I'd think it would have to be the latter. Given that the royal coffers are empty and wildly in debt with the bank in the first place, I'm not sure how a broke Stannis would be any more able to repay them after taking the kingdom than the current regime which at least has a rich family backing them up.my thought as well. thinking of a deal where the iron bank finances their army to get repaid with a hefty sum once stannis is king both on that debt and the lannister debt. or maybe more of an "equity play" where the iron bank gets a piece of the kingdom as repayment.Nah, I think it is all about finding financial backing for Stanis. Not so much maybe a loan as maybe positioning Stanis as the past due collector. Remember the comments last episode from Queen of Thorns to Tywin about fearing the Iron Bank? If all was well between Tywin and the Iron Bank then why would there be any fear of them? Also- it would be one heck of a bank robbery to cross the sea, go into a foreign city, rob the bank, haul a significant sum of gold (heavy) out and back across the sea.... seems highly doubtful to me.I'd have to imagine Davos is planning on robbing the bank. All the talk about smuggler vs. pirate just fits too well.
Also I don't think he would need a little girl to remind him to use a bank. "Hmmm....I need money but don't know where to get it. What's that you say? You can get a loan from a bank when you need cash? I'd never thought of that!".
Yeah, this makes a lot of sense except there was nothing at all alluded to about an land payoff. What is the price per acre in westeros these days anyways?I'd think it would have to be the latter. Given that the royal coffers are empty and wildly in debt with the bank in the first place, I'm not sure how a broke Stannis would be any more able to repay them after taking the kingdom than the current regime which at least has a rich family backing them up.my thought as well. thinking of a deal where the iron bank finances their army to get repaid with a hefty sum once stannis is king both on that debt and the lannister debt. or maybe more of an "equity play" where the iron bank gets a piece of the kingdom as repayment.Nah, I think it is all about finding financial backing for Stanis. Not so much maybe a loan as maybe positioning Stanis as the past due collector. Remember the comments last episode from Queen of Thorns to Tywin about fearing the Iron Bank? If all was well between Tywin and the Iron Bank then why would there be any fear of them? Also- it would be one heck of a bank robbery to cross the sea, go into a foreign city, rob the bank, haul a significant sum of gold (heavy) out and back across the sea.... seems highly doubtful to me.I'd have to imagine Davos is planning on robbing the bank. All the talk about smuggler vs. pirate just fits too well.
Also I don't think he would need a little girl to remind him to use a bank. "Hmmm....I need money but don't know where to get it. What's that you say? You can get a loan from a bank when you need cash? I'd never thought of that!".
Blouses cry about everything.Serious question here. Since the internets have made a huge deal about the Jaime rape scene I have to ask why it's even a big deal? Why is "tv" or "movie" rape more horrifying than dismembered limbs and infants getting murdered? This world that the show is based on is seriously messed up in every sense, why are people upset that someone involved in an incestuous relationship would not take no for an answer?
Maybe because it was done right in front of their recently dead child's body? That to me was more twisted than any questions of rape.Serious question here. Since the internets have made a huge deal about the Jaime rape scene I have to ask why it's even a big deal? Why is "tv" or "movie" rape more horrifying than dismembered limbs and infants getting murdered? This world that the show is based on is seriously messed up in every sense, why are people upset that someone involved in an incestuous relationship would not take no for an answer?
Also not a rape if you yell "SURPRISE!" at the end.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
GTFO - leave this thread immediately. Now.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
It was dumb for the director to say that, whether he thought it to be or not. Should have taken the safe road and just said something like: sorry if if came off that way. it was not what we intended to depict, we realize now what difference a couple seconds or a couple words might have made, blah, blah. Especially with a hot button topic like this to begin with.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
He has a difficult time taking no for an answer.Yikes, somebody must've pissed in Sinn's Cheerios this morning.
I agree that it has more to do with who Jamie is, or more accurately who he has become, in the viewers eyes. I don't get the outrage. Yeah, it was a crazy scene but just one of many on the show.It was dumb for the director to say that, whether he thought it to be or not. Should have taken the safe road and just said something like: sorry if if came off that way. it was not what we intended to depict, we realize now what difference a couple seconds or a couple words might have made, blah, blah. Especially with a hot button topic like this to begin with.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
That said, the reason I roll my eyes a little at the outrage of the scene is because a lot of the articles that came out seemed like they were written before Sunday since a lot of critics get screeners (I have heard a couple say they had the first 3 episodes in advance) or at least were written before the director's comments came out. If that is the case I think a lot of it has to do with it being a character that we started to like and less to do with what was shown. I really don't think this would have been as big an issue in season one, or if it was a character like Ramsay. So it's not about the act, it's about who did it. Sure, Jamie has toned down since his hand got cut off and he is on the road and more helpless, but this is also a character who's moral compass allowed him to coldly push a child out a window and strangle his cousin not too long ago. Maybe being in King's Landing around his lovely family is messing with him a little too.
and people want explanations from the writers of that episode as if they are entitled to them. I seriously don't understand the uproar. Jaime is not the hero we all believed he transformed into over the last year, he is a baby pushing kingslayer, he is prone to the rape too! In this show, anything can go, the writers don't have to justify anythingI agree that it has more to do with who Jamie is, or more accurately who he has become, in the viewers eyes. I don't get the outrage. Yeah, it was a crazy scene but just one of many on the show.It was dumb for the director to say that, whether he thought it to be or not. Should have taken the safe road and just said something like: sorry if if came off that way. it was not what we intended to depict, we realize now what difference a couple seconds or a couple words might have made, blah, blah. Especially with a hot button topic like this to begin with.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
That said, the reason I roll my eyes a little at the outrage of the scene is because a lot of the articles that came out seemed like they were written before Sunday since a lot of critics get screeners (I have heard a couple say they had the first 3 episodes in advance) or at least were written before the director's comments came out. If that is the case I think a lot of it has to do with it being a character that we started to like and less to do with what was shown. I really don't think this would have been as big an issue in season one, or if it was a character like Ramsay. So it's not about the act, it's about who did it. Sure, Jamie has toned down since his hand got cut off and he is on the road and more helpless, but this is also a character who's moral compass allowed him to coldly push a child out a window and strangle his cousin not too long ago. Maybe being in King's Landing around his lovely family is messing with him a little too.
lol. I've never read the books. If a discussion of how "the show's version of the non consensual incest over their dead child's body seemed a little more rapey than the books" is a spoiler, then take heart in the fact that I don't have any idea exactly HOW rapey it is in the books, or what the distinction is in the level of rapiness. If there's any consequences that might occur due to the kind of rapey incest over their dead child's body that wouldn't have occurred if it was a little more rapey, or vice versa, then I don't know about it, and don't have the capacity to distinguish between those rapiness levels necessary to spoil it. You may now go back to enjoying the canonical, show-only version of a mother saying no while her brother penetrated her over their freshly dead evil son with the weird creepy things in his eyes. Which is creepy as hell and by all accounts almost exactly identical to the book version except for a distinction made by people discussing what kind of rape it was.GTFO - leave this thread immediately. Now.There is no book.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
This is just a TV show, written by tv writers, based on their own thoughts and ideas. Any similarities to any real book is coincidental and unintentional - any attempt to interject ideas born outside the show itself are punishable by death (or castration, or rape, or stabbing in the stomach, if you happen to pregnant.)
Next time use a ####### spoiler tag at least, before you bring up even the notion of a supposed "book"
TIA, now GTFO. Seriously. Tired of this #### by the same people.
:reported:
The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
He was a member of the Kings Guard. They are sworn to protect the King until their own death. Killing the King is the most dishonorable thing that he could have done.Jamie gets a bad rap....and it's actually kind of cool that one of the Alpha Males of the realm (lots of money, good looking guy, supposedly(by his own words in the show) one of the top four fighters in the realm) really gets kind of #### on by Lords and commoners (when he's not around) for his role in the death of the Mad King.....despite it being the right decision.
Has anyone posted the original script for the scene yet?The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.![]()
Not sure how much can be answered without knowledge from those things with words, but I will answer #4. Renly was the 3rd brother - killed in Season 2 by the smoke thingy in the tent.Ok, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
Rules.Has anyone posted the original script for the scene yet?The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.![]()
[Parody, no spoiler alert necessary]
We know Dany was young when they fled. We also know that Cersei and Robert were married after the war, so add a couple of years onto however old you think Joffrey was, or take a few years off how old you think Dany is.Not sure how much can be answered without knowledge from those things with words, but I will answer #4. Renly was the 3rd brother - killed in Season 2 by the smoke thingy in the tent.Ok, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
Nicely played.Has anyone posted the original script for the scene yet?The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.![]()
[Parody, no spoiler alert necessary]
1. BookOk, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
No need for the spoiler in 3, I'm pretty sure in this most recent episode Tywin states Robert ruled for 17 years in his "what makes a good king" lesson at the beginning. So the king slaying was about 17 years prior to when the show started - which is like 18? 19? years prior to where they are now.1. BookOk, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
2. Yes
3.
In the book it looks like Robert ruled for about 15 years.
Yup, and then Jack and Sawyer spied on Kate (aka freckles) bathing in the lagoon.Crap, should I have put that in a spoiled tag for those who aren't caught up on Lost yet?Not sure how much can be answered without knowledge from those things with words, but I will answer #4. Renly was the 3rd brother - killed in Season 2 by the smoke thingy in the tent.Ok, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
As long as you haven't read Lost, you're OK.Yup, and then Jack and Sawyer spied on Kate (aka freckles) bathing in the lagoon.Crap, should I have put that in a spoiled tag for those who aren't caught up on Lost yet?Not sure how much can be answered without knowledge from those things with words, but I will answer #4. Renly was the 3rd brother - killed in Season 2 by the smoke thingy in the tent.Ok, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
That is friggin spectacular.Has anyone posted the original script for the scene yet?The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.![]()
[Parody, no spoiler alert necessary]
Ned sired Jon Snow while out fighting the war, so basically Jon's age.Ok, still some lingering questions from a TV-only viewer too afraid to google anything because of potential spoilers:
- What are all 7 of the Kingdoms?
- The cannibal guy, Egret's posse, the fat guy getting all his daughter's pregnant, and Osha are ALL wildlings/wildling "tribes"? And they all come from north of the wall (but some, like Osha, are living south of it.
- About how long ago did the Kingslayer slay the king (Dany's dad), when the show first began and Robert was on the throne?
- Stanis is Robert's brother, but wasn't there a third brother?
I really hope this is just board schtick. Otherwise, this is really dumb. It's not a spoiler to acknowledge there is source material call books. It's also very possible in reading information on the web to have picked up the #3 fact when reading about this scene and the controversy.GTFO - leave this thread immediately. Now.The issue isn't that they showed a rape. That happens in movies all the time. The issue is this combination of things:
1) Jaime forced himself on her and she said no, but he kept going, and eventually she seemed ok with it
2) The executives suggested that they didn't turn the scene into a rape
3) The scene in the book supposedly wasn't as clearly a rape, so the producers made a conscious decision
4) This suggests that the producers don't think it's a rape if she says no as long as she says yes later.
That's a really dangerous thought if you're a woman - if a woman says no, repeatedly, it's ok to have sex with her as long as she eventually changes her mind.
There is no book.
This is just a TV show, written by tv writers, based on their own thoughts and ideas. Any similarities to any real book is coincidental and unintentional - any attempt to interject ideas born outside the show itself are punishable by death (or castration, or rape, or stabbing in the stomach, if you happen to pregnant.)
Next time use a ####### spoiler tag at least, before you bring up even the notion of a supposed "book"
TIA, now GTFO. Seriously. Tired of this #### by the same people.
:reported:
Oh yeah? Well Joffrey is going to show you what to do with them!!There are, in fact, books.
I don't believe the TV show ever specifies the 7 kingdoms, but the Riverlands are specifically mentioned as not one of the 7 kingdoms (Robert talked about "making the eight" meaning having one girl from each kingdom + the Riverlands).1) 8 Kingdoms.....7 are united, 1 is affiliated. (Tywin talks about it last week). The North, The Westerlands,The Reach, The Riverland, The Iron Islands, The Vale and The Stormlands. Dorne the affiliated one.
Interesting....so what...is the Riverlands like "open territory"?I don't believe the TV show ever specifies the 7 kingdoms, but the Riverlands are specifically mentioned as not one of the 7 kingdoms (Robert talked about "making the eight" meaning having one girl from each kingdom + the Riverlands).1) 8 Kingdoms.....7 are united, 1 is affiliated. (Tywin talks about it last week). The North, The Westerlands,The Reach, The Riverland, The Iron Islands, The Vale and The Stormlands. Dorne the affiliated one.
Robert also talks about ruling as the King 7 Kingdoms. I believe the qoute is something like "One King, Seven Kingdoms- I can't rule them if the Lannisters and Starks are at each others throats" I never counted the Kingdoms but always assumed Dorne was one of them.I don't believe the TV show ever specifies the 7 kingdoms, but the Riverlands are specifically mentioned as not one of the 7 kingdoms (Robert talked about "making the eight" meaning having one girl from each kingdom + the Riverlands).1) 8 Kingdoms.....7 are united, 1 is affiliated. (Tywin talks about it last week). The North, The Westerlands,The Reach, The Riverland, The Iron Islands, The Vale and The Stormlands. Dorne the affiliated one.
even if they are backstory questions, only people with no knowledge of backstory are allowed to answer said questions.if you guys don't want backstory answers you shouldn't ask backstory questions.
I thought that the Iron Islands were either part of the North or part of Riverrun.....just on the map they look too small to be a legit kingdom.Robert also talks about ruling as the King 7 Kingdoms. I believe the qoute is something like "One King, Seven Kingdoms- I can't rule them if the Lannisters and Starks are at each others throats" I never counted the Kingdoms but always assumed Dorne was one of them.I don't believe the TV show ever specifies the 7 kingdoms, but the Riverlands are specifically mentioned as not one of the 7 kingdoms (Robert talked about "making the eight" meaning having one girl from each kingdom + the Riverlands).1) 8 Kingdoms.....7 are united, 1 is affiliated. (Tywin talks about it last week). The North, The Westerlands,The Reach, The Riverland, The Iron Islands, The Vale and The Stormlands. Dorne the affiliated one.![]()
In this thread, I interpret the question "what are the 7 kingdoms" as "based solely on what has been shown on TV, what do we know of the 7 kingdoms".if you guys don't want backstory answers you shouldn't ask backstory questions.