What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is there any way to stop terrorism? (1 Viewer)

Are you under the impression ISIS is the only terrorist organization on earth?
I am under the impression they are the biggest threat and if your goal is to exterminate Islam extremism, you start with the biggest threat.

The others you can take care of more easily.

 
There really is just one way to do this.

We must all immediately go to our Facebook accounts and superimpose the image of the flag of Belgium on our profile pictures. The rainbow overlay got gay marriage adjudicated. There have been no attacks in France since everyone started putting the French tri-colour overlay on their pictures. Sometimes we make things mpore complicated than they need to be.

450px-Flag_of_Belgium.svg.png
 

 
I disagree with this. If you cut the head off the snake, it will die.

Just like this country, any organization gets immediately weakened when you remove its leader. You've got to bomb the hell out of ISIS Al Queda and take control of their oil.

No leadership and no revenue will result in a very weakened ISIS Al Queda right off the bat.
FTFY

 
Excellent point, we had radical Islam reeling under George W Bush. But Obama took his eye off the ball and a new evil took its place.

Luckily for us, these two sides are at war with each other.

 
Eradicate? No. Limit? Yes.

The only real effective approach is a holistic one that takes more intelligence and courage than most politicians show.

Leadership. Leadership needs to be provided to unite allied and other countries in an effort against terror. Amongst our allies there could be much better coordination, sharing, etc. We need to figure out a way to work with Russia and China, both have their own Islamic terror problems and our big players that could really help. The trick is dancing with them on terror even when we are at odds in other subjects. We are the superpower and that leadership falls on us. In different ways the Bush and Obama administrations have failed miserably at providing this leadership.

Money. You have to identify source of and stop the flow of money. It is not a peripheral issue but at the core of it. One of the failings, in my view, of Afghanistan was how the military essentially turned a blind eye to the drugs in Afghanistan which ended up being a huge source of funds for the Taliban. Of course, it is not as easy as just destroying crops etc because then you risk turning simple farmers trying to make a few bucks against you and then their whole family etc but you can't go around putting our fires (i.e. capturing weapons) and expect that to be effective. The smart thing is to remove the source of the fires and clear the brush (i.e. no money to buy weapons) before a fire can start.

Military engagement. I know this is the big issue here that some people freak out about. But, you CAN NOT allow Daesh and satellites to operate essentially almost freely in areas and expect that we can contain them or bomb them into submission. Al-Qaeda was decimated largely because we denied them a safe home base. The same must be done for Daesh and it's satellites. This does not always mean a large scale invasion and occupation- though at times it may. Increasingly we can count on these European countries that are being hit with terror to pony up and shoulder a larger burden supported by US logistics. For example, France has already shown it's ability to operate in Africa. With further assistance and encouragement, as part of a global strategy, this could be augmented and working along African nations then progress will be made. The air war will need to be continued and even further expanded but in areas special forces along with native or neighboring forces, our own troops, allied countries like France, etc will be needed.

Intelligence. We have to turn and infiltrate their organizations. The hard part is when they are small organizationally, typically they are full of true believers which makes it almost impossible to turn them and smaller organizations are hard to infiltrate normally. The larger they become, they easier it is to do both because not everyone playing the Jihadi is a true believer and you can play the Jihadi and be welcomed into the fold with some convincing.

There is more. I don't have the time right now to go into all of them in detail but education, propaganda (for lack of a better word), community relations within our borders with Arab/Muslim communities and protecting/assimilating those populations (not treating them like foreigners), encouraging refugees towards Turkey, Jordan, Saudi, etc and supporting those nations in hosting them, police/security improvements and economic/free trade development.

 
That's one hypothesis.  But if there was really a clear majority of folks who didn't want their governments to be like this, you'd expect that they would have gotten their way in at least one country, someplace, at some point in time.  That never happens.

Also, it's hard to for this theory to account for why this behavior continues when people immigrate out of the ME into countries where their rights are protected (like France and Belgium).  If your hypothesis were correct, once they move into a free society, the pro-western folks should have no problem flourishing and the bring-back-the-caliphate people should wither away.  That's pretty much the opposite of what we actually observe.
Haven't places like Egypt and Turkey had periods of less autocratic rule? The idea of immigrants to the West not adapting has some merit, but there's a number of "pro-western" folks who have flourished all over Europe and The United States. 

 
Eradicate? No. Limit? Yes.

The only real effective approach is a holistic one that takes more intelligence and courage than most politicians show.

Leadership. Leadership needs to be provided to unite allied and other countries in an effort against terror. Amongst our allies there could be much better coordination, sharing, etc. We need to figure out a way to work with Russia and China, both have their own Islamic terror problems and our big players that could really help. The trick is dancing with them on terror even when we are at odds in other subjects. We are the superpower and that leadership falls on us. In different ways the Bush and Obama administrations have failed miserably at providing this leadership.

Money. You have to identify source of and stop the flow of money. It is not a peripheral issue but at the core of it. One of the failings, in my view, of Afghanistan was how the military essentially turned a blind eye to the drugs in Afghanistan which ended up being a huge source of funds for the Taliban. Of course, it is not as easy as just destroying crops etc because then you risk turning simple farmers trying to make a few bucks against you and then their whole family etc but you can't go around putting our fires (i.e. capturing weapons) and expect that to be effective. The smart thing is to remove the source of the fires and clear the brush (i.e. no money to buy weapons) before a fire can start.

Military engagement. I know this is the big issue here that some people freak out about. But, you CAN NOT allow Daesh and satellites to operate essentially almost freely in areas and expect that we can contain them or bomb them into submission. Al-Qaeda was decimated largely because we denied them a safe home base. The same must be done for Daesh and it's satellites. This does not always mean a large scale invasion and occupation- though at times it may. Increasingly we can count on these European countries that are being hit with terror to pony up and shoulder a larger burden supported by US logistics. For example, France has already shown it's ability to operate in Africa. With further assistance and encouragement, as part of a global strategy, this could be augmented and working along African nations then progress will be made. The air war will need to be continued and even further expanded but in areas special forces along with native or neighboring forces, our own troops, allied countries like France, etc will be needed.

Intelligence. We have to turn and infiltrate their organizations. The hard part is when they are small organizationally, typically they are full of true believers which makes it almost impossible to turn them and smaller organizations are hard to infiltrate normally. The larger they become, they easier it is to do both because not everyone playing the Jihadi is a true believer and you can play the Jihadi and be welcomed into the fold with some convincing.

There is more. I don't have the time right now to go into all of them in detail but education, propaganda (for lack of a better word), community relations within our borders with Arab/Muslim communities and protecting/assimilating those populations (not treating them like foreigners), encouraging refugees towards Turkey, Jordan, Saudi, etc and supporting those nations in hosting them, police/security improvements and economic/free trade development.
This guy is smart.

 
Actually, you said it would die. If that is hyperbole - why post something so obviously wrong. 
And it will. But there's not just one head to the snake, one leader you've got to cut off.

The prerequisite to death is being weakened.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you want to take my answer that simplistic, then it's people like you who are the problem.

You want to stop a movement, you start by killing the leaders. Yeah, that's so stupid! What am I saying?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you want to take my answer that simplistic, then it's people like you who are the problem.

You want to stop a movement, you start by killing the leaders. Yeah, that's so stupid! What am I saying?
Killing their leaders?  Gee why didn't anyone else think of that?  You really should consider a Presidential run.

 
And it will. But there's not just one head to the sneak, one leader you've got to cut off.

The prerequisite to death is being weakened.
No, there are more than you could possibly ever target and kill. Terrorism doesn't have a centralized leadership. How many "top targets" have been killed over the years? Dozens? Hundreds? Has it really helped? 

 
Are you under the impression ISIS is the only terrorist organization on earth?
He basically is suggesting starting WWIII. If you want to attack the middle east and take their oil.....we are going to war. A real war. Your talking about wiping out a culture. Because hate breeds hate.

The suggestion is basically carpet bombing countries like Syria, Iran, Pakistan and making them parking lots. That is what some people in this country are cheering for. We are talking massive amounts of death not seen since WWII. Take over the oil fields and occupy.

We still would have plenty of terrorism.

I always go back to this simple statement. "You can't have freedom for free" Innocent lives will be lost as part of our way of life. If we start to fear and restrict our way of life.....they win.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can you explain, in detail, what you mean?  How do you isolate "these people"?  
You just ship their dirty ###es back to the home land. If that offends them well then tough poo....Until they can learn to play nice with others, isolate them to their wasteland of a home....

 
Did you actually read it? It did happen.

From Snopes:

"So while it's true that the U.S. military dropped leaflets on 16 November 2015 warning "telling Syrian truck drivers to run for their lives" less than an hour before massive airstrikes were undertaken against ISIS forces, the operation didn't directly involve President Obama. Moreover, critical articles published more than a week after the strikes failed to account for extensive commentary made by Col. Warren about the operation and its focus on minimizing civilian casualties. No portion of extensive media coverage of those strikes remotely indicated that the leaflets were dropped aiding with ISIS in mind, and the maneuvers were not retaliatory in nature."

 
 
No, there are more than you could possibly ever target and kill. Terrorism doesn't have a centralized leadership. How many "top targets" have been killed over the years? Dozens? Hundreds? Has it really helped? 
Somewhat, it's probably a good deterrent. If there is a way to stop it, that would be the method to do so.

Allowing the leaders to recruit and gather resources won't do us much good.

 
Counter Intelligence and a united effort among NATO is the only way to curb and decrease the attacks. No way we can ever just defeat the radical Islamic sect. There are too many parasites on our planet. All we can do is try to prevent as many of these senseless acts of violence as we can through black op's, strategic air strikes and ground attacks when needed. Every time you kill a leader of a cell...a new one is waiting in the wings.

They breed like rabbits.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You just ship their dirty ###es back to the home land. If that offends them well then tough poo....Until they can learn to play nice with others, isolate them to their wasteland of a home....
I think you're missing the point of my question.  Who is "they" and how do you identify them?  Ultimately, however you define "them", those who you're most concerned about will simply change their identities.  Instead of Muslim from Syria, they're Christian from France, or so they say.  

 
I think you're missing the point of my question.  Who is "they" and how do you identify them?  Ultimately, however you define "them", those who you're most concerned about will simply change their identities.  Instead of Muslim from Syria, they're Christian from France, or so they say.  
I think they are pretty easy to identify actually. Just because a middle easterner has his beard trim to look all PC and Americanized doesn't mean much to me.

 
Somewhat, it's probably a good deterrent. If there is a way to stop it, that would be the method to do so.

Allowing the leaders to recruit and gather resources won't do us much good.
It isn't a deterrent. You don't become a radical - capable of suicide bombings - if you are afraid you might die.

 
It isn't a deterrent. You don't become a radical - capable of suicide bombings - if you are afraid you might die.
Right, but if we find that it's the leaders helping in this radicalization then we could definitely slow it down. 

They take men who live in poverty and offer them money and women in support of their cause.

Serious question, is it the text itself that radicalized these people? Do they have mental illness? Or is it propaganda perpetuated by their leaders?

 
Right, but if we find that it's the leaders helping in this radicalization then we could definitely slow it down. 

They take men who live in poverty and offer them money and women in support of their cause.

Serious question, is it the text itself that radicalized these people? Do they have mental illness? Or is it propaganda perpetuated by their leaders?
They are raised in it from the time they are born. That will never change.....

 
Did you actually read it? It did happen.

From Snopes:

"So while it's true that the U.S. military dropped leaflets on 16 November 2015 warning "telling Syrian truck drivers to run for their lives" less than an hour before massive airstrikes were undertaken against ISIS forces, the operation didn't directly involve President Obama. Moreover, critical articles published more than a week after the strikes failed to account for extensive commentary made by Col. Warren about the operation and its focus on minimizing civilian casualties. No portion of extensive media coverage of those strikes remotely indicated that the leaflets were dropped aiding with ISIS in mind, and the maneuvers were not retaliatory in nature."

 
Congrats on being only 97% wrong on that one.  :thumbup:

 
I'll assume you're just having fun here because this can't be taken seriously.  
It can not be taken seriously since no politician will ever do anything about it. They will just sit around talking is all while radical muslims waltz around the world doing as they please.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top