Golden Gopher
Footballguy
I don't necessarily disagree with any of that. If I had to rank the outcomes, in order of likelihood, though, they would go like this:I think from a macro level, you have done a good analysis. The micro side of things may change your scenario. GB has had a week off to get healthy; Dallas played a tough game with Detroit and have several defensive players with nagging injuries. Dom Capers is definitely a coach who can out scheme you and the Cowboys have shown in two games this year (1st Redskins game and Lions game) that they are susceptible to the blitz. Detroit definitely did some things to get to Romo unblocked. I expect GB will try similar thinks and they have the linebackers to be successful at it. I think GB wins and while it will probably be close, it would not surprise me if GB ran away with this one.I wasn't minimizing the wins over NE or DET. Just pointing out that they were close games, relatively speaking. My point was simply that a lot of people (in general, not necessarily those who have posted in this thread) seem to have the impression that GB blows everybody out at home, but the reality is that the blowouts were all against bad teams. They've won the rest, but they were close/closer games. So, if their first 8 home games this year tell us anything, I would expect a close game on Sunday.Bold #1: you minimized them beating the AFC #1 seed and then minimized them beating the Lions by 10 when Dallas just beat them by 4.Lot of Cowboys hate in here, it seems. I don't know if they'll necessarily win, but I think it will be much closer than many people think. Sure, Green Bay blew out some bad teams at home this year... MIN (with Ponder at QB), CAR (when they were a different team than they are now), PHI (right after Foles went down), and CHI. None of those teams were any good, at least at the time when those games were played, so the perception that GB crushes teams at home is not exactly accurate. They barely beat the Jets at home (admittedly, it was Week 2, and I would say that GB is a different team than they were then, as well), and gave up 37 points to a bad Falcons team a month ago. They beat NE in a game that could have gone either way, and beat DET by 10 at the end of the year (in a game that was relatively close). If anything, I would say that GB tends to play good teams close at home, yet finds a way to win. But, I would be surprised if Dallas doesn't score at least 24-28 points on Sunday.
I don't think there is any question that Dallas will put up points. The question is whether or not they can outscore GB, obviously. Dallas has the better running game. I don't think that can really be debated. The main things that will determine the outcome of this game, in my mind, are will Rodgers be 100% (or at least close enough to 100% that he's not severely limited), and will GB be able to pressure/disrupt Romo. If they make Romo uncomfortable enough that he has a bad/mediocre game, it doesn't matter if Murray runs for 200 yards... Dallas won't win. But, if Romo is relatively well-protected, Dallas has a shot to at least keep it close.
Nobody that GB has played this year scores points like Dallas does. They've been in the 30's (or 40's) in 11 of 17 games this year. They've failed to reach 28 just four times (all of which they were still in the 20's). Any team that can give up 37 to the putrid Falcons should at least be somewhat concerned. Atlanta's offensive line, compared to that of Dallas, is like night and day. Take the Cowboys lightly, and they might get into a shootout that leaves them (the Packers) on the short end of the stick, so to speak.
My prediction is GB wins in a relatively high-scoring affair. Maybe not as high-scoring as it would be if the weather was better, but I think both teams will still find a way to reach the mid-20's at a minimum, with the winner more than likely in the 30's.
I'll say 31-27, with Romo committing a late turnover to seal the win. Of course, if that happens, the haters will continue to argue that he's no good, that he is a choke artist, etc.... even though he's probably a top-five candidate for league MVP this year.
On the other hand, I wouldn't be shocked if Dallas wins the game, either.![]()
Bold #2: Points scored: Philly 474, NE 468, Dallas 467.
I have no problem with your prediction, just some of your supporting rationale.
As for your second point, I should clarify. I wasn't necessarily saying that nobody has scored as many points as Dallas. Obviously, as you pointed out, that's not the case. What I was trying to say is that nobody scores points as consistently as Dallas does. They are the only team in the league who has yet to fail to reach 20 points. All of the other high-scoring teams have done so. Pittsburgh failed to reach 20 five times, if I'm not mistaken. Indy did against Dallas, coindidentally. Denver (who scored more than Dallas or NE this year) only managed seven points against the Rams. Green Bay failed to reach 20 in three of their four losses. New England did so twice (against KC early, and BUF in Week 17). And, although the Eagles came close, they even missed 20 once (at Seattle). So, yeah, NE and PHI were the next closest to accomplishing that feat, but Dallas is the only team to do it. And, let's face it... Philly's numbers are inflated because of their defense/ST's touchdowns... Their offense wasn't in the same class as the other teams I've mentioned, and certainly not with Sanchez starting.
What does that mean? Well, nothing, technically. They're just numbers, right? My point was simply that I don't see any way that Dallas doesn't score in the 20's, at a minimum. If they do fail to reach 20 points, it will be because they played their worst game of the year, frankly.
So, based on both of those things (Green Bay playing tough opponents close at home, and Dallas scoring more consistently than anybody else), I would expect a close game in which the winner needs to get into the high 20's at a minimum, and maybe even the 30's. That's all I'm saying. Nothing taken away from NE, PHI, or GB, for that matter. Just saying what I think will have to happen, to win the game.
1 - GB wins a close game
2 - DAL wins a close game
3 - GB wins easily
4 - DAL wins easily
I think 1 is much more likely than 2 or 3 (with 2 and 3 being fairly close, and much more likely than 4).
And, I get what you're saying about getting to Romo (I think that's the key to most of this weekend's games... which defense can "bother" the opposing QB more). I just have a gut feeling that DAL keeps it close this weekend. Not because I want them to (I really don't care who wins), but just a feeling.