This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Smelly
well, there certainly hasn't been any info yet to suggest that. I understand that due to D-Mac last season, people are going to be quick to throw that term around. The information released has said it's to the ball of his foot which would be different than a lis franc injury.I'm gonna go ahead and say it...lisfranc.
Can't tell where he would have hurt it when looking at the replay.I'm gonna go ahead and say it...lisfranc.
Incorrect.....the injury is the top of the foot...mid-foot to be precise..Suffered when d-back came down on his heal while toe area was planted...Thats Lis Franc territory.well, there certainly hasn't been any info yet to suggest that. I understand that due to D-Mac last season, people are going to be quick to throw that term around. The information released has said it's to the ball of his foot which would be different than a lis franc injury.I'm gonna go ahead and say it...lisfranc.
So it's a reverse lis franc possibly.Incorrect.....the injury is the top of the foot...mid-foot to be precise..Suffered when d-back came down on his heal while toe area was planted...Thats Lis Franc territory.well, there certainly hasn't been any info yet to suggest that. I understand that due to D-Mac last season, people are going to be quick to throw that term around. The information released has said it's to the ball of his foot which would be different than a lis franc injury.I'm gonna go ahead and say it...lisfranc.
apparently there is conflicting information out there then whether intentional or not.from Shanahan, 5 days ago....Incorrect.....the injury is the top of the foot...mid-foot to be precise..Suffered when d-back came down on his heal while toe area was planted...well, there certainly hasn't been any info yet to suggest that. I understand that due to D-Mac last season, people are going to be quick to throw that term around. The information released has said it's to the ball of his foot which would be different than a lis franc injury.I'm gonna go ahead and say it...lisfranc.
Thats Lis Franc territory.
Shame:
All lisfranc injuries are dreaded, some may be worse then others but make no mistake, they are highly dreaded by all.
How do you know he hasn't?
Like someone else mentioned it's a lot like the McFadden injury, Bradshaws foot, or AJs knee last season...LJs lisfranc, Matt Schaub, Ronnie Brown, etc...each missed time and every week it was a question whether or not the guy would play..and every week you would hear them say one more week..last year was particularly painful with AJ...once you get someone with an injury where you are not hearing a lot of information from the team, you can bet it's serious, lingering, and potentially season ending..I'd probably jump ship with regards to Garçon..I'm gonna go ahead and say it...lisfranc.
Yea I'm in the same boat. Except I lost Jennings, Garcon, and Maclin on the same team. Next up, McCluster!Jennings for me probably out again, now Garcon one more time, insert Mr. Britt.I love weeks like these.
Yeah, I don't get it, what is up with all these receivers getting hurt this earlyin the season. I am expecting AJ to be next and probably this weekend.'meyerj31 said:Yea I'm in the same boat. Except I lost Jennings, Garcon, and Maclin on the same team. Next up, McCluster!'Fubared said:Jennings for me probably out again, now Garcon one more time, insert Mr. Britt.I love weeks like these.
Very much so.... I have him everywhere this year. I know I'd have a slew of additional wins if he had remained healthy. With that offensive scheme for his "X" role he was primed for a monster year. At this point I just hope he gets healthy, even if it means sitting another week or two.
His value is about zero, reading this board and rotoworld's board everyone seems to believe he has suffered a lisfranc injury except very few hopeful owners. I just don't understand why if it is a lisfranc injury the team don't shut there $45m player like it was previously asked. Instead, garçon is running, practicing and running route trees in practice... Makes no sense. But who knows..
My understanding is that an injury in the Lisfranc area can either be either a dislocation or a sprain. The dislocation is usually immediately diagnosed, and requires surgery or at least a cast (this I believe is what Schaub had). The mid-foot sprain (which incidentally could be described as "like turf toe but not in the toe"), is not so easily diagnosed, and can sometimes get better relatively quickly, but also can get worse, leading to a situation where the damaged ligament has to be surgically repaired. If Garcon had the latter type of Lisfranc injury, then the team's actions make sense.
