What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jahvid Best (1 Viewer)

In a 12m ppr money leagueJust got Best at 3.04 after Rice at 1.04 and Fitz at 2.09..feeing pretty good about the draft so far :banned: I considered Best at 2.09 but when Fitz fell I couldn't pass. I held my breath until 3.04
Wow 2.09 would have been too early for me. I got Best at 3.08 and if I didn't take him another team was ready to take him before my 4th round pick came around. I even feel that the 3rd round is a little bit of a reach, but somethings you just need to reach to get a player. Last year I tried waiting on Ray Rice and ended up not getting him. Lesson learned....
 
Eric Karabell is pretty skeptical:

Still, I don't see a 1,000-yard back. I see missed games and a running back in a heavy passing offense. Best is definitely more of a flex option, at best, than a clear starter.

That was written yesterday. Here's hoping he's way off on this one...
ha, eric karabell, dont bring that crap in here.http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football...ldk2k9ravens32Q

Here's a little snippet from that article dated 08/25/09:

I'm a bit less convinced that Rice will be the main running back unless injuries or terrific play forces such a move. I'd also be surprised if McGahee doesn't get a chance to play when healthy. Cameron's approach remains to ride the hot hand, see what the defense offers and make instinctive decisions based on each contest. One week Rice might get 18 carries, the next it could be McGahee. This lowers the individual value of each running back for fantasy, but it's good for the team. That's why I wouldn't recommend any Ravens running back in the top 50, because I think all three will fall short of 1,000 yards, and the team will keep its fans and fantasy owners guessing from week to week, and play to play. Someday soon Rice might be a fantasy monster, but I think for this year the competition will keep his value in check.

 
Eric Karabell is pretty skeptical:

Still, I don't see a 1,000-yard back. I see missed games and a running back in a heavy passing offense. Best is definitely more of a flex option, at best, than a clear starter.

That was written yesterday. Here's hoping he's way off on this one...
ha, eric karabell, dont bring that crap in here.http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football...ldk2k9ravens32Q

Here's a little snippet from that article dated 08/25/09:

I'm a bit less convinced that Rice will be the main running back unless injuries or terrific play forces such a move. I'd also be surprised if McGahee doesn't get a chance to play when healthy. Cameron's approach remains to ride the hot hand, see what the defense offers and make instinctive decisions based on each contest. One week Rice might get 18 carries, the next it could be McGahee. This lowers the individual value of each running back for fantasy, but it's good for the team. That's why I wouldn't recommend any Ravens running back in the top 50, because I think all three will fall short of 1,000 yards, and the team will keep its fans and fantasy owners guessing from week to week, and play to play. Someday soon Rice might be a fantasy monster, but I think for this year the competition will keep his value in check.
Help me understand what conclusion you are drawing here. Is it Karabell was wrong about Rice in 2009, therefore he will be wrong about Best in 2010?
 
Eric Karabell is pretty skeptical:

Still, I don't see a 1,000-yard back. I see missed games and a running back in a heavy passing offense. Best is definitely more of a flex option, at best, than a clear starter.

That was written yesterday. Here's hoping he's way off on this one...
ha, eric karabell, dont bring that crap in here.http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football...ldk2k9ravens32Q

Here's a little snippet from that article dated 08/25/09:

I'm a bit less convinced that Rice will be the main running back unless injuries or terrific play forces such a move. I'd also be surprised if McGahee doesn't get a chance to play when healthy. Cameron's approach remains to ride the hot hand, see what the defense offers and make instinctive decisions based on each contest. One week Rice might get 18 carries, the next it could be McGahee. This lowers the individual value of each running back for fantasy, but it's good for the team. That's why I wouldn't recommend any Ravens running back in the top 50, because I think all three will fall short of 1,000 yards, and the team will keep its fans and fantasy owners guessing from week to week, and play to play. Someday soon Rice might be a fantasy monster, but I think for this year the competition will keep his value in check.
Help me understand what conclusion you are drawing here. Is it Karabell was wrong about Rice in 2009, therefore he will be wrong about Best in 2010?
I'm trying to follow the hyperbole trend in the thread. Karabell said Rice wouldn't be a 1000 yard rusher and we know how he did and now he says Best won't be a 1000 yard rusher. So, obviously, by the transitive property, Best will finish as a top 4 running back. It's science.
 
Eric Karabell is pretty skeptical:

Still, I don't see a 1,000-yard back. I see missed games and a running back in a heavy passing offense. Best is definitely more of a flex option, at best, than a clear starter.

That was written yesterday. Here's hoping he's way off on this one...
ha, eric karabell, dont bring that crap in here.http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/football...ldk2k9ravens32Q

Here's a little snippet from that article dated 08/25/09:

I'm a bit less convinced that Rice will be the main running back unless injuries or terrific play forces such a move. I'd also be surprised if McGahee doesn't get a chance to play when healthy. Cameron's approach remains to ride the hot hand, see what the defense offers and make instinctive decisions based on each contest. One week Rice might get 18 carries, the next it could be McGahee. This lowers the individual value of each running back for fantasy, but it's good for the team. That's why I wouldn't recommend any Ravens running back in the top 50, because I think all three will fall short of 1,000 yards, and the team will keep its fans and fantasy owners guessing from week to week, and play to play. Someday soon Rice might be a fantasy monster, but I think for this year the competition will keep his value in check.
Help me understand what conclusion you are drawing here. Is it Karabell was wrong about Rice in 2009, therefore he will be wrong about Best in 2010?
I'm trying to follow the hyperbole trend in the thread. Karabell said Rice wouldn't be a 1000 yard rusher and we know how he did and now he says Best won't be a 1000 yard rusher. So, obviously, by the transitive property, Best will finish as a top 4 running back. It's science.
:confused: I can't tell if you are mocking yourself or what
 
In a 12m ppr money leagueJust got Best at 3.04 after Rice at 1.04 and Fitz at 2.09..feeing pretty good about the draft so far :confused: I considered Best at 2.09 but when Fitz fell I couldn't pass. I held my breath until 3.04
I have a ppr draft that starts in an hour, I have Rodgers and Rice as keepers, and hoping that Jennings and Best make it to the 3/4 turn(Keepers count as first twp picks.)Rice and Best will make a dangerous pair in PPR leagues this year.
My plan worked out, plus i got Finley in the 5th, giving me Rodgers, Jennings and Finley....they may as well give me my money now. :excited:
 
In a 12m ppr money leagueJust got Best at 3.04 after Rice at 1.04 and Fitz at 2.09..feeing pretty good about the draft so far :yes: I considered Best at 2.09 but when Fitz fell I couldn't pass. I held my breath until 3.04
I have a ppr draft that starts in an hour, I have Rodgers and Rice as keepers, and hoping that Jennings and Best make it to the 3/4 turn(Keepers count as first twp picks.)Rice and Best will make a dangerous pair in PPR leagues this year.
My plan worked out, plus i got Finley in the 5th, giving me Rodgers, Jennings and Finley....they may as well give me my money now. :excited:
Jennings.....blah
 
NinerK said:
Choosing 10th in a 12 team PPR tomorrow. Seriously thinking of taking Best with 2.3. I'm one of 4-5 Cal fans in the league, there is no way he falls to me at the end of round 3. It's high and against VBD by a round and a half; but if he hits, oh man.I like all three draftable lions this year.
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :banned: , but this is getting out of control!! The point of taking best was to get 2 or 3rd round value in the 4th or later. Drafting him late 2nd early 3rd, you are getting him right where he should be. I just finished a non ppr and got him in mid round 5. Nothing that special about taking Best late 2nd. At that point he is being drafted as a top 10 rb or so. Getting Best in late 2/early 3 is just like getting Randy Moss late 1st/early 2nd. Solid value but nothing to get excited about.What kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
 
"Plays on the Lions" is gonna look like a silly argument soon.
Agreed, the D is god awful, but the O looks like it's ready to take off.
That is the perfect storm as far as FF is concerned. A really bad defense paired with a good offense is fantasy gold. They should be involved in a lot of shootouts. Best is even more valuable in PPR. He should be a lock for at least 40 receptions. I could see him reaching 65-75 catches and being the 2nd leading reciever behind CJ
 
These threads always occur when a gifted RB comes into a perfect situation... I remember it well with Adrian Peterson.

Sometimes they hit, often they miss...

There is no koolaid, or haterade... one camp will be right, the other wrong.

I myself am front and center for the Best Train.... and I dont think or a second any of the praise is undeserved. I can understand waiting until the regular season begins to really hype up projections and say how great he really is in the NFL...

But from what he has shown until today, September 4, 2010.... he deserves all the hype he is getting

 
Last edited by a moderator:
These threads always occur when a gifted RB comes into a perfect situation... I remember it well with Adrian Peterson.

Sometimes they hit, often they miss...

There is no koolaid, or haterade... one camp will be right, the other wrong.

I myself am front and center for the Best Train.... and I dont think or a second any of the praise is undeserved. I can understand waiting until the regular season begins to really hype up projections and say how great he really is in the NFL...

But from what he has shown until today, September 4, 2010.... he deserves all the hype he is getting
Wholeheartedly agree. Best was the best RB in this year's draft and he is an elite talent. The only thing that will stop him will be injuries.

More free poorn:

2008:

Spiller and Matthews are going to be good backs but Best has the best combination of moves, speed, hands, vision of 95% of the backs in the NFL.

 
One other thing could stop him. Lions D so terrible get behind early and often is death to a RB, no matter how good.

 
One other thing could stop him. Lions D so terrible get behind early and often is death to a RB, no matter how good.
That's not true. You're a Rams fan, you should know this. Browns were the 2nd worst D and 8th best rushing offense, Chiefs were 3rd worst and 11th best, Titans 5th worst and 2nd best. You get my point.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :banned: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :confused: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :confused: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
As long as Calvin is healthy Best will not be the entire focus of the defense. Detroit has enough weapons to spread it around right now and the defense would be in trouble if they focus on the run.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :confused: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
because Best is the ONLY offensive weapon they have to focus on?
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :confused: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
We must be watching different players/teams. You seem to be confused.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :confused: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
because Best is the ONLY offensive weapon they have to focus on?
Most defenses SHOULD be able to cover Best, Megatron, and a 2nd year QB. Unless I missed something, the Lions haven't exactly escaped the Matt Millen nightmare.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :banned: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
We must be watching different players/teams. You seem to be confused.
I am not confused at all. Feel free to draft him as the #10 RB. I will take a more established player that I know will perform. Next year when we have these same debates we can discuss who was BEST.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :unsure: , but this is getting out of control!! T

What kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :unsure:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
We must be watching different players/teams. You seem to be confused.
I am not confused at all. Feel free to draft him as the #10 RB. I will take a more established player that I know will perform. Next year when we have these same debates we can discuss who was BEST.
Who are the ten established running backs that you know will perform?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :unsure: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :unsure:
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.
because Best is the ONLY offensive weapon they have to focus on?
Most defenses SHOULD be able to cover Best, Megatron, and a 2nd year QB. Unless I missed something, the Lions haven't exactly escaped the Matt Millen nightmare.
Is there a third dimension to an offense other than running and passing?
 
Draft with caution. Best is a great talent on a team that MIGHT have a good offense. I do not think that he will make his own holes, I think that defenses will put much of their focus on him, and he is an unproven rookie. Rating him as the #10 RB is nice but I think that the risk doesn't warrant that ranking.

because Best is the ONLY offensive weapon they have to focus on?

Most defenses SHOULD be able to cover Best, Megatron, and a 2nd year QB. Unless I missed something, the Lions haven't exactly escaped the Matt Millen nightmare.

Is there a third dimension to an offense other than running and passing?

Having talented players and actually being a good team are two different things. We aren't talking Aikman, Irvin, and Smith. But, Hey, Thanks for playing!!

 
Is there a third dimension to an offense other than running and passing?
Yes, it's called blocking. But I think that's lost on the people here who think the NFL has become a 7 on 7 league. But don't let me bust the Jahvid Best orgy here.
Really? Blocking isn't part of the running dimension?
:popcorn:Now I realize you really were mocking yourself earlier
I don't know if you know what mock means but if the point you're trying to make is that the Lions don't have an offensive line, I would like to know what you're basing that on. The yards per carry average of Kevin Smith, an average running back?
 
I know he has put on a good 20-30lbs of muscle/size over the past 2 years, but injuries/body-type concerns are the reason he fell a bit, and the reason I don't see him as a workhorse. Of course, every now and then exception the rules come along, but I don't expect Best to last very long in the NFL, hope I'm wrong, cause he is fun to watch...if I get 1-2 good seasons out of him in my dynasty league, I'll be content...as I should be

 
The Lions offensive line is average. I am not sure why so many people here think it is so bad.

As for opponents focusing on Best, maybe. However, the Lions have enough weapons where no one player can't just be schemed out of the equation.

-Calvin: obvious mismatch for any defensive player on the planet

- Best: speed, quickness, and pass catching

-Burelson: legitimate NFL #2, Lions depended on Northcutt and an injured Bryant Johnson last year

-Scheffler/Pettigrew TE combo: how many teams have 2 tight ends as talented as this pair?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Lions offensive line is average. I am not sure why so many people here think it is so bad. As for opponents focusing on Best, maybe. However, the Lions have enough weapons where no one player can't just be schemed out of the equation. -Calvin: obvious mismatch for any defensive player on the plane- Best: speed, quickness, and pass catching-Burelson: legitimate NFL #2, Lions depended on Northcutt and an injured Bryant Johnson last year-Scheffler/Pettigrew TE combo: how many teams have 2 tight ends as talented as this pair?
:popcorn:As far as tight end duos go:Witten and Bennett in Dallas?Olsen and Clark in Chicago?But that's nitpicking and you only need one top 3 receiver on your offense to keep 8 out of the box and Burleson is no pushover. Obviously, a lot rests in the hands or right arm of Stafford but there are many reasons to have confidence in him going into his second season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eric Karabell is pretty skeptical:

Still, I don't see a 1,000-yard back. I see missed games and a running back in a heavy passing offense. Best is definitely more of a flex option, at best, than a clear starter.

That was written yesterday. Here's hoping he's way off on this one...
Pretty piss poor analysis. One, he assumes an injury. OK, that could happen to any RB, but what is his potential. The guy is a stud with a second year QB who struggled his first year. If the Lions can establish a rushing attack, they most definitely will. If Best is healthy, he is a solid RB1 on any team.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :thumbup: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Dodds is one of the few to move him that high. Considering there is some health risk, that is about right. It is not hard to move someone up the rankings after the fact. If Best comes out of the gate with three hundred yard games, all the analysts will be claiming they told you so (when in fact they probably had Best rated RB18-25).
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :thumbup: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Dodds is one of the few to move him that high. Considering there is some health risk, that is about right. It is not hard to move someone up the rankings after the fact. If Best comes out of the gate with three hundred yard games, all the analysts will be claiming they told you so (when in fact they probably had Best rated RB18-25).
I can't imagine him running for 300 yards more than once this year.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :X , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Dodds is one of the few to move him that high. Considering there is some health risk, that is about right. It is not hard to move someone up the rankings after the fact. If Best comes out of the gate with three hundred yard games, all the analysts will be claiming they told you so (when in fact they probably had Best rated RB18-25).
I can't imagine him running for 300 yards more than once this year.
Tehehehe. Nice word spinning. On that note, I see him running for 300 yards at least 6 times this year.
 
if the point you're trying to make is that the Lions don't have an offensive line, I would like to know what you're basing that on. The yards per carry average of Kevin Smith, an average running back?
I'm basing it on me watching them play. But I guess if you want me to cite some objective experts, FO had their line last year rated at 29/22 run/pass. They gave up 43 sacks, which is ungood.
 
I really hate to come in sipping the haterade :blackdot: , but this is getting out of control!! TWhat kind of numbers are you projecting for Best to where you feel 3rd round is a no brainer? Top 5 Rb? Top 8? At top 12 all he did is live up to his draft spot.
Dodds is projecting him to be RB10. Is it really that silly? :banned:
Dodds is one of the few to move him that high. Considering there is some health risk, that is about right. It is not hard to move someone up the rankings after the fact. If Best comes out of the gate with three hundred yard games, all the analysts will be claiming they told you so (when in fact they probably had Best rated RB18-25).
I can't imagine him running for 300 yards more than once this year.
Tehehehe. Nice word spinning. On that note, I see him running for 300 yards at least 6 times this year.
I know it's all subjective but I think Dodds has Best a little too high and Foster a little too low. In this overall top 300, he has Best at 13 and Foster at 20.
 
if the point you're trying to make is that the Lions don't have an offensive line, I would like to know what you're basing that on. The yards per carry average of Kevin Smith, an average running back?
I'm basing it on me watching them play. But I guess if you want me to cite some objective experts, FO had their line last year rated at 29/22 run/pass. They gave up 43 sacks, which is ungood.
I doubt you've spent hours going over Lions game film and analyzing their offensive line's play. I can see you were able to look up stats from last year which can be the result of many factors including having three different starting quarterbacks and an average at best running back. You're obviously an expert on the Lions offensive line though, so I concede.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lions were #2 in the NFL in rushes of 4+ yds., but they were among the worst in plays of 20+. Best is going to break a lot of big runs, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him in the top 5 RBs this year.
Where did you find that stat? If it's true, it means they didn't have a running back that could make anyone miss at the second level.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top