What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hot! (1 Viewer)

Upton is good looking, she's plump, but none the less attractive.
Agree

She would be a great hustler or penthouse model.
Totally agree.

Just because a woman has nice jugs doesn't make her a model.
The fact that she gets paid to do modeling makes her a model. ROCKET SCIENCE.
Yes, she works as a model. But she's not a 10. These are 10s.
I didn't say she was a 10. I was replying to the notion that she's not a model.

 
Upton is good looking, she's plump, but none the less attractive.
Agree

She would be a great hustler or penthouse model.
Totally agree.

Just because a woman has nice jugs doesn't make her a model.
The fact that she gets paid to do modeling makes her a model. ROCKET SCIENCE.
Yes, she works as a model. But she's not a 10. These are 10s.
I didn't say she was a 10. I was replying to the notion that she's not a model.
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.

 
Upton is good looking, she's plump, but none the less attractive.
Agree

She would be a great hustler or penthouse model.
Totally agree.

Just because a woman has nice jugs doesn't make her a model.
The fact that she gets paid to do modeling makes her a model. ROCKET SCIENCE.
Yes, she works as a model. But she's not a 10. These are 10s.
I didn't say she was a 10. I was replying to the notion that she's not a model.
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Great name for a band.

Upton aside, I've been saying the FFA overrates mediocre chicks with giant cans for years.

 
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Actually the biggest strawman in here is thinking everyone should share your taste. It's just ignorant.

 
Upton is good looking, she's plump, but none the less attractive.
Agree

She would be a great hustler or penthouse model.
Totally agree.

Just because a woman has nice jugs doesn't make her a model.
The fact that she gets paid to do modeling makes her a model. ROCKET SCIENCE.
Yes, she works as a model. But she's not a 10. These are 10s.
I didn't say she was a 10. I was replying to the notion that she's not a model.
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Great name for a band.

Upton aside, I've been saying the FFA overrates mediocre chicks with giant cans for years.
1,000 x :goodposting:
 
Upton is good looking, she's plump, but none the less attractive.
Agree

She would be a great hustler or penthouse model.
Totally agree.

Just because a woman has nice jugs doesn't make her a model.
The fact that she gets paid to do modeling makes her a model. ROCKET SCIENCE.
Yes, she works as a model. But she's not a 10. These are 10s.
I didn't say she was a 10. I was replying to the notion that she's not a model.
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Great name for a band.

Upton aside, I've been saying the FFA overrates mediocre chicks with giant cans for years.
1,000 x :goodposting:
But her face -- sans any imputed hair --is kinda...perfect.

 
Upton is good looking, she's plump, but none the less attractive.
Agree

She would be a great hustler or penthouse model.
Totally agree.

Just because a woman has nice jugs doesn't make her a model.
The fact that she gets paid to do modeling makes her a model. ROCKET SCIENCE.
Yes, she works as a model. But she's not a 10. These are 10s.
I didn't say she was a 10. I was replying to the notion that she's not a model.
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Great name for a band.

Upton aside, I've been saying the FFA overrates mediocre chicks with giant cans for years.
1,000 x :goodposting:
But her face -- sans any imputed hair --is kinda...perfect.
Yes, she's adorable. Really beautiful face.
 
Kate Upton's cellulite doesn't turn me off. Her hairy upper lip, on the other hand....
GM, you're one picky dude.
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img542/5836/luf7.jpg
Hairy lip, nose hair (and at her age) and a possible canker sore inside her mouth. Of course I ain't no prize myself.
She looks like she could have a unibrow that she's tried to pluck out too.
 
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Actually the biggest strawman in here is thinking everyone should share your taste. It's just ignorant.
You can like fat chicks, but let's just call a spade a spade.
I did. I called an ignorant person ignorant. But I'm not at all surprised the point went right on over your head.

 
In before offdee comes in and rates her an 8
9.5 ------- 10: Almost flawless and very rare. Could be a top model, top playboy centerfold, (nationally amazing, the MENSA of hotness) 9: The hottest girl at the club, The hottest girl at school, etc (more locally amazing)
jesus offdee, and you're supposed to be the definitive ratings guy. #epicfail

http://moderndayruth.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/kate-upton-lardy-2.jpg
Rating was done 3 yrs ago. Time is not a woman's friend.

 
That's a strawman. Of course she's a model, and that's a silly debate. She's just a chubby one, and overrated by men with marginal taste because she has big sloppy flapjacks.
Actually the biggest strawman in here is thinking everyone should share your taste. It's just ignorant.
You can like fat chicks, but let's just call a spade a spade.
I did. I called an ignorant person ignorant. But I'm not at all surprised the point went right on over your head.
You need to be more upset about this.
 
Like someone intelligent on this thread said:

Boy, if she'd just lose some weight her modeling career might really take off............

 
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
She is giving out more wood than Lumber Liquidators

 
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
She is giving out more wood than Lumber Liquidators
I'm harder than a diamond in an ice storm.

 
Upton at her best, from the front, from the waist up, is a 15. But, she has a flat ### and no hips - she's like a man from the ribcage down.

That McKinney chick is way too skinny. Give me Beyonce's body over that anyday.

 
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.

 
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Can you tell me the lottery numbers as long as you are predicting the future here?

 
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Can you tell me the lottery numbers as long as you are predicting the future here?
Feel free to bump this if she ever becomes famous as Kate.
 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?

 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this isn't just about slobbering over Kate. It's a critical discussion of her place in the world of hotness.

 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this isn't just about slobbering over Kate. It's a critical discussion of her place in the world of hotness.
Oh. I thought it was one persons quest to get everyone else to agree with him that she isnt very hot. My bad. Carry on.
 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this isn't just about slobbering over Kate. It's a critical discussion of her place in the world of hotness.
Oh. I thought it was one persons quest to get everyone else to agree with him that she isnt very hot. My bad. Carry on.
He almost had me with the hairy lip, but I came to my senses. Those things are easily removed with a little effort.

I'm also not convinced that such a goddess has major blemishes like that. Looks photoshopped.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this isn't just about slobbering over Kate. It's a critical discussion of her place in the world of hotness.
Oh. I thought it was one persons quest to get everyone else to agree with him that she isnt very hot. My bad. Carry on.
Well there is that as well.

 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
This isn't a debate about marketing or popularity, timschochet.

 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this debate is about whether Upton is overrated, and there are a bunch of mouth breathers in here fawning over her juggs and claiming she's a 10, and when we start posting pics of chicks that are much hotter then Upton, she necessarily slides down the scale from 10. So it's perfectly relevant. Oh and also way to complain about pictures of perfect 10s.

 
Wingnut said:
Otis said:
Hang 10 said:
Al Czervik said:
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this debate is about whether Upton is overrated, and there are a bunch of mouth breathers in here fawning over her juggs and claiming she's a 10, and when we start posting pics of chicks that are much hotter then Upton, she necessarily slides down the scale from 10. So it's perfectly relevant. Oh and also way to complain about pictures of perfect 10s.
I guess it also comes down to how many women in the world you think are 10's. I happen to think there are probably millions of chicks who I'd classify as a 10 or at least many many thousands, but if you only think there are like 10 or so then no she's probably not one of the 10 hottest chicks walking the planet today. There are tons of insanely hot chicks who just aren't famous for one reason or another, and then you've got the Jessica Alba type celebrities that just blow away everyone. So even though Upton's face and boobs are a 15, her ### and hips are probably average or below average. So while I still average that out to a 10, I can see why it would be a deal-breaker for an ### man or a leg man to call her a 10.

 
Her #### are not a 10 IMO. Bigger is not always better.
Couldn't agree more on the bolded, and I've said as much to people on here before. People got killed in the Denise Milani thread for saying they were too big or cartoonish (I was one of the ones who said that). But Upton's are pretty much awesome, real big but not ridiculous-looking, and all-natural. Good stuff.

People also get blinded by huge cans when the chick's face is mediocre at best. But in this instance, I think she's outrageously beautiful and the boobs are awesome too. I can overlook the flat butt when everything else is great. And actually aside from that one runway pic when she admittedly was getting a little too thick and sloppy for a 20 year old, her ### at least usually looks toned. There's just no shape or anything to it, but aside from that one time period when she got chunky, I haven't seen this "fat" people keep talking about.

 
Just saw an article calling this girl the next Kate Upton. Though, every blond with huge hoo-hoos that comes along is probably called the "next Kate Upton".

Anyway, here she is; Charlotte McKinney http://instagram.com/charlottemckinney
Definitely hotter than Kate.
Way hotter than Upton. This is an argument for a perfect ten. See the difference?
Yes. The difference is she'll never be household name like Kate, as famous or popular as Kate, and the number of men around the world who masturbate to her pics will never be more than around 1% of Kates numbers.So yes, the difference is obvious.
Who gives a ####?
Exactly. There are millions of women hotter than Kate, but why put pics of any of them in this thread? There are plenty of threads here for women who aren't Kate.
Because this debate is about whether Upton is overrated, and there are a bunch of mouth breathers in here fawning over her juggs and claiming she's a 10, and when we start posting pics of chicks that are much hotter then Upton, she necessarily slides down the scale from 10. So it's perfectly relevant. Oh and also way to complain about pictures of perfect 10s.
This has gotta be shtick.

Her face is a ten. You could put that on a bony-### chick, and her cheekbones, jawbones, symmetry, and blue eyes make her damn near perfect.

McKinney had weird, ape-like cheekbones in some of her shots. Doesn't mean she's not a ten, either.

 
Her #### are not a 10 IMO. Bigger is not always better.
Couldn't agree more on the bolded, and I've said as much to people on here before. People got killed in the Denise Milani thread for saying they were too big or cartoonish (I was one of the ones who said that). But Upton's are pretty much awesome, real big but not ridiculous-looking, and all-natural. Good stuff.People also get blinded by huge cans when the chick's face is mediocre at best. But in this instance, I think she's outrageously beautiful and the boobs are awesome too. I can overlook the flat butt when everything else is great. And actually aside from that one runway pic when she admittedly was getting a little too thick and sloppy for a 20 year old, her ### at least usually looks toned. There's just no shape or anything to it, but aside from that one time period when she got chunky, I haven't seen this "fat" people keep talking about.
Her face is killer. Her #### are sloppy.
 
Her #### are not a 10 IMO. Bigger is not always better.
Couldn't agree more on the bolded, and I've said as much to people on here before. People got killed in the Denise Milani thread for saying they were too big or cartoonish (I was one of the ones who said that). But Upton's are pretty much awesome, real big but not ridiculous-looking, and all-natural. Good stuff.People also get blinded by huge cans when the chick's face is mediocre at best. But in this instance, I think she's outrageously beautiful and the boobs are awesome too. I can overlook the flat butt when everything else is great. And actually aside from that one runway pic when she admittedly was getting a little too thick and sloppy for a 20 year old, her ### at least usually looks toned. There's just no shape or anything to it, but aside from that one time period when she got chunky, I haven't seen this "fat" people keep talking about.
Her face is killer. Her #### are sloppy.
What a mess!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top