Wait, these are real? WTF.TEL = non-911 police number (answered by 911 dispatcher)
BM = black male
LSW = last seen wearing
46. Feb. 26, 2012 – 7:20 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Repeats prior report
45. Feb. 26, 2012 (night of Martin shooting) – 7:11 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Black male “late teens lsw dark gray hoodie jeans or sweatpants walking around area” … “subj now running towards back entrance of complex”
44. Feb. 2, 2012 – 8:29 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “BM lsw: black leather jacket, black hat, printed PJ pants, he keeps going going to this” location
43. Jan. 29, 2012 – 5:38 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Children “running and playing in the street”
42. Dec. 10, 2011 – 5:29 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “At the club house” … “Male subject [arrived on scene] that thought he was employed by” Zimmerman … “Subj is expected to get paid for serving food.” … Zimmerman “said that he didn’t wish him to serve at the [event]” … Zimmerman “hired someone else, subj sounded upset and wants to get paid”
41. Oct. 1, 2011 – 12:53 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Two black male suspects “20–30 YOA in [white] Chevy poss Impala at the gate of the community.” Zimmerman “does not recognize subjs or veh and is concerned due to recent” burglaries in the area
40. Sept. 23, 2011 – 11:08 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Neighbor/Suspicious activity
Report: Zimmerman reports “open garage door” … Describes “neighborhood watch mtg last night with Sgt Herx who [advised] to report anything [suspicious]” … Zimmerman “is part of neighborhood watch” and is concerned because of recent burglaries in the area
39. Aug. 6, 2011 – 10:20 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Two black males, one wearing a black tank top and black shorts, the second wearing a black t-shirt and jeans … “Subjs are in their teens”
38. Aug. 3, 2011 – 6:45 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Black male last seen wearing a white tank top and black shorts … Zimmerman “believes subject is involved in recent” burglaries in the neighborhood
37. May 27, 2011 – 9:18 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Alarm
Report: Zimmerman “has a self responding alarm that just notified him of” an alarm at this location
36. April 22, 2011 – 7:09 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Juvenile black male “apprx 7–9” years old, four feet tall “skinny build short blk hair” last seen wearing a blue t-shirt and blue shorts
35. March 18, 2011 – 9:26 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Animals
Report: Zimmerman requested an officer meet him regarding a pit bull in his garage
34. Nov. 26, 2010 – 2:54 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Alarm
Report: Zimmerman was out of town and a motion alarm he monitors himself went off
33. Nov. 8, 2010 – 6:54 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Maintenance
Report: Zimmerman reports “trash in roadwy”
32. Oct. 2, 2010 – 1:55 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Zimmerman reports “blu jeep grand Cherokee female driver yelling at elderly passengers … windows are tinted” … “the veh was rocking back and forth and he could hear the female yelling”
31. June 26, 2010 – 11:00 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “Loud party … approx 50 subjs & blocking the street”
30. June 12, 2010 – 11:13 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Subject “at the clubhouse & pool areas having a party”
29. April 28, 2010 – 9:02 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “White older model four-door Buick or Oldsmobile” obstructing road
28. Feb. 27, 2010 – 4:46 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “Residence w/a lot of [suspicious] activity” … “multiple vehs are constantly coming to the” location … “unk subs run out to the vehs and run back inside” … “the subjs are always outside w/the garage open” … “the subjs hang out towards the st all night//ongoing problem”
27. Jan. 12, 2010 – 10:25 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Neighbor
Report: Open garage door … Zimmerman says “this is very unlike his neighbor” … “there is a lot of electronics in the resd and posb in the garage”
26. Jan. 1, 2010 – 4:34 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Zimmerman reports reckless driver in “purplish Ford Ranger single cab”
25. Nov. 3, 2009 – 5:04 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: White Ford F350 that was “cutting people off”
24. Nov. 21, 2009 – 2:26 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Unclear
23. Oct. 23, 2009 – 9:18 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Animals
Report: “Aggressive white and brown pitbull” sitting outside Zimmerman’s home
22. Sept. 22, 2009 – 6:00 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “Yellow speed bike … was speeding and weaving in and out of traffic and doing wheelies”
21. Sept. 7, 2009 – 9:01 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Maintenance
Report: “Pot hole in the road” … “it is deep and can cause damage to vehicles”
20. Aug. 26, 2009 - 8:35 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “Gold Caprice … male driving with no headlights … speeding”
19. Aug. 21, 2009 – 6:57 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Conflict
Report: “Landlord is trying to take [Zimmerman’s] money for rent … and home in foreclosure”
18. June 16, 2009 – 3:50 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Persons in the pool area playing basketball, “jumpin over the fence going into pool area and trashin the bathroom”
17. June 10, 2009 – 1:55 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Alarm
Report: Fire alarm going off
16. May 4, 2009 – 4:07 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Reports a blue Audi A4
15. March 12, 2009 – 6:58 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Patrol
Report: Patrol request between March 13 and March 22
14. Jan. 5, 2009 – 10:53 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Alarm
Report: Fire alarm going off
13. Nov. 25, 2007 – 12:40 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “Ex roommate is letting people that [Zimmerman] don’t like in the” house
12. Nov. 25, 2007 – 12:21 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: White male ex-roommate last seen wearing a red Florida State University shirt
11. Oct. 14, 2007 – 4:10 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Possible criminal mischief to the tire of Zimmerman’s black Dodge Durango
10. June 24, 2007 – 12:48 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “By the pool”, two Hispanic males and one white male with “slim jim”
9. Nov. 4, 2006 – 2:37 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: A call regarding a “late model red” Toyota pickup “driving around the neighborhood and apt complex for the past 5 min”
8. Sept. 23, 2005 – 7:03 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Zimmerman’s “little sister just call him from above” his address and advises “there was a” suspicious person “at the front door”
7. Sept. 21, 2005 – 9:00 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Animals
Report: Reports a stray dog
6. April 27, 2005 – 12:40 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Neighbor
Report: Open garage door
5. March 17, 2005 – 7:21 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Maintenance
Report: Pothole “that is blocking the road”
4. Oct. 20, 2004 – 9:13 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Drunk pedestrian walking in the road
3. Aug. 20, 2004 – 11:33 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Neighbor
Report: Reports an open garage door
2. Aug.12, 2004 – 10:03 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Repeats earlier report
1. Aug. 12, 2004 – 9:59 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Places a call reporting a male in a green Ford pickup![]()
Skittles, Iced Tea and now Slim Jims. Seeing a pattern here.10. June 24, 2007 – 12:48 a.m.Type: TELSubject: Suspicious activityReport: “By the pool”, two Hispanic males and one white male with “slim jim”
I have no idea what happened that night. I've written over and over again that it seems, based on the slim evidence presented, like Zimmerman is certainly guilty of a crime, but it will be very difficult to prove, and that based on what I know I would be forced to acquit. In this thread there are a lot of thoughtful people- people trying to be fair, to do the right thing, to provide good commentary. I disagree strongly with some of the comments made by Carolina Hustler and renesauz, to cite two examples, but I very much appreciate their integrity: I believe that they are honestly attempting to give a reasonable judgment about a complicated situation.But you on the other hand- there's no nice way to say this, BoneYard Dog, but your posts are simply pathetic. On this issue, just like every issue, you begin by looking for whichever position happens to match you extremist conservative point of view, and that is the position you adopt. Then you go cherrypicking "facts" which will support your point of view. It's incredibly predictable, because you have done the same thing in every thread you have ever entered. You provide nothing new, and nothing interesting. I could write all of your posts. If I were you I would stay away from posting until I could figure out a way to contribute something of value.Again read the thread through and try not to ignore the witness statements and police "leaks"...You can wish plead and hope to your hearts content but the facts will come out...You may also feel free to address the questions addressed in a previous post to knuckle dude...You have a closed and one sided mind based on air, but that is the way you roll, always...Well, now that Bone Yard Dog has solved the case, we can shut down the thread.
This is a lie...The Detective who questioned him at the station didn't believe Zimmerman's story, and wanted to charge him, but the DA wouldn't let him. This is the same DA that was involved in a cover up involving the previous Police Chiefs son, where the son beat up a homeless black man. Son was never charged until a video of the assault went viral.I don't think I've read the last 500 posts or so. Any forensics updates? Any new news? I saw the police chief said he didn't buy Zimmerman's story or whatever.
well according to Carolina H this is normal , gentle george just wants a safe crime free hoodWait, these are real? WTF.TEL = non-911 police number (answered by 911 dispatcher)
BM = black male
LSW = last seen wearing
46. Feb. 26, 2012 – 7:20 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Repeats prior report
45. Feb. 26, 2012 (night of Martin shooting) – 7:11 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Black male “late teens lsw dark gray hoodie jeans or sweatpants walking around area” … “subj now running towards back entrance of complex”
44. Feb. 2, 2012 – 8:29 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “BM lsw: black leather jacket, black hat, printed PJ pants, he keeps going going to this” location
43. Jan. 29, 2012 – 5:38 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Children “running and playing in the street”
42. Dec. 10, 2011 – 5:29 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “At the club house” … “Male subject [arrived on scene] that thought he was employed by” Zimmerman … “Subj is expected to get paid for serving food.” … Zimmerman “said that he didn’t wish him to serve at the [event]” … Zimmerman “hired someone else, subj sounded upset and wants to get paid”
41. Oct. 1, 2011 – 12:53 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Two black male suspects “20–30 YOA in [white] Chevy poss Impala at the gate of the community.” Zimmerman “does not recognize subjs or veh and is concerned due to recent” burglaries in the area
40. Sept. 23, 2011 – 11:08 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Neighbor/Suspicious activity
Report: Zimmerman reports “open garage door” … Describes “neighborhood watch mtg last night with Sgt Herx who [advised] to report anything [suspicious]” … Zimmerman “is part of neighborhood watch” and is concerned because of recent burglaries in the area
39. Aug. 6, 2011 – 10:20 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Two black males, one wearing a black tank top and black shorts, the second wearing a black t-shirt and jeans … “Subjs are in their teens”
38. Aug. 3, 2011 – 6:45 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Black male last seen wearing a white tank top and black shorts … Zimmerman “believes subject is involved in recent” burglaries in the neighborhood
37. May 27, 2011 – 9:18 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Alarm
Report: Zimmerman “has a self responding alarm that just notified him of” an alarm at this location
36. April 22, 2011 – 7:09 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Juvenile black male “apprx 7–9” years old, four feet tall “skinny build short blk hair” last seen wearing a blue t-shirt and blue shorts
35. March 18, 2011 – 9:26 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Animals
Report: Zimmerman requested an officer meet him regarding a pit bull in his garage
34. Nov. 26, 2010 – 2:54 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Alarm
Report: Zimmerman was out of town and a motion alarm he monitors himself went off
33. Nov. 8, 2010 – 6:54 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Maintenance
Report: Zimmerman reports “trash in roadwy”
32. Oct. 2, 2010 – 1:55 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Zimmerman reports “blu jeep grand Cherokee female driver yelling at elderly passengers … windows are tinted” … “the veh was rocking back and forth and he could hear the female yelling”
31. June 26, 2010 – 11:00 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “Loud party … approx 50 subjs & blocking the street”
30. June 12, 2010 – 11:13 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Subject “at the clubhouse & pool areas having a party”
29. April 28, 2010 – 9:02 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “White older model four-door Buick or Oldsmobile” obstructing road
28. Feb. 27, 2010 – 4:46 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “Residence w/a lot of [suspicious] activity” … “multiple vehs are constantly coming to the” location … “unk subs run out to the vehs and run back inside” … “the subjs are always outside w/the garage open” … “the subjs hang out towards the st all night//ongoing problem”
27. Jan. 12, 2010 – 10:25 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Neighbor
Report: Open garage door … Zimmerman says “this is very unlike his neighbor” … “there is a lot of electronics in the resd and posb in the garage”
26. Jan. 1, 2010 – 4:34 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Zimmerman reports reckless driver in “purplish Ford Ranger single cab”
25. Nov. 3, 2009 – 5:04 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: White Ford F350 that was “cutting people off”
24. Nov. 21, 2009 – 2:26 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Unclear
23. Oct. 23, 2009 – 9:18 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Animals
Report: “Aggressive white and brown pitbull” sitting outside Zimmerman’s home
22. Sept. 22, 2009 – 6:00 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “Yellow speed bike … was speeding and weaving in and out of traffic and doing wheelies”
21. Sept. 7, 2009 – 9:01 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Maintenance
Report: “Pot hole in the road” … “it is deep and can cause damage to vehicles”
20. Aug. 26, 2009 - 8:35 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “Gold Caprice … male driving with no headlights … speeding”
19. Aug. 21, 2009 – 6:57 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Conflict
Report: “Landlord is trying to take [Zimmerman’s] money for rent … and home in foreclosure”
18. June 16, 2009 – 3:50 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Persons in the pool area playing basketball, “jumpin over the fence going into pool area and trashin the bathroom”
17. June 10, 2009 – 1:55 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Alarm
Report: Fire alarm going off
16. May 4, 2009 – 4:07 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Reports a blue Audi A4
15. March 12, 2009 – 6:58 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Patrol
Report: Patrol request between March 13 and March 22
14. Jan. 5, 2009 – 10:53 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Alarm
Report: Fire alarm going off
13. Nov. 25, 2007 – 12:40 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Disturbance
Report: “Ex roommate is letting people that [Zimmerman] don’t like in the” house
12. Nov. 25, 2007 – 12:21 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: White male ex-roommate last seen wearing a red Florida State University shirt
11. Oct. 14, 2007 – 4:10 p.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Possible criminal mischief to the tire of Zimmerman’s black Dodge Durango
10. June 24, 2007 – 12:48 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: “By the pool”, two Hispanic males and one white male with “slim jim”
9. Nov. 4, 2006 – 2:37 a.m.
Type: TEL
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: A call regarding a “late model red” Toyota pickup “driving around the neighborhood and apt complex for the past 5 min”
8. Sept. 23, 2005 – 7:03 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Zimmerman’s “little sister just call him from above” his address and advises “there was a” suspicious person “at the front door”
7. Sept. 21, 2005 – 9:00 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Animals
Report: Reports a stray dog
6. April 27, 2005 – 12:40 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Neighbor
Report: Open garage door
5. March 17, 2005 – 7:21 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Maintenance
Report: Pothole “that is blocking the road”
4. Oct. 20, 2004 – 9:13 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Disturbance
Report: Drunk pedestrian walking in the road
3. Aug. 20, 2004 – 11:33 p.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Neighbor
Report: Reports an open garage door
2. Aug.12, 2004 – 10:03 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Repeats earlier report
1. Aug. 12, 2004 – 9:59 a.m.
Type: 911
Subject: Suspicious activity
Report: Places a call reporting a male in a green Ford pickup![]()
More or less obtuse than the people who keep claiming the police ordered Zimmerman not to follow him?People keep repeating this and I have to say it's truly annoying. It reminds me of Bill Clinton discussing the definition of "is". Look, by now we've all heard the 911 tape. What was said to Zimmerman was pretty firm. They didn't want him to pursue Martin. If you don't get this, you're being deliberately obtuse.They said they "didn't need him" to follow.. The didn't say "don't follow" or "we advise against that"[
Where have you been, Christo? I missed you in this thread! And don't tell me you were busy working or anything. Priorities, dude!More or less obtuse than the people who keep claiming the police ordered Zimmerman not to follow him?People keep repeating this and I have to say it's truly annoying. It reminds me of Bill Clinton discussing the definition of "is". Look, by now we've all heard the 911 tape. What was said to Zimmerman was pretty firm. They didn't want him to pursue Martin. If you don't get this, you're being deliberately obtuse.They said they "didn't need him" to follow.. The didn't say "don't follow" or "we advise against that"[
Which part is a lie?This is a lie...The Detective who questioned him at the station didn't believe Zimmerman's story, and wanted to charge him, but the DA wouldn't let him. This is the same DA that was involved in a cover up involving the previous Police Chiefs son, where the son beat up a homeless black man. Son was never charged until a video of the assault went viral.I don't think I've read the last 500 posts or so. Any forensics updates? Any new news? I saw the police chief said he didn't buy Zimmerman's story or whatever.
YOU LIE!Which part is a lie?This is a lie...The Detective who questioned him at the station didn't believe Zimmerman's story, and wanted to charge him, but the DA wouldn't let him. This is the same DA that was involved in a cover up involving the previous Police Chiefs son, where the son beat up a homeless black man. Son was never charged until a video of the assault went viral.I don't think I've read the last 500 posts or so. Any forensics updates? Any new news? I saw the police chief said he didn't buy Zimmerman's story or whatever.
That part was deemed irrelevant by the Zimmerman defenders who subsequently went on to make as big a deal about Martin's school suspension as possible.
Ahhh got itThat part was deemed irrelevant by the Zimmerman defenders who subsequently went on to make as big a deal about Martin's school suspension as possible.
It still hasn't been established that Zimmerman was the aggressor.782.07 Manslaughter; aggravated manslaughter of an elderly person or disabled adult; aggravated manslaughter of a child; aggravated manslaughter of an officer, a firefighter, an emergency medical technician, or a paramedic.—(1) The killing of a human being by the act, procurement, or culpable negligence of another, without lawful justification according to the provisions of chapter 776 and in cases in which such killing shall not be excusable homicide or murder, according to the provisions of this chapter, is manslaughter, a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.776.041 Use of force by aggressor.—The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who:Here are Florida's applicable statutes.http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/Chapter782What state is this law from?After my thorough legal review of this case (my lunch break). I am charging Zimmerman with culpable negligence (negligent homicide).
Culpable Negligence: Failure to exercise that degree of care rendered appropriate by the particular circumstances, and which a man of ordinary prudence in the same situation and with equal experience would not have omitted.
Homicide: The killing of one human being by the act, procurement, or omission of another. A person is quilty of criminal homicide if he purposley, knowingly, recklessly, or neglegently causes the death of another human being.Criminal homicide is murder, manslaughter or negligent homicide.
I understand he is supposedly protected by the "stand your ground rule". But IMLO, when he left his vehicle and pursued Martin he set into motion the events that led to Martins death, and in fact acted with negligence. If not for his negligence the death of Martin would not have happened.
I rest my case.
Disclaimer: I am a Lunch Time Attorney Only.
(1) Is attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of, a forcible felony; or
(2) Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:
(a) Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm and that he or she has exhausted every reasonable means to escape such danger other than the use of force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm to the assailant; or
(b) In good faith, the person withdraws from physical contact with the assailant and indicates clearly to the assailant that he or she desires to withdraw and terminate the use of force, but the assailant continues or resumes the use of force.
I still make the arrest based on the reasons I stated earlier and let it be tried in court.
Alright, alrightthats almost 12 pages of pure ChristoWho posted in: Florida boy killed by Neighborhood WatchMember name PostsChristo 584![]()
Your a liar Timmy, you KNOW I am pro-choice, agnostic, anti-war and couldn't care less about your sexual proclivities... Are these the "extremist conservative" values of which you speak???The "positions" I am "cherry picking" are statements from witnesses that were there and the "leaked" police reports and in addition the statements of people that know Zimmerman the best...WTH are you basing your judgements on, please tell me...I have no idea what happened that night. I've written over and over again that it seems, based on the slim evidence presented, like Zimmerman is certainly guilty of a crime, but it will be very difficult to prove, and that based on what I know I would be forced to acquit. In this thread there are a lot of thoughtful people- people trying to be fair, to do the right thing, to provide good commentary. I disagree strongly with some of the comments made by Carolina Hustler and renesauz, to cite two examples, but I very much appreciate their integrity: I believe that they are honestly attempting to give a reasonable judgment about a complicated situation.But you on the other hand- there's no nice way to say this, BoneYard Dog, but your posts are simply pathetic. On this issue, just like every issue, you begin by looking for whichever position happens to match you extremist conservative point of view, and that is the position you adopt. Then you go cherrypicking "facts" which will support your point of view. It's incredibly predictable, because you have done the same thing in every thread you have ever entered. You provide nothing new, and nothing interesting. I could write all of your posts. If I were you I would stay away from posting until I could figure out a way to contribute something of value.Again read the thread through and try not to ignore the witness statements and police "leaks"...You can wish plead and hope to your hearts content but the facts will come out...You may also feel free to address the questions addressed in a previous post to knuckle dude...You have a closed and one sided mind based on air, but that is the way you roll, always...Well, now that Bone Yard Dog has solved the case, we can shut down the thread.
None of it.Which part is a lie?This is a lie...The Detective who questioned him at the station didn't believe Zimmerman's story, and wanted to charge him, but the DA wouldn't let him. This is the same DA that was involved in a cover up involving the previous Police Chiefs son, where the son beat up a homeless black man. Son was never charged until a video of the assault went viral.I don't think I've read the last 500 posts or so. Any forensics updates? Any new news? I saw the police chief said he didn't buy Zimmerman's story or whatever.
Hell, I worked through lunch.Where have you been, Christo? I missed you in this thread! And don't tell me you were busy working or anything. Priorities, dude!More or less obtuse than the people who keep claiming the police ordered Zimmerman not to follow him?People keep repeating this and I have to say it's truly annoying. It reminds me of Bill Clinton discussing the definition of "is". Look, by now we've all heard the 911 tape. What was said to Zimmerman was pretty firm. They didn't want him to pursue Martin. If you don't get this, you're being deliberately obtuse.They said they "didn't need him" to follow.. The didn't say "don't follow" or "we advise against that"[
His dad's a Jew. It was either go into the law or become a dentist.I didn't realize Zimmerman's dad was a retired judge.
Undoubtedly.So basically they're looking at what other cops have done numerous times in the past, saying a high percentage of cops perform cover-ups, so the cops in the present case must also be performing a cover-up. That sounds like people would be profiling the present cops based on the actions of other cops. Aren't we not supposed to use "you belong to a group" logic to profile? Shouldn't Bobby Rush be speaking out against this profiling?I believe a lot of people are going to distrust anything the police says, and assume that its all lies and cover ups.
“According to a records search on George, he was previously arrested for domestic violence, resisting an officer without violence and most shockingly, resisting an officer with violence — a felony charge that surely could have landed him in prison,” Danielle Canada, who looked at Zimmerman’s record, writes on RollingOut.com.“All three of those arrests, however, were mysteriously closed with no semblance of charges for the Florida resident.”It all makes sense now.I didn't realize Zimmerman's dad was a retired judge.
LIES LIES LIESThe Martin family lawyer is on TV right now pointing out that according to the first police report there were no injuries listed to Zimmerman. Only in the second report did these injuries show up, which makes him skeptical. I bring this up to point out a phenomenon similar to the OJ Simpson case: I believe a lot of people are going to distrust anything the police says, and assume that its all lies and cover ups.
-boneyarddogThe Martin family lawyer is on TV right now pointing out that according to the first police report there were no injuries listed to Zimmerman. Only in the second report did these injuries show up, which makes him skeptical
Is there a 2nd 13 year old witness or is this the same kid that was out walking his dog?The 13 year old witness, whom BoneYardDog and others have claimed supports Zimmerman's story, has told his mother very clearly that the cries for help were from Trayvon Martin, not Zimmerman. He also says that there was no struggle that he saw. He does not believe that this was a case of self defense. I wonder if he's lying....or if the mother's lying....
Probably written by the lead investigator who stated he did not believe Zimmerman. It is not surprising he may have not reported the injuries because he appears biased against Zimmerman.The Martin family lawyer is on TV right now pointing out that according to the first police report there were no injuries listed to Zimmerman. Only in the second report did these injuries show up, which makes him skeptical![]()
There are links to at least two interviews in this thread he gave and he was nowhere near clear about that.The 13 year old witness, whom BoneYardDog and others have claimed supports Zimmerman's story, has told his mother very clearly that the cries for help were from Trayvon Martin, not Zimmerman. He also says that there was no struggle that he saw. He does not believe that this was a case of self defense. I wonder if he's lying....or if the mother's lying....
OR....Probably written by the lead investigator who stated he did not believe Zimmerman. It is not surprising he may have not reported the injuries because he appears biased against Zimmerman.The Martin family lawyer is on TV right now pointing out that according to the first police report there were no injuries listed to Zimmerman. Only in the second report did these injuries show up, which makes him skeptical![]()
Same kid.Is there a 2nd 13 year old witness or is this the same kid that was out walking his dog?The 13 year old witness, whom BoneYardDog and others have claimed supports Zimmerman's story, has told his mother very clearly that the cries for help were from Trayvon Martin, not Zimmerman. He also says that there was no struggle that he saw. He does not believe that this was a case of self defense. I wonder if he's lying....or if the mother's lying....
Kid walking his dog. Said he thought it was Martin crying out and that the two were laying on the ground separated right before the shot.Is there a 2nd 13 year old witness or is this the same kid that was out walking his dog?The 13 year old witness, whom BoneYardDog and others have claimed supports Zimmerman's story, has told his mother very clearly that the cries for help were from Trayvon Martin, not Zimmerman. He also says that there was no struggle that he saw. He does not believe that this was a case of self defense. I wonder if he's lying....or if the mother's lying....
The kid told reporters that the guy on the ground was wearing red.I think Mom is trying to get her 15 minutes here.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".
![]()
As I stated many times, the lead investigator appears very biased. I think it is inappropriate for an investigator to make such statements. He is playing judge and juror. He should be gathering facts and keeping his opinions to himself.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".
![]()
OR...The kid told reporters that the guy on the ground was wearing red.I think Mom is trying to get her 15 minutes here.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".
![]()
Just telling you what the mom says on TV. She seemed pretty firm about it. She implied that all of the police officers outside of the chief investigator who intereviewed her son deliberately tried to mislead him and frame his testimony in a certain way. And that the chief investigator told her that there was stereotyping going on and to "read between the lines."There are links to at least two interviews in this thread he gave and he was nowhere near clear about that.The 13 year old witness, whom BoneYardDog and others have claimed supports Zimmerman's story, has told his mother very clearly that the cries for help were from Trayvon Martin, not Zimmerman. He also says that there was no struggle that he saw. He does not believe that this was a case of self defense. I wonder if he's lying....or if the mother's lying....
Do you have a link to this? Are you sure the kid spoke directly to reporters? Or did they get that from the police report?The kid told reporters that the guy on the ground was wearing red.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.![]()
The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".![]()
I think Mom is trying to get her 15 minutes here.
Ya...he should be leading the witnesses and ignoring any statements that may incriminate zimmerman, Like the other cops on the scene were doing. Damn lone wolf cops can screw up badly done investigation like nobodies business hahaAs I stated many times, the lead investigator appears very biased. I think it is inappropriate for an investigator to make such statements. He is playing judge and juror. He should be gathering facts and keeping his opinions to himself.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".
![]()
It's in here. I'm not looking for it. It was an interview he gave a reporter and both of them went to the spot where the fight occurred.Do you have a link to this? Are you sure the kid spoke directly to reporters? Or did they get that from the police report?The kid told reporters that the guy on the ground was wearing red.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.![]()
The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".![]()
I think Mom is trying to get her 15 minutes here.
How far away from the fight was he? I remember in the interview he said it was dark out because of no moon and the rain. I got the impression he wouldn't have been able to make out what people were wearing.It's in here. I'm not looking for it. It was an interview he gave a reporter and both of them went to the spot where the fight occurred.Do you have a link to this? Are you sure the kid spoke directly to reporters? Or did they get that from the police report?The kid told reporters that the guy on the ground was wearing red.The mom of the 13 year old is on TV right now and is also saying that when the cops interviewed son, they asked a bunch of leading questions- such as asking what color shirt was the person on the ground, suggesting different colors (like red???) even though it was too dark for the kid to see.![]()
The lead investigator told the mother, "This is absolutely not self defense. There's been some stereotyping going on here. Read between the lines".![]()
I think Mom is trying to get her 15 minutes here.