What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Free Market Tops Govt Cartels - Case Study: Uber (1 Viewer)

Jack White

Footballguy
Government Cartels Lose to The Free Market

John Keller

Big Time. Uber is the free market’s answer to the government cartelized and protected taxi service. I travel a lot for work, and hated taking taxis for a few reasons. First, if you ever need to take a taxi to the airport for an early morning flight talking to the taxi dispatcher the night before is hit or miss. The cab shows up within 5 minutes of the appointed time about half of the time. Same thing if you’re trying to hail a cab – “did they see me?” Uber solves this problem with an app that shows your driver’s position on the map and an ETA.

Second problem with the cabbie cartel is the cab line’s iron clad protection of every rattletrap, stinking, beater cab ever made. Grocery stores let you choose from the entire produce bin, but you can’t pick a nicely maintained cab? Madness! This is a major way the cartel attempts to provide above market returns for members, by protecting shoddy service. Uber solves this and many other problems with a 5-star rating system. Drivers who are impolite or drive dangerously, cars that smell like wet dog are downrated, and no longer eligible to be Uber drivers. It works both ways, too – riders are rated by drivers so everyone is on the most polite behavior.

The third problem with a cab is paying and getting out-sitting there as the driver pretends the credit card reader isn’t working today so they can get your cash, writing on a slip of paper the size of something from The Shawshank Redemption, and fumbling with credit cards, wallet, laptop case, luggage as you get out. Uber takes care of all of this at registration. Put your credit card in one time only when you get the app and thank the driver as you exit.

This is what entrepreneurs do-systematically analyze human wants and needs to create something better. In this case, Uber is so far superior to cabs that they’ve massively grown this established market. In San Francisco, the Uber experience has people taking Uber cabs in droves. Yes, they’ve cannibalized the taxi market, but they’ve quadrupled the size of the overall market from $140MM for cabs to $640MM for cabs and Uber. Taxi drivers are hanging up their (overpriced) medallions and driving for themselves via Uber. Mention that the next time some statist tells you the free market is good for some things, but needs regulation and the government must provide services like “defense” and “law enforcement”.

Follow me on Twitter: @johnakeller
Next Up: The 3 Most Important Words in Business, Relationships and Life
 
Democrats Vs. Uber, 'The Sharing Economy' and 4% Growth


While the car service app Uber Technologies faces continued government roadblocks to doing business around the world, Democratic candidates for President like Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders have spoken out forcefully against Uber, insisting that the company should be further regulated, ignoring the possible consequences of higher fares for users of the Uber app and the ease of doing business for Uber drivers should such regulations become enacted. The primary contention drawn by Democrats is that Uber drivers are legally classified by as independent contractors, a status under which they are exempt from most state and federal labor laws, as opposed to being classified as employees.

In an interview with Bloomberg News, Bernie Sanders said he has “serious problems” with Uber because it’s “unregulated.” Martin O’Malley further proposes to create an entirely new safety net specifically for Uber drivers and other members of the sharing economy.

In Hillary Clinton’s recently unveiled economic plan, she heavily criticized Uber and the sharing economy as a major contributor to the rise in income inequality arguing it creates independent contractors, such as Uber drivers, who do not receive government mandated employee benefits.

...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonhartley/2015/08/09/democrats-vs-uber-and-the-sharing-economy/#6fb336832897

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Capitalism, individual enterprise vrs. government run business  is almost always a win for capitalism and the consumer.    I guess you can nit pick here & there to refute, but it is a fact.

Sorry semi socialists, including Hillary, Bernie & Barack.

 
Capitalism, individual enterprise vrs. government run business  is almost always a win for capitalism and the consumer.    I guess you can nit pick here & there to refute, but it is a fact.

Sorry semi socialists, including Hillary, Bernie & Barack.




Government run or government regulated?  Before the government regulated a lot of businesses, it definitely was not a win for the consumer (the food industry especially).

I agree governments are lousy at running businesses, because it isn't their money they are spending/saving.  

 
Need to look at it for sure - it's ruining some places - New Orleans being one of them.
I have friends in Bywater, they say this but it's because of the absentee quality of the owners and the constant rotation of tourist types that come in, they claim it's ruined things.

So I get that, but that's a matter of personal preference. Is there a real problem here that Congress should be looking at? People who like to travel love it.

 
Capitalism, individual enterprise vrs. government run business  is almost always a win for capitalism and the consumer.    I guess you can nit pick here & there to refute, but it is a fact.

Sorry semi socialists, including Hillary, Bernie & Barack.
Hillary and Obama socialists :lol:

 
Let's not pretend Uber isn't without its warts as well.  

- no refunds - only credit

- crazy "market rate" suprise prices (low cost to initial destination ...5x plus or more to get home/back) 

 
Lyft, not Uber, introduced ride sharing.

In NYC, I've maybe twice in hundreds of times had a cabbie not show up for an appointed pickup.  Cabs I've been in are rather well maintained and clean on the whole.  I could give a #### if the driver is rude - infact, I'd rather they be silent.  Credit card readers are in the back with the passengers and pose zero problems.

Both companies have serious problems in driver retention, largely because the pay sucks and there are no benefits.  The savings passengers see come directly from the drivers, with a good part of every transaction going to help support Uber's 66B and Lyft's 5.5B valuations.  Background checks, registration, inspection and insurance are also significant issues.  

So yes, the free market has given everyone generally cheaper options, but this has other costs.  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top