I'm color-blind and still don't see the tragedy, ecstasy or doom.http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/236x/99/ba/1b/99ba1bf93209fce3d09bf094cb7d83e0.jpgFlapJacks said:guy must be one of the best con artists of our time...gianmarco said:
I'm color-blind and still don't see the tragedy, ecstasy or doom.http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/236x/99/ba/1b/99ba1bf93209fce3d09bf094cb7d83e0.jpgFlapJacks said:guy must be one of the best con artists of our time...gianmarco said:
We're supposed to focus on big emotions rather than color relationships, and that's what he calls his painting?Christo said:Bargain. Orange, Red, Yellow went for $86.8MM in '12. I guess interest is waning.How on earth can this painting be worth 36.5 million?
This Rothko painting (Untitled) just sold at auction for 36.5 million?
It's a marketing gimmick. He's the Kim Kardashian of the art world.We're supposed to focus on big emotions rather than color relationships, and that's what he calls his painting?Christo said:Bargain. Orange, Red, Yellow went for $86.8MM in '12. I guess interest is waning.How on earth can this painting be worth 36.5 million?
This Rothko painting (Untitled) just sold at auction for 36.5 million?
Art said you were pretty difficult yourself.How on earth can this painting be worth 36.5 million?
This Rothko painting (Untitled) just sold at auction for 36.5 million?
what do you and your potty mouth daughter think of this "art"?Del Griffith said:I was at the Guggenheim in NYC about 3 years ago. The place is full of crap like this. My younger daughter (then 15), who is a decent artist, looked at a piece of "art" like this, and just said, "What the f*** is this???" I couldn't scold her for her language....she was right.
what do you and your potty mouth daughter think of this "art"?Del Griffith said:I was at the Guggenheim in NYC about 3 years ago. The place is full of crap like this. My younger daughter (then 15), who is a decent artist, looked at a piece of "art" like this, and just said, "What the f*** is this???" I couldn't scold her for her language....she was right.
it's a flower. NOW it's art.what do you and your potty mouth daughter think of this "art"?Del Griffith said:I was at the Guggenheim in NYC about 3 years ago. The place is full of crap like this. My younger daughter (then 15), who is a decent artist, looked at a piece of "art" like this, and just said, "What the f*** is this???" I couldn't scold her for her language....she was right.
love this kind of stuff and never heard of or seen this guy and his art (reminds a little of a one-trick pony Richard Long... yes, **** Long)- thanks for linking
now that's cool
It's not.I'm normally an "art is in the eye of the beholder" type, but yeah....that is about as artistic as my office wall.
Somewhat true but a lot of the more successful ones are those that dared to be different and changed the perception of "what is art?" It's been that way since the Renaissance.I think a lot of art Is just group-think bs. Some elites of the art world crown someone a genius, then the rest not wanting to look like they don't get it, pretend to see the genius as to be part of the hip crowd. The Emperor has no clothes, but don't tell anyone. It is like a religion for the atheist.
I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.
But I do think it's probably safe to say he's got something like a consensus in that regard.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.
Oh yeah, he was a rock star and knew how to play up his celebrity.But I do think it's probably safe to say he's got something like a consensus in that regard.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.![]()
I like all of those.Oh yeah, he was a rock star and knew how to play up his celebrity.But I do think it's probably safe to say he's got something like a consensus in that regard.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.![]()
Turner has always been interesting to me. I love his more abstract works but his more polished landscape paintings don't have the same effect on me.
I;m not saying I don't like them all but I get a reaction from the first that I don't from the second. To me, that's what art is all about.I like all of those.Oh yeah, he was a rock star and knew how to play up his celebrity.But I do think it's probably safe to say he's got something like a consensus in that regard.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.![]()
Turner has always been interesting to me. I love his more abstract works but his more polished landscape paintings don't have the same effect on me.
agree- and not normally part of that who's-who group listed earlier, IMO. Also more like Rothko than the others.Good stuff.Diebenkorn![]()
Me too. Love where they took Impressionism.Personally, I like the post-impressionists best: Rodin, Seurat, Cezanne, etc
Oh I wasn't being argumentative. I'd just never seen them before. More of a thanks for posting.I;m not saying I don't like them all but I get a reaction from the first that I don't from the second. To me, that's what art is all about.I like all of those.Oh yeah, he was a rock star and knew how to play up his celebrity.But I do think it's probably safe to say he's got something like a consensus in that regard.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.![]()
Turner has always been interesting to me. I love his more abstract works but his more polished landscape paintings don't have the same effect on me.
No.An individual will like what they like.I think a lot of art Is just group-think bs. Some elites of the art world crown someone a genius, then the rest not wanting to look like they don't get it, pretend to see the genius as to be part of the hip crowd. The Emperor has no clothes, but don't tell anyone. It is like a religion for the atheist.
I didn't think you were. I was just expanding on my thought.Oh I wasn't being argumentative. I'd just never seen them before. More of a thanks for posting.I;m not saying I don't like them all but I get a reaction from the first that I don't from the second. To me, that's what art is all about.I like all of those.Oh yeah, he was a rock star and knew how to play up his celebrity.But I do think it's probably safe to say he's got something like a consensus in that regard.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.![]()
Turner has always been interesting to me. I love his more abstract works but his more polished landscape paintings don't have the same effect on me.
LMAORothko and his horizontal color blocks always seemed sort of half-measures and weak attempts at digging into the depths of human aesthetic understanding to me. Now Barnett Newman, on the other hand, there was an artist.
Somewhat true but a lot of the more successful ones are those that dared to be different and changed the perception of "what is art?" It's been that way since the Renaissance.I think a lot of art Is just group-think bs. Some elites of the art world crown someone a genius, then the rest not wanting to look like they don't get it, pretend to see the genius as to be part of the hip crowd. The Emperor has no clothes, but don't tell anyone. It is like a religion for the atheist.
Yeah, a lot of his stuff seems pretty overrated.I've never been a huge fan of Picasso although Guernica was one of the most impressive works I've ever seen. Mostly because of its scale.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.
I love his "Still Life with Partridge Family Bus"A lot of you are probably familiar with the work of Mondrian
My dad had the chance 40 years ago to buy a sketch of his for a reasonable price, but for some reason decided not to.Picasso has to be the concensus Towering Genius of the past 100 years, right? Just boggles the mind, his work, and is pretty much accessible to a huge range of people.
$81.9 millionTwo Warhol's sell for 151 Million
fan.Kinda dig Modigliani's stuff. Seems very ahead of its time.
wow, really nice.I am a big fan of John Atkinson Grimshaw. He's no Picasso, but I really like the look, feeling and texture he captured.
https://www.google.com/search?q=john+atkinson+grimshaw&client=safari&hl=en&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=s4JuVK-zJoz_yQT784GoCA&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=320&bih=460
I really want to get a print or two of his and frame them. He really captured something both beautiful and sad about city life.wow, really nice.I am a big fan of John Atkinson Grimshaw. He's no Picasso, but I really like the look, feeling and texture he captured.
https://www.google.com/search?q=john+atkinson+grimshaw&client=safari&hl=en&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=s4JuVK-zJoz_yQT784GoCA&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=320&bih=460