I'm down with this.I want single payer health care for all. A government alternative woyld set the market and privates would have to compete.
Feel free to pay for your neighbor that doesnt have it and everyone else that doesnt either. Its your choice, make the right one.Just want to get educated on the against.
Not going to debate here.
I will and go, I pay for a lot of crap that I can care less about.Feel free to pay for your neighbor that doesnt have it and everyone else that doesnt either. Its your choice, make the right one.
Freaking so crates here.I want single payer health care for all. A government alternative woyld set the market and privates would have to compete.
Are you sure you are doing enough?I will and go, I pay for a lot of crap that I can care less about.
Dunno enlighten me. I mean I donated over 10k just on fbgs.Are you sure you are doing enough?
I have no clue what you believe you should be spending on others healthcare. Thus I am asking, do you feel you are doing enough to help others with their healthcare costs?Dunno enlighten me. I mean I donated over 10k just on fbgs.
You are asking the wrong person this. I would give my kidney to another human being. How you want to win here? I can prove my donations to people here that have to do with healthcare. Care to match my proof? That is a win, win.I have no clue what you believe you should be spending on others healthcare. Thus I am asking, do you feel you are doing enough to help others with their healthcare costs?
Well I actually did give my kidney to some one. Once again... do you feel you are doing enough to help others with their healthcare cost?You are asking the wrong person this. I would give my kidney to another human being. How you want to win here? I can prove my donations to people here that have to do with healthcare. Care to match my proof? That is a win, win.
Honestly, given your past posts on this topic, I don't think you want to be educated at all. It seems more likely that you want to accuse and spout talking points.Just want to get educated on the against.
Not going to debate here.
Of course, I do. I have been doing it for 20 years. Give me the name and proof of the person that needed the kidney and after I vet it, if not related to your family, I will give them 500 bucks.Well I actually did give my kidney to some one. Once again... do you feel you are doing enough to help others with their healthcare cost?
Okay want do you want me to expand on?Honestly, given your past posts on this topic, I don't think you want to be educated at all. It seems more likely that you want to accuse and spout talking points.
LOL done... Donated my kidney to my father on 4-28-14. What sort of proof would you like? The head of my kidney donor team? The Gift of Life Family House in Philly that we continue to sponsor? Just let me knowOf course, I do. I have been doing it for 20 years. Give me the name and proof of the person that needed the kidney and after I vet it, if not related to your family, I will give the 500 bucks.
No lol, this isn't a contest. I will be happy to help them.LOL done...
I can give you a list of people that need a kidney. Its very easy to find a match. Same with a piece of your liver. But lets be honest, you really arent doing all that you can, only what you deem acceptable. But at least you have done enough in your book.Of course, I do. I have been doing it for 20 years. Give me the name and proof of the person that needed the kidney and after I vet it, if not related to your family, I will give them 500 bucks.
Good, go here, register and start the process. It's a fantastic experience.No lol, this isn't a contest. I will be happy to help them.
Let's get this over, you are right.I can give you a list of people that need a kidney. Its very easy to find a match. Same with a piece of your liver. But lets be honest, you really arent doing all that you can, only what you deem acceptable. But at least you have done enough in your book.
Because you feel YOU are the one to determine who is doing enough, well I don't believe you are.Let's get this over, you are right.
Now what does it have to do with anything we were talking about?
For someone so giving you seem mad. You did a great thing. I admire you for that. What do you want from me, I only ask because you have a pointLOL done... Donated my kidney to my father on 4-28-14. What sort of proof would you like? The head of my kidney donor team? The Gift of Life Family House in Philly that we continue to sponsor? Just let me know
I think we should go to the extreme for our fellow man, you did, what am I missing?Because you feel YOU are the one to determine who is doing enough, well I don't believe you are.
I want you to do as much as you possibly can (to be determined by me) if you are going to judge and determine what others should be doing with their lives.For someone so giving you seem mad. You did a great thing. I admire you for that. What do you want from me, I only ask because you have a point
Looked, can't register from that link, but I might need to look further,
Had I known my individual costs would more than triple, I would have gladly volunteered to double them.Feel free to pay for your neighbor that doesnt have it and everyone else that doesnt either. Its your choice, make the right one.
I get you, but what does this have to do for healthcare for all?I want you to do as much as you possibly can (to be determined by me) if you are going to judge and determine what others should be doing with their lives.
I don't give a tuck what other people doI want you to do as much as you possibly can (to be determined by me) if you are going to judge and determine what others should be doing with their lives.
because someone has to pay for it and I am one of those crazy people that believe healthcare is not near as important as food, water, shelter, and housing. Since I believe this (if I believed in healthcare for all) I would have to believe that food, water, shelter and housing should be provided for everyone as well at zero cost. This puts a massive burden on people who may not have the same beliefs as I do. I am not willing to reduce a persons quality of life for someone else's all because I deem they have "enough".I get you, but what does this have to do for healthcare for all?
I disagree with you and that's okay. I am not the enemy.because someone has to pay for it and I am one of those crazy people that believe healthcare is not near as important as food, water, shelter, and housing. Since I believe this (if I believed in healthcare for all) I would have to believe that food, water, shelter and housing should be provided for everyone as well at zero cost. This puts a massive burden on people who may not have the same beliefs as I do. I am not willing to reduce a persons quality of life for someone else's all because I deem they have "enough".
Thus my point, I deem you have not done enough.You have far more than others. So I believe you should go donate a kidney, part of your liver, donate a majority of your income to leave you living with bare necessities so that others can live at the same level you do.I disagree with you and that's okay. I am not the enemy.
I don't disagree with you but then there is reality. Gates is going to be rich and people are going to be poor. It is a reality, be have to take care of those idiots. Just the cost of doing businessThis is an excellent question. I am very conservative and I believe the short answer is that it comes back to choice. Babies don't get a choice so someone has to protect them. I would even say that if legislation proposed free healthcare for anyone under the age of 18 that conservatives wouldn't have a problem with that. The problem comes from not allowing people to be adults and have consequences for their choices. For example- I just moved to a smaller midwest town that has job openings everywhere. But employers keep saying most can't pass the drug test. Is it then my responsibility to continue to help that habit by providing healthcare and finances? . Also, Many hospitals were started and funded by Christian organizations. So it isn't that that group doesn't care about people and their health. Good question that I think needs to be explored. Thanks
I am fine with you saying I haven't done enough, I want my govt to use their money and do enough.Thus my point, I deem you have not done enough.You have far more than others. So I believe you should go donate a kidney, part of your liver, donate a majority of your income to leave you living with bare necessities so that others can live at the same level you do.
You know its not THEIR money right?I am fine with you saying I haven't done enough, I want my govt to use their money and do enough.
The reality is Gates earned his money and it isn't our right to take it from him. Socialism doesn't work. Everyone loses motivation to better themselves. We can not be responsible for other people's poor choices.I don't disagree with you but then there is reality. Gates is going to be rich and people are going to be poor. It is a reality, be have to take care of those idiots. Just the cost of doing business
I want to give humans healthcare, will this break gates? Better yet, who loses here?The reality is Gates earned his money and it isn't our right to take it from him. Socialism doesn't work. Everyone loses motivation to better themselves. We can not be responsible for other people's poor choices.
I don't think your use of the word "socialism" is applicable here. We're just arguing about expenditures in the federal budget.The reality is Gates earned his money and it isn't our right to take it from him. Socialism doesn't work. Everyone loses motivation to better themselves. We can not be responsible for other people's poor choices.
Should we let people starve, be cold, or sleep on the street? We somewhat solved two of these by addressing costs. Seems like we should be attacking it from that angle.Should we let people die? Seems like the fundamental question.
I was referring to the statement that Gates will be rich and others will be poor. The implication is that he should share that or be required to for the benefit of those who don't have. That is socialism. Also, the money has to come from the people who will pay the taxes. Those will have to go up. There by those who have provide for those who don't have.I don't think your use of the word "socialism" is applicable here. We're just arguing about expenditures in the federal budget.
I will give you any organ you need, but the unpopular truth is that your only help is single payer, yes i have met bnb irl.Should we let people starve, be cold, or sleep on the street? We somewhat solved two of these by addressing costs. Seems like we should be attacking it from that angle.
Bs, non educated answer, i will never send you another ps3The Federal government is so efficient at managing money and costs I think they would do a fine job as the single payer and try to save us money.
We always have wealthier people paying a bigger tax bill than poor people, we're just debating how to spend those revenues. Taxes may indeed go up for some if we don't shift spending from other parts of the budget but health insurance premiums will be eliminated which, incidentally, would be a boon for American business and entrepreneurism.I was referring to the statement that Gates will be rich and others will be poor. The implication is that he should share that or be required to for the benefit of those who don't have. That is socialism. Also, the money has to come from the people who will pay the taxes. Those will have to go up. There by those who have provide for those who don't have.
Pm me your dads name and addy, i will hook him up with 500. If you think this is bs, ask rude, mt, or cgYou know its not THEIR money right?