What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hakeem Nicks - WR - NYG - Questionable (1 Viewer)

Andy Hicks

Andy Hicks

Footballguy
If you here about the status of Hakeem Nicks, please post only news in here.

Lineup decisions and conjecture, please go to the Assistant Coach forum and an unpinned thread respectively

 
According to beat writer Ralph Vacchiano, Giants WR Hakeem Nicks (ankle) and RE Osi Umenyiora (knee) are both traveling with the team to Indianapolis.

Both are listed as questionable, though this is a good sign that they will try to play Sunday against the Colts. Stay tuned for more updates.

Source: Ralph Vacchiano on Twitter

Giants WR Hakeem Nicks (ankle) expects to play Sunday against the Colts.

Nicks was limited at practice Friday, though he was not held back by his ankle. Said Nicks, "Early in the week it was bothering me when I'd go to the right a little bit," Nicks said. "But now I'm going every direction fine." If you picked up Mario Manningham as insurance for Nicks, don't cut him just yet.

looks good to go

 
This is from 9/17 but figured it was worth putting here

Giants receiver Hakeem Nicks says he expects to play against Colts

Zach Berman/The Star-Ledger

Wide receiver Hakeem Nicks expects to play in Sunday’s game against the Indianapolis Colts after he was in pads for today's practice, although his participation was limited. Nicks did not practice on Wednesday or Thursday while he recovered from an ankle injury, but he does not anticipate an issue before Sunday.

“In my eyes, I expect to play,” Nicks said. “Unless they tell me otherwise when game time gets here, but I felt good today.”

Nicks said his ankle hurt when he cut to his right earlier in the week, but he no longer has any limitations. Coughlin said Nicks is a game-time decision.

“We’ll see how he is in the morning after he’s done a little bit,” Coughlin said.

http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2010/09...ct_to_play.html

Nicks + Umenyiora are questionable. Nicks did some work during team drills today, Coughlin said. #nyg

Nicks expects to play. Also says he's havin no issues cutting/changing direction. The ankle "responded pretty good." #nyg

Well then you heard wrong. RT @AmpedFantasy: heard nicks was only jogging... #nyg

https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hakeem Nicks is out on the field + warming up. #nyg 30 minutes ago via ÜberTwitter

Nicks is catching passes from Sage Rosenfels + a member of the Manning family. #nyg 29 minutes ago via ÜberTwitter

Nicks running go routes here. And not exactly taking it easy either. Looks good for him so far. #nyg 17 minutes ago via web

https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo

Osi is on the field in game pants. He appears to be a go as well. #nyg

 
On Mike's twitter page : -- Nicks is working with the second team in pre-game warm-ups. Mario Manningham is with the first team. There are no changes on the defensive side.

Translation - If you must have 10 points, I'd go Manningham, but if you have your W in the bag or need to go for broke (20+) I'd go Nicks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Team Legacy said:
On Mike's twitter page : -- Nicks is working with the second team in pre-game warm-ups. Mario Manningham is with the first team. There are no changes on the defensive side.Translation - If you must have 10 points, I'd go Manningham, but if you have your W in the bag or need to go for broke (20+) I'd go Nicks.
Click to expand...
glad i listen to the first post saying nicks was in the starting lineup. can't believe no one not even the announcer talked about the fact that nicks was not going to start and might not even play.
 
I know. Why even read? This is so unbelievably maddening. Every single source I read all week said bnot only playing but starting and now every single team I have will lose because every word written about this was a flat-out lie. :boxing:

 
I'm not sure how anyone can be upset by someone reporting what's been said. He barely practiced, was listed as questionable, the Giants have a viable replacement for a game in Manningham, and it's a late game. Why on Earth would you have started him unless your WR cupboard was completely bare otherwise? I benched him in five leagues. Even if he started and had a big game, the chance of a goose egg made it poor lineup management unless you had Manningham, a Colts receiver, or one of the MNF options as an alternative.

 
fflmonster said:
Team Legacy said:
On Mike's twitter page : -- Nicks is working with the second team in pre-game warm-ups. Mario Manningham is with the first team. There are no changes on the defensive side.Translation - If you must have 10 points, I'd go Manningham, but if you have your W in the bag or need to go for broke (20+) I'd go Nicks.
Click to expand...
glad i listen to the first post saying nicks was in the starting lineup. can't believe no one not even the announcer talked about the fact that nicks was not going to start and might not even play.
Click to expand...
Calm downHe's playing and with already 2 targets
 
Jason Wood said:
I'm not sure how anyone can be upset by someone reporting what's been said. He barely practiced, was listed as questionable, the Giants have a viable replacement for a game in Manningham, and it's a late game. Why on Earth would you have started him unless your WR cupboard was completely bare otherwise? I benched him in five leagues. Even if he started and had a big game, the chance of a goose egg made it poor lineup management unless you had Manningham, a Colts receiver, or one of the MNF options as an alternative.
Click to expand...
:)
Giants | Hakeem Nicks to start Week 2 Sun Sep 19, 02:42 PMNew York Giants WR Hakeem Nicks (knee) will start in the team's Week 2 game, according to ESPN's Sal Paolantonio.Our view: Get him in your lineup.Link to storyHakeem Nicks player page
Click to expand...
 
Jason Wood said:
I'm not sure how anyone can be upset by someone reporting what's been said. He barely practiced, was listed as questionable, the Giants have a viable replacement for a game in Manningham, and it's a late game. Why on Earth would you have started him unless your WR cupboard was completely bare otherwise? I benched him in five leagues. Even if he started and had a big game, the chance of a goose egg made it poor lineup management unless you had Manningham, a Colts receiver, or one of the MNF options as an alternative.
Click to expand...
as you stated above, my choice for wr was going to be nicks or manningham.waited till the last minute only to not get the right player in the lineup. hopefully i get lucky and nicks gets a td catch but with so many reporters and announcers i can't believe they either got this wrong or didn't report anything at all
 
fflmonster said:
Jason Wood said:
I'm not sure how anyone can be upset by someone reporting what's been said. He barely practiced, was listed as questionable, the Giants have a viable replacement for a game in Manningham, and it's a late game. Why on Earth would you have started him unless your WR cupboard was completely bare otherwise? I benched him in five leagues. Even if he started and had a big game, the chance of a goose egg made it poor lineup management unless you had Manningham, a Colts receiver, or one of the MNF options as an alternative.
Click to expand...
as you stated above, my choice for wr was going to be nicks or manningham.waited till the last minute only to not get the right player in the lineup. hopefully i get lucky and nicks gets a td catch but with so many reporters and announcers i can't believe they either got this wrong or didn't report anything at all
Click to expand...
you do realize the giants have only completed 3 passes tonight, right? chill out man.
 
fflmonster said:
Jason Wood said:
I'm not sure how anyone can be upset by someone reporting what's been said. He barely practiced, was listed as questionable, the Giants have a viable replacement for a game in Manningham, and it's a late game. Why on Earth would you have started him unless your WR cupboard was completely bare otherwise? I benched him in five leagues. Even if he started and had a big game, the chance of a goose egg made it poor lineup management unless you had Manningham, a Colts receiver, or one of the MNF options as an alternative.
Click to expand...
as you stated above, my choice for wr was going to be nicks or manningham.waited till the last minute only to not get the right player in the lineup. hopefully i get lucky and nicks gets a td catch but with so many reporters and announcers i can't believe they either got this wrong or didn't report anything at all
Click to expand...
You do know that he is playing, right?
 
I am so glad that I picked up Manningham for a "just in case" Nicks was out guy. Right now I am losing by 5 points with Nicks in my lineup and Manningham on my bench.

 
Jason Wood said:
I'm not sure how anyone can be upset by someone reporting what's been said. He barely practiced, was listed as questionable, the Giants have a viable replacement for a game in Manningham, and it's a late game. Why on Earth would you have started him unless your WR cupboard was completely bare otherwise? I benched him in five leagues. Even if he started and had a big game, the chance of a goose egg made it poor lineup management unless you had Manningham, a Colts receiver, or one of the MNF options as an alternative.
Click to expand...
Guppy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Joe Bryant
Big Idea And A Brand New Tool At Footballguys - The Assistant Coach
Replies
21
Views
792
ignatiusjreilly
ignatiusjreilly
eighsse2
The Dynasty "Next Move" Thread
Replies
37
Views
1K
JohnnyU
JohnnyU
Joe Bryant
An Apology - Building And Creating A Better Shark Pool
3 4 5
Replies
200
Views
5K
Dan Lambskin
Dan Lambskin

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top