Yep, and probably refers more to the defense getting more tired than they do and not necessarily that they actually get better and stronger.For me it refers to a player whose play improves with additional carries/touches/snaps, and doesn't let the physical pounding of the game materially impair their performance in the later stages of a contest. Usually I think of RBs in those terms, and most specifically backs who maintain, or improve, their yards per rush in either the 4th quarter or after their 15th and 20th carries.
Yep, and probably refers more to the defense getting more tired than they do and not necessarily that they actually get better and stronger.
agreed, they don't wear down as fast as the opposition.Yep, and probably refers more to the defense getting more tired than they do and not necessarily that they actually get better and stronger.![]()
Emmitt Smith, Jerome Bettis, Terrell Davis, Priest Holmes, Edgerrin James are the types I think of when this term comes up. People have tried to use the term with Brandon Jacobs, but he doesn't take over games in the 4th quarter when the defense is tired, like the phrase implies.
It helps if the player's back is against the wall. Taking it one play at a time is also a MUST!'Carolina Hustler said:agreed, they don't wear down as fast as the opposition.'adrenaline said:Yep, and probably refers more to the defense getting more tired than they do and not necessarily that they actually get better and stronger.![]()
lol.. What?It helps if the player's back is against the wall. Taking it one play at a time is also a MUST!'Carolina Hustler said:agreed, they don't wear down as fast as the opposition.'adrenaline said:Yep, and probably refers more to the defense getting more tired than they do and not necessarily that they actually get better and stronger.![]()
John Riggins and, of course, Jim Brown also.Earl Campell always pops in my mind when that phrase is said always loved seeing him pound defensive line in the 4th
While stamina isnt indicated by an RB's size, you dont see 250 pound men winning marathons. There is another reason larger backs are reffered to in these quotes. A large back who is hard to tackle and initiates hits on defenders does help tire defenders. You'll hear this sometimes when announcers talk about thunder and lightning RBBCs. It doesnt mean the same large RB has the stamina to continue running hard the whole game. So why do we hear about small speed backs being limited in carries? Because they get tired and lose their explosiveness also when given too many carries. A speed back who has lost his burst is even less effective than a power back who has lost his. Again, RB size is not an indicator of their stamina. A RB has to be a sprinter but may or may not be an iron man.What's sometimes overlooked by announcers in these discussions is that making defenders run sideline to sideline also wears them down. So its not only the power backs who help wear down defenses. Speed backs and short passes do also. Finally, if your QB doesnt convert on third downs, you arent going to wear out the D that much anyway. RBBC is a way of keeping RBs fresh while wearing down a defense. Its not a neccessity as most backs I believe do have the stamina for 30 carries. Slowing down slightly doesnt render a RB inneffective. More, its a strategy of throwing different types of running styles at a defense and makeing them adjust. Its a way to use different gameplans more effectively against different teams. One type of RB can be more effective against certain opponents than the other. Bill Parcells was a master at switching game plans from one week to another. In the process, Parcells frustrated fantasy owners who would watch their stud RB only get a handful of carries while the backup RB or fullback chewed up an NFL opponent. RBBC isnt just about keeping a back fresh.Here's a list of RBs yards per rush in the 4th quarter, over the last 5 years:http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/datadom.php?pt=p&groupyears=1&prr=s&pos=rb&team=all&opp=all&minyr=2006&maxyr=2010&minwk=1&maxwk=17&homeroad=all&mindown=1&maxdown=4&mindist=1&maxdist=99&minfp=0&maxfp=100&mintime=45&maxtime=75&minmargin=-99&maxmargin=99&sortby=yprsh&sortorder=desc&mintoqual=100&mincat=rshSome surprises on both sides of the equation.