I think the week 3 game will be telling in that regard.Is it a foregone conclusion that Cook gets more targets than Rodgers, considering Rodgers is still #1 on the depth chart?
If Rodgers holds down the starting job, he is a steal at his current ADP in deep leagues.I think the week 3 game will be telling in that regard.
Rationally, no it isn't a foregone conclusion. However, at the spot Cooks is available it's too much fun.Is it a foregone conclusion that Cook gets more targets than Rodgers, considering Rodgers is still #1 on the depth chart?
Sounds promising in theoryDenny Carter of Living the Stream is pushing Jared hard. With the garbage QBs he has had over his career, he's still posted a much better average yards per target than Rogers. GB coaching/management specifically mentioned in the offseason that GB needed a guy that win deep in the middle of the field. GB rarely brings in FA so it is likely they have a real plan for Cook. That's his basic argument.
yep, he is now official sleeper status and with a non televised game in many drafts he'll be valued...going way under the radar.Ilov80s said:On board big time after tonight. Major party of this offense. He's the 3rd pass catcher we have been looking for.
2, caught 1. Tried to warn you guys.Bucsfan5493 said:Started Cook over Dwayne Allen ugh. Did he even get many targets?
Brutal, I bought into the hype instead of trusting myself with Dwayne Allen who I've been preaching all off-season.2, caught 1. Tried to warn you guys.
Yes, but he split snaps with Richard Rodgers and I think it's clear the Packers still want Davante Adams to be heavily involved. Best case scenario, Cook is the 4th option. We could see a few breakout games but I'm not sure he'll be a consistent low-end TE1.Gb offense was off all game. Kind of hard to blame this on cook
were people drafting cook to be a low end te1? that's their wrong, not cooks.Yes, but he split snaps with Richard Rodgers and I think it's clear the Packers still want Davante Adams to be heavily involved. Best case scenario, Cook is the 4th option. We could see a few breakout games but I'm not sure he'll be a consistent low-end TE1.
A few preseason articles compared his potential impact to what Jermichael Finley once was for Rodgers.were people drafting cook to be a low end te1? that's their wrong, not cooks.
Jared Cook said he expects more targets going forward.
Cook had just two targets in the opener. He outsnapped Richard Rodgers, but wasn't higher than the No. 4 option. Cook should remain a non-factor with a matchup against Vikings S Harrison Smith in Week 2.
Source: Green Bay Press-Gazette
Sep 16 - 7:02 PM
Flap and his jedi mind tricksCook is a bum and always has been. No upside. Don't give away points by starting this guy. Move on
I'm reacting to years of Cook in the league. Wake upFlap and his jedi mind tricksLet's over react to week 1 out comes shall we? Hopefully you drafted him as a a TE2 and are willing to see how things play out if not, by all means follow Flap's advice.
Cook might be huge this week. Don't be shocked if he doubles or even triples his output from week 1.
Totally agree, Cook is about to blow up.TZMarkie said:![]()
Seeing as he got a grand total of .70 in my standard league, even if he got ten times that he would still "only" be barely startable. LOL.
But I am assuming you posted that with a bit of sarcasm.
In a weird set of circumstances, I actually ended up with Cook in my biggest money league, at the tail end of the draft.
So I gave him the obligatory "1 week roll out" , and then I gave him the mandatory drop to the waiver wire.
I hope he blows up.....and he just might, he just won't be doing it on my team.![]()
I will start Kyle Rudolph, and the truth is, I will sleep better at night because of it.
In 2 or 3 weeks when the bye weeks begin, I will snag someone slightly less brutal. Barnidge was just dropped in that very league, but I will wait for waivers to clear. I am not using up priority for him either. If I get him great, and if I don't...thats great too~!
Its not like Barnidge is something I want to be hinging my fantasy season on.
TZM
Yep, The Outlaw was out there for 68 plays. 100% of Packers plays.ldizzle said:I saw that he was only in for like 30 something snaps. Not enough for me to keep him since Rodgers spreads the ball
Reportedly not pass protecting particularly well.Yep, The Outlaw was out there for 68 plays. 100% of Packers plays.
Fair point, but he solidly outplayed and outproduced Cook week 1 which is very very impressive.Reportedly not pass protecting particularly well.
I like the kid, great name, could be solid. Not saying he's a bad pickup, but if he doesn't clean that up he won't be out there at that high of a % looking ahead.
Neither had earth shattering weeks - Cook was just nonexistent.Fair point, but he solidly outplayed and outproduced Cook week 1 which is very very impressive.
I snorted at this. lolI don't think Rodgers wants his passes clanking ineffectually off of Cooks hands. That's Davantae Adams job.
And arguably this is his best situation of his career, not coaching & QB-wise.Cook has been a disappointment, but he has still averaged 49/638/3.1 per 16 games over the past 5 seasons. He doesn't need that big a boost over those numbers to be a fantasy starter.
What isn't debatable is he sucks.And arguably this is his best situation of his career, not coaching & QB-wise.
Im not even sure it's debatable.