What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hardesty ranking this week (1 Viewer)

Otis

Footballguy
Not trying to give away pay content here, but in the updated rankings Hardesty is bordering on top 10 for the week. Sort of surprising to me, especially given the fairly stout Niner defense. I guess the expectation is that Hillis isn't starting (or at least isn't playing much) and that Hardesty will get a crapload of touches again?

Folks really with him this week? :popcorn:

 
Not trying to give away pay content here, but in the updated rankings Hardesty is bordering on top 10 for the week. Sort of surprising to me, especially given the fairly stout Niner defense. I guess the expectation is that Hillis isn't starting (or at least isn't playing much) and that Hardesty will get a crapload of touches again?Folks really with him this week? :popcorn:
I would not call him a top 10 but with Hillis out last week they ran him over and over again showing he will get the chances. and if the Browns run a TD in it will probably be Hardesty so I think he is a solid start.
 
I am forced to start Hardesty this week so i was a little pumped when i saw there ranking but truthfully its about 10 spots to high. The logic is like you said, he has a good chance (30+) of leading every running back in touches. the browns pass D is near the top of the league and they are first in fantasy WR points against; this may lead to a game similar to last week. I also though Mo Morris in the top 15 a little crazy and the Pitt WR (other than Wallace) a little to high. sorry for posting pay content, i couldn't help myself, this thread hit a nerve

 
Hillis isn't even out, yet.
Right, another reason for my surprise. I guess they're assuming he'll either be out or, if he plays, limited such that Hardesty will still get most of the work.
Peyton Hillis (hamstring) is listed as questionable for Week 8 after missing a third straight practice Friday.Hillis will make the trip to San Francisco, but is not expected to play. The Browns have listed him as "questionable" previously after no practice all week, and he was inactive on game day. Look for Montario Hardesty to start. Oct 28 - 1:28 PMI will be very suprised if he plays.
 
Like I said - he will have the job to himself by Halloween. Right. On. Schedule.
:rolleyes: Shurmur had said consistently that Hillis is the starting running back when he is healthy (he even said this about 2-3 times in his pressers this week). Are you saying that Hillis' injuries are right on schedule?People who don't follow the Browns sure do get caught up in what the media writes and their own wishful thinking...
 
browns defense is a lot better than ppl think. san fran offense is way worse than ppl think. this game stays close. hardesty gets his touches. expect 100 yfs and a 50% chance at a td.

 
I never said how it would happen, just that it would. I expected hardesty to perform better, but if he's the starter because of injury then that is fine with me. Starting backs after the 100th pick of a fantasy draft are hard to find.

 
I think they screwed up. They meant 12 yards rushing this week. Not 12 overall RB....

The Niners simply dont give up rushing yards or TD's. Look elsewhere this week folks.

 
I think they screwed up. They meant 12 yards rushing this week. Not 12 overall RB....The Niners simply dont give up rushing yards or TD's. Look elsewhere this week folks.
Exactly. He'd be lucky to get 50 yds and a rec TD. So 5 pts (non-PPR) sounds about right.Unfortunately I think I'll be forced to start him at flex.I'll keep ya'll updated on my starting lineup. :hophead:
 
I never said how it would happen, just that it would. I expected hardesty to perform better, but if he's the starter because of injury then that is fine with me. Starting backs after the 100th pick of a fantasy draft are hard to find.
There all over the place, Tate, Moreno, Battle ect. If you meant rest of year your kidding yourself. In fact if you lump Hardesty in there Battle is the only one who I can say is a starter. Hardesty is a mediocre talent in a prime spot for opportunity at the moment. I follow the Browns, I could care less about Hillis or Hardesty, but your projection gave me a laugh, spoken like a true fantasy football player hopeful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
33 for 95 = not good
9.5 fantasy points on the ground sounds pretty good to me. add in some rec yards and td equity and its lookin like a fine starter.
Yea that's how I view it. In PPR leagues he's posted over 11.6 and 14.2 in the two games Hillis missed and neither total was inflated by a TD. This weeks projection for him runs 1-3 points above that so I don't see the big deal on his projections this week. All of this of course assumes Hillis is out which I'm not ready to assume simply because I don't see why they would bother to include Hillis on the trip to San Fran if they were not going to give him a chance to play.
 
33 for 95 = not good
9.5 fantasy points on the ground sounds pretty good to me. add in some rec yards and td equity and its lookin like a fine starter.
Yea that's how I view it. In PPR leagues he's posted over 11.6 and 14.2 in the two games Hillis missed and neither total was inflated by a TD. This weeks projection for him runs 1-3 points above that so I don't see the big deal on his projections this week. All of this of course assumes Hillis is out which I'm not ready to assume simply because I don't see why they would bother to include Hillis on the trip to San Fran if they were not going to give him a chance to play.
:confused: He missed three days of practice and had a "setback" with his hamstring injury. I don't see why the Browns would rush him back after a "setback" from trying to get him on the field too early in the first place. I think its safe to assume Hillis isn't playing.
 
if they give anyone 30 carries a game they should break one sooner or later- or get injured. Because of this his chances of having a pretty good game are decent. I think he'll top 100 combined and surprise some folks.

 
Really this is about opportunities. This is about the fact that Hardesty got 33 carries last week. I've played fantasy football for over a decade and one thing I've learned is that if you just fished the bottom of the barrel for WRs who suddenly are getting a lot of targets, or RBs that are suddenly getting a ton of carries, you strike gold way more often than not.

33 carries last week, from a completely unbiased perspective, is like a batsignal.

I think Hardesty has negatives. He's proven to have hands of stone, and I doubt McCoy trusts him to throw him the ball, which means he will get pulled a lot for Oggie on 3rd down. I think the Browns are going to run the no-huddle a lot though so Oggie may not get in the game. With MoMass out, maybe McCoy makes some more throws to Hardesty this week. He might drop them all, but he'll get one more chance here.

Giving him a high ranking for this week, yeah I can see it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless this is another 3-6 game I'm not sure how the Browns are going to run the ball 30+ times again. Also I wouldn't be surprised to see Ogbonnaya to get more work this week. We all know Hardesty can't catch so Ogbonnaya will definitely get all of the 3rd down work after a very nice showing last week. He averaged 5 yards per carry on 3 carries and 8.6 yards per carry on 5 receptions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.

 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
There are six teams on bye and only handful of back are going to potentially touch the ball 25+ times and Hardesty is one of them. His floor is going to be higher than most by default. He's higher than Scott because Scott is most likely going to lose goal line carries to Leonard and Battle is splitting carries with McCluster and Jones. I don't see why the ranking is so outrageous.
 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
There are six teams on bye and only handful of back are going to potentially touch the ball 25+ times and Hardesty is one of them. His floor is going to be higher than most by default. He's higher than Scott because Scott is most likely going to lose goal line carries to Leonard and Battle is splitting carries with McCluster and Jones. I don't see why the ranking is so outrageous.
Not only are six teams on bye, but there have been a rash of injured starters out there as well. I don't see this as Hardesty being a legit top 15 RB outside of this week, but I agree that he has as decent a chance as anyone THIS week.
 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
There are six teams on bye and only handful of back are going to potentially touch the ball 25+ times and Hardesty is one of them. His floor is going to be higher than most by default. He's higher than Scott because Scott is most likely going to lose goal line carries to Leonard and Battle is splitting carries with McCluster and Jones. I don't see why the ranking is so outrageous.
What are the honest chances of the Browns scoring an offensive TD this week? 10% ? Hardesty is not a top 15 option in any format.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
There are six teams on bye and only handful of back are going to potentially touch the ball 25+ times and Hardesty is one of them. His floor is going to be higher than most by default. He's higher than Scott because Scott is most likely going to lose goal line carries to Leonard and Battle is splitting carries with McCluster and Jones. I don't see why the ranking is so outrageous.
What are the honest chances of the Browns scoring an offensive TD this week? 10% ? Hardesty is not a top 15 option in any format.
10% chance is beyond an exaggeration.
 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
There are six teams on bye and only handful of back are going to potentially touch the ball 25+ times and Hardesty is one of them. His floor is going to be higher than most by default. He's higher than Scott because Scott is most likely going to lose goal line carries to Leonard and Battle is splitting carries with McCluster and Jones. I don't see why the ranking is so outrageous.
This is very :goodposting: I haven't seen the FBG rankings, but in my rough rankings I'd put him somewhere in the 15-18 range without thinking twice about it. He should be a solid RB2 play with great upside due to the amount of touches he is likely to see.
 
Sounds high to me. Would anybody start him over Torain?

If Hillis is out, at least you know Hardesty is the RB. But he has looked average and he is facing a tough 9ers D.

 
Sounds high to me. Would anybody start him over Torain? If Hillis is out, at least you know Hardesty is the RB. But he has looked average and he is facing a tough 9ers D.
Im in the same boat with these two turds, leaning towards Hardesty and his 25 carries for 50 yards.
 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
Wasn't the :hawkscrote: pimping him all year?
 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
Wasn't the :hawkscrote: pimping him all year?
Of course.
Then when did you lose your love for him? Or, are you just contrarian by nature?
 
Trust me, I struggle with this too. I wonder how people can start Hardesty over even other questionable starts like B. Scott or Battle, but if you believe in FBG this is a no-brainer. Just really jumped out at me in the rankings.
Wasn't the :hawkscrote: pimping him all year?
Of course.
Very disappointed in you. A hawk knows that when the stars have aligned and things are going your way, you don't back off the gas. We have been waiting for Montario the Barberio - the Sultan of Short yardage, the Human open field Juke-box - to get his chance. It's here. Get back on the bus. :drive:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top