 2:22, without any prompting other than the aforementioned noises and breathing, the dispatcher asks “Are you following him?” to which Zimmerman responds, “Yeah.”

At 2:26, the dispatcher says, “Okay, we don’t need you to do that,” to which Zimmerman responds, “Okay.”

Zimmerman proceeds to give the dispatcher his name. Then he says, “He ran.”

Zimmerman can still be heard breathing into the phone until about 2:39, at which point the heavy breathing stops entirely, a mere 13 seconds after the dispatcher asked him to stop following. A very calm and collected Zimmerman then proceeds to give the dispatcher his own information, directions and a description of his location for another 1 minute and 33 seconds.

The difference between someone running while on the phone and not running can be heard quite clearly, and I encourage readers to listen for themselves.

There’s another reason to believe that Zimmerman stopped following Martin: After he gives the dispatcher his personal address, at 3:35, he says, “Oh crap, I don’t want to give that all out. I don’t know where this kid is,” meaning he is worried Martin might hear where he lives. If Zimmerman doesn’t even know where Martin is, would it even be possible for him to still be following Martin at this point? Would it even be possible for him to have continued following Martin after hanging up the phone — a full two minutes after he first got out of his car and a minute and a half after he fully stops breathing heavily — unless Martin came back and revealed himself?

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/02/911-call-shows-zimmerman-stopped-following-martin-after-dispatchers-request-corroborates-story/

Listen to the call itself. They're wrong. Plus: Daily Caller. Same author who set up a "sting" on NPR execs where they talked bad about conservatives. Not biased at all. Probably has Trayvon Martin targets in his back yard.

 

[Carolina Hustler]

Also his being there can be attributed to serving a suspension from school.. One of many..

Well then, he got what he deserved.

What did he deserve? His school suspension is just as relevant as the skittles.. Probably more relevant as skittles have no bearing on his character..

Apparently neither do previous assault arrests. But pictures of middle fingers do!!!!!

one of many? 3 is many? once for being late to school(oh the horror) once for tagging WTF on a locker at school(gangbanger for sure ) and the last time was for having a glad bag with ''possible'' weed residue. Such a badass kid,im sure Zimmy did the world a favor.

3 times in 1 year is many... We've been over this before. It's not even close to the average..

Obviously he deserved to die.

He was carrying skittles, obviously he's never done anything wrong in his life... I mean, SKITTLES!!.. Right? Skittles!! Bad guys don't buy candy... Busted Knuckles has admitted to hitting people on numerous occasions, lets see if he's ever bought skittles... Maybe we can get to the bottom of this..

Can you show me where someone said he deserved to die? I'm thinking his death was the unfortunate conclusion to him showing this fat white guy why he wasn't to be trifled with..