What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Ndumakong Suh a DL1? (1 Viewer)

Jene Bramel

Footballguy
I'm working on the first offseason installments of this year's Reading the Defense. While we wait for free agency and, hopefully, an OTA or two before camp to settle out the usual player movement and depth chart/scheme discussions, I'm putting together a "20 Questions" of sorts.

Here's an excerpt from the first installment:

Is Ndumakong Suh a DL1?

I framed the question this way for a reason. I think the debate about Suh in fantasy circles – i.e. can he maintain his production, how good can the Detroit defensive line be, were we wrong about Gerald McCoy, etc. – misses a key point.

In a recent IDP-only mock draft I participated in, Suh was drafted fourth overall by Shane Hallam of Draft Countdown. Hallam is a recent convert to the world of IDP fantasy football and the pick sparked some debate among the mockers and in our forum at Footballguys:

How big of a reach was Suh? Is taking a defensive tackle in the first round ever justifiable?

While I think the hype surrounding Detroit’s defensive line is overblown (more on that later) and that Suh’s game has holes that can be exploited by a smart offensive coordinator, there’s a valid argument that none of that matters in this case.

With so many defenses rotating their interior linemen or using a run stopping/pass rushing platoon, drafting a defensive tackle as a “stud DL” has become unthinkable. A casual IDP follower might nod their head in fond remembrance of Warren Sapp or even Jon Randle, Hall-of-Famer defensive tackles with huge numbers. But they weren’t the outliers you might expect. Even long time IDP vets may have forgotten names like Wayne Martin (65 sacks, including five seasons of double-digit sacks between 1992 and 1997) and La’Roi Glover (17 sacks in 2000, eight straight seasons of at least five sacks between 1997 and 2004). The IDP careers of those players (and others) rivaled IDP HOF DEs like Michael Strahan and Bruce Smith.

If you think Suh’s 2010 season – one in which he played nearly every snap, was moved all around the line to exploit mismatches, and wreaked consistent havoc on passing downs on his way to a 48-10 finish – was the real thing, there’s a very strong chance that he’ll be the next Randle, Martin or Glover. Not only is he then worthy of a first round pick in an All-IDP format, he’s arguably worth the #1 overall pick as the biggest relative advantage on the board.

I’m not sure I’m ready to crown Suh yet. He’s going to face more double teams, there’s no guarantee he sees such a high number of snaps this year, he converted a huge percentage of his pressures into sacks and he wasn’t nearly as consistent against the run as his numbers suggest. But this is yet another situation where you need to put aside your standard default biases and make sure you’re asking the right questions when putting together your rankings and tiers.

Four of the five FBG staffers who have submitted redraft rankings at the DL position have Suh in their top 12.Would you take the risk?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a league where DE and DT are separate and DT starters are required, he is a genuine first round pick and potential #1 overall. Even in leagues where the Linemen are combined, he ranked #5 overall last season, only behind the likes of Tuck, Umenyiora, Suggs, and Allen.

If you think that his rookie season was his ULTIMATE ceiling, which is a ridiculous statement considering his youth and his new first round line-mate, then he would still be a DL1 to me.

Before I looked at his stats, I did not even realize that he ranked so high in the combined rankings, so I must agree that he is indeed a definite DL1 at this point. Fairley should only help keep the pressure off him, and that D-line rotation up there in detroit is starting to look SCARY.

I think in combined position leagues, the only players I would rank above him at this point are the 4 that finished ahead of him last season, Trent Cole, and Charles Johnson. And because of their age, Jared Allen is only BARELY ahead of him in my eyes and Peppers is right behind him.

I came into this thread thinking there was no way that Suh was a DL1, but after looking at the stats, I must agree with the staff consensus.

 
JUst looking at a league, I know where a friend took Warren Sapp in the original draft early because of this. Did not work out. So I checked out the numbers and it was Kevin Williams who was the guy who was kind of the same

League Scoring was at bottom. Suh scored a 114.5 this year which was DL4 overall. But it was not the best DT performance ever. That was Kevin Williams who scored a 135 in 2004. Suh score is the 2nd best since 2001 when looking at the stats. I think is Williams rookie year. He followed this up with 68, 68, 74, 97.5 and 62.5 the next 5 seasons. Add in that the 134.5 for Tuck this year was a down year for DL as the usual high is 150 range with a high of 169.5 by Jason Taylor in 2006. It is the lowest since 2001.

So will he be different than Kevin Williams or does this season make it tougher for him playing a position that takes alot of effort to play. I am thinking he will go down the Kevin Williams path and is certainly being overdrafted based on one season.

League Scoring

Tackle 1 pt

Assist .5 pt

Half Sack 2 pts

Safety 2 pts

INT 5 pts

Forced Fumble 3 pts

Fumble Recovery 2 pts

Blocked Kick 3 pts

Any TD scored 6 pts

Pass Defended 1 pt

 
I'd say NO. Its mostly how you see Fairley helping or hurting his value since they will be playing side by side.
so you're saying that Fairly will hurt Suh's value then?I personally can't get on board with DTs unless its a DT mandatory league. I don't go back far enough to remember them ever having consistent value year to year. Just outliers here and there. I'll let someone else count on a DT while I run out my DEs.And with regards to Suh, the draft would probably have to run through 10-20 DEs before I consider taking him
 
I'm only in DT required leagues and Suh is a beast. I haven't really thought about where he would go if the positions were combined. But, even with the crazy year he had, in 2 of my leagues, he wasn't outscoring Williams by that much about 1 ppg and he was outscoring the 10th DT (Seymour) by about 3 ppg. I'm not sure with that difference, he's worth going after so early

 
I've typically been in the "avoid DT camp" for quite some time as it seems there are precious few that not only put up good fantasy numbers but do it on a consistent basis. However in Suh I think you have the exception based on freakish ability that's tough to put into words. Suh's been doubleteamed his entire career and still makes plays. The last Defensive Lineman that demonstrated raw strength the way Suh does was Reggie White. Last year he sacked Michael Vick with one hand by simply clamping his big mitt onto Vick's chest, picking him up and throwing him to the ground. He did this while being blocked by two Eagles players. He had no business even being in the play yet he registered a sack by sticking his arm out. The guy is a freak.

I'd be thrilled with having Suh as my DL1 and wouldn't shy away from it or feel as though his production will fall the way some of the other names mentioned did. Suh is going to be a superstar in this league for years to come. His impact in his rookie year was very similar to his standout performances at Nebraska which tells me that he has had no problem adjusting to the speed and increased strength of NFL opposition and even in spite of this has still been able to dominate. I'm sold.

 
Last year he sacked Michael Vick with one hand by simply clamping his big mitt onto Vick's chest, picking him up and throwing him to the ground. He did this while being blocked by two Eagles players. He had no business even being in the play yet he registered a sack by sticking his arm out. The guy is a freak.
I'm trying to figure out if he had another phantom sack against Vick that I didn't see, or if you were on hallucinogens while watching this. Or maybe you didn't watch it? Suh wasn't being blocked by two guys. Suh didn't pick up Vick either. In fact he did have to use two hands to take him down, one of which was the "horse collar" type of tackle. I'm not trying to tell people Suh isn't a fantastic DT, but you really don't need to exaggerate his play. It's good enough as it is.
 
In my league we play the DT position and Suh put up huge numbers, but like most have already said, the DT position is widely inconsistent and is almost an after thought in drafts and free agency. I don't think Fairley will "steal" much from Suh and he probably will benefit more with teams having to account for Fairley and a healthy Vandenbosh. Wherever you draft Suh, you can sit back and enjoy his production, because he should be a beast in the NFL for years to come.

 
Last year he sacked Michael Vick with one hand by simply clamping his big mitt onto Vick's chest, picking him up and throwing him to the ground. He did this while being blocked by two Eagles players. He had no business even being in the play yet he registered a sack by sticking his arm out. The guy is a freak.
I'm trying to figure out if he had another phantom sack against Vick that I didn't see, or if you were on hallucinogens while watching this. Or maybe you didn't watch it? Suh wasn't being blocked by two guys. Suh didn't pick up Vick either. In fact he did have to use two hands to take him down, one of which was the "horse collar" type of tackle. I'm not trying to tell people Suh isn't a fantastic DT, but you really don't need to exaggerate his play. It's good enough as it is.
I don't have the play recorded and am admittedly recalling it from memory. Maybe my reference to him picking him up and slamming him to the ground is slightly overblown as it was more a case of Suh clotheslining Vick versus bodyslamming him, although I don't recall him being penalized on the play. Maybe this didn't occur behind the line of scrimmage either and thus wasn't a sack. The "sack" component of the play wasn't what amazed me rather it was the ridiculous strength Suh exhibited. Then again, maybe I was on hallucinogens too. I've been guilty of that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top