What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Isaac Bruce..(St. Louis homers) (1 Viewer)

i think so... the STL passing offense should only get better as they adjust to linehan (& he adjusts to them)... curtis has been getting almost no looks, & the TE hasn't been very involved, so the bulk of whatever receptions there are should be distributed mostly to holt & bruce...

 
I like him as a decent #3. I think he would be very good at putting up solid but unspectacular stats every week so he should be more consistent than a lot of WR. He will not win or lose you many games as a WR#3.

 
I ask because I am thinking about dropping Moulds for him.

Larrty Fitz, L. Coles and Derrick Mason are my other WR's + Bulger is my starting QB.

I think he could be a solid # 3 but wanted to get some additional feedback on him and what people think he can still do.

 
I ask because I am thinking about dropping Moulds for him.Larrty Fitz, L. Coles and Derrick Mason are my other WR's + Bulger is my starting QB.I think he could be a solid # 3 but wanted to get some additional feedback on him and what people think he can still do.
I would keep Moulds. He could easily get 1,200/10 the way he is going and Bruce will be lucky to see 400/3. Look to trade Moulds for Boldin or Fitzgerald to see if you can get value from him. Moulds is :thumbup: AAC
 
I ask because I am thinking about dropping Moulds for him.

Larrty Fitz, L. Coles and Derrick Mason are my other WR's + Bulger is my starting QB.

I think he could be a solid # 3 but wanted to get some additional feedback on him and what people think he can still do.
I would keep Moulds. He could easily get 1,200/10 the way he is going and Bruce will be lucky to see 400/3. Look to trade Moulds for Boldin or Fitzgerald to see if you can get value from him. Moulds is :thumbup: AAC
You know Bruce currently has 220 yards and Moulds has 154? Bruce has also been targeted more. Moulds does have one more catch than Ike though.
 
AAC

You know Bruce currently has 220 yards and Moulds has 154? Bruce has also been targeted more. Moulds does have one more catch than Ike though.

Yardage wise I think these two guys will be very close. I think Moulds will find the endzone a few more times.

 
Worthy of a #3 WR spot?

Let's keep it on topic here, folks. (Depading Moulds/Bruce is really an AC topic, IMHO.)

I say YES.

 
mrspree15 said:
Psychology Kev said:
xenon said:
I ask because I am thinking about dropping Moulds for him.

Larrty Fitz, L. Coles and Derrick Mason are my other WR's + Bulger is my starting QB.

I think he could be a solid # 3 but wanted to get some additional feedback on him and what people think he can still do.
I would keep Moulds. He could easily get 1,200/10 the way he is going and Bruce will be lucky to see 400/3. Look to trade Moulds for Boldin or Fitzgerald to see if you can get value from him. Moulds is :thumbup: AAC
You know Bruce currently has 220 yards and Moulds has 154? Bruce has also been targeted more. Moulds does have one more catch than Ike though.
Sell High?
 
Nigel Tufnel said:
Bruce has seven more targets than Moulds, too. The only edge Moulds has is TDs. I like Bruce more than Moulds.
I agree with this. I have Bruce and he has been more consistent week to week with his production than Moulds (non PPR for me). Bottom line, if you're starting a team's 2nd WR, you're in a crapshoot. So, go with consistency. That way, you're less likely to get unacceptable production from that position on your team.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top