What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

iPad (2 Viewers)

The biggest gripe people had with the iphone was its lack of multitasking. Apple corrects that, and now you resort to "how innovative!" and "android had it all along!". Childish.
The funny thing is when Android first came out all the iPhone jockers talked about how pretty the iPhone was compared to the G1...now that there are great looking Android phones out the iPhone jocks are doing the same thing.
Your posts make me appreciate jim11.
And yours make me want to gouge my eyes out. Glad we understand each other now.
 
Hey look it just got folders like I wanted and was put down for. Guess Apple was on the same page as me.
Android has had this since day 1 :hifive:
I know. I was told on the wonder Apple GUI it wasn't needed and I was pretty much bashing it for no reason. I find it very funny now that Apple has actually made it a feature. It'll be innovative now!!!!!!!!!!
Was just talking to a coworker about this. Now that they can do multi tasking and have folders and can search txt msgs they will put them in their commercials and make it seem as if they came up with these ideas on a mobile device. It's almost like they are looking at Android and trying to take as many features as possible.
Yeah, because Google CEO Eric Schmidt didn't get any ideas from the iPhone while he was a member of Apple's Board of Directors. You guys are being pretty petty here. :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jesus christ this is pathetic :thumbup:

Poster Posts

LokiKx 82

Redding 80

Joe Bryant 47

Otis 45

3C's 44

Card Trader 38

He didn't even jump into the thread till well past halfway through. I think the guy is now outposting all others in this thread combined.

Cold down in Mom's basement?

 
Yeah, because Google CEO Eric Schmidt didn't get any ideas from the iPhone while he was a member of Apple's Board of Directors. You guys are being pretty petty here. :thumbup:
C'mon goon, it may be petty but you remember doing the same thing...right? "Wake me when they come up with something new" or something along those lines in your comment about the Nexus One and commenting how they copied the iPhone. We all do it.
 
Jesus christ this is pathetic :thumbup:

Poster Posts

LokiKx 82

Redding 80

Joe Bryant 47

Otis 45

3C's 44

Card Trader 38

He didn't even jump into the thread till well past halfway through. I think the guy is now outposting all others in this thread combined.

Cold down in Mom's basement?
i had to bail on the thread once Lokikx got involved. he completely tooled it up.
 
Send Steve Jobs your resume ASAP.
Awesome another post that means nothing. See I can do it to.
You've been doing it on every page of the thread. I gave up taking decent time to respond to you. Can't you just relax and enjoy possibly the coolest product since the iPhone? Or maybe just go back to your Android thread?
Once again another useless post. Try again, I shared real world experiences and what I thought were issues. You simply made posts like the above. Just to not make this a pointless post like yours.Looks like the Ads are/can be mini-apps inside an app. they showed a toy story mini-game launched from the ad. Kinda cool I suppose if you like ads. Curious what is going to happen to app prices.
 
Jesus christ this is pathetic :lmao:

Poster Posts

LokiKx 82

Redding 80

Joe Bryant 47

Otis 45

3C's 44

Card Trader 38

He didn't even jump into the thread till well past halfway through. I think the guy is now outposting all others in this thread combined.

Cold down in Mom's basement?
:bag: I have the advantage of not typing on an iPad. Just kidding. What's it matter how much I post. At least they not all useless like yours. See quoted as an example.

 
Jesus christ this is pathetic :bag:

Poster Posts

LokiKx 82

Redding 80

Joe Bryant 47

Otis 45

3C's 44

Card Trader 38

He didn't even jump into the thread till well past halfway through. I think the guy is now outposting all others in this thread combined.

Cold down in Mom's basement?
i had to bail on the thread once Lokikx got involved. he completely tooled it up.
Where's the links you provided to reviews of the iPad? where your hands on experience detailed? Where are you ideas for tethering like one guy asked about? Or anything useful?You Apple fan boys really are touchy.

 
Crazy.

11:40AM Q: How do you close applications when multitasking? A: (Scott) You don't have to. The user just uses things and doesn't ever have to worry about it. (Steve) It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.
 
Crazy.

11:40AM Q: How do you close applications when multitasking? A: (Scott) You don't have to. The user just uses things and doesn't ever have to worry about it. (Steve) It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.
Intriguing. You have a link to any of this preso? Been busy at work and haven't had a chance to see any demos. I agree 100% that a stylus is a nice thing to avoid. I also love the idea of not having to waste clicks/touches to navigate through a task manager.
 
Crazy.

11:40AM Q: How do you close applications when multitasking? A: (Scott) You don't have to. The user just uses things and doesn't ever have to worry about it. (Steve) It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.
Intriguing. You have a link to any of this preso? Been busy at work and haven't had a chance to see any demos. I agree 100% that a stylus is a nice thing to avoid. I also love the idea of not having to waste clicks/touches to navigate through a task manager.
Pretty sure I grabbed it from here.
 
Jesus christ this is pathetic :)

Poster Posts

LokiKx 82

Redding 80

Joe Bryant 47

Otis 45

3C's 44

Card Trader 38

He didn't even jump into the thread till well past halfway through. I think the guy is now outposting all others in this thread combined.

Cold down in Mom's basement?
Actually, the #1 poster in this thread has almost as many posts as #2 and #3 combined. ;)
 
Crazy.

11:40AM Q: How do you close applications when multitasking? A: (Scott) You don't have to. The user just uses things and doesn't ever have to worry about it. (Steve) It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.
Such a great new idea.
 
Yeah, because Google CEO Eric Schmidt didn't get any ideas from the iPhone while he was a member of Apple's Board of Directors. You guys are being pretty petty here. :excited:
C'mon goon, it may be petty but you remember doing the same thing...right? "Wake me when they come up with something new" or something along those lines in your comment about the Nexus One and commenting how they copied the iPhone. We all do it.
One of my better posts. Ruffled some serious feathers with that one. :thumbup: :) :lmao:
 
Crazy.

11:40AM Q: How do you close applications when multitasking? A: (Scott) You don't have to. The user just uses things and doesn't ever have to worry about it. (Steve) It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.
Such a great new idea.
In my experience multi-tasking has been a drain on the battery and performance. Apple today has basically said there will be ~0 battery/performance drain. Now that is a great idea. Once again taking what we already have and making it better. I think Joe talked about this being one of the things Apple does well and often.
 
I'm looking forward to upgrading to 4.0 on my Touch but a lot of the new stuff is already available if you jailbreak.

If we're still talking about ipads in this thread, I didn't realize until now that only the 3g versions had GPS. I never planned on wanting a 3g ipad, I have wifi at home, work, wifi tether to my phone, have a wifi hotspot in my car :excited: but a GPS enabled ipad is something I'd want. This makes the waiting a bit easier for me.

 
Crazy.

11:40AM Q: How do you close applications when multitasking? A: (Scott) You don't have to. The user just uses things and doesn't ever have to worry about it. (Steve) It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.
Such a great new idea.
In my experience multi-tasking has been a drain on the battery and performance. Apple today has basically said there will be ~0 battery/performance drain. Now that is a great idea. Once again taking what we already have and making it better. I think Joe talked about this being one of the things Apple does well and often.
Guess I missed where you were talking about 0% battery drain? So they found a way to make it take 0 battery life to keep the radio streaming pandora or downloading a file? Reduce yes but limiting multi-tasking or not having a true multi-tasking system. They gave 7 api's that can do things in the background to help reduce the drain by just any app do anything. Don't get me wrong I like the implementation but what your stating is incorrect.

 
I'm looking forward to upgrading to 4.0 on my Touch but a lot of the new stuff is already available if you jailbreak.If we're still talking about ipads in this thread, I didn't realize until now that only the 3g versions had GPS. I never planned on wanting a 3g ipad, I have wifi at home, work, wifi tether to my phone, have a wifi hotspot in my car :lmao: but a GPS enabled ipad is something I'd want. This makes the waiting a bit easier for me.
I'll have to upgrade my wifes phone to have multi-tasking on it. Luckily my Touch will be fine since it's a third gen.
 
Well there ya go. Multitasking, App Folders, Unified Threaded Mail, Game Center (ie XBOX Live for your Phone - WOW).

Quite a nice set of improvements for IPOS4 :thumbup:

Gonna have to see iAd in action before I make judgement on it. If it just pops up a small banner at the bottom every 3 mins and requires you to activate the interactive ads (which look pretty slick) then it's not THAT bad. If #### pops up full screen every 3 minutes in an App I'll be getting a droid.

 
The biggest gripe people had with the iphone was its lack of multitasking. Apple corrects that, and now you resort to "how innovative!" and "android had it all along!". Childish.
:thumbup: Pretty sad.
Oh, you mean like when Otis reminded us how the iPhone had pinch zoom all along and Droid finally "caught up"?
I still noticed that Apple's iPhone was the first really useable touchscreen device, and it's been out, what, three years now? They were the first ones to do it right in a well-designed product. I know that deeply pains you. And from what I read in the droid thread, pinch zoom IS an app. So, here we are, three years later, and other folks are catching on to things that make sense.giantapplethumbup
 
Well there ya go. Multitasking, App Folders, Unified Threaded Mail, Game Center (ie XBOX Live for your Phone - WOW).

Quite a nice set of improvements for IPOS4 :thumbup:

Gonna have to see iAd in action before I make judgement on it. If it just pops up a small banner at the bottom every 3 mins and requires you to activate the interactive ads (which look pretty slick) then it's not THAT bad. If #### pops up full screen every 3 minutes in an App I'll be getting a droid.
Huge.
 
I'm all for Apple/Android/Microsoft/Palm/Blackberry copying the best of each other's features if it gives me a better user experience.

Palm has the best multitasking approach on a smartphone by far. Too bad they're gonna die.

 
I'm looking forward to upgrading to 4.0 on my Touch but a lot of the new stuff is already available if you jailbreak.If we're still talking about ipads in this thread, I didn't realize until now that only the 3g versions had GPS. I never planned on wanting a 3g ipad, I have wifi at home, work, wifi tether to my phone, have a wifi hotspot in my car :lmao: but a GPS enabled ipad is something I'd want. This makes the waiting a bit easier for me.
Wouldn't mind upgrading my daughters touch but I had to jailbreak it to install an app that replaces the (broken) home button. Of course it breaks two months after the warranty ends. :thumbup: Fortunately, if you want to call it that, the first one broke while still in warranty.
 
Worst thing about OS4 by far is that it doesn't hit the iPad until Fall. Ughh.
I'm going through the press conference today. Why will iphone/touch get 4.0 in the summer, but ipads in the fall? I know there will be a new iphone in June with 4.0 on it but I thought Apple would want to update their ipads asap.
 
In my experience multi-tasking has been a drain on the battery and performance. Apple today has basically said there will be ~0 battery/performance drain. Now that is a great idea. Once again taking what we already have and making it better. I think Joe talked about this being one of the things Apple does well and often.
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
 
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
Agreed, but have a hard time believing it. It's almost like they are not talking about multi-tasking but rather saving the state an app was in when you leave it...guess I should download the new sdk and look at it.

 
In my experience multi-tasking has been a drain on the battery and performance. Apple today has basically said there will be ~0 battery/performance drain. Now that is a great idea. Once again taking what we already have and making it better. I think Joe talked about this being one of the things Apple does well and often.
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
~0 was intended to be near zero, not exactly zero. In the presentation they were saying how little battery and performance it sucked up. It seems through that in some ways, the state of the app will be saved and not actually run (for instance, if you pause a game of scrabble). However, in other apps it will play audio (Pandora) or do location services (TomTom) in the background. Different apps utilize the background in different ways.
 
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
Agreed, but have a hard time believing it. It's almost like they are not talking about multi-tasking but rather saving the state an app was in when you leave it...guess I should download the new sdk and look at it.
They are providing 7 api's or services that allow background tasks to work. For other apps the state is saved.
 
In my experience multi-tasking has been a drain on the battery and performance. Apple today has basically said there will be ~0 battery/performance drain. Now that is a great idea. Once again taking what we already have and making it better. I think Joe talked about this being one of the things Apple does well and often.
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
~0 was intended to be near zero, not exactly zero. In the presentation they were saying how little battery and performance it sucked up. It seems through that in some ways, the state of the app will be saved and not actually run (for instance, if you pause a game of scrabble). However, in other apps it will play audio (Pandora) or do location services (TomTom) in the background. Different apps utilize the background in different ways.
I probably shouldn't have assumed that they were using the common definition of "multi-tasking". Either way, it will still be interesting to see what they mean. The most expensive action an OS can make is writing from memory to disk or pulling from disk to memory. If they don't ever have to close an app, memory will run out eventually and the increased interaction with disk is inevitable. I agree 100% that they can write apps to use less power if they aren't at the forefront....not requiring apps to be turned off will bite them eventually IMO.
 
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
Agreed, but have a hard time believing it. It's almost like they are not talking about multi-tasking but rather saving the state an app was in when you leave it...guess I should download the new sdk and look at it.
They are providing 7 api's or services that allow background tasks to work. For other apps the state is saved.
This makes a lot more sense.
 
In my experience multi-tasking has been a drain on the battery and performance. Apple today has basically said there will be ~0 battery/performance drain. Now that is a great idea. Once again taking what we already have and making it better. I think Joe talked about this being one of the things Apple does well and often.
I wonder how this will work. If a program is running in the background it's going to use the battery no? For example, it's a problem on the Android phones. They have an app to help with it. I am wondering how Apple plans on letting things run without using the battery. That will definitely be innovative IMO if they can accomplish it.
~0 was intended to be near zero, not exactly zero. In the presentation they were saying how little battery and performance it sucked up. It seems through that in some ways, the state of the app will be saved and not actually run (for instance, if you pause a game of scrabble). However, in other apps it will play audio (Pandora) or do location services (TomTom) in the background. Different apps utilize the background in different ways.
Developers are locked into the 7 provided API's. GPS will burn off battery super quickly. So if you are a legit GPS app you use that API. If your a social APP then you call that API. If your a music app you call that API, etc, etc.Otherwise your state is saved.
 
I have to wonder if once 4.0 is released if they will now be checking for power saving code in the submissions to the Market before approving.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Worst thing about OS4 by far is that it doesn't hit the iPad until Fall. Ughh.
I'm going through the press conference today. Why will iphone/touch get 4.0 in the summer, but ipads in the fall? I know there will be a new iphone in June with 4.0 on it but I thought Apple would want to update their ipads asap.
Surprised at this as well. iPads just shipped a week ago? Why not hold them back 2 weeks, and put 4.0 on them?Gonna be some irate iPad adopters if 4.0 doesn't work on the 1st generation of iPads.
 
I'm looking forward to upgrading to 4.0 on my Touch but a lot of the new stuff is already available if you jailbreak.If we're still talking about ipads in this thread, I didn't realize until now that only the 3g versions had GPS. I never planned on wanting a 3g ipad, I have wifi at home, work, wifi tether to my phone, have a wifi hotspot in my car :nerd: but a GPS enabled ipad is something I'd want. This makes the waiting a bit easier for me.
Would this be a free upgrade for a 3rd gen touch?
 
I'm looking forward to upgrading to 4.0 on my Touch but a lot of the new stuff is already available if you jailbreak.If we're still talking about ipads in this thread, I didn't realize until now that only the 3g versions had GPS. I never planned on wanting a 3g ipad, I have wifi at home, work, wifi tether to my phone, have a wifi hotspot in my car :goodposting: but a GPS enabled ipad is something I'd want. This makes the waiting a bit easier for me.
Would this be a free upgrade for a 3rd gen touch?
I don't think any pricing was released but I'd be surprised if it wasn't $10 for Touch, free for iphone, like 3.0.
 
Gonna be some irate iPad adopters if 4.0 doesn't work on the 1st generation of iPads.
Agreed though I'd put the odds of this at 0%
You'd think so. But I'm surprised it won't work on the iPhone 3G. :goodposting:
Isn't 3g the last iphone? And the new OS can't work with it?Is that right?J
3G-S is the newest iPhone.3G will have been out for two years when OS4 comes out, and it can upgrade to it -- just can't do everything (eg multitask)
 
Gonna be some irate iPad adopters if 4.0 doesn't work on the 1st generation of iPads.
Agreed though I'd put the odds of this at 0%
You'd think so. But I'm surprised it won't work on the iPhone 3G. :goodposting:
Isn't 3g the last iphone? And the new OS can't work with it?Is that right?J
Latest iphone is 3GS, which you can upgrade.The one before that is 3G, which you can't.There's still a ton of 3G iphones in use right now.edit: correction, 3G can upgrade to 4.0, no multi tasking tho (actually should be called app switching).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gonna be some irate iPad adopters if 4.0 doesn't work on the 1st generation of iPads.
Agreed though I'd put the odds of this at 0%
You'd think so. But I'm surprised it won't work on the iPhone 3G. :goodposting:
Isn't 3g the last iphone? And the new OS can't work with it?Is that right?J
No, the latest iPhone iteration is 3Gs. 4.0 will work on the 3Gs, though most of my fanboy friends didn't upgrade to the 3Gs from the 3G b/c in their opinion it wasn't a huge upgrade. Now they're short if they want 4.0, but I have no doubt they'll ante up for iPhone HD in a few month if it lives up to the hype on internet boards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The biggest gripe people had with the iphone was its lack of multitasking. Apple corrects that, and now you resort to "how innovative!" and "android had it all along!". Childish.
:goodposting: Pretty sad.
Oh, you mean like when Otis reminded us how the iPhone had pinch zoom all along and Droid finally "caught up"?
I still noticed that Apple's iPhone was the first really useable touchscreen device, and it's been out, what, three years now? They were the first ones to do it right in a well-designed product. I know that deeply pains you. And from what I read in the droid thread, pinch zoom IS an app. So, here we are, three years later, and other folks are catching on to things that make sense.giantapplethumbup
Yes. The childish behavior in here has been lame. Starting with things like you said. Apple guy taunts the Android feature. Then the Android guy taunts the apple feature. Then apple guy taunts the android feature because he got his feelings hurt that he was taunted over the last feature. It's like a bunch of kindergarteners in here. On both sides. Please grow up some.J
 
Gonna be some irate iPad adopters if 4.0 doesn't work on the 1st generation of iPads.
Agreed though I'd put the odds of this at 0%
You'd think so. But I'm surprised it won't work on the iPhone 3G. :thumbup:
Isn't 3g the last iphone? And the new OS can't work with it?Is that right?J
3G-S is the newest iPhone.3G will have been out for two years when OS4 comes out, and it can upgrade to it -- just can't do everything (eg multitask)
Thanks.J
 
Ok, I think this is kinda dumb.

We all know that you can't run Flash on Apple's mobile devices. But now Apple is trying to make it impossible—illegal—to develop for iPhones in any other development environment but Apple's own. Oh boy.

There's one primary target this interferes with: Adobe, whose upcoming Packager for iPhone in CS5 lets you develop applications in Flash (or specifically, ActionScript 3, Flash's native scripting language) and then cross-compile them so that they work in both a browser's Flash plugin and as a standalone iPhone application.

The thinking goes like this: While applications written this way might not have the performance of applications written in Objective-C, the iPhone's native development language, they'd be good enough—and they'd allow developers who already know ActionScript to avoid having to learn a new language. (At least in theory. The game above, "THAT ROACH GAME", was made with Flash. One reviewer noted "The animation and fades must be computed with a hand calculator. The developer should consider some night classes.")

In iPhone OS4's licensing agreement, however, it appears that Apple is specifically proscribing what languages can be used to make iPhone apps.

How would Apple ever know what language was originally used if the end result is Objective-C (or C or C++)? From speaking to a Flash developer who may abandon an iPad application he has already been working on in ActionScript, most of the cross-compilers* use a set of unified libraries that are easy to recognize, even after the being compiled into iPhone apps.

In short, Apple is forcing a huge number of developers to change their development environment of choice simply to encourage them to move away from a competitor's platform. It is unclear if apps already on the App Store that have been developed using these tools will be banned.

Hello, FTC? Apple just passed Go. ** [★]
http://gizmodo.com/5512847/apple-takes-fla...in-war-on-adobe
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top