Plus, you get the points from your back up who you start in his stead...so really, you need to add those two to your slot of "TE1", only furthering your point, some Gronk is a lot better than no Gronk.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/article.php?article=stuart_valuing_rob_gronkowski
Assuming he plays in 10 games at full health/ability, he would be projected to score 138 Adjusted FP in 0PPR leagues and 209 Adjusted FP in PPR leagues. That's more than any TE other than Graham. You might taken Witten over him in PPR leagues. But 10 games of healthy Gronk is no worse than the 3rd most valuable TE in FF.
I think it's a good exercise in case he does. I didn't read the OP to be predicting that's what'll happen. Just where we'd value him at.Why are we assuming he starts season on PUP?
I'm not worried about the value part. The part that worries me is playing half the season minus a high pick which reduces your margin for error with your other picks. You are one less injury/bad run from digging yourself a hole that will keep you out of the playoffs. Plus you will have to waste another roster spot or two on TE. My main league voted to reduce benches by 2 spots this year which will be the deciding factor in me not being able to draft him where I will probably have to to land him.You have to add the replacement value to the first six weeks of Gronk's total as well to figure out what your tight end production might be for the year.
What about in FFPC scoring (1.5 ppr for TE)? In those drafts, Gronk is going in the mid-3rd or earlier. The problem is that the FFPC is an 11 week regular season. So if he starts on PUP, you only get him for 4 regular season games (misses 6 games + week 10 bye). That is not a winning strategy to make the playoffs in week 12. If you do somehow make it Gronk could be huge, but you have to burn a top 36 pick to get him.Chase Stuart said:http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/article.php?article=stuart_valuing_rob_gronkowski
Assuming he plays in 10 games at full health/ability, he would be projected to score 138 Adjusted FP in 0PPR leagues and 209 Adjusted FP in PPR leagues. That's more than any TE other than Graham. You might taken Witten over him in PPR leagues. But 10 games of healthy Gronk is no worse than the 3rd most valuable TE in FF.
I got him in the 5th rd of my non ppr draft last week.I think Gronk is safer in a 10-12 teamer than in a 14-16 team league. If you're taking him in a larger league you better be confident in finding a late round TE to cover his absence for the beginning of the season. All in all the decision to take Gronk could be a league winning play, the value could be that good. Reminds me of those that happened to get ADP in the 2nd rd. or later last year. It was unbelievable value. I'd pull the trigger in the 4th for larger leagues, and 5th in smaller.
For those that are shooting to get him or have already gotten him, who are you aiming for as your 2nd TE and in what round?
So Gronk is going to start Week 1 not having practiced in almost a year? That would be bold.I think the Pats are holding out information (surprise surprise). I think he goes week #1. With that, I took him at 4.05 last night in a 12 team redraft FFPC Draftmasters league. This is a best-ball league.
I took RBs McCoy, Forte, and McFadden before him and backed him up with Dwayne Allen, Dallas Clark, and James Casey. I feel pretty good about it.
I got him at 4.10 in a 12 team PPR redraft last nightSweet Love said:Plus, you get the points from your back up who you start in his stead...so really, you need to add those two to your slot of "TE1", only furthering your point, some Gronk is a lot better than no Gronk.Chase Stuart said:http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/article.php?article=stuart_valuing_rob_gronkowski
Assuming he plays in 10 games at full health/ability, he would be projected to score 138 Adjusted FP in 0PPR leagues and 209 Adjusted FP in PPR leagues. That's more than any TE other than Graham. You might taken Witten over him in PPR leagues. But 10 games of healthy Gronk is no worse than the 3rd most valuable TE in FF.
I would pick him in the 5th of a PPR, but I know he would not last. I am not sure whether I have the stomach to go lower.
Bingo. I got Davis at 12.10 to complement him. A 4th and a 12th is a fairly high price to pay for TE but I feel like I may have an advantage at the position over everyone but the Graham owner,and he spent pick 2.1 to get Graham.I think it's tied into if you like a late round guy.
I love Fred Davis, so I like the looks of that combo.