I would think Smith's value increases, I have no figures to support this, just a gut feeling..the offense can be opened up a bit more, since cutler can throw the ball a country mile compared to plummer..perhaps it means more deep passes to walker, leaving smith with plenty of room to roam underneath..?I think smith is a good waiver pickup, for sure..if not for anything else, cutler might be able to sustain longer drives, meaning more time of possession for denver.any thoughts?
hey Rovers, if you have something on your mind say itBrandon Marshall.
LOL, yeah, but I'm a dynasty league guy. That explains my BM fixation. If Cutler starts, I think I bump ALL of Denver's WR's, but especially Marshall for next year. Cutler and Marshall have a lot of practice time together.hey Rovers, if you have something on your mind say itBrandon Marshall.I think Marshall does benefit since they've been practicing quite a bit together. But at the same time I think Rod does get a bump up cause of the softer underneath coverage that should result from Walker getting some deep balls, or at least the threat there.What I'm interested in is how the run game is effected with the deeper balls. Should push some safety coverage back a bit. Also, I know I'm going to get flamed for this, but I think Lelie would have been a great fit here now. Would have been a nice 3 WR set with Walker and Lelie both having the ability going deep.
Cutler cannot perform any worse than Plummer. There'd be a million "told you so" if you disagree.Whether or not Cutler can get it done fantasy wise is a different matter.Why do you have to be a 4-8 to insert the QB of the future?The writing was on the wall when Denver traded up to draft Cutler.The Broncos defense has helped them get this far, with the addition of Walker being another key ingredient.If Cutler can get the football within arms reach, instead of Jake's throwing at their feet, I think you can upgrade both Walker and Smith. As for Marshall, reach if you want.We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I picked him (Cutler) up off WW last week when I first heard the rumour. I am starting him this week over Frye and Roethlisberger. If he does well I may even make him one of my 4 keepers.pigskin pimp said:Cutler cannot perform any worse than Plummer. There'd be a million "told you so" if you disagree.Whether or not Cutler can get it done fantasy wise is a different matter.Why do you have to be a 4-8 to insert the QB of the future?The writing was on the wall when Denver traded up to draft Cutler.The Broncos defense has helped them get this far, with the addition of Walker being another key ingredient.If Cutler can get the football within arms reach, instead of Jake's throwing at their feet, I think you can upgrade both Walker and Smith. As for Marshall, reach if you want.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
+1. No telling. Can't be any worse than Plummer. Oh wait. He's a rook.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
Maybe. But I thought that it was Scheffler that Cutler was bonding with during OTA's and training camp. One of the staff members was posting daily updates about the Bronco's training camps and it seemed like Scheffler was really shining in those camps. Then again...Scheffler would have to be activated to be of any use (friggin Skeletor).Rovers said:Yes..... Brandon Marshall.
Plummer has been bad but Cutler could definitely be worse. I don't disagree with the move at all but Cutler could easily be as bad or worse. I don't think the Denver offense will change much, I just think they want Cutler to hit the open wr's that Plummer was missing.pigskin pimp said:Cutler cannot perform any worse than Plummer. There'd be a million "told you so" if you disagree.Whether or not Cutler can get it done fantasy wise is a different matter.Why do you have to be a 4-8 to insert the QB of the future?The writing was on the wall when Denver traded up to draft Cutler.The Broncos defense has helped them get this far, with the addition of Walker being another key ingredient.If Cutler can get the football within arms reach, instead of Jake's throwing at their feet, I think you can upgrade both Walker and Smith. As for Marshall, reach if you want.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
MarshallKircusGentlemen, it IS next year for Denver. I could see both of these guys having a good week out of the next 2 or 3 games.Maybe. But I thought that it was Scheffler that Cutler was bonding with during OTA's and training camp. One of the staff members was posting daily updates about the Bronco's training camps and it seemed like Scheffler was really shining in those camps. Then again...Scheffler would have to be activated to be of any use (friggin Skeletor).Rovers said:Yes..... Brandon Marshall.![]()
For someone who works for a website who's whole point is to project, you seem awful down on projecting.You heard the man, everyone out. No one knows. You don't have to go home but you can't stay here!Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I know for a fact that this move will kill Javon Walker's value. Its statistically impossible for him to finish the year as a Top 10 WR now. Guaranteed.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I know for a fact that this move will kill Javon Walker's value. Its statistically impossible for him to finish the year as a Top 10 WR now. Guaranteed.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
Right now there are 32 starting QB's in the NFL, probably about half that number are consistent at finding the open man and getting him the ball accurately and on time. Divide that number by the amouint of people on the planet and its pretty small percentage of people who posess this skill.I don't think the Denver offense will change much, I just think they want Cutler to hit the open wr's that Plummer was missing.
Ok.......but Plummer was one of the 32 that was clearing missing the open wr's based on his completion % and QB rating. From everything I've read Cutler looks lights out in practice and has been blowing Plummer away (which is the reason for the change). Do you know that Cutler has a problem with his accuracy? Looking at his college stats they look pretty good 61%/59% his last two years.These are his positives from his FBG page....Jay Cutler is a tough, well-built athlete with a strong will to win. He has great measurables, and a cannon for an arm. Cutler is a student of the game and is known to spend a lot of time in the film room. He can move around behind the line of scrimmage, and is more athletic that people give him credit for. When protection breaks down, Cutler can break the pocket and pick up significant yardage with his feet. He throws well on the run, and is very adept at the short and underneath passing game. He does have a big arm, and can take shots down the field when necessary. Cutler is very strong as well, as evidenced by his QB record 23 reps at 225 lbs at the combine.Right now there are 32 starting QB's in the NFL, probably about half that number are consistent at finding the open man and getting him the ball accurately and on time. Divide that number by the amouint of people on the planet and its pretty small percentage of people who posess this skill.I don't think the Denver offense will change much, I just think they want Cutler to hit the open wr's that Plummer was missing.
are you sure you know what "statistically impossible" means?I know for a fact that this move will kill Javon Walker's value. Its statistically impossible for him to finish the year as a Top 10 WR now. Guaranteed.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
bingo. This is the guy to keep an eye on. Cutler and Kircus had good repore in pre-season - lots of long TD catches. Presumably, they have been practicing together all season as well.MarshallKircusMaybe. But I thought that it was Scheffler that Cutler was bonding with during OTA's and training camp. One of the staff members was posting daily updates about the Bronco's training camps and it seemed like Scheffler was really shining in those camps. Then again...Scheffler would have to be activated to be of any use (friggin Skeletor).Rovers said:Yes..... Brandon Marshall.![]()
Gentlemen, it IS next year for Denver.
I could see both of these guys having a good week out of the next 2 or 3 games.
Sure, I project, but I'm not going to lie to you. If the standard is to know everything all the time with 100% accuracy you're in for a disappointment. I don't know. Would you rather I guessed? I haven't seen Cutler play in a live NFL game that counts. He might get the jitters and be scared. He could easily pull a Rick Mirer and have no leadership abiliities. It happens. For the moment we have no idea what sort of presence he'll have on the field. Such is life. We wait. We watch. We learn.For someone who works for a website who's whole point is to project, you seem awful down on projecting.You heard the man, everyone out. No one knows. You don't have to go home but you can't stay here!Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
[are you sure you know what "statistically impossible" means?
Rovers said:my BM fixation
"I told you so!" Sorry, just warming up.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I am thinking of starting him over Frye and Alex Smith.I picked him (Cutler) up off WW last week when I first heard the rumour. I am starting him this week over Frye and Roethlisberger. If he does well I may even make him one of my 4 keepers.
Considering I don't get docked for INT's, I am really tempted to start Cutler. I'd take those numbers.considering it. Defenses haven't seen any tape on Cutler yet - they don't know how to game plan for him.Leinart seems to be the best comparable - taking over for a struggling vet w/o much experience prior.Leinarts first start:5 kan | 22 35 253 2 1 | 1 4 0 I expect Cutler to put up around 200 yards, with a couple of TD's and a pick.
To the moderators: this thread was originally posted as a Rod Smith thread. I believe that Smith deserves his own thread. It's not all about Cutler to the extent that the thread should be merged into a Cutler thread. I agree with most decisions to merge threads, but merging this thread may be a bit excessive.If you insist on merging the R. Smith thread, can you modify the title so that it attracts input for those looking for a R. Smith thread. Otherwise, maybe someone needs to start another Smith thread.
No one said "for certain".... it's about projecting. I still think B Marshall is the guy to get in dynasty leagues, and I'm not saying that to set up any I told you so" posts. Geeze.... get a grip.Shick! said:We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I would absolutely drop Frye for Leinart. I would consider dropping McNair for Young. I'd probably hold off on dropping Eli for Cutler, but if Cutler blows up and Eli just blows, I'd consider it.Ron_Mexico said:Would I be insane if I droppedMcNairEliFryeand picked upYoungLeinartCutlerfor the playoff push ?
This is exactly why I picked him up last week.I don't know enough about Cutler to make a projection, but his schedule is really, really soft in the playoffs. Maybe he's worth a look in 2 QB leagues for those enticing matchups.
Started a Rod Smith thread here.shredhead said:MillenniuM Presents: Frank Black said:To the moderators: this thread was originally posted as a Rod Smith thread. I believe that Smith deserves his own thread. It's not all about Cutler to the extent that the thread should be merged into a Cutler thread. I agree with most decisions to merge threads, but merging this thread may be a bit excessive.
If you insist on merging the R. Smith thread, can you modify the title so that it attracts input for those looking for a R. Smith thread. Otherwise, maybe someone needs to start another Smith thread.I read this post last night as a Rod Smith thread. It shouldn't have been merged.
![]()
He averaged less than 2.8 ypc in college. As a comparison, Jake and Aaron Brooks are all well over 4 ypc and McNabb is over 6. He's mobile for a pocket passer, but he's not a rushing QB. If you are expecting rushing yards I think you are going to be disappointed.Not starting him. Just grabbing a backup. I've got Palmer as my starter. Passing yards still important, but a lousy QB that can put up some rushing yards is better than a lousy QB that can't run in our scoring system.
Your understanding is wrong. For his first two years he was an option QB, it was in his junior year when the switch came to a pocket QB.My understanding was when he ran in college it was running for his life due to his O line being overmatched.As said above mobile but not know as a rusher.Although while running for his life he learned to throw on the run wich is good in Denver's scheme.