What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

If Denver loses to SD this week and goes 1-4 (1 Viewer)

LawFitz

Footballguy
Complete speculation on my part, but with a 1-4 record, including home losses to both the Chargers and Raiders, I'd be very tempted to see what Tebow has the rest of the way if I'm the Denver brass. Worst case, Tebow sux and increases the odds of landing Luck. It would put fans in the seats and give a head start towards the future, with or without Timmy T.

Too soon?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Only if John Fox's hand is forced by the front office. That's possible, but if it's up to him, Orton will be the starter the rest of the season.

 
The offense isn't why Denver is losing games. Fox didn't draft Tebow nor did Elway play a part in it, and they may not feel he is an upgrade over Orton.

 
Only if John Fox's hand is forced by the front office. That's possible, but if it's up to him, Orton will be the starter the rest of the season.
Pretty much what I read some place. Basically Fox has said that if they go with Tebow they will have to run a completely different offense. I guess he worries they might lose twice a week rather than just once if he makes changes. Not to hijack but in Carolina the offense was developed to fit the personnel, seems like a revolutionary idea to me. Why not see what they have in Tebow ( I understand this question have been asked many times).
 
I hope so based purely on selfish reasons. I need a backup for Rodgers bye and there is NOTHING in the FA pool. If Tewbow gets the gig before week 8 there's a good chance he could be in my lineup for a week as I'd like his chances among anyone who's available.

I think a lot depends on how Orton looks in the losses. If he keeps turning the ball over it could happen but if he plays a little better than he has I think he keeps the job longer even with the losses.

What's the word in Denver?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is Tebow going to be playing in the secondary? Not sure how a QB change is going to help them stop giving up huge chunks of yardage.

 
Only if John Fox's hand is forced by the front office. That's possible, but if it's up to him, Orton will be the starter the rest of the season.
Pretty much what I read some place. Basically Fox has said that if they go with Tebow they will have to run a completely different offense. I guess he worries they might lose twice a week rather than just once if he makes changes. Not to hijack but in Carolina the offense was developed to fit the personnel, seems like a revolutionary idea to me. Why not see what they have in Tebow ( I understand this question have been asked many times).
I don't really think that was the case in Carolina. In Carolina, John Fox had an idea for what he wanted to run, and everyone was forced into the role that he saw for them. If he didn't like you, you never earned a shot. If he did like you, you kept your job until you got injured. John Fox did great when the personel was perfect to fit what he was looking for, but otherwise he just crashed and burned with his system.I am so glad to not have him in Carolina any longer, even with the 1-3 record...
 
Too bad. Seems like a good time if they are indeed 1-4 after this weekend.

Tebow comes in and makes plays and wins = win.

Tebow comes in and sux as does the rest of the season = maybe #1 pick? Plus excited fanbase and a chance for some real, extended evaluation of TT.

If Orton is the type of pro you want on your team, he'll understand and take a back seat until his time comes again. If not, then you shouldn't worry too much about him anyway. Maybe even pick up the phone and see if Miami still wants him, especially with Henne going down.

 
Broncos | Tim Tebow not expected anytime soon

Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:18:46 -0700

Denver Broncos head coach John Fox remains committed to QB Kyle Orton despite the team's 1-3 start. Fox pointed out that Orton and QB Tim Tebow had an open competition in the preseason and Orton won out. Fox isn't placing much blame on Orton for the team's slow start, and Tebow isn't ready for a full-time role in the offense.

It is possible that QB Brady Quinn is actually the No. 2 quarterback at this point; Quinn's skill set is similar to that of Orton, so the team wouldn't have to change the game plan drastically if Quinn had to enter a game.

 
Only if John Fox's hand is forced by the front office. That's possible, but if it's up to him, Orton will be the starter the rest of the season.
Pretty much what I read some place. Basically Fox has said that if they go with Tebow they will have to run a completely different offense. I guess he worries they might lose twice a week rather than just once if he makes changes. Not to hijack but in Carolina the offense was developed to fit the personnel, seems like a revolutionary idea to me. Why not see what they have in Tebow ( I understand this question have been asked many times).
:lmao:
 
Only if John Fox's hand is forced by the front office. That's possible, but if it's up to him, Orton will be the starter the rest of the season.
Pretty much what I read some place. Basically Fox has said that if they go with Tebow they will have to run a completely different offense. I guess he worries they might lose twice a week rather than just once if he makes changes. Not to hijack but in Carolina the offense was developed to fit the personnel, seems like a revolutionary idea to me. Why not see what they have in Tebow ( I understand this question have been asked many times).
Great post. I disagreed with the decision to start Orton because I didn't think this team could compete this year and so they were better off seeing what they had in Tebow (and Quinn). You know what Orton is and he isn't changing. That being said, they decided to go with the experienced journeyman, and try to win now. Fine. I can respect that. But at some point, if you aren't competing anyway, don't you need to see what you have?And Papa, your point about crafting the offense to the players is spot on. That's what good teams do. And it is another reason why they have to know if Tebow is their future or not. If he is, then next off season they will need to revamp playbook and possibly the OC. If you wait until the end of the year to do anything, you won't have enough time to assess the young kids and your off season will be directionless yet again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Should they or will they?

Problem is that all those with votes have differing reasons for saying no

Fox doesn't want to have a losing record (like he could do anything about it with that roster) in his first season.

Elway apparently is not a believer - and doesn't want to be shown to be wrong.

Only if Pat Bowlen decides he wants to see Tebow will we see him for more than a few plays or a meaningless game......Unless there was suddenly a team in contention that needed to trade for Orton (sorry Dolphin fans your team doesn't qualify)

 
'Captain Hook said:
Only if Pat Bowlen decides he wants to see Tebow will we see him for more than a few plays or a meaningless game......Unless there was suddenly a team in contention that needed to trade for Orton (sorry Dolphin fans your team doesn't qualify)
The dolphins don't want orton now for the same reason they didn't want him in preseason. Orton wants Kolb money and Miami is smart enough not to pay him that. Orton won't take less, which makes him untradable this year.

 
As has been posted earlier, there is no down side to plugging Tebow in now.None.
Except that the HC feels that Orton is the better QB. Why put in your 2nd string or possibly 3rd string guy? Orton is not the reason that the Broncos are losing. The D is pitiful. The running game has struggled.
 
Fox is fiercly loyal to incumbants and veterans and no where outside of the fantasy realm does anyone think Tebow gives the Broncos a better chance to win real football games. Tebow has a lot of learning to do and playing a few games at the end of the year last year against beat up teams is not a good measure of his readiness. The young man had completion percentages of 50/55/44%. That is putrid. And the 55% was against Houston, who was arguably the worst passing defensive team in the last two decades last year.

I get it for fantasy, but in real life I can't see being so Gungh-Ho over a Qb that averages ~200 yards, a 1.5 TD/INT rati0, and 50% completion rate. That does not win many games in the NFL.

 
As has been posted earlier, there is no down side to plugging Tebow in now.None.
Except that the HC feels that Orton is the better QB. Why put in your 2nd string or possibly 3rd string guy? Orton is not the reason that the Broncos are losing. The D is pitiful. The running game has struggled.
The D wasn't doing so bad until last week's debacle. 23, 22, and 17 points allowed to teams scoring 29.3, 19.3, and 23.7 ppg against other teams, respectively. If you have an average offense you would expect to win 50% if your D is allowing "par" scores like 17, 22, 23. They were 1-2 in those games. Denver is looking like one of those middle-of-the-road teams that is susceptible to a blowout like last week when they come up against an elite team. Bailey comes back, say the offense starts picking up another scoring drive or so per game, maybe they can surprise some people. But the schedule is brutal, AFC East + NFC North probably as bad as it gets this year. Packers, Pats, Lions, Bill, Jets, Bears, OOOOF.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing I don't understand about Tebow fans in the NFL is their blind faith in this guy. Let's assume he is better than Orton and Denver's professional NFL management and HC has less of a clue than you - (an "average" / Tebow fan)by benching Tebow. Let us also assume there are teams out there that has a worse QB situation than having a QB like Orton ( *Cough Maimi, Minnesota Cough*). Than why haven't those teams even talking about a trade with Denver, they could get him cheap... a 2nd round pick, obliviously Denver doesn't know what they have in a 3rd string QB aka Tebow the supa Dupa super weapon!

I didn't know you are smarter than the rest of professional management in the NFL. Only if NFL give Tebow Fans a coaching job, they will win a super bowl every year... I have faith...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As has been posted earlier, there is no down side to plugging Tebow in now.None.
I didn't get to hear everything that was said on the radio, but on one of the local stations they were indicating that Tebow not playing may also have a ton to do with money.....something about if he plays X number of snaps or games or quarters or something that something in his contract with a lot of zero's after it kicks in......I could be completely off base here, but they made it sound like if Tebow plays too many snaps it could cost them (millions) of dollars.....whereas if he doesn't play, something in Tebpw's contract would not kick in.....not real sure....might need Cecil or somebody to chime in or check it out, but the guys on the radio said that there are also some financial factors in place that the coach/team won't come right out and and say that is not why they are playing a guy, but it is discussed behind the scenes..."we are going to suck anyway so let's save some cash"....?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing I don't understand about Tebow fans in the NFL is their blind faith in this guy. Let's assume he is better than Orton and Denver's professional NFL management and HC has less of a clue than you - (an "average" / Tebow fan)by benching Tebow. Let us also assume there are teams out there that has a worse QB situation than having a QB like Orton ( *Cough Maimi, Minnesota Cough*). Than why haven't those teams even talking about a trade with Denver, they could get him cheap... a 2nd round pick, obliviously Denver doesn't know what they have in a 3rd string QB aka Tebow the supa Dupa super weapon!

I didn't know you are smarter than the rest of professional management in the NFL. Only if NFL give Tebow Fans a coaching job, they will win a super bowl every year... I have faith...
Do you have any concept of how boring sports would be if we all collectively refrained from ever critizing coaches and GMs for personel and game decisions? It's like, half the fun! :excited:
 
As has been posted earlier, there is no down side to plugging Tebow in now.None.
How about the careers and livelihood of every single other player on that team?Lets pretend for a second that the professional evaluators in Denver have some semblance of a clue what they are talking about when they decide that Tebow is the 3rd best QB on the team. They start him anyway because "we gotta see what we have in him" and "fans demand it". Since we are assuming they are correct about him, the team will do worse. (no, not 2 losses a week, hardeeharhar :rolleyes: ). But instead, worse meaning the offense does worse. Generates fewer points. Gains fewer yards. How does that affect the ability of the current players to negotiate their next contract. To even have a next contract. To even have a job next year. And when an offense does bad, the defense is on the field more. Giving up more yards. More points. Diminishing their contracts. Their ability to continue to have a job. Not every player on a team is locked into a high dollar contract for the next decade.So all for the glorification of the egos of people who love a guy because of his religion, you're going to give a huge middle finger to 50+ other players, dozens of coaches and staff personnel. None of them matter. None of their careers matter. None of their contracts matter.
 
'Reepicheep said:
'FarEastKilla said:
One thing I don't understand about Tebow fans in the NFL is their blind faith in this guy. Let's assume he is better than Orton and Denver's professional NFL management and HC has less of a clue than you - (an "average" / Tebow fan)by benching Tebow. Let us also assume there are teams out there that has a worse QB situation than having a QB like Orton ( *Cough Maimi, Minnesota Cough*). Than why haven't those teams even talking about a trade with Denver, they could get him cheap... a 2nd round pick, obliviously Denver doesn't know what they have in a 3rd string QB aka Tebow the supa Dupa super weapon!

I didn't know you are smarter than the rest of professional management in the NFL. Only if NFL give Tebow Fans a coaching job, they will win a super bowl every year... I have faith...
Do you have any concept of how boring sports would be if we all collectively refrained from ever critizing coaches and GMs for personel and game decisions? It's like, half the fun! :excited:
It's more fun to be right when you call it against consensus. TT has talent. He needs an offense and a coach that fits. Fox and Denver don't seem to be.
 
'Reepicheep said:
'FarEastKilla said:
One thing I don't understand about Tebow fans in the NFL is their blind faith in this guy. Let's assume he is better than Orton and Denver's professional NFL management and HC has less of a clue than you - (an "average" / Tebow fan)by benching Tebow. Let us also assume there are teams out there that has a worse QB situation than having a QB like Orton ( *Cough Maimi, Minnesota Cough*). Than why haven't those teams even talking about a trade with Denver, they could get him cheap... a 2nd round pick, obliviously Denver doesn't know what they have in a 3rd string QB aka Tebow the supa Dupa super weapon!

I didn't know you are smarter than the rest of professional management in the NFL. Only if NFL give Tebow Fans a coaching job, they will win a super bowl every year... I have faith...
Do you have any concept of how boring sports would be if we all collectively refrained from ever critizing coaches and GMs for personel and game decisions? It's like, half the fun! :excited:
It's more fun to be right when you call it against consensus. TT has talent.
Everyone that gets drafted in the NFL has talent.
 
'Reepicheep said:
'FarEastKilla said:
One thing I don't understand about Tebow fans in the NFL is their blind faith in this guy. Let's assume he is better than Orton and Denver's professional NFL management and HC has less of a clue than you - (an "average" / Tebow fan)by benching Tebow. Let us also assume there are teams out there that has a worse QB situation than having a QB like Orton ( *Cough Maimi, Minnesota Cough*). Than why haven't those teams even talking about a trade with Denver, they could get him cheap... a 2nd round pick, obliviously Denver doesn't know what they have in a 3rd string QB aka Tebow the supa Dupa super weapon!

I didn't know you are smarter than the rest of professional management in the NFL. Only if NFL give Tebow Fans a coaching job, they will win a super bowl every year... I have faith...
Do you have any concept of how boring sports would be if we all collectively refrained from ever critizing coaches and GMs for personel and game decisions? It's like, half the fun! :excited:
It's more fun to be right when you call it against consensus. TT has talent.
Everyone that gets drafted in the NFL has talent.
Everyone that gets drafted in the NFL has talent.Fixed! :lmao:

 
'Stinkin Ref said:
'Spanky24 said:
As has been posted earlier, there is no down side to plugging Tebow in now.None.
I didn't get to hear everything that was said on the radio, but on one of the local stations they were indicating that Tebow not playing may also have a ton to do with money.....something about if he plays X number of snaps or games or quarters or something that something in his contract with a lot of zero's after it kicks in......I could be completely off base here, but they made it sound like if Tebow plays too many snaps it could cost them (millions) of dollars.....whereas if he doesn't play, something in Tebpw's contract would not kick in.....not real sure....might need Cecil or somebody to chime in or check it out, but the guys on the radio said that there are also some financial factors in place that the coach/team won't come right out and and say that is not why they are playing a guy, but it is discussed behind the scenes..."we are going to suck anyway so let's save some cash"....?
I seem to recall Tebow has escalators in his contract that kick in if he takes more than 50 percent of the team's snaps. Given how long Fox stuck with Delhomme as a starting QB in Carolina, I can't see Tebow getting a chance this year. Saving money is just a bonus for the front office.
 
'Shutout said:
Fox is fiercly loyal to incumbants and veterans and no where outside of the fantasy realm does anyone think Tebow gives the Broncos a better chance to win real football games. Tebow has a lot of learning to do and playing a few games at the end of the year last year against beat up teams is not a good measure of his readiness. The young man had completion percentages of 50/55/44%. That is putrid. And the 55% was against Houston, who was arguably the worst passing defensive team in the last two decades last year.

I get it for fantasy, but in real life I can't see being so Gungh-Ho over a Qb that averages ~200 yards, a 1.5 TD/INT rati0, and 50% completion rate. That does not win many games in the NFL.
fans are putting up billboards in denver begging for tebow.and ofc, theres this place: http://www.tebowzone.com/

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top