What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

HBO - Song of Ice&Fire Series -Varsity Thread - no TV only whiners (4 Viewers)

Im a little disappointed that they didnt at least show Dany's vision of a blue rose coming out of the ice when she was beyond the wall to throw the book readers a bone. Surely that wouldnt have put them over budget.
what does the blue rose signify, does if have something to do with her brother Rhaegar? (I haven't read the books, but I've done more poking around the wiki than I should have...)
 
Found this on the interwebs:This is the rarest of spoilers, insofar as it seems to apply both to the TV show and the as yet unpublished books. Theon Greyjoy actor Alfie Allen reveals he asked George R.R. Martin the answer to one of the saga's biggest unsolved mysteries, and his answer certainly drops some potentially massive clues:
Oh wow. I have a theory that fits this.DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T READ THE BOOKS! MANY MANY BIG SPOILERS...
When Brandon Stark (Eddard's Brother) goes to the Red Keep and demands that Rhaegar 'come out to die' it's because Rhaegar has 'kidnapped' Lyanna. And there's an assertion/assumption scattered through the book that Rhaegar 'raped' her. The obvious path from there is Lyanna got pregnant when Rhaegar raped her, Jon is their son, and Brandon Stark was killed when he went to avenge his sister. Which started the rebellion. But...What if it was Brandon Stark that got Lyanna pregnant and Rhaegar 'rescued' her? Incest is fairly common in Westeros and Brandon was supposedly quite rash. That would make the Starks responsible for the war, and would help explain why Aerys called Brandon and all his supporters to the Keep and killed them. It would also make Jon the son of his Uncle Brandon and Aunt Lyanna, and give Eddard even MORE reason to pursue Lyanna to the Tower of Joy where he and his friends defeated the Kingsguard and took the infant with them afterwards to be raised as Eddard's *******?
A few picks with this theory; Incest was common among the Targaryens, among everyone else it is a serious crime. According to Eddard, Lyanna wanted to be brought back to Winterfell to buried next to her father and brother. I doubt she would make that request if her brother had raped her. Also, at the Tower of Joy, Gerold Hightower explains the presence of the three KG members there by saying "we swore a vow". This would seem to indicate that they are there doing some element of their duty to defend the King or his heirs (though they may have thought Rhaegar was the father and possibly he wasn't)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Found this on the interwebs:This is the rarest of spoilers, insofar as it seems to apply both to the TV show and the as yet unpublished books. Theon Greyjoy actor Alfie Allen reveals he asked George R.R. Martin the answer to one of the saga's biggest unsolved mysteries, and his answer certainly drops some potentially massive clues:
Oh wow. I have a theory that fits this.DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T READ THE BOOKS! MANY MANY BIG SPOILERS...
When Brandon Stark (Eddard's Brother) goes to the Red Keep and demands that Rhaegar 'come out to die' it's because Rhaegar has 'kidnapped' Lyanna. And there's an assertion/assumption scattered through the book that Rhaegar 'raped' her. The obvious path from there is Lyanna got pregnant when Rhaegar raped her, Jon is their son, and Brandon Stark was killed when he went to avenge his sister. Which started the rebellion. But...What if it was Brandon Stark that got Lyanna pregnant and Rhaegar 'rescued' her? Incest is fairly common in Westeros and Brandon was supposedly quite rash. That would make the Starks responsible for the war, and would help explain why Aerys called Brandon and all his supporters to the Keep and killed them. It would also make Jon the son of his Uncle Brandon and Aunt Lyanna, and give Eddard even MORE reason to pursue Lyanna to the Tower of Joy where he and his friends defeated the Kingsguard and took the infant with them afterwards to be raised as Eddard's *******?
From what we know about the Starks, that theory is preposterous.
 
Found this on the interwebs:This is the rarest of spoilers, insofar as it seems to apply both to the TV show and the as yet unpublished books. Theon Greyjoy actor Alfie Allen reveals he asked George R.R. Martin the answer to one of the saga's biggest unsolved mysteries, and his answer certainly drops some potentially massive clues:
Oh wow. I have a theory that fits this.DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T READ THE BOOKS! MANY MANY BIG SPOILERS...
When Brandon Stark (Eddard's Brother) goes to the Red Keep and demands that Rhaegar 'come out to die' it's because Rhaegar has 'kidnapped' Lyanna. And there's an assertion/assumption scattered through the book that Rhaegar 'raped' her. The obvious path from there is Lyanna got pregnant when Rhaegar raped her, Jon is their son, and Brandon Stark was killed when he went to avenge his sister. Which started the rebellion. But...What if it was Brandon Stark that got Lyanna pregnant and Rhaegar 'rescued' her? Incest is fairly common in Westeros and Brandon was supposedly quite rash. That would make the Starks responsible for the war, and would help explain why Aerys called Brandon and all his supporters to the Keep and killed them. It would also make Jon the son of his Uncle Brandon and Aunt Lyanna, and give Eddard even MORE reason to pursue Lyanna to the Tower of Joy where he and his friends defeated the Kingsguard and took the infant with them afterwards to be raised as Eddard's *******?
According to Eddard, Lyanna wanted to be brought back to Winterfell to buried next to her father and brother.
Yup. Which kinda kills the claim that Lyanna made Ned promise to take her remains back to Winterfell - everyone knows remains/bones of Starks are buried in the crypts. Was the honorable Ned Stark lying to everyone and claiming John Snow as his so Robert wouldn't kill Snow? I think so...
 
Found this on the interwebs:

This is the rarest of spoilers, insofar as it seems to apply both to the TV show and the as yet unpublished books. Theon Greyjoy actor Alfie Allen reveals he asked George R.R. Martin the answer to one of the saga's biggest unsolved mysteries, and his answer certainly drops some potentially massive clues:
Oh wow. I have a theory that fits this.DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T READ THE BOOKS! MANY MANY BIG SPOILERS...

When Brandon Stark (Eddard's Brother) goes to the Red Keep and demands that Rhaegar 'come out to die' it's because Rhaegar has 'kidnapped' Lyanna. And there's an assertion/assumption scattered through the book that Rhaegar 'raped' her. The obvious path from there is Lyanna got pregnant when Rhaegar raped her, Jon is their son, and Brandon Stark was killed when he went to avenge his sister. Which started the rebellion. But...

What if it was Brandon Stark that got Lyanna pregnant and Rhaegar 'rescued' her? Incest is fairly common in Westeros and Brandon was supposedly quite rash. That would make the Starks responsible for the war, and would help explain why Aerys called Brandon and all his supporters to the Keep and killed them. It would also make Jon the son of his Uncle Brandon and Aunt Lyanna, and give Eddard even MORE reason to pursue Lyanna to the Tower of Joy where he and his friends defeated the Kingsguard and took the infant with them afterwards to be raised as Eddard's *******?
IIRC the event timeline correctly, and we are to believe Jon's age as stated in the book, Brandon Stark (Eddard's brother) was already dead before Jon was conceived. So unless the others or a red priest/priestess is involved I don't think this scenario is possible.
what was the timeline of Lyanna's "abduction" as it related to Brandon & Rickard's death? I can never tell how long these battles last. Robb is older than Jon, right?
282

Dishonoring of Lyanna Stark

Rhaegar Targaryen is assumed to have hurt Lyanna in some fashion; Rhaegar may have abducted and/or raped Lyanna.

Brandon Stark rides to King's Landing to make Rhaegar answer for his crimes. Rhaegar is not at King's Landing, but Aerys arrests Brandon and his companions (Ethan Glover, Jeffory Mallister, Kyle Royce, and Elbert Arryn), demanding that their fathers come ransom them.

Trial at King's Landing

Aerys commands the execution of Brandon, his companions, and their fathers. Only Brandon's squire Ethan Glover survives.

283

Robb Stark is born to Catelyn Tully at Riverrun.

Battle by The Tower of Joy

Eddard, Martyn Cassel, Theo Wull, Ethan Glover, Mark Ryswell, Howland Reed, and Lord Dustin encounter Oswell Whent, Gerold Hightower, and Arthur Dayne of the Kingsguard by The Tower of Joy; only Eddard and Howland Reed survive the ensuing battle.

Death of Lyanna Stark

Lyanna dies of unknown causes, presumably at The Tower of Joy. Eddard promises her something.

Eddard returns Arthur Dayne's sword to the Daynes of Starfall. Ashara Dayne flings herself into the sea.
The entirety of Robert's Rebellion happened between the Trial at King's landing and the Battle by the Tower of Joy. Considering (for example) the siege of Storm's End lasted a year by itself, I don't think there's any way Brandon Stark could have been Jon's father.
 
Seems like these spoilers are heating up...am I the only one who wants to open them but am to far behind on the books?
They're not really spoilers as they are theories. People are trading evidence to support their theories, but it's nothing that could ruin the enjoyment of the show since none of this is confirmed yet (through the first 5 books at least).But just to be safe, best not to open.
 
Im a little disappointed that they didnt at least show Dany's vision of a blue rose coming out of the ice when she was beyond the wall to throw the book readers a bone. Surely that wouldnt have put them over budget.
what does the blue rose signify, does if have something to do with her brother Rhaegar? (I haven't read the books, but I've done more poking around the wiki than I should have...)
Unknown. There is a theory out there, but I do not want to spoil anything for you. I just thought it would have been something cool and easy to throw in there for us nerds.
 
thats why I dont think Jon Snow is dead. too much speculation on his parentage to just have him whacked now
I need to read Book 5 again but didn't John's wounds smoke much like one of Dany's dragons (Drogon's?) did when it was hit by an arrow? Would make sense considering he would be "blood of the dragon" - at least half that is.But yeah I agree, no way he is dead. Tho some theories suggest he is Azor Ahai and will reborn by some spell Mel pulls off.
 
thats why I dont think Jon Snow is dead. too much speculation on his parentage to just have him whacked now
I need to read Book 5 again but didn't John's wounds smoke much like one of Dany's dragons (Drogon's?) did when it was hit by an arrow? Would make sense considering he would be "blood of the dragon" - at least half that is.But yeah I agree, no way he is dead. Tho some theories suggest he is Azor Ahai and will reborn by some spell Mel pulls off.
I don't recall his wounds smoking at that point, but it's certain he burned when he saved Mormont from the wights, so he's definitely not a dragon like Dany (though he could still be a Targaryen like Viserys was) at this point. No way Martin kills him off IMO, just too many dangling threads would result.
 
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
 
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
I don't speak for everyone but my issue with it is that I'm only on book 3 and I have no way of knowing if it's true or not. Some here may but some don't and unfortunately you can't erase it from your memory after you read it.

 
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
 
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
Or if you know it is a fake spoiler then it isn't true which is in a way a spoiler. The worst offenses IMO are the nonspoiler tagged comments that reveal certain characters are still around in book 4 or 5.
 
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
Or if you know it is a fake spoiler then it isn't true which is in a way a spoiler. The worst offenses IMO are the nonspoiler tagged comments that reveal certain characters are still around in book 4 or 5.
Exactly. Is it really that hard to just not be an ######?
 
Im a little disappointed that they didnt at least show Dany's vision of a blue rose coming out of the ice when she was beyond the wall to throw the book readers a bone. Surely that wouldnt have put them over budget.
what does the blue rose signify, does if have something to do with her brother Rhaegar? (I haven't read the books, but I've done more poking around the wiki than I should have...)
Unknown. There is a theory out there, but I do not want to spoil anything for you. I just thought it would have been something cool and easy to throw in there for us nerds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kind of odd that Robb and Cat havent ever been told about Bran and Rickon's "deaths" as that emotion played a major role in what Robb and Cat did these last episodes in the books. Omitting that emotion and the chain/tyrion's masterfulness and adding scene's with Ros and other things out of thin air are what annoy me a bit. They could have worked.

 
Why do Robb and fakejeyne get married under the 7 gods. Shouldnt he worship the old gods and she something from essos?
I imagine there wasn't a weirwood handy wherever they were at that point. Also Robb's mom worshiped the 7, not the old gods, so its not a huge stretch for him. Maybe Jeyne's family worshiped the 7 even though they were in Volantis?
(Or maybe she's not fakejeyne after all).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Seems like these spoilers are heating up...am I the only one who wants to open them but am to far behind on the books?
MOst of the recent spoilers are simply conjecture on the differing theories regardsing Jon Snow's actual parents. Not really much "spoiler" in them, but some contain nuggets the non-book readers wouldn't know.
 
'bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
thats why I dont think Jon Snow is dead. too much speculation on his parentage to just have him whacked now
Agreed. It certainly wasn't very clear compared to other deaths in the series.
 
'Ilov80s said:
'Mjolnirs said:
'mad sweeney said:
'Mjolnirs said:
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
Or if you know it is a fake spoiler then it isn't true which is in a way a spoiler. The worst offenses IMO are the nonspoiler tagged comments that reveal certain characters are still around in book 4 or 5.
Or it's so outrageous that it's not anything at all.
 
'Moe. said:
'Ilov80s said:
'Mjolnirs said:
'mad sweeney said:
'Mjolnirs said:
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
Or if you know it is a fake spoiler then it isn't true which is in a way a spoiler. The worst offenses IMO are the nonspoiler tagged comments that reveal certain characters are still around in book 4 or 5.
Exactly. Is it really that hard to just not be an ######?
 
'Moe. said:
'Ilov80s said:
'Mjolnirs said:
'mad sweeney said:
'Mjolnirs said:
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
Or if you know it is a fake spoiler then it isn't true which is in a way a spoiler. The worst offenses IMO are the nonspoiler tagged comments that reveal certain characters are still around in book 4 or 5.
Exactly. Is it really that hard to just not be an ######?
Sorry Sally, but you're in a thread started by one of the biggest book fans on the board. You know there's a huge potential for spoilers and there's also a thread for non book readers. Half the conjecture by people who haven't read it all is worse spoilers than the jokes. If you want to take a chance in a place where most have read the books, don't cry when someone has a little fun.
 
Sorry Sally, but you're in a thread started by one of the biggest book fans on the board. You know there's a huge potential for spoilers and there's also a thread for non book readers. Half the conjecture by people who haven't read it all is worse spoilers than the jokes. If you want to take a chance in a place where most have read the books, don't cry when someone has a little fun.
You know there's the huge potential to see spoilers like you know when you're being an ### and not putting a spoiler tage around them.There is a thread for non-book readers but where's the one for the guys who are reading the books now? Where's the book 3 thread?The tough talk is funny in a thread like this too :confused:
 
Sorry Sally, but you're in a thread started by one of the biggest book fans on the board. You know there's a huge potential for spoilers and there's also a thread for non book readers. Half the conjecture by people who haven't read it all is worse spoilers than the jokes. If you want to take a chance in a place where most have read the books, don't cry when someone has a little fun.
You know there's the huge potential to see spoilers like you know when you're being an ### and not putting a spoiler tage around them.There is a thread for non-book readers but where's the one for the guys who are reading the books now? Where's the book 3 thread?The tough talk is funny in a thread like this too :confused:
You can start any thread you want. I've never put a spoiler, or anything close to a believable fake spoiler, not in tags so your ### comment is really misplaced, and quite frankly rude and unnecessary. As for tough talk? I was just responding to the guy who thought it was a good idea to jump in and call people names. But I notice you didn't go after him...eta: bottom line, it's a thread started by book readers. If you don't want any spoilers, stay out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really hope GRRM doesn't eat the way he writes. His love of bacon, blood sausage, roasted meat, stuff swimming in butter and grease leads me to think he may not live to see the Mayan apocalypse.

 
'Leeroy Jenkins said:
Kind of odd that Robb and Cat havent ever been told about Bran and Rickon's "deaths" as that emotion played a major role in what Robb and Cat did these last episodes in the books. Omitting that emotion and the chain/tyrion's masterfulness and adding scene's with Ros and other things out of thin air are what annoy me a bit. They could have worked.
Theon killed all the Ravens
 
No reason not to read these if you like the show. Books 2 and 3 are epic.

Book 4 is not so epic.

Book 5 picks back up again a bit.

Awesome books.

 
'Leeroy Jenkins said:
Kind of odd that Robb and Cat havent ever been told about Bran and Rickon's "deaths" as that emotion played a major role in what Robb and Cat did these last episodes in the books. Omitting that emotion and the chain/tyrion's masterfulness and adding scene's with Ros and other things out of thin air are what annoy me a bit. They could have worked.
Theon killed all the Ravens
I know. Im talking about it being a purposeful deviation from the books but am unsure why they did so.
 
Sorry Sally, but you're in a thread started by one of the biggest book fans on the board. You know there's a huge potential for spoilers and there's also a thread for non book readers. Half the conjecture by people who haven't read it all is worse spoilers than the jokes. If you want to take a chance in a place where most have read the books, don't cry when someone has a little fun.
You know there's the huge potential to see spoilers like you know when you're being an ### and not putting a spoiler tage around them.There is a thread for non-book readers but where's the one for the guys who are reading the books now? Where's the book 3 thread?The tough talk is funny in a thread like this too :confused:
You can start any thread you want. I've never put a spoiler, or anything close to a believable fake spoiler, not in tags so your ### comment is really misplaced, and quite frankly rude and unnecessary. As for tough talk? I was just responding to the guy who thought it was a good idea to jump in and call people names. But I notice you didn't go after him...eta: bottom line, it's a thread started by book readers. If you don't want any spoilers, stay out.
The "you" in my reply was meant to be in a general form, I apologize for the confusion. And please, don't be the guy casting stones at another then acting all butt hurt when it comes to you. Rude? Seriously? Man up, Sally. :thumbup: Also the thread title is "HBO acquires rights to A Song of Ice and Fire Series"...in fact, if you start on page 1 it almost reads as if this is more about the HBO show then the books. None of it matters now given the direction the thread has taken but people being curtious with the spoiler tags seems to be the norm. There's also no need to start other threads given the fact that a majority of the book readers seem like pretty cool people and slap a spoiler tage around some things. Maybe you should start a spoiler free thread?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Moe. said:
'Ilov80s said:
'Mjolnirs said:
'mad sweeney said:
'Mjolnirs said:
I don't follow this thread or the show, but please stop posting spoilers (real or fake). People are getting upset.
Spoilers weren't the problem. Everyone following this thread knows the book readers are posting spoilers in spoiler tags. Actually non book readers have started a separate thread that is just for the show and spoiler free.The problem here was people posting fake spoilers outside of spoiler tags.
I am a bit curious as to why that's a problem.
If you aren't a book reader then you don't know it's a fake spoiler. From your point of view you've just been spoiled.
Or if you know it is a fake spoiler then it isn't true which is in a way a spoiler. The worst offenses IMO are the nonspoiler tagged comments that reveal certain characters are still around in book 4 or 5.
Exactly. Is it really that hard to just not be an ######?
Sorry Sally, but you're in a thread started by one of the biggest book fans on the board. You know there's a huge potential for spoilers and there's also a thread for non book readers. Half the conjecture by people who haven't read it all is worse spoilers than the jokes. If you want to take a chance in a place where most have read the books, don't cry when someone has a little fun.
Your tone is hilarious. I've read the books. I'm not even talking about people who have read the books posting spoilers in tags or whatever. Just the fake spoiler nonsense.
 
People make offensive comments about race, politics, religion, sex and violence in other threads with no concequences, but in here we get warned twice by admin over TV non-spoilers?

A little perspective would be nice.

 
People make offensive comments about race, politics, religion, sex and violence in other threads with no concequences, but in here we get warned twice by admin over TV non-spoilers?A little perspective would be nice.
It's still stupid to post fake spoilers, because the non-book readers freak out and ask if it's real, then book readers have to say "no, that didn't happen"...which actually turns the whole thing INTO a spoiler, because now the non-book readers know that, for example, Jon Snow didn't fart the Others away, or whatever. If it's something ridiculous like that, then it's not a big deal...but people were posting realistic non-spoilers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top