What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Getting a Certificate Error on the FBG Survey (1 Viewer)

@Joe Bryant I figured I'd mention this here rather than create a new thread, but the survey format is going to lead to some weird results. For example the questions asking "Which Footballguys ___ Tools and Features did you use this season, and how helpful did you find them?" There's no option to just say "I didn't use this tool." My options are to choose "Didn't know about" which isn't true, or "Helpful / Not Helpful" which also isn't true. And it wouldn't let me leave them blank. So bear that in mind when interpreting results. I'm not even sure I answered consistently on those, sometimes I put "didn't know about" and sometimes I put "not helpful" when the truth was that I knew about those features but didn't use them.
 
@Joe Bryant I figured I'd mention this here rather than create a new thread, but the survey format is going to lead to some weird results. For example the questions asking "Which Footballguys ___ Tools and Features did you use this season, and how helpful did you find them?" There's no option to just say "I didn't use this tool." My options are to choose "Didn't know about" which isn't true, or "Helpful / Not Helpful" which also isn't true. And it wouldn't let me leave them blank. So bear that in mind when interpreting results. I'm not even sure I answered consistently on those, sometimes I put "didn't know about" and sometimes I put "not helpful" when the truth was that I knew about those features but didn't use them.

Thanks. I'm expecting people to put "Not Helpful" if they knew about a feature but didn't use it. But next year we'll look at adding another choice there of just "Did Not Use".

Surveys always seem like they should be simple to do but we always run into tons of issues like this that make it more complicated and offer more choices and questions. We tried to be more streamlined but that comes with a cost sometimes. The good news is we've been swamped with returned surveys so we're getting tons of good feedback. Thanks for sending in your survey.
 
@Joe Bryant I've sent in help request and mentioned this on the threads.....please, please go back to putting in season and pre-season projections by projector on the player pages. Also please go back to the rankings format where I could see each of the ranker rankings on one page (and set a timeframe for the rankers I wanted). Currently you have to a whole lot of clicking and toggling to get the information. It soooo much easier to visually have everything on one page. Lastly we lost a flex option on the projections page (used to have WR/TE and RB/WR/TE option) so it's much more difficult to compare Singletary with Palmer.
 
@Joe Bryant I've sent in help request and mentioned this on the threads.....please, please go back to putting in season and pre-season projections by projector on the player pages. Also please go back to the rankings format where I could see each of the ranker rankings on one page (and set a timeframe for the rankers I wanted). Currently you have to a whole lot of clicking and toggling to get the information. It soooo much easier to visually have everything on one page. Lastly we lost a flex option on the projections page (used to have WR/TE and RB/WR/TE option) so it's much more difficult to compare Singletary with Palmer.
Thanks. As always we appreciate the feedback. As you can imagine, we get thousands of requests to do things a thousand different ways and we'll never get what everyone wants but we'll always try our best to look. Thanks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top