What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

HBO - Song of Ice&Fire Series -Varsity Thread - no TV only whiners (3 Viewers)

One last question:

The group going north of the wall is a standard thing, not a special mission?

Beside Jon looking for his uncle.

 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One last question:The group going north of the wall is a standard thing, not a special mission?Beside Jon looking for his uncle.
I believe scouting parties are standard (5 or so guys), but a large group with the Lord Commander qualifies as a special mission.
 
One last question:The group going north of the wall is a standard thing, not a special mission?Beside Jon looking for his uncle.
the Night's Watch would do "rangings" to scout, keep the wildlings in check, ect.What they have done now is much more substantial in number and scope. They are going out to lay waste to the growing Wildling army before it can lay waste to them.ETA:The prologue in Episode 1, the very first scene, is a good example of a ranging.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One last question:The group going north of the wall is a standard thing, not a special mission?Beside Jon looking for his uncle.
the Night's Watch would do "rangings" to scout, keep the wildlings in check, ect.What they have done now is much more substantial in number and scope. They are going out to lay waste to the growing Wildling army before it can lay waste to them.ETA:The prologue in Episode 1, the very first scene, is a good example of a ranging.
:thumbup: I think I'm up to speed on all the storylines now...thx!
 
One last question:The group going north of the wall is a standard thing, not a special mission?Beside Jon looking for his uncle.
I believe scouting parties are standard (5 or so guys), but a large group with the Lord Commander qualifies as a special mission.
Has it been made clear what that is at this point?
They just dealt with the snow zombies and were hearing reports about Wildlings massing for war. Mormont decided it was time to be pro-active rather than reactive.
 
Was it just me, or was Daenerys having a hard time making eye contact with the CGI dragon?
:goodposting: very much so
When I first read these comments I wasn't sure what you guys were talking about. After seeing the episode a 2nd time, I get it. When I watched it the first time it never crossed my mind that she was even trying to look at the dragon in those scenes, I just thought she was looking at something off to her left outside the frame - that's how poorly executed that was.
It's not a good idea to :eek: some animals. You can be viewed as a threat.
 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
In the books the flames are never supposed to die out.
 
Why is Sam with the party north of the Wall? He can't fight and he's supposed to be maester aemons assistant
You heard what Ser Allister Thorne said last year, they could last a fortnight on a fat boy like him and still have bones for soup.
 
Thanks for the clarification...that's who I meant.

It just seemed like a much larger group following Drogo.

Thanks for the reply!
Those werent Targaerians. I forgot what they were called now
She has nothing to invade with.
Dragons
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
 
You heard what Ser Allister Thorne said last year, they could last a fortnight on a fat boy like him and still have bones for soup.
He cares for the ravens and uses them to send status reports.
He is taking care of the ravens and communication with Castle Black.
he's in charge of the Ravens. I think there was dialogue in the book with Sam asking the same question you are asking. Why me?
And he's good with maps.
 
Thanks for the clarification...that's who I meant.

It just seemed like a much larger group following Drogo.

Thanks for the reply!
Those werent Targaerians. I forgot what they were called now
She has nothing to invade with.
Dragons
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
I was under the impression that they were old, weak and sick Dothraki. With just one of the lamb girls staying on as an assistant when her people were freed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
In the books the flames are never supposed to die out.
Yes, but
It is also pretty apparent that the sword is a fraud in the books based on Maester Aemon and the lack of heat. I think there were other doubters of the sword as well based on the heat factor IIRC. And Mel uses all kinds of powders etc. that she has up her sleeves. Now, there obviously is some type of magic that these red priests are capable of based on the shadow babies, kiss of life, and whatever Victarion had done to him, but they also seem to be false prophets at the same time. I don't know what to think of the lord of the light and his minions just yet.
 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
In the books the flames are never supposed to die out.
Yes, but
It is also pretty apparent that the sword is a fraud in the books based on Maester Aemon and the lack of heat. I think there were other doubters of the sword as well based on the heat factor IIRC. And Mel uses all kinds of powders etc. that she has up her sleeves. Now, there obviously is some type of magic that these red priests are capable of based on the shadow babies, kiss of life, and whatever Victarion had done to him, but they also seem to be false prophets at the same time. I don't know what to think of the lord of the light and his minions just yet.
Sure, but that doesn't change what I posted and how the show is different from the books in that regard.
In the books the sword is *supposed* to be extremely bright - not just normal looking flames.
 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
In the books the flames are never supposed to die out.
Yes, butIt is also pretty apparent that the sword is a fraud in the books based on Maester Aemon and the lack of heat. I think there were other doubters of the sword as well based on the heat factor IIRC. And Mel uses all kinds of powders etc. that she has up her sleeves. Now, there obviously is some type of magic that these red priests are capable of based on the shadow babies, kiss of life, and whatever Victarion had done to him, but they also seem to be false prophets at the same time. I don't know what to think of the lord of the light and his minions just yet.
Sure, but that doesn't change what I posted and how the show is different from the books in that regard.
In the books the sword is *supposed* to be extremely bright - not just normal looking flames.
I thought it was really weird in the show actually that A) the flame went out and B) Stannis left the sword there. Maybe they are getting away from the literal Lightbringer?
 
Is it controversial to say that this series is better than the Lord of the Rings films? A lot better.
Not to me. And the tone and adult themes are what the Star Wars prequels should have been.
Star Wars??? Seriously? I think what happened was that you (and millions of other people) watched the original Star Wars when you were kids, then watched the prequels when you were adults and forgot that the appeal of Star Wars was mainly to kids and teenagers in the 70's. I don't know many 60 year olds that love Star Wars. And they were in their 20's and 30's when it originally came out.It was a movie for young people when it started and remains that way.Game of Thrones is an entirely different genre.
 
Is it controversial to say that this series is better than the Lord of the Rings films? A lot better.
Nothing wrong with speaking the truth.
Here's what got me thinking about this. An acquaintance on Facebook posted this in one of my Game of Thrones threads: "Actually, I am going to disagree with you. Except for the performance of Peter Dinklage, I found it quite ordinary - a routine melodrama dressed up in a pseudo-middle ages fantasy."

I thought about de-friending her for saying such stupid #### :yes:
Did she watch season 1? The first episode of this season was rather boring. There are so many characters they are trying to get around to, that it moved around a bunch and kind of "set the stage" for the rest of the season.I can see why a new viewer wouldn't have been overly impressed.

 
Is it controversial to say that this series is better than the Lord of the Rings films? A lot better.
Nothing wrong with speaking the truth.
Here's what got me thinking about this. An acquaintance on Facebook posted this in one of my Game of Thrones threads: "Actually, I am going to disagree with you. Except for the performance of Peter Dinklage, I found it quite ordinary - a routine melodrama dressed up in a pseudo-middle ages fantasy."

I thought about de-friending her for saying such stupid #### :yes:
Did she watch season 1? The first episode of this season was rather boring. There are so many characters they are trying to get around to, that it moved around a bunch and kind of "set the stage" for the rest of the season.I can see why a new viewer wouldn't have been overly impressed.
I watched the first episode and fell asleep after 30 minutes. I didn't give it a chance when it aired, much like The Wire. Finally invested myself for more than an episode and was :excited: :shock: :thumbup: . This twitter generation has no patience for plot building and character development.
 
Do they eventually reveal what happens to Caster's sons? (The dude that marries his daughters.)

No reason for a spoiler--yes or no will suffice.

 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
In the books the flames are never supposed to die out.
Yes, but
It is also pretty apparent that the sword is a fraud in the books based on Maester Aemon and the lack of heat. I think there were other doubters of the sword as well based on the heat factor IIRC. And Mel uses all kinds of powders etc. that she has up her sleeves. Now, there obviously is some type of magic that these red priests are capable of based on the shadow babies, kiss of life, and whatever Victarion had done to him, but they also seem to be false prophets at the same time. I don't know what to think of the lord of the light and his minions just yet.
I'm not sure if the prophesies are true. But we know that Thoros of Myr used wildfire to create his flaming green swords, so it could just be a parlor trick for those in attendance.
 
Do they eventually reveal what happens to Caster's sons? (The dude that marries his daughters.) No reason for a spoiler--yes or no will suffice.
Yes. It was mentioned in the books but the show will likely skip over any detailed explanation.
 
question for the book guys.The whole Fire sword on the beach ceremony, seemed a little weak to me.What was the point that you set a sword on fire and stick it in the dirt? whats that suppose to symbolize?
ya, I thought that scene was pretty :unsure:whole thing was cheesy imo (but I can live with it).
felt like Conan or something. they could of improved it, I mean is that sword supposed to be a magical sword or something? Or was it just symbolism? Could only stannis have pulled the sword from the fire?
In the books the flames are never supposed to die out.
Yes, butIt is also pretty apparent that the sword is a fraud in the books based on Maester Aemon and the lack of heat. I think there were other doubters of the sword as well based on the heat factor IIRC. And Mel uses all kinds of powders etc. that she has up her sleeves. Now, there obviously is some type of magic that these red priests are capable of based on the shadow babies, kiss of life, and whatever Victarion had done to him, but they also seem to be false prophets at the same time. I don't know what to think of the lord of the light and his minions just yet.
I'm not sure if the prophesies are true. But we know that Thoros of Myr used wildfire to create his flaming green swords, so it could just be a parlor trick for those in attendance.
or a mummers farce...
 
Do they eventually reveal what happens to Caster's sons? (The dude that marries his daughters.) No reason for a spoiler--yes or no will suffice.
Yes. It was mentioned in the books but the show will likely skip over any detailed explanation.
I have to believe they'll give some explanation - they aren't going to just leave that one hanging out there.
 
I read the books after season one so it's a totally different perspective for me this season. I find myself being more critical of some of the choices they made be it casting(Some mentioned above)or story related(see below). Also in some instances it seemed less "real" and more like people reading lines to me(Sansa especially).

The story for example, I though Maester Cressen should have had a little more back story. They didn't get across how important he was to Stanis, it would have given more weight to his sacrifice. Also thought the Roz part came off as very cheesy. Osha's constant head tilting when she talks is making her character a bit grading to watch.

Mostly just nit picky stuff, it was still very good, just interesting how the perspective totally changed.
For Christ's sake, you're named after CHEESE, you should know it's grating.
 
I read the books after season one so it's a totally different perspective for me this season. I find myself being more critical of some of the choices they made be it casting(Some mentioned above)or story related(see below). Also in some instances it seemed less "real" and more like people reading lines to me(Sansa especially).

The story for example, I though Maester Cressen should have had a little more back story. They didn't get across how important he was to Stanis, it would have given more weight to his sacrifice. Also thought the Roz part came off as very cheesy. Osha's constant head tilting when she talks is making her character a bit grading to watch.

Mostly just nit picky stuff, it was still very good, just interesting how the perspective totally changed.
For Christ's sake, you're named after CHEESE, you should know it's grating.
:lmao:
 
'Drifter said:
'Gr00vus said:
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
So who was the last scout that Dany stopped, and called 'blood of my blood', or something like that? Seemed like he was Drogo's brother.
 
'Drifter said:
'Gr00vus said:
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
So who was the last scout that Dany stopped, and called 'blood of my blood', or something like that? Seemed like he was Drogo's brother.
One of her blood riders. I think they were the about the only warriors who stayed with her after the rest of the Khallasar left. She refers to all three of them that way throughout the books.
 
'Drifter said:
'Gr00vus said:
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
So who was the last scout that Dany stopped, and called 'blood of my blood', or something like that? Seemed like he was Drogo's brother.
One of her blood riders. I think they were the about the only warriors who stayed with her after the rest of the Khallasar left. She refers to all three of them that way throughout the books.
Rakharo, Aggo and Jhogo are Dany's bloodriders. And I think it was Rakharo was the last one she spoke with.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Drifter said:
'Gr00vus said:
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
So who was the last scout that Dany stopped, and called 'blood of my blood', or something like that? Seemed like he was Drogo's brother.
One of her blood riders. I think they were the about the only warriors who stayed with her after the rest of the Khallasar left. She refers to all three of them that way throughout the books.
Rakharo, Aggo and Jhogo are Dany's bloodriders. And I think it was Rakharo was the last one she spoke with.
IIRC, they are tied to their Khal/Khalleesi until death (and they have to die with them?). Hence the reason they didn't take off with everyone else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Drifter said:
'Gr00vus said:
That was Drogo's Dothraki Khallasar. She ended up with mainly the dregs sticking with her, I think along with some of the lamb people whose town they had just wiped out.
IIRC, they are all the lamb people except for a few of her personal bodyguard from Drogo's crew.
So who was the last scout that Dany stopped, and called 'blood of my blood', or something like that? Seemed like he was Drogo's brother.
One of her blood riders. I think they were the about the only warriors who stayed with her after the rest of the Khallasar left. She refers to all three of them that way throughout the books.
Rakharo, Aggo and Jhogo are Dany's bloodriders. And I think it was Rakharo was the last one she spoke with.
IIRC, they are tied to their Khal/Khalleesi until death (and they have to die with them?). Hence the reason they didn't take off with everyone else.
I think only a khal has bloodriders. A khal's widow returns to Vas Dothrak to be silent sister type thing. These 3 stuck with Dany only after she gave them her wedding gifts (sword, whip and bow) and emerged with baby dragons.
 
Fan of the books forever. Don't have HBO but on vacay and watched an episode. Was good and then hard core porn out of the blue. Is this normal for this series?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top