Thank youWe're back in full bickering mode. I take responsibility for not suspending enough people. I will start suspending everybody next week when I have more time.
Please don't interpret my Like as an endorsement for suspending me. I just want everybody else to be suspended. Thanks for your consideration.We're back in full bickering mode. I take responsibility for not suspending enough people. I will start suspending everybody next week when I have more time.
People talk about self-policing, but when it comes to it they are too emotionally invested in their political views. Is it really that hard to not make arguements personal? When people resort to personal comments it is destructive to the discussion and an intellectually lazy tactic.Will the next person that sees anything like this directed at someone point them out so we can get there out of here? This isn't Cleveland.
People talk about self-policing, but when it comes to it they are too emotionally invested in their political views. Is it really that hard to not make arguements personal? When people resort to personal comments it is destructive to the discussion and an intellectually lazy tactic.
I doubt it is ok...i haven't seem people accused of being racist in some time.Can someone explain why it is ok for posters to accuse other posters of being racists on this forum based on nothing? Seriously, why is nothing done?
I haven't seen that in ages.Can someone explain why it is ok for posters to accuse other posters of being racists on this forum based on nothing? Seriously, why is nothing done?
It went on all day today in the Rashida Tlaib thread.I doubt it is ok...i haven't seem people accused of being racist in some time.
Not in the Rashida Tlaib thread I was reading.It went on all day today in the Rashida Tlaib thread.
Was it reported? Joe has been pretty clear that they moderate based on reported posts. If something isn’t reported with the report button, don’t expect anything to happen.Can someone explain why it is ok for posters to accuse other posters of being racists on this forum based on nothing? Seriously, why is nothing done?
YesWas it reported? Joe has been pretty clear that they moderate based on reported posts. If something isn’t reported with the report button, don’t expect anything to happen.
I am serious. Can you provide a recent post/quote of these other posters who accuse others of being racist "based on nothing"?Of course not.
There were actually days where there were discussions on topics without a single personal attack. That had not happened for years.Was it?
The usual are at it again. I reported the same guy today too so we will see.There were actually days where there were discussions on topics without a single personal attack. That had not happened for years.
I read the thread. Didn't see any posters called racist.It went on all day today in the Rashida Tlaib thread.
I will let the mods decide. But not even seeing an inference there that he said you or any other poster are racist.This post started it by Tobias:
My post was about your terrible analogy, which you ignored.
Anyway, this post says more about how you feel about David Duke/white supremacists than anything else. Also, as a Jew, I'd like to ask that you kindly stop using false accusations of anti-Semitism in bad faith as a political weapon.
If you're wondering how I know it's in bad faith, it's because I can find dozens and dozens of worse examples from the right and neither you nor any other conservative around here has said a single word about any of them.
So please, stop pretending you care about us as a way to attack women of color whose politics you don't like. We're not buying it.
----‐
Basically stating I am a disingenuous liar who targets women of color which is a clear insinuation I am racist. It is way over the line uncalled for personal attack.
If you twist your mind into a pretzel and do a mental backflip you'll be able to see it.I will let the mods decide. But not even seeing an inference there that he said you or any other poster are racist.
There is no twisting involved. We dove into this before and we went back to a post he recieved a TO for and he reiterated that he stands behind this:If you twist your mind into a pretzel and do a mental backflip you'll be able to see it.
Yea, that post is pretty awful.There is no twisting involved. We dove into this before and we went back to a post he recieved a TO for and he reiterated that he stands behind this:
"Yes, I agree. The issue here is the disgraceful, pathetic, rage-inducing duplicity of many conservatives who have co-opted anti-Semitism for their own Islamophobic political gain on the one hand while doing virtually everything they can to ignore of even embrace white nationalism on the other hand. They are duplicitous bloodsuckers feeding on bigotry. This poster is merely echoing their disingenuous garbage on a much smaller stage."
He was just being a bit more subtle in his vileness today.
Well it was disguised well. I think we knew what was meant.I will let the mods decide. But not even seeing an inference there that he said you or any other poster are racist.
What is beinging?But that post was a while ago and he was suspended for it...whats the purpose of beinging ir back up? It doesn't change that the current posting is not calling anyone racist at all. Thats a pretty big accusation to make.
So we are going from “Its now ok to call posters racist” to claiming we know someone meant?Well it was disguised well. I think we knew what was meant.
Because it mirrors what he said today and when I pointed that specific old post out today he says he still stands by that. This type of discussion has no place on this forum. Just because you wrap it in a bit nicer package with inuendo instead of a club does not change the essence of the attack.But that post was a while ago and he was suspended for it...whats the purpose of beinging ir back up? It doesn't change that the current posting is not calling anyone racist at all. Thats a pretty big accusation to make.
Sho is stirring the pot. He gets away with it.Because it mirrors what he said today and when I pointed that specific old post out today he says he still stands by that. This type of discussion has no place on this forum. Just because you wrap it in a bit nicer package with inuendo instead of a club does not change the essence of the attack.
Same as it ever was......Sho is stirring the pot. He gets away with it.
You have got to be kidding. So...to paraphrase... "This is what he said in the past and got a TO, so this must be what he is saying again now, except "just being a bit more subtle in his vileness today"?There is no twisting involved. We dove into this before and we went back to a post he recieved a TO for and he reiterated that he stands behind this:
"Yes, I agree. The issue here is the disgraceful, pathetic, rage-inducing duplicity of many conservatives who have co-opted anti-Semitism for their own Islamophobic political gain on the one hand while doing virtually everything they can to ignore of even embrace white nationalism on the other hand. They are duplicitous bloodsuckers feeding on bigotry. This poster is merely echoing their disingenuous garbage on a much smaller stage."
He was just being a bit more subtle in his vileness today.
Dude...you are offended by an emoji.You have got to be kidding? So...to paraphrase... "This is what he said in the past and got a TO, so this must be what he is saying again now, except "just being a bit more subtle in his vileness today"?
This seems to be getting dangerously close to Orwell's 1984 thoughtcrime territory.
It seems like you are always in the middle of firestorms here as well. What do you think?So we are going from “Its now ok to call posters racist” to claiming we know someone meant?
It’s what he does. He’s toxic to this place.It seems like you are always in the middle of firestorms here as well. What do you think?
Drop it.squistion said:You have got to be kidding. So...to paraphrase... "This is what he said in the past and got a TO, so this must be what he is saying again now, except "just being a bit more subtle in his vileness today"?
This seems to be getting dangerously close into Orwell's 1984 thoughtcrime territory.
Drop it.jon_mx said:Because it mirrors what he said today and when I pointed that specific old post out today he says he still stands by that. This type of discussion has no place on this forum. Just because you wrap it in a bit nicer package with inuendo instead of a club does not change the essence of the attack.
There are a bunch non-substantive threads, such as this one, where people can talk about stuff besides politics. They can talk about moderation, they can talk about how to make the forum better, and so on.John Blutarsky said:Sho is stirring the pot. He gets away with it.