What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Game Thread W5 - New England V Denver (1 Viewer)

Agreed- it was a clean play by Dawkins, Welker wasn't down yet (he was on top of the Denver player).

Everyone in an IDP league who started Randy Moss has to love that play.

 
I got 3pts for Moss's INT. Hardly loving his performance so far though

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How's Welker looking? Sharp cuts? Any sign of the mystery injury?
We haven't seen a lot of the precision timing stuff out of him, most of Welker's receptions have been plays where he was just the 3rd option and Brady had so much time in the pocket that he eventually made it to Welker. He's looked fine outside of the minor injury, although it's hard to tell for sure since he's out of the frame 75% of the time.
 
Brady is still struggling a little bit with his accuracy. Other than his overthrow of Moss in the first half there haven't been any terrible balls, but he's been just a foot or two off on most of his passes.

 
Moreno's looking pretty solid. He's not making any spectacular plays, but he's been very consistent and reliable getting yardage. And, of course, as I start to type this he hobbles off the field. He looks fine on the sidelines (has his helmet back on already), but I'll keep you updated.

 
Denver holds three times in a span of four plays. The first two don't count because of offsetting penalties on New England. The third one sticks. Hopefully not a harbinger of things to come.

 
Great play by Gaffney stealing the ball from 3 New England defenders after a tip.

 
3rd and inches in the red zone. I say take a shot at the end zone and, if it fails, run a QB sneak.

 
New England knew that rush attempt was coming on 3rd down. You could clearly hear one of the defenders yelling "Moreno!".

Ugh, I hate the FG attempt here. QB Sneak! Come on! You can get field goals from anywhere, but you might not get a better shot at a TD.

 
What the hell happened to New England's offensive line? Someone needs to remind these guys that they suck at pass blocking.

Going for the TD on that last possession is looking smarter and smarter.

 
Finally Moss does something. Faked a lateral aswell lol. Reminded me of the Vikings days.
Ironically enough, that famous Hook-and-Ladder to Moe Williams came against Denver, too. Maybe it's something about playing the Broncos that makes Moss want to lateral.
 
Jabar Gaffney took his vertically striped socks and twisted them, resulting in spirally stripes. It would actually look pretty cool if the entire uniform wasn't so unbelievably garish.

 
Graham gets a lot of well-deserved credit for his incredible blocking prowess, but man oh man did he blow that one on 3rd and short. He motioned out wide of the guy he was supposed to block and then never even got a hand on him as the defender went unabated to make a tackle in the backfield.

 
Business as usual: Brady has plenty of time, no Denver defenders within 2 yards, and decides to overthrow Moss.

 
People are so busy complaining about how the NFL pampers QBs, but it turns out that punters are the real golden boys of the NFL, at least based on how eager the NFL is to protect them.

 
People are so busy complaining about how the NFL pampers QBs, but it turns out that punters are the real golden boys of the NFL, at least based on how eager the NFL is to protect them.
To play devils advocate:Two feet off the ground and one foot above their head, that is a pretty vulnerable position.
 
A flop like that shouldn't draw a penalty. If somebody runs into him and he can hold his balance or falls on accident, call it. But the moment he falls down on purpose in a ridiculous manner after barely being touched, it shouldn't be called.

 
A flop like that shouldn't draw a penalty. If somebody runs into him and he can hold his balance or falls on accident, call it. But the moment he falls down on purpose in a ridiculous manner after barely being touched, it shouldn't be called.
I am pretty sure touching him at all is a penalty, isn't it?
 
People are so busy complaining about how the NFL pampers QBs, but it turns out that punters are the real golden boys of the NFL, at least based on how eager the NFL is to protect them.
To play devils advocate:Two feet off the ground and one foot above their head, that is a pretty vulnerable position.
I've got no problem with protecting the punter. I have a problem with making touching the punter into a penalty. It's worse than with QBs- contact = penalty.
A flop like that shouldn't draw a penalty. If somebody runs into him and he can hold his balance or falls on accident, call it. But the moment he falls down on purpose in a ridiculous manner after barely being touched, it shouldn't be called.
I'd take it one further. I think that flopping should be an unsportsmanlike penalty on the punter. Yeah, it'd be a judgment call and it'd be hard to actually call, but just give the punter something to think about before deciding whether or not to audition for the Oscars.
 
A flop like that shouldn't draw a penalty. If somebody runs into him and he can hold his balance or falls on accident, call it. But the moment he falls down on purpose in a ridiculous manner after barely being touched, it shouldn't be called.
I am pretty sure touching him at all is a penalty, isn't it?
No, touching the punter is not a real penalty (New England touched Denver's punter on his last punt, he just declined to flop). In practice, though, like 90% of the time when you touch the punter it's going to be a penalty.
 
A flop like that shouldn't draw a penalty. If somebody runs into him and he can hold his balance or falls on accident, call it. But the moment he falls down on purpose in a ridiculous manner after barely being touched, it shouldn't be called.
I am pretty sure touching him at all is a penalty, isn't it?
No, touching the punter is not a real penalty (New England touched Denver's punter on his last punt, he just declined to flop). In practice, though, like 90% of the time when you touch the punter it's going to be a penalty.
What is the definition of "running into the kicker"?
 
Not only does Denver's defense force another punt only to have the special teams blow it, but I'd like to take special masochistic pride to point out that the player that blew it was the reserve blocking TE that Denver wasted a mind-boggling 2nd round pick on.

 
Still no pressure on Brady at all. Have they even knocked him down once?

Fortunately he's been off target all day, or this game would be a laugher.

 
Denver better hold New England to fewer than 3 yards on 3rd and 8 so that the special teams has two chances to field the punt without accumulating a 5-yard penalty.

 
Still no pressure on Brady at all. Have they even knocked him down once?Fortunately he's been off target all day, or this game would be a laugher.
Andre Davis and D.J. Williams both managed to get a hit on Brady in the first half on blitzes. I think that's about it so far.
 
The Bronocss special teams may very well have just cost them a chance to tie the game with those stupid penalties. They went from getting the ball around midfield to starting from their own 2.

 
A flop like that shouldn't draw a penalty. If somebody runs into him and he can hold his balance or falls on accident, call it. But the moment he falls down on purpose in a ridiculous manner after barely being touched, it shouldn't be called.
I am pretty sure touching him at all is a penalty, isn't it?
No, touching the punter is not a real penalty (New England touched Denver's punter on his last punt, he just declined to flop). In practice, though, like 90% of the time when you touch the punter it's going to be a penalty.
What is the definition of "running into the kicker"?
Running Article 6 No defensive player may run into or rough a kicker who kicks from behind his lineInto Kicker unless such contact:

(a) is incidental to and after he has touched the kick in flight;

(b) is caused by the kicker’s own motions;

© occurs during a quick kick;

(d) occurs during a kick or after a run behind the line;

(e) occurs after the kicker recovers a loose ball on the ground; or

(f) is caused because a defender is blocked into the kicker.

Looks like a judgement call but any touching of the kicker could be called so long as none of these conditions apply, which was the case on the penalty.

 
Running Article 6 No defensive player may run into or rough a kicker who kicks from behind his line

Into Kicker unless such contact:

(a) is incidental to and after he has touched the kick in flight;

(b) is caused by the kicker’s own motions;

© occurs during a quick kick;

(d) occurs during a kick or after a run behind the line;

(e) occurs after the kicker recovers a loose ball on the ground; or

(f) is caused because a defender is blocked into the kicker.

Looks like a judgement call but any touching of the kicker could be called so long as none of these conditions apply, which was the case on the penalty.
That contact was absolutely incidental.
 
Running Article 6 No defensive player may run into or rough a kicker who kicks from behind his line

Into Kicker unless such contact:

(a) is incidental to and after he has touched the kick in flight;

(b) is caused by the kicker’s own motions;

© occurs during a quick kick;

(d) occurs during a kick or after a run behind the line;

(e) occurs after the kicker recovers a loose ball on the ground; or

(f) is caused because a defender is blocked into the kicker.

Looks like a judgement call but any touching of the kicker could be called so long as none of these conditions apply, which was the case on the penalty.
That contact was absolutely incidental.
You have to touch the ball first for that condition to apply. Note the word "and".
 
First time watching the Broncos play this year and I am pretty impressed with the play of Orton. Having seen him a bit in Chicago he looks to have matured quite a bit. Maybe it's just this game, but he looks pretty good to me.

 
You have to touch the ball first for that condition to apply. Note the word "and".
Ah, I read that as after the KICKER had touched the ball, not the defender. Either way, it's ludicrous. Everyone who watched that play knows that the Broncos player was doing his best to avoid the kicker, barely brushed the kicker, and the kicker flopped egregiously. If the rulebook says that's a penalty, the rulebook needs to be changed.Welcome back Eddie Royal and Brandon Marshall. To paraphrase a very wise scholar of the game... you are who we thought you were. You are who we thought you were!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top