Yes, to a certain extent you are 100% correct. CBS, a company whose news division I cited in a hypothetical a few posts up, has a parent who is in bed with the NFL as much (or more) than Peter King and SI/TW; to the tune of around a billion dollars annually.That said, there is plenty of room in the media for blatantly unfavorable coverage of Goodell. And this may be the instance where that swath of media, commentators/political types and general NFL naysayers in the media get enough of a rise that their demand for Goodell's blood is met.Slapdash said:They're the same damn companies.Bob Kraft went on CBS and defended Goodell publicly.
SPORTS MEDIA: Points to this as proof that Goodell is safe b/c Bob Kraft carries so much weight within NFL ownership
NON-SPORTS MEDIA: Does not have such reverence for Kraft and they think Kraft sounds like an ignorant baffoon to defend the indefensible actions of Goodell.
Goodell is in trouble here. The NFL doesnt seem to realize Peter King is not the one covering them this time. The real media will not bend over the way that the sports media does.
I find Andrew Brandt's insistence on Ross Tucker's Sirius show this morning that Goodell is Teflon absolutely ridiculous.
The logic of NFL insiders such as Brandt who say Goodell makes the owners too much money to get fired, etc. is officially in the back seat at this point. This is now in the mob-justice sphere (for right or wrong) which has its own business implications, and any number of outcomes could occur.
Last edited by a moderator: