comfortably numb
Footballguy
My questions is, Why don't people factor in playoffs when they are "concerened" about too many carries for player X?
LJ had 416 & 41 rec
post season 13 & 5
Grand total of 475
LT 348 & 56
post season 23 & 2
Grand total of 429
So lets say LT made it to the super bowl, would anyone be mentioning he had almost 500 touches, and the he could be at a higher risk for an injury?
These guys are both 27 years old, one could argue LJ is "fresher" due to not starting his 1st 2 years.
The top 4 in carries this year
LJ 416
LT 348
SJ 346
Rudi 341
LJ is the main person who gets a ??? for next year based on all the carries he got, but if any of the these other guys made it into the Superbowl, and lets give them 20 carries a game.
thats 60 extra carries, that puts them all over 400. Yet I don't think anyone would mention that in regards to being at a higher risk for injury the following season.
Is all this injury concern unwarrented, or just cautious comparisons due to Jamal Anderson???
LJ had 416 & 41 rec
post season 13 & 5
Grand total of 475
LT 348 & 56
post season 23 & 2
Grand total of 429
So lets say LT made it to the super bowl, would anyone be mentioning he had almost 500 touches, and the he could be at a higher risk for an injury?
These guys are both 27 years old, one could argue LJ is "fresher" due to not starting his 1st 2 years.
The top 4 in carries this year
LJ 416
LT 348
SJ 346
Rudi 341
LJ is the main person who gets a ??? for next year based on all the carries he got, but if any of the these other guys made it into the Superbowl, and lets give them 20 carries a game.
thats 60 extra carries, that puts them all over 400. Yet I don't think anyone would mention that in regards to being at a higher risk for injury the following season.
Is all this injury concern unwarrented, or just cautious comparisons due to Jamal Anderson???
Last edited by a moderator: