What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Jay Cutler Thread *** (1 Viewer)

any thoughts?
I would think Smith's value increases, I have no figures to support this, just a gut feeling..the offense can be opened up a bit more, since cutler can throw the ball a country mile compared to plummer..perhaps it means more deep passes to walker, leaving smith with plenty of room to roam underneath..?I think smith is a good waiver pickup, for sure..if not for anything else, cutler might be able to sustain longer drives, meaning more time of possession for denver.
 
Brandon Marshall.
hey Rovers, if you have something on your mind say it :D I think Marshall does benefit since they've been practicing quite a bit together. But at the same time I think Rod does get a bump up cause of the softer underneath coverage that should result from Walker getting some deep balls, or at least the threat there.What I'm interested in is how the run game is effected with the deeper balls. Should push some safety coverage back a bit. Also, I know I'm going to get flamed for this, but I think Lelie would have been a great fit here now. Would have been a nice 3 WR set with Walker and Lelie both having the ability going deep.
 
Brandon Marshall.
hey Rovers, if you have something on your mind say it :D I think Marshall does benefit since they've been practicing quite a bit together. But at the same time I think Rod does get a bump up cause of the softer underneath coverage that should result from Walker getting some deep balls, or at least the threat there.What I'm interested in is how the run game is effected with the deeper balls. Should push some safety coverage back a bit. Also, I know I'm going to get flamed for this, but I think Lelie would have been a great fit here now. Would have been a nice 3 WR set with Walker and Lelie both having the ability going deep.
LOL, yeah, but I'm a dynasty league guy. That explains my BM fixation. If Cutler starts, I think I bump ALL of Denver's WR's, but especially Marshall for next year. Cutler and Marshall have a lot of practice time together.
 
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.

This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.

IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.

 
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
Cutler cannot perform any worse than Plummer. There'd be a million "told you so" if you disagree.Whether or not Cutler can get it done fantasy wise is a different matter.Why do you have to be a 4-8 to insert the QB of the future?The writing was on the wall when Denver traded up to draft Cutler.The Broncos defense has helped them get this far, with the addition of Walker being another key ingredient.If Cutler can get the football within arms reach, instead of Jake's throwing at their feet, I think you can upgrade both Walker and Smith. As for Marshall, reach if you want.
 
pigskin pimp said:
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
Cutler cannot perform any worse than Plummer. There'd be a million "told you so" if you disagree.Whether or not Cutler can get it done fantasy wise is a different matter.Why do you have to be a 4-8 to insert the QB of the future?The writing was on the wall when Denver traded up to draft Cutler.The Broncos defense has helped them get this far, with the addition of Walker being another key ingredient.If Cutler can get the football within arms reach, instead of Jake's throwing at their feet, I think you can upgrade both Walker and Smith. As for Marshall, reach if you want.
I picked him (Cutler) up off WW last week when I first heard the rumour. I am starting him this week over Frye and Roethlisberger. If he does well I may even make him one of my 4 keepers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
+1. No telling. Can't be any worse than Plummer. Oh wait. He's a rook.
 
Rovers said:
Yes..... Brandon Marshall.
Maybe. But I thought that it was Scheffler that Cutler was bonding with during OTA's and training camp. One of the staff members was posting daily updates about the Bronco's training camps and it seemed like Scheffler was really shining in those camps. Then again...Scheffler would have to be activated to be of any use (friggin Skeletor). :hot:
 
pigskin pimp said:
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
Cutler cannot perform any worse than Plummer. There'd be a million "told you so" if you disagree.Whether or not Cutler can get it done fantasy wise is a different matter.Why do you have to be a 4-8 to insert the QB of the future?The writing was on the wall when Denver traded up to draft Cutler.The Broncos defense has helped them get this far, with the addition of Walker being another key ingredient.If Cutler can get the football within arms reach, instead of Jake's throwing at their feet, I think you can upgrade both Walker and Smith. As for Marshall, reach if you want.
Plummer has been bad but Cutler could definitely be worse. I don't disagree with the move at all but Cutler could easily be as bad or worse. I don't think the Denver offense will change much, I just think they want Cutler to hit the open wr's that Plummer was missing.
 
Rovers said:
Yes..... Brandon Marshall.
Maybe. But I thought that it was Scheffler that Cutler was bonding with during OTA's and training camp. One of the staff members was posting daily updates about the Bronco's training camps and it seemed like Scheffler was really shining in those camps. Then again...Scheffler would have to be activated to be of any use (friggin Skeletor). :hot:
MarshallKircusGentlemen, it IS next year for Denver. I could see both of these guys having a good week out of the next 2 or 3 games.
 
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
For someone who works for a website who's whole point is to project, you seem awful down on projecting.You heard the man, everyone out. No one knows. You don't have to go home but you can't stay here!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I know for a fact that this move will kill Javon Walker's value. Its statistically impossible for him to finish the year as a Top 10 WR now. Guaranteed.
 
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I know for a fact that this move will kill Javon Walker's value. Its statistically impossible for him to finish the year as a Top 10 WR now. Guaranteed.
:confused: I'm not sure why. The kid has a cannon arm and Javon has shown the ability to get behind the defense. Plummer doesn't have the arm strength and tended to float some balls but a big arm is one of Cutler's strengths.
 
I don't think the Denver offense will change much, I just think they want Cutler to hit the open wr's that Plummer was missing.
Right now there are 32 starting QB's in the NFL, probably about half that number are consistent at finding the open man and getting him the ball accurately and on time. Divide that number by the amouint of people on the planet and its pretty small percentage of people who posess this skill.
 
I don't think the Denver offense will change much, I just think they want Cutler to hit the open wr's that Plummer was missing.
Right now there are 32 starting QB's in the NFL, probably about half that number are consistent at finding the open man and getting him the ball accurately and on time. Divide that number by the amouint of people on the planet and its pretty small percentage of people who posess this skill.
Ok.......but Plummer was one of the 32 that was clearing missing the open wr's based on his completion % and QB rating. From everything I've read Cutler looks lights out in practice and has been blowing Plummer away (which is the reason for the change). Do you know that Cutler has a problem with his accuracy? Looking at his college stats they look pretty good 61%/59% his last two years.These are his positives from his FBG page....Jay Cutler is a tough, well-built athlete with a strong will to win. He has great measurables, and a cannon for an arm. Cutler is a student of the game and is known to spend a lot of time in the film room. He can move around behind the line of scrimmage, and is more athletic that people give him credit for. When protection breaks down, Cutler can break the pocket and pick up significant yardage with his feet. He throws well on the run, and is very adept at the short and underneath passing game. He does have a big arm, and can take shots down the field when necessary. Cutler is very strong as well, as evidenced by his QB record 23 reps at 225 lbs at the combine.
 
Starting rookie QBs, for whatever reason, enjoy throwing the ball to the TE for the most part, it is a safe throw in the NFL. Scaife, Cooley, A.Smith, Witten all have benefited from rookie QBs this season.

No idea who the TE's are for Denver but they get a bump in my book

 
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
I know for a fact that this move will kill Javon Walker's value. Its statistically impossible for him to finish the year as a Top 10 WR now. Guaranteed.
are you sure you know what "statistically impossible" means?
 
Rod may be a little better, but dont expect him to explode.

He is an aging possession receiver at this point, nothing more. Instead of his usual 4 for 37, he may see 6 catches for 53 yards. He is not much of a scoring threat.

 
Rovers said:
Yes..... Brandon Marshall.
Maybe. But I thought that it was Scheffler that Cutler was bonding with during OTA's and training camp. One of the staff members was posting daily updates about the Bronco's training camps and it seemed like Scheffler was really shining in those camps. Then again...Scheffler would have to be activated to be of any use (friggin Skeletor). :hot:
MarshallKircus

Gentlemen, it IS next year for Denver.

I could see both of these guys having a good week out of the next 2 or 3 games.
bingo. This is the guy to keep an eye on. Cutler and Kircus had good repore in pre-season - lots of long TD catches. Presumably, they have been practicing together all season as well.
 
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
For someone who works for a website who's whole point is to project, you seem awful down on projecting.You heard the man, everyone out. No one knows. You don't have to go home but you can't stay here!
Sure, I project, but I'm not going to lie to you. If the standard is to know everything all the time with 100% accuracy you're in for a disappointment. I don't know. Would you rather I guessed? I haven't seen Cutler play in a live NFL game that counts. He might get the jitters and be scared. He could easily pull a Rick Mirer and have no leadership abiliities. It happens. For the moment we have no idea what sort of presence he'll have on the field. Such is life. We wait. We watch. We learn.
 
This is a big deal for me, since I am playing for a first round bye. My QB pretty much all season has been Kitna, and I think the Pats tear him a new ##### this week. Pretty slim pickings on the waiver wire, then I thought about Cutler. It will be his first game...SEA is a middle of the road pass defense, and I think he might go big in front of a national audience on the Sunday Night game.

:banned:

who's with me?

anyone?

 
I picked him up in the only league where I have been eliminated and am starting him against a Bronco fan. Might as well have a little fun even though I am out.

 
considering it. Defenses haven't seen any tape on Cutler yet - they don't know how to game plan for him.

Leinart seems to be the best comparable - taking over for a struggling vet w/o much experience prior.

Leinarts first start:

5 kan | 22 35 253 2 1 | 1 4 0

I expect Cutler to put up around 200 yards, with a couple of TD's and a pick.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure about starting him this week, but I am probably going to try to grab him and drop Alex Smith in a start 2 QB league I'm in.

 
To the moderators: this thread was originally posted as a Rod Smith thread. I believe that Smith deserves his own thread. It's not all about Cutler to the extent that the thread should be merged into a Cutler thread. I agree with most decisions to merge threads, but merging this thread may be a bit excessive.

If you insist on merging the R. Smith thread, can you modify the title so that it attracts input for those looking for a R. Smith thread. Otherwise, maybe someone needs to start another Smith thread.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
"I told you so!" Sorry, just warming up.
 
I picked him (Cutler) up off WW last week when I first heard the rumour. I am starting him this week over Frye and Roethlisberger. If he does well I may even make him one of my 4 keepers.
I am thinking of starting him over Frye and Alex Smith.
considering it. Defenses haven't seen any tape on Cutler yet - they don't know how to game plan for him.Leinart seems to be the best comparable - taking over for a struggling vet w/o much experience prior.Leinarts first start:5 kan | 22 35 253 2 1 | 1 4 0 I expect Cutler to put up around 200 yards, with a couple of TD's and a pick.
Considering I don't get docked for INT's, I am really tempted to start Cutler. I'd take those numbers.
 
To the moderators: this thread was originally posted as a Rod Smith thread. I believe that Smith deserves his own thread. It's not all about Cutler to the extent that the thread should be merged into a Cutler thread. I agree with most decisions to merge threads, but merging this thread may be a bit excessive.If you insist on merging the R. Smith thread, can you modify the title so that it attracts input for those looking for a R. Smith thread. Otherwise, maybe someone needs to start another Smith thread.
:goodposting: I read this post last night as a Rod Smith thread. It shouldn't have been merged. :thumbdown:
 
Shick! said:
We don't know. Nobody does at this moment.This move could backfire and Cutler could fall flat on his face. He might have a great impact on the Denver offense. For now, he's a giant wildcard.IMO anyone who tells you they know for certain is posturing so they can pull the "I told ya so" later on.
No one said "for certain".... it's about projecting. I still think B Marshall is the guy to get in dynasty leagues, and I'm not saying that to set up any I told you so" posts. Geeze.... get a grip.
 
Considering I have big trouble at QB, I am starting Cutler. My other options are Plummer, Frye and very little on the wire. So, I am praying Cutler is as good as Shanny thinks he is. Well, he cant be any worse than Plummer (whom I drafted to be my starter this season). Good thing I also drafted LT2, Westbrook & the Ravens D.

 
Ron_Mexico said:
Would I be insane if I droppedMcNairEliFryeand picked upYoungLeinartCutlerfor the playoff push ?
I would absolutely drop Frye for Leinart. I would consider dropping McNair for Young. I'd probably hold off on dropping Eli for Cutler, but if Cutler blows up and Eli just blows, I'd consider it. :shock: I can't believe I just wrote that!
 
I don't know enough about Cutler to make a projection, but his schedule is really, really soft in the playoffs.

Maybe he's worth a look in 2 QB leagues for those enticing matchups.

I'm going to pick him up in hopes of catching lightning in a bottle a la Tony Romo. Not that I'm comparing him to Romo, but it's possible Cutler and Walker develop instant chemistry.

 
shredhead said:
MillenniuM Presents: Frank Black said:
To the moderators: this thread was originally posted as a Rod Smith thread. I believe that Smith deserves his own thread. It's not all about Cutler to the extent that the thread should be merged into a Cutler thread. I agree with most decisions to merge threads, but merging this thread may be a bit excessive.

If you insist on merging the R. Smith thread, can you modify the title so that it attracts input for those looking for a R. Smith thread. Otherwise, maybe someone needs to start another Smith thread.
:goodposting: I read this post last night as a Rod Smith thread. It shouldn't have been merged. :thumbdown:
Started a Rod Smith thread here.
 
My League awards bonus points for rushing yards/TDs for QBs/WRs. (1 pt for 5 yds/8 pt TDs). Strange I know, but it's teh rules.

I'm wondering how mobile Cutler is. Dropping JP Losman as backup QB to pick up another QB. Pickings are slim on waivers.

Was leaning toward Aaron Brooks or Jeff Garcia, but with Cutler taking over in Denver, am considering him as well.

 
Cutler is a mobile athletic QB. He ran for over 1000 yards in his college career and 17 TDs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not starting him. Just grabbing a backup. I've got Palmer as my starter. Passing yards still important, but a lousy QB that can put up some rushing yards is better than a lousy QB that can't run in our scoring system.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not starting him. Just grabbing a backup. I've got Palmer as my starter. Passing yards still important, but a lousy QB that can put up some rushing yards is better than a lousy QB that can't run in our scoring system.
He averaged less than 2.8 ypc in college. As a comparison, Jake and Aaron Brooks are all well over 4 ypc and McNabb is over 6. He's mobile for a pocket passer, but he's not a rushing QB. If you are expecting rushing yards I think you are going to be disappointed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My understanding was when he ran in college it was running for his life due to his O line being overmatched.

As said above mobile but not know as a rusher.

Although while running for his life he learned to throw on the run wich is good in Denver's scheme.

 
My understanding was when he ran in college it was running for his life due to his O line being overmatched.As said above mobile but not know as a rusher.Although while running for his life he learned to throw on the run wich is good in Denver's scheme.
Your understanding is wrong. For his first two years he was an option QB, it was in his junior year when the switch came to a pocket QB.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top