NutterButter
Footballguy
No, that's paid for by the taxes of the non criminal illegals.So now you want us all to pay for a criminal alien's lunches, healthcare, and jail space too?
No, that's paid for by the taxes of the non criminal illegals.So now you want us all to pay for a criminal alien's lunches, healthcare, and jail space too?
One of these is not like the others.You've chosen to ignore all content by Higgs. Options
You've chosen to ignore all content by MaxThreshold. Options
You've chosen to ignore all content by squistion. Options
You've chosen to ignore all content by Dr Oadi. Options
You've chosen to ignore all content by RBM. Options
You've chosen to ignore all content by HellToupee. Options
You've chosen to ignore all content by Phase of the Game. Options
i think that makes mcgarnicle a moderate leftyOne of these is not like the others.
Yep...one has a pigeon fetish. You got one right!One of these is not like the others.
I don't really see the relevance here. Just because illegals may commit fewer crimes we should let them come in here illegally?I notice that you completely ignored the link I provided in the other thread from the CATO Institute about immigrants and crime.
so just to be clear and make sure everyone is on the same page...the key issue is not the rape of a 14 year old girl?So 4 pages of posts and not one of them dealing with the key issue here - catch and release. An unaccompanied kid crosses the border illegally in August and is caught. Instead of sending him back, they release him, and after 7 months his deportation hearing still hasn't been scheduled yet. Combine that with sanctuary cities and you know what you have in effect? Open borders.
How is this a good thing for the US? How is this fair to people trying to get into the country legally? How is this fair to the students in that town in Maryland? I heard on the radio that there is a significant cost associated with having to hire teachers who can teach English as a second language, not to mention the other costs with welfare, food stamps, and crime that these kids are bringing with them. Apparently there has also been a huge spike in gang activity in the town.
Why do we have catch and release? Does anybody have a cogent explanation for it?
And is your goal the reduction of crime or the reduction of immigrants?I don't really see the relevance here. Just because illegals may commit fewer crimes we should let them come in here illegally?
It NEVER gets old. Sometimes I play it when I'm having a bad day.Still awesome
I want all illegal aliens out. They're presence here is against the law, hence the term. Better to keep things simple.Wait.
Do you want illegal aliens accused of a crime to be deported or tried for their offenses?
Neither. My goal is the reduction of illegal immigration. I can't for the life of me understand why the Left doesn't support this as well. Can anyone explain it to me?And is your goal the reduction of crime or the reduction of immigrants?
So I just shot the legs out from under your original point and that's the best you got?I don't really see the relevance here. Just because illegals may commit fewer crimes we should let them come in here illegally?
Not really.So I just shot the legs out from under your original point and that's the best you got?
Youre pathetic.
You mean the reduction of illegal immigrants.And is your goal the reduction of crime or the reduction of immigrants?
I apologize...I did mean to put illegal immigrants.Neither. My goal is the reduction of illegal immigration. I can't for the life of me understand why the Left doesn't support this as well. Can anyone explain it to me?
Racist.if the concern is minimizing crime, the finite amount of money that we do have should be focused on the segment of the population that commits the most crime.
Ok. So if this is your goal, you need to find a better argument than dramatizing violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Because a large portion of logical thinkers will take that argument, look at the statistics for crimes committed by illegal immigrants compared to other groups in our society, and come to the conclusion that there are other issues that can have a more positive impact on society.My goal is the reduction of illegal immigration.
Can you give me a good reason for allowing illegal immigration?Ok. So if this is your goal, you need to find a better argument than dramatizing violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants. Because a large portion of logical thinkers will take that argument, look at the statistics for crimes committed by illegal immigrants compared to other groups in our society, and come to the conclusion that there are other issues that can have a more positive impact on society.
Here's the question - who do you think has a higher crime rate - legal immigrants or illegal immigrants?
Analyses of census data from 1980 through 2010 show that among men ages 18 to 49, immigrants were one-half to one-fifth as likely to be incarcerated as those born in the United States. Across all ages and sexes, about 7 percent of the nation’s population are noncitizens, while figures from the Justice Department show that about 5 percent of inmates in state and federal prisons are noncitizens.
Illegals obviously. But if you're talking about crime and you have the money to hire one additional law enforcement officer and you can have that law enforcement officer stationed in a part of this country that has high crime or you can have them hunting down illegals, which do you think is going to lead to less crime?Here's the question - who do you think has a higher crime rate - legal immigrants or illegal immigrants?
Inb4 some kind of emotionally appealing response. Something that HITS THE FEELS!Can you give me a good reason for allowing illegal immigration?
Yeah, really.Not really.
Is that your opinion or fact? I would think illegals would be more likely to commit crimes for a number of obvious reasons (legals are vetted, they are set up for success, and they followed the rules in getting here which seems to imply better character).Legals obviously? But if you're talking about crime and you have the money to hire one additional law enforcement officer and you can have that law enforcement officer stationed in a part of this country that has high crime or you can have them hunting down illegals, which do you think is going to lead to less crime?
I know the answer you are looking for here...you are going to say that all illegal immigrants are committing a crime so their rate is 100%. Then you will pat yourself on the back, collect a sackful of likes from like-minded individuals, and say argument won...and if that's your point of view, fine.Here's the question - who do you think has a higher crime rate - legal immigrants or illegal immigrants?
He's already made it clear that he's all about the reduction in illegals and not about the reduction in crime. Those links have nothing to do with illegals.Yeah, really.
Why didn't you start threads about these cases?
http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2016/11/pastor_accused_of_raping_prete.html
http://www.click2houston.com/news/warrant-pastor-accused-of-raping-teen-said-god-would-kill-her-if-she-told
http://www.11alive.com/news/crime/youth-pastor-arrested-for-statutory-rape-molesting-teen-girl/379637889
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-news/os-church-youth-pastor-arrest-rape-20161109-story.html
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/03/21/after-coach-was-benched-over-gang-rape-his-substitute-allegedly-sexted-girl.html
http://www.poconorecord.com/news/20170303/former-stroudsburg-youth-wrestling-coach-charged-with-child-rape
http://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/life-university-coach-faces-261-child-sex-charges/MHLMtahS2SXOC9IZVDm7sI/
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2017/03/former_metairie_playground_coa_1.html
Not what I askedI want all illegal aliens out. They're presence here is against the law, hence the term. Better to keep things simple.
God dammit, I meant to say illegals. I edited my post.Is that your opinion or fact? I would think illegals would be more likely to commit crimes for a number of obvious reasons (legals are vetted, they are set up for success, and they followed the rules in getting here which seems to imply better character).
And yet you have no documentation to back this.Is that your opinion or fact? I would think illegals would be more likely to commit crimes for a number of obvious reasons (legals are vetted, they are set up for success, and they followed the rules in getting here which seems to imply better character).
Nope. Exclude the illegal act of coming here. Who is likely to commit more crimes - a legal immigrant or an illegal immigrant?I know the answer you are looking for here...you are going to say that all illegal immigrants are committing a crime so their rate is 100%. Then you will pat yourself on the back, collect a sackful of likes from like-minded individuals, and say argument won...and if that's your point of view, fine.
Disagree. For example, if you worked in a secured building, and were raped, if the rapist did not have clearance to be in the building, then the victim would have legal complaint against the buildings security management.Exactly. The status of their documents is completely irrelevant.
I'd think it would be illegals as well, but that's beside the point if we're talking about crime reduction which I would think is the priority.And yet you have no documentation to back this.
Right. Because the Government doesn't track this stuff very well. I wonder why?And yet you have no documentation to back this.
From a quick google search:Can you give me a good reason for allowing illegal immigration?
Most arguments against illegal immigration begin with the premise that undocumented workers don't pay income taxes, and that they therefore take more in services than they contribute. However, IRS estimates that about 6 million unauthorized immigrants file individual income tax returns each year.[20] Research reviewed by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office indicates that between 50 percent and 75 percent of unauthorized immigrants pay federal, state, and local taxes.[20] Illegal immigrants are estimated to pay in about $7 billion per year into Social Security.[30] In addition, they spend millions of dollars per year, which supports the US economy and helps to create new jobs. The Texas State Comptroller reported in 2006 that the 1.4 million illegal immigrants in Texas alone added almost $18 billion to the state's budget, and paid $1.2 billion in state services they used.[31]
The Social Security and Medicare contributions of illegal immigrants directly support older Americans, as illegal immigrants are not eligible to receive these services.[32] The Internal Revenue Service issues an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) regardless of immigration status because both resident and nonresident aliens may have Federal tax return and payment responsibilities under the Internal Revenue Code. Federal tax law prohibits the IRS from sharing data with other government agencies including the INS. In 2006 1.4 million people used ITIN when filing taxes, of which more than half were illegal immigrants.[33]
But isn't your point somehow that crime prevention is a rational basis to overturning the "catch and release" policy? Or are you just admitting that you're unfairly using this emotionally-charged red herring to support a political position?I don't really see the relevance here. Just because illegals may commit fewer crimes we should let them come in here illegally?
No. I now believe that immigrants commit fewer crimes (though the tracking of the crimes sucks, which causes a lot of disagreement).More like, not what you wanted to see.![]()
Yes. Get rid of catch and release.From a quick google search:
Now, can you give me one good (i.e. financially feasible) way of "getting rid" of the illegal immigrants that are currently here?
What about U.S. citizens raping 14-year-old girls? You think that happens more often than illegal immigrants raping 14-year-old girls?No. I now believe that immigrants commit fewer crimes (though the tracking of the crimes sucks, which causes a lot of disagreement).More like, not what you wanted to see.![]()
what do you do with the ones you catch? and what percentage of illegal immigrants will that get rid of?Yes. Get rid of catch and release.
My point is that illegal immigration should be enforced. No more catch and release. No more sanctuary cities. This does not mean we end legal immigration. Just the opposite. We can expand it.But isn't your point somehow that crime prevention is a rational basis to overturning the "catch and release" policy? Or are you just admitting that you're unfairly using this emotionally-charged red herring to support a political position?
Oh FFSRight. Because the Government doesn't track this stuff very well. I wonder why?
if only there was some stupid law that we could overturn to free up a lot more jail space.what do you do with the ones you catch? and what percentage of illegal immigrants will that get rid of?
No doubt. But in this particular case the illegal immigrant rape could easily have been prevented if they had simply returned him when he was caught entering illegally.What about U.S. citizens raping 14-year-old girls? You think that happens more often than illegal immigrants raping 14-year-old girls?
Hint: It is not close
Then this is an illogical/intellectually dishonest way to make your point.My point is that illegal immigration should be enforced. No more catch and release. No more sanctuary cities. This does not mean we end legal immigration. Just the opposite. We can expand it.
you were doing so well and then you had to go all right wing conspiracy theory.Right. Because the Government doesn't track this stuff very well. I wonder why?
So why did you choose to make that point with a thread title of "illegal immigrants rape 14 year old in Maryland high school"?My point is that illegal immigration should be enforced. No more catch and release. No more sanctuary cities. This does not mean we end legal immigration. Just the opposite. We can expand it.
Again, you said before you are pretty close to "off the boat." How would you feel if your people were treated the way you want the law to be enforced?My point is that illegal immigration should be enforced. No more catch and release. No more sanctuary cities. This does not mean we end legal immigration. Just the opposite. We can expand it.