Hawaii without Brennan = 3-9
Florida without Tebow = 9-3
Look, you are absolutely kidding yourself. I can't believe someone could even post something as ridiculous as this.You see what Oregon has become without Dixon? That is what happens to Florida without Tebow.
Meanwhile, Brennan missed 3 games for Hawaii and they won all 3. So unless you're saying they would've gone 0-9 against the rest...
And I can't believe someone could even post something as ridiculous as this.Did you seriously just compare the defending national champions to Oregon? Umm, Florida has about 10x as much supporting talent and Dixon > Tebow.
Brennan missed 2 games. You think a Brennan-less win over Charleston Southern proves that Hawaii is just as good without him?
Someone's been spending too much time on the Tebow-hype machine... err ESPN.
Without Tebow, Florida loses to Ole Miss by 2 scores.Yay, Florida won the national championship on the legs of their defense last year. The legs of their defense that lost 9 starters. Who cares? Florida's offense SUCKED last year. This year it is one of the best in the country. What is the difference? Tim Tebow. That's it.
Yes I compared Oregon to Florida. Oregon has a better defense and much better running backs. Florida has better WRs and a better quarterback.
Hawaii played Charleston Southern and Nevada without Brennan and won. You act as if they weren't playing teams like that week in and week out. Hawaii could have won 6 or 7 games this year with me starting at quarterback.
Don't get me started on the ESPN hype machine. ESPN would have me believe that McFadden has a shot at winning the heisman and that Hawaii is a good football team. Neither are true.
Yeah, Tebow did an awesome job in that game of blocking for himself and catching his own passes. Oh wait, he had some of the best players in the country doing that for him.Florida's offense didn't SUCK last year, it was a top 20-25 offense all year. And when did I mention the defense? I said his supporting cast on offense was one of the best in the country. If anything, the crappy defense has allowed him to run up the stats because they actually had to play from behind this year.
Florida has a better o-line and wide receivers. The defense doesn't affect Tebow's play and Florida doesn't use a feature back, so it's apples and oranges.
No, Hawaii didn't play Charleston Southern every week. Do you realize how bad that team is? Probably not, because you obviously don't pay attention to football outside the SEC.
I suppose you also thought that Roethlisberger, Romo, Favre, Garrard, Warner, etc. weren't very good quarterbacks in comparison to their big school counterparts. How'd that work out for you?
Look, it's obvious you know little about the Florida team you're trying to talk about.Tebow didn't block for himself or catch his own passes in the Ole Miss game, but he may as well have. He was met at or near the line on most plays and carried guys for 4-7 yards repeatedly. His O-line is better than Hawaii's, but average at best nationally. The fact that Florida doesn't use a feature back in far from irrelevant. They don't use one because they don't have anyone good enough to be one, and as a result they have to put their best WR back there. When Percy doesn't line up at WR (or when he was out with injuries) the Florida and Hawaii WRs are pretty comparable, with only Caldwell (who missed half the season) being notably better than the Hawaii WRs.
Florida's line and WRs are better than Hawaii's, but the defenses they're facing are also leagues upon leagues better than the ones Hawaii was facing. And the difference between the Florida line/WRs vs. the Hawaii line/WRs is far less than the difference between Auburn's defense and Fresno State's.
As for your statement that Florida was a top 20 offense last year, you just lost any credibility you had. Florida's offense was terrible last year. They scored when they did usually because their amazing defense set them up with great field position time after time after time. With as much as they started deep in their opponent's territory last year even an average offense would have averaged 35-40 points per game.
This year, they have gotten good starting field position off turnovers less than 3 times this year and their defense allows the other team to stay out on the field for much longer and run down the clock, yet they've still put up a heck of a lot more points.
Believe me, in the grand scheme of things, last year's offense was quite inept. Comparing it to this year's offense is just the most laughable thing anyone could possibly do. Last year's was the worst offense Florida has had since the start of the Spurrier era, this year's is right on par with (and possibly better than) the amazing offenses they put together in '96 and '01. Again, the only difference between the worst in a decade and a half and possibly the best in a decade and a half was the move from Leak to Tebow.
You say that the defense is irrelevant, but you also say that losses are relevant. Florida has lost this year *ONLY* because of their defense.
As for your last comment, you see that quarterback in my sig? I traded up in our rookie draft to get that guy with Phillip Rivers still on the board and have ridden him without waiver ever since. I also thought (and said) that when Steve McNair was going to tear the NFL apart when he came out of that monstrous Alcorn State University.
I like the little guy, but comparing Brennan to Tebow this year is not even possible. Vegas (who has no bias) agrees, putting Tebow's odds at 1.2:1 (that's one point two, not twelve in case the decimal is hard to see) and Brennan's at 50:1.
Also, you're the one sitting in here severely underrating Hawaii's WRs just because they were not big name recruits and don't play for a big name school. Those guys have a
ton of YAC this year.