Hope you break your ankle this afternoon, for SP purposes. It's not death.Hardly. Hope he goes on IR for fantasy purposes. Injury is not death.PatheticCrow time! Tate hurt
Hope you break your ankle this afternoon, for SP purposes. It's not death.Hardly. Hope he goes on IR for fantasy purposes. Injury is not death.PatheticCrow time! Tate hurt
Because many are incompetent. If they didn't know someone, they wouldn't even be coaching in the NFL, they would be asking you 'would you like fries with that' when you roll up to the drive thru.Put West in on 3rd and 1.... for a loss of 1. Why do coaches not learn to play the best players?west looked horrid. he had a few just abysmal runs. if crowell aint the 2 now, then id be shocked.
yep, clearly the worst of the three yesterday.it was tough sledding for all of them today.
but i really didn't like what i saw from West today.
Check this thread. http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=707131&page=8I read it all. I don't remember anybody saying Crowell was clearly ahead of West.Apparently you missed all the grand standing last the past few weeks.Who said Crowell was clearly ahead of West?8 touches for Tate, 6 touches for West.
So much for Crowell being clearly ahead of West.![]()
Maybe you could quote all of those grandstanding posts where people said that, you know, prove you aren't full of crap?
Yeah, most coaches are dumb. Crowell is clearly the most explosive back on Cleveland's roster, just like it took Tre Mason 6 games to see the field despite Stacy and Cunningham looking like they're stuck in the mud when they run.Because many are incompetent. If they didn't know someone, they wouldn't even be coaching in the NFL, they would be asking you 'would you like fries with that' when you roll up to the drive thru.Put West in on 3rd and 1.... for a loss of 1. Why do coaches not learn to play the best players?west looked horrid. he had a few just abysmal runs. if crowell aint the 2 now, then id be shocked.
Antone Smith is currently the best, most explosive RB on the Falcons and even when the whole world knows it, Mike Smith keeps trotting out 3 yards and a cloud of dust Steven Jackson.
So, clear as mud again.Crowell's ahead of West. Even West knows that. The interesting question was whether or not Crowell would take over the leftover carries exclusively. He didn't, so he's probably not a good start unless he gets the starting job somehow.
-Yes, that is a different thread.Check this thread.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=707131&page=8I read it all. I don't remember anybody saying Crowell was clearly ahead of West.Apparently you missed all the grand standing last the past few weeks.Who said Crowell was clearly ahead of West?8 touches for Tate, 6 touches for West.
So much for Crowell being clearly ahead of West.![]()
Maybe you could quote all of those grandstanding posts where people said that, you know, prove you aren't full of crap?
It's hard keeping up with all the threads with the same topic.
Hes a handcuff. Not sure what you were expecting.Starting to feel bad I burned a high ww pick on this guy. He has one more week to show me something or is back to the crap pile
i agree except for the part about the OLine. Mack injury took it from elite to below average.Crowell will emerge, Im confident of it.
After yesterday, there needs to be a shakeup in CLE... they had the division in their grasp, and they blew it against JAX.
Unacceptable. Yesterday was by a country mile their worst performance.
Tate looks ok, West dances like he's Patrick Swayze (with less results) and Crowell just means business. It's not hard to see if you watch the games.
Crowell gives my Browns the best chance to win. This isnt just a fantasy thing for me... it's my team. I follow their every move.
If ti were up to me, we'd see, carry wise: Crow - 15-18, tate 5-8, West 2-3
Until Gordon comes back, slam the rock. Mack or not, you have an elite o-line, so USE IT.
Did the o-line look that different without Mack? Is it fixable?i agree except for the part about the OLine.Mack injury took it from elite to below average.Crowell will emerge, Im confident of it.
After yesterday, there needs to be a shakeup in CLE... they had the division in their grasp, and they blew it against JAX.
Unacceptable. Yesterday was by a country mile their worst performance.
Tate looks ok, West dances like he's Patrick Swayze (with less results) and Crowell just means business. It's not hard to see if you watch the games.
Crowell gives my Browns the best chance to win. This isnt just a fantasy thing for me... it's my team. I follow their every move.
If ti were up to me, we'd see, carry wise: Crow - 15-18, tate 5-8, West 2-3
Until Gordon comes back, slam the rock. Mack or not, you have an elite o-line, so USE IT.
the line was a disaster yesterday, they're prepping Nick McDonald for the center job so Greco can go back to guard. McQuinstan may lose his job even if McDonald isn't ready.The Jags line is pretty damn good though. Telvin Smith balled out too.Did the o-line look that different without Mack? Is it fixable? Did the Jags just play unusually good rush defense this week or did they just stack the box? If stacking the box is a winning formula against the Mack-less Browns, then that's very bad news for Tate, Crowell, and the Browns in general.i agree except for the part about the OLine.Mack injury took it from elite to below average.Crowell will emerge, Im confident of it.
After yesterday, there needs to be a shakeup in CLE... they had the division in their grasp, and they blew it against JAX.
Unacceptable. Yesterday was by a country mile their worst performance.
Tate looks ok, West dances like he's Patrick Swayze (with less results) and Crowell just means business. It's not hard to see if you watch the games.
Crowell gives my Browns the best chance to win. This isnt just a fantasy thing for me... it's my team. I follow their every move.
If ti were up to me, we'd see, carry wise: Crow - 15-18, tate 5-8, West 2-3
Until Gordon comes back, slam the rock. Mack or not, you have an elite o-line, so USE IT.
Allow me to be the first to welcome you to the Isaiah Crowell thread.Who said Crowell was clearly ahead of West?8 touches for Tate, 6 touches for West.
So much for Crowell being clearly ahead of West.![]()
Two key pieces you're missing - the Steelers are soft up front, the Jags are not.As I understand this thread, the Browns ran all over the Pittsburgh Steelers because Cleveland had its starting center. The reason their running game was shut down by the mighty Jaguars was due primarily to the absence of Cleveland's starting center.
I own Crowell, and I dropped Stevan Ridley to obtain him. It's kind of like having Ridley again.
West is a good kid. But he dances at the line so much that he leaves too many yards on the play.http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/browns-notebook-mike-pettine-says-juggling-3-running-backs-is-good-problem-to-have-but-you-re-still-dealing-with-the-word-problem-1.533501?localLinksEnabled=false
Akron-Beacon Journal reports West was benched Sunday for poor performance and quotes Pettine as saying they will reevaluate how they're rotating their RBs.
excerpt from FBG take on the article: and head coach Mike Pettine suggested a change was coming for the trio. 'We'll have a discussion this week as to how to best rotate those guys,' Pettine said.http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/browns-notebook-mike-pettine-says-juggling-3-running-backs-is-good-problem-to-have-but-you-re-still-dealing-with-the-word-problem-1.533501?localLinksEnabled=false
Akron-Beacon Journal reports West was benched Sunday for poor performance and quotes Pettine as saying they will reevaluate how they're rotating their RBs.
I really, really, really hope you are right about this guy and Mason. Any advice on what to do with Ball?Soulfly3 said:Crowell should be the lead back, 100% - Tho I wouldnt argue with a split between him and tate for a week or two more to see who distinguishes himself...
If CLE is serious about making some noise, with their cake schedule coming up, they cant do this 3 back crap anymore. It does NOT work
Well, Im not the coach, so I can only say what I see...I really, really, really hope you are right about this guy and Mason. Any advice on what to do with Ball?Soulfly3 said:Crowell should be the lead back, 100% - Tho I wouldnt argue with a split between him and tate for a week or two more to see who distinguishes himself...
If CLE is serious about making some noise, with their cake schedule coming up, they cant do this 3 back crap anymore. It does NOT work
I admit that I would be shocked to see that happen but as a Crowell owner I will also be thrilled.shady inc said:excerpt from FBG take on the article: and head coach Mike Pettine suggested a change was coming for the trio. 'We'll have a discussion this week as to how to best rotate those guys,' Pettine said.jtp1982 said:http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/browns-notebook-mike-pettine-says-juggling-3-running-backs-is-good-problem-to-have-but-you-re-still-dealing-with-the-word-problem-1.533501?localLinksEnabled=false
Akron-Beacon Journal reports West was benched Sunday for poor performance and quotes Pettine as saying they will reevaluate how they're rotating their RBs.
maybe crowell gets a chance to take over even with tate healthy?
Try to acquire Hillman.I really, really, really hope you are right about this guy and Mason. Any advice on what to do with Ball?Soulfly3 said:Crowell should be the lead back, 100% - Tho I wouldnt argue with a split between him and tate for a week or two more to see who distinguishes himself...
If CLE is serious about making some noise, with their cake schedule coming up, they cant do this 3 back crap anymore. It does NOT work
I'd be surprised. I hesitated to say the Browns would re-eval the 3 headed approach (even though I thought they should), but am glad to read they are. Tate will remain in the lead though. The C-G issues were the problem with the Tate/Crow run game last week. Hoping to hear McDonald is the starting C during Pettine's PC tomorrow and Greco goes back to guard.shady inc said:excerpt from FBG take on the article: and head coach Mike Pettine suggested a change was coming for the trio. 'We'll have a discussion this week as to how to best rotate those guys,' Pettine said.jtp1982 said:http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/browns-notebook-mike-pettine-says-juggling-3-running-backs-is-good-problem-to-have-but-you-re-still-dealing-with-the-word-problem-1.533501?localLinksEnabled=false
Akron-Beacon Journal reports West was benched Sunday for poor performance and quotes Pettine as saying they will reevaluate how they're rotating their RBs.
maybe crowell gets a chance to take over even with tate healthy?
3 RB rotation can work. Just ask Sean Payton. I think it could work if the RBs offered a varied skill set. I don't think Clev's group does that. At least 1 guy has to be a 3rd down, pass catching guy to make a 3 back rotation work IMO. Clev doesn't have that. Regardless, the major problem vs. Jax was blocking. None of the RBs looked good because there was by and large nowhere to run.Soulfly3 said:If CLE is serious about making some noise, with their cake schedule coming up, they cant do this 3 back crap anymore. It does NOT work
Maybe he was talking about the Crowell/West roatations. Crowell has not been such a standout that he deserves to start over Tate. Crowell had 2 TDs his first game after Tate got hurt and his only decent game was last week, the week that Tate also had a good game. Crowell has dropped the ball more then a few times on top of it.I admit that I would be shocked to see that happen but as a Crowell owner I will also be thrilled.shady inc said:excerpt from FBG take on the article: and head coach Mike Pettine suggested a change was coming for the trio. 'We'll have a discussion this week as to how to best rotate those guys,' Pettine said.jtp1982 said:http://www.ohio.com/sports/browns/browns-notebook-mike-pettine-says-juggling-3-running-backs-is-good-problem-to-have-but-you-re-still-dealing-with-the-word-problem-1.533501?localLinksEnabled=false
Akron-Beacon Journal reports West was benched Sunday for poor performance and quotes Pettine as saying they will reevaluate how they're rotating their RBs.
maybe crowell gets a chance to take over even with tate healthy?
NO and SD have been masters of telegraphing RB usage and getting production ( well at least with Ingram this year) by using backs with specific skill sets. I still don't like the approach however. I truly think rhythm is still a thing, even in the age of the RBBC. Plus, I don't think that there's a legit 3-back rotation this year that has proven to be super effective. On the ground specifically, the only other backfield aside from CLE's to have three RBs over 40 carries is the BAL backfield and anyone whose been paying attention to it knows they'd be better off leaving Pierce on the bench; he literally looks like he's running backwards. I think having 2 backs handle a majority of the work load is the best line. You reach a point of diminishing returns when you spread the carries to thin where "fresh legs" is out weighed by a lack of rhythm and subsequent production.3 RB rotation can work. Just ask Sean Payton. I think it could work if the RBs offered a varied skill set. I don't think Clev's group does that. At least 1 guy has to be a 3rd down, pass catching guy to make a 3 back rotation work IMO. Clev doesn't have that.Regardless, the major problem vs. Jax was blocking. None of the RBs looked good because there was by and large nowhere to run.Soulfly3 said:If CLE is serious about making some noise, with their cake schedule coming up, they cant do this 3 back crap anymore. It does NOT work
Maybe narrowing things down to just 2 backs helps. I'm guessing better blocking helps more.
Damn. Hope you feel better bro.Ouch...just broke my ankle. Im alive so who cares. Life goes on!!
The one who is starting?I own Crowell and McFadden. Which of the two, if left just those options, would you start this week?
Emmit smithThe one who is starting?I own Crowell and McFadden. Which of the two, if left just those options, would you start this week?
Given the answers to my question, I agree with you.I own Crowell and I wish this thread would die.
Questions like yours should be taken to the AC forum, as they usually only serve to derail threads. But..you should start DMC. CLE's DL is so ####ty it has people believing Robinson is the future JAC RB.Given the answers to my question, I agree with you.I own Crowell and I wish this thread would die.
No that is flash in the pan stuff, Crowell for life essay!!! In all seriousness I tried to get Denard in Yahoo to no avail. Otherwise the Bills situation seems cloudy to me...Maybe the league has figured Brown out? We'll see...Are any Crowell owners giving up on him to pick up guys like Dixon, Brown, Shoelace, etc.?
What did you get for him ? Curious what his trade value is.Sabertooth said:I traded him away today in one dynasty league. So he'll go off. Guaranteed .
3 key pieces. Ridley's ACLTwo key pieces you're missing - the Steelers are soft up front, the Jags are not.As I understand this thread, the Browns ran all over the Pittsburgh Steelers because Cleveland had its starting center. The reason their running game was shut down by the mighty Jaguars was due primarily to the absence of Cleveland's starting center.
I own Crowell, and I dropped Stevan Ridley to obtain him. It's kind of like having Ridley again.