What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jerry Sandusky accused of child molestation (2 Viewers)

Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
It is simply absurd. If somehow she convinced HERSELF she didn't know, its a willful ignorance of not WANTING to know. Christ, your husband taking multiple strange boys on trips? If you're innocent than you're an idiot.
Unfortunately being an idiot isn't against the law, if it was we'd have tens of millions more people in our jails. I think it is reasonable to assume she had some idea what was going on, but it's far from a slam dunk. Would they possibly be able to bring her in on child endangerment?
Agreed on the idiocy. Frankly, I don't see the purpose of prosecuting her, I don't know that a wife from her generation can necessarily have that much of an expectation to operate otherwise. In her case alone, I would think the judgement of her family is punishment enough as opposed to a judgement from the state.If you're going to start looking for more blood, it sounds like there is no shortage blood to be had from the rest of the Penn State Admins.

Its cliche and its been said a 1000 times but I almost have Christian sympathy for Sandusky as a sick, sick man. He was in a place where he couldn't or wouldn't help himself. Now, he should still hang high for what he did for the innocents but he was mentally deranged. There is no acceptable excuse for the inaction of Penn State adminstrators and their inaction, from Paterno on down. There should be a Nuremberg at Penn State to serve as an example for those that stood by and did nothing.

 
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
You may not buy it, but it's not an impossibility.
 
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
It is simply absurd. If somehow she convinced HERSELF she didn't know, its a willful ignorance of not WANTING to know. Christ, your husband taking multiple strange boys on trips? If you're innocent than you're an idiot.
Unfortunately being an idiot isn't against the law, if it was we'd have tens of millions more people in our jails. I think it is reasonable to assume she had some idea what was going on, but it's far from a slam dunk. Would they possibly be able to bring her in on child endangerment?
Agreed on the idiocy. Frankly, I don't see the purpose of prosecuting her, I don't know that a wife from her generation can necessarily have that much of an expectation to operate otherwise. In her case alone, I would think the judgement of her family is punishment enough as opposed to a judgement from the state.If you're going to start looking for more blood, it sounds like there is no shortage blood to be had from the rest of the Penn State Admins.

Its cliche and its been said a 1000 times but I almost have Christian sympathy for Sandusky as a sick, sick man. He was in a place where he couldn't or wouldn't help himself. Now, he should still hang high for what he did for the innocents but he was mentally deranged. There is no acceptable excuse for the inaction of Penn State adminstrators and their inaction, from Paterno on down. There should be a Nuremberg at Penn State to serve as an example for those that stood by and did nothing.
I really wish JoePa had lived to see this trial, hopefully he died a painful death.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My question to you all: Should Sandusky, Ohio consider changing its name? :popcorn:
Isn't it sad that Chris Farley once saved the town of Sandusky, Ohio?
Actually rented that movie from the Library on Saturday. Great movie. Horrible name to have, though. I wonder if the great town of Sandusky will consider a formal name change?
Samir: No one in this country can ever pronounce my name right. It's not that hard: Na-ghee-na-na-jar. Nagheenanajar. Michael Bolton: Yeah, well, at least your name isn't Michael Bolton. Samir: You know, there's nothing wrong with that name. Michael Bolton: There *was* nothing wrong with it... until I was about twelve years old and that no-talent ### clown became famous and started winning Grammys. Samir: Hmm... well, why don't you just go by Mike instead of Michael? Michael Bolton: No way! Why should I change? He's the one who sucks.
 
My question to you all: Should Sandusky, Ohio consider changing its name? :popcorn:
Isn't it sad that Chris Farley once saved the town of Sandusky, Ohio?
Actually rented that movie from the Library on Saturday. Great movie. Horrible name to have, though. I wonder if the great town of Sandusky will consider a formal name change?
Maybe Tressel, Ohio?
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: That was funny.
 
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
It is simply absurd. If somehow she convinced HERSELF she didn't know, its a willful ignorance of not WANTING to know. Christ, your husband taking multiple strange boys on trips? If you're innocent than you're an idiot.
Unfortunately being an idiot isn't against the law, if it was we'd have tens of millions more people in our jails. I think it is reasonable to assume she had some idea what was going on, but it's far from a slam dunk. Would they possibly be able to bring her in on child endangerment?
Agreed on the idiocy. Frankly, I don't see the purpose of prosecuting her, I don't know that a wife from her generation can necessarily have that much of an expectation to operate otherwise. In her case alone, I would think the judgement of her family is punishment enough as opposed to a judgement from the state.If you're going to start looking for more blood, it sounds like there is no shortage blood to be had from the rest of the Penn State Admins.

Its cliche and its been said a 1000 times but I almost have Christian sympathy for Sandusky as a sick, sick man. He was in a place where he couldn't or wouldn't help himself. Now, he should still hang high for what he did for the innocents but he was mentally deranged. There is no acceptable excuse for the inaction of Penn State adminstrators and their inaction, from Paterno on down. There should be a Nuremberg at Penn State to serve as an example for those that stood by and did nothing.
I really wish JoePa had lived to see this trial, hopefully he died a painful death.
That's really an awful thing to say.

 
'proninja said:
'TexanFan02 said:
'culdeus said:
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
It is simply absurd. If somehow she convinced HERSELF she didn't know, its a willful ignorance of not WANTING to know. Christ, your husband taking multiple strange boys on trips? If you're innocent than you're an idiot.
Unfortunately being an idiot isn't against the law, if it was we'd have tens of millions more people in our jails. I think it is reasonable to assume she had some idea what was going on, but it's far from a slam dunk. Would they possibly be able to bring her in on child endangerment?
Agreed on the idiocy. Frankly, I don't see the purpose of prosecuting her, I don't know that a wife from her generation can necessarily have that much of an expectation to operate otherwise. In her case alone, I would think the judgement of her family is punishment enough as opposed to a judgement from the state.If you're going to start looking for more blood, it sounds like there is no shortage blood to be had from the rest of the Penn State Admins.

Its cliche and its been said a 1000 times but I almost have Christian sympathy for Sandusky as a sick, sick man. He was in a place where he couldn't or wouldn't help himself. Now, he should still hang high for what he did for the innocents but he was mentally deranged. There is no acceptable excuse for the inaction of Penn State adminstrators and their inaction, from Paterno on down. There should be a Nuremberg at Penn State to serve as an example for those that stood by and did nothing.
I really wish JoePa had lived to see this trial, hopefully he died a painful death.
That's really an awful thing to say.
No, awful is what Sandusky did while all the people in charge including JoePa looked the other way.
It's still an awful thing to say. People sure do get worked up on the internet.
 
'proninja said:
'TexanFan02 said:
'culdeus said:
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
It is simply absurd. If somehow she convinced HERSELF she didn't know, its a willful ignorance of not WANTING to know. Christ, your husband taking multiple strange boys on trips? If you're innocent than you're an idiot.
Unfortunately being an idiot isn't against the law, if it was we'd have tens of millions more people in our jails. I think it is reasonable to assume she had some idea what was going on, but it's far from a slam dunk. Would they possibly be able to bring her in on child endangerment?
Agreed on the idiocy. Frankly, I don't see the purpose of prosecuting her, I don't know that a wife from her generation can necessarily have that much of an expectation to operate otherwise. In her case alone, I would think the judgement of her family is punishment enough as opposed to a judgement from the state.If you're going to start looking for more blood, it sounds like there is no shortage blood to be had from the rest of the Penn State Admins.

Its cliche and its been said a 1000 times but I almost have Christian sympathy for Sandusky as a sick, sick man. He was in a place where he couldn't or wouldn't help himself. Now, he should still hang high for what he did for the innocents but he was mentally deranged. There is no acceptable excuse for the inaction of Penn State adminstrators and their inaction, from Paterno on down. There should be a Nuremberg at Penn State to serve as an example for those that stood by and did nothing.
I really wish JoePa had lived to see this trial, hopefully he died a painful death.
That's really an awful thing to say.
No, awful is what Sandusky did while all the people in charge including JoePa looked the other way.
They basically allowed a wolf to roam free in a henhouse for years. They did more than allow. They looked the other way, excused and lied to cover it all up. Pretty heinous actions. Hard to fault somebody for expressing anger over this.
 
Were all his victims male?
That's usually the way it works. They either molest boys or they molest girls, but they rarely molest both.
Forgive the questions, but my mind doesn't work like a pedophile (thank God)...So he's ONLY gay for little boys? Or he would be gay for an attractive 24-year-old man as well?

:unsure:
Pedophile <> Gay
Whoa, I must have been on a vacation from the FFA for a while. For you to be the first to respond is :loco: ;) :hifive:

 
Were all his victims male?
That's usually the way it works. They either molest boys or they molest girls, but they rarely molest both.
Forgive the questions, but my mind doesn't work like a pedophile (thank God)...So he's ONLY gay for little boys? Or he would be gay for an attractive 24-year-old man as well?

:unsure:
Pedophile <> Gay
Whoa, I must have been on a vacation from the FFA for a while. For you to be the first to respond is :loco: ;) :hifive:
Sandusky isn't even a little gay? :confused:
 
Were all his victims male?
That's usually the way it works. They either molest boys or they molest girls, but they rarely molest both.
Forgive the questions, but my mind doesn't work like a pedophile (thank God)...So he's ONLY gay for little boys? Or he would be gay for an attractive 24-year-old man as well?

:unsure:
Pedophile <> Gay
Whoa, I must have been on a vacation from the FFA for a while. For you to be the first to respond is :loco: ;) :hifive:
I'm not as bad a guy as you might think. ;)

 
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
I am beginning to remember your vile defense of Paterno/Sandusky in this thread, Tim.
That's interesting because I don't.
You were defending your hero the child buggerer protector and man-boy rape enabler.
 
'proninja said:
It's still an awful thing to say. People sure do get worked up on the internet.
Yeah, how weird is it that people get worked up about a grown man sodomizing little boys while his cronies allow it to happen right under their noses?
Joe Pat was not a Crony, and reported it. Wishing him a painful death is juvenile at best, and puts you on a moral level about equal to Sandusky.
 
'proninja said:
'proninja said:
It's still an awful thing to say. People sure do get worked up on the internet.
Yeah, how weird is it that people get worked up about a grown man sodomizing little boys while his cronies allow it to happen right under their noses?
Joe Pat was not a Crony, and reported it. Wishing him a painful death is juvenile at best, and puts you on a moral level about equal to Sandusky.
When did I wish him a paniful death? What exactly did I do that puts me on a moral level with the child rapist?Are you trying to shed any last remaining bit of your credibility here?
Don't play dumb.
 
'proninja said:
It's still an awful thing to say. People sure do get worked up on the internet.
Yeah, how weird is it that people get worked up about a grown man sodomizing little boys while his cronies allow it to happen right under their noses?
Joe Pat was not a Crony, and reported it. Wishing him a painful death is juvenile at best, and puts you on a moral level about equal to Sandusky.
WTF are you talking about? He continued to bring children to practice, games, team facilities and on the road for YEARS following as a part of the PSU traveling party. While it is probably best to turn the other cheek in this life, I believe Joe has had to answer for his choices in the next phase of his journey.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
[That's really an awful thing to say.
:lmao: if this wasn't so sad.
You don't think it's awful to hope someone who committed no crime at all suffered a painful death? I don't want to party with you.
Texan, if what went on with the administration at PSU in light of what we are learning they knew and when, then I most assuredly do not want to party with you.Joe was human, but based on the aftermath of his actions, its hard to think that at best, he was putting the institution in front of the individual. At worst, he appears to have been more concerned with preserving his legacy than actually putting what he preached into action, as far as doing the right thing in a community. I'm guessing the reality is somewhere in between, but his legacy is his choices.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
[That's really an awful thing to say.
:lmao: if this wasn't so sad.
You don't think it's awful to hope someone who committed no crime at all suffered a painful death? I don't want to party with you.
Texan, if what went on with the administration at PSU in light of what we are learning they knew and when, then I most assuredly do not want to party with you.Joe was human, but based on the aftermath of his actions, its hard to think that at best, he was putting the institution in front of the individual. At worst, he appears to have been more concerned with preserving his legacy than actually putting what he preached into action, as far as doing the right thing in a community. I'm guessing the reality is somewhere in between, but his legacy is his choices.
Joe Pa was not "the Administration". He reported it to them, it was up to them to follow up. For all he knew, they resolved the situation.
 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
I found an article from UC Davis that speaks more to this. I found the quoted text helpful. Sounds like Sandusky cannot be classified as a homosexual since his fixations are on children only. Interesting stuff...
The distinction between a victim's gender and a perpetrator's sexual orientation is important because many child molesters don't really have an adult sexual orientation. They have never developed the capacity for mature sexual relationships with other adults, either men or women. Instead, their sexual attractions focus on children – boys, girls, or children of both sexes.

Over the years, this fact has been incorporated into various systems for categorizing child molesters. For example, Finkelhor and Araji (1986) proposed that perpetrators' sexual attractions should be conceptualized as ranging along a continuum – from exclusive interest in children at one extreme, to exclusive interest in adult partners at the other end.

Typologies of offenders have often included a distinction between those with an enduring primary preference for children as sexual partners and those who have established age-appropriate relationships but become sexually involved with children under unusual circumstances of extreme stress. Perpetrators in the first category – those with a more or less exclusive interest in children – have been labeled fixated. Fixation means "a temporary or permanent arrestment of psychological maturation resulting from unresolved formative issues which persist and underlie the organization of subsequent phases of development" (Groth & Birnbaum, 1978, p. 176). Many clinicians view fixated offenders as being "stuck" at an early stage of psychological development.

By contrast, other molesters are described as regressed. Regression is "a temporary or permanent appearance of primitive behavior after more mature forms of expression had been attained, regardless of whether the immature behavior was actually manifested earlier in the individual's development" (Groth & Birnbaum, 1978, p. 177). Regressed offenders have developed an adult sexual orientation but under certain conditions (such as extreme stress) they return to an earlier, less mature psychological state and engage in sexual contact with children.

Some typologies of child molesters divide the fixation-regression distinction into multiple categories, and some include additional categories as well (e.g., Knight, 1989).

For the present discussion, the important point is that many child molesters cannot be meaningfully described as homosexuals, heterosexuals, or bisexuals (in the usual sense of those terms) because they are not really capable of a relationship with an adult man or woman. Instead of gender, their sexual attractions are based primarily on age. These individuals – who are often characterized as fixated – are attracted to children, not to men or women.
 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
[That's really an awful thing to say.
:lmao: if this wasn't so sad.
You don't think it's awful to hope someone who committed no crime at all suffered a painful death? I don't want to party with you.
Texan, if what went on with the administration at PSU in light of what we are learning they knew and when, then I most assuredly do not want to party with you.Joe was human, but based on the aftermath of his actions, its hard to think that at best, he was putting the institution in front of the individual. At worst, he appears to have been more concerned with preserving his legacy than actually putting what he preached into action, as far as doing the right thing in a community. I'm guessing the reality is somewhere in between, but his legacy is his choices.
Joe Pa was not "the Administration". He reported it to them, it was up to them to follow up. For all he knew, they resolved the situation.
The Same guy who told them he would retire on his terms, not theirs, is not the adminstration?Ugh, I'm almost reluctant to go down this road, but to be kind your opinion on this matter is clouded and pathetic. The facts are there, and we knew JoePa KNEW of an accusation by McQueary. By his own admission. Furthermore, this squirrely guy still brought children around to events through the 2011 season. It is just asinine to think Joe didn't see smoke where there was fire, and that wasn't a part Sandusky's sudden departure. Joe knew enough to get him away from the program, but not enough to get him away from the kids.
 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
Then why did he only diddle boys?
 
I'm hesitant to lump Paterno in with the AD, Pres and V. Pres, who are probably going to face charges of their own. I think he knew Sandusky had issues with little boys, but probably turned a blind eye to it once he retired and especially after he reported it up the chain. That said, I think others here are making a strong case by saying he had a duty to do more to stop it. He's not alone, though. Either way, we'll find out more as this case unfolds.

The deatils of this case make my soul hurt and my stomach churn. So sickening. I wonder what happened to Sandusky in life to lead him down this road. Will we find out that he was a victim at one time?

 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
Then why did he only diddle boys?
why does it matter?it's wrong whether it was little girls or little boys.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
[That's really an awful thing to say.
:lmao: if this wasn't so sad.
You don't think it's awful to hope someone who committed no crime at all suffered a painful death? I don't want to party with you.
Texan, if what went on with the administration at PSU in light of what we are learning they knew and when, then I most assuredly do not want to party with you.Joe was human, but based on the aftermath of his actions, its hard to think that at best, he was putting the institution in front of the individual. At worst, he appears to have been more concerned with preserving his legacy than actually putting what he preached into action, as far as doing the right thing in a community. I'm guessing the reality is somewhere in between, but his legacy is his choices.
Joe Pa was not "the Administration". He reported it to them, it was up to them to follow up. For all he knew, they resolved the situation.
The Same guy who told them he would retire on his terms, not theirs, is not the adminstration?Ugh, I'm almost reluctant to go down this road, but to be kind your opinion on this matter is clouded and pathetic. The facts are there, and we knew JoePa KNEW of an accusation by McQueary. By his own admission. Furthermore, this squirrely guy still brought children around to events through the 2011 season. It is just asinine to think Joe didn't see smoke where there was fire, and that wasn't a part Sandusky's sudden departure. Joe knew enough to get him away from the program, but not enough to get him away from the kids.
So painfully obvious that this is how it went. Amazing how some choose to stay blind to it.
 
Oh, and his wife should go to jail too. No way she didn't know this stuff was going on.
Is there some kind of evidence that would cause you to make this assumption? Because if you're simply relying on common sense, I can assure you that the spouses of these monsters rarely know what they're up to.
Come on Tim, use your head here. Do you really think it's possible for a serial pedophile to abuse multiple victims over a period of decades, often in the basement of his home, and the woman that he lives with has no idea what's going on? Sorry, I don't buy it.
http://ezinearticles.com/?8-Myths-About-Child-Molesters&id=67169908 Myths about Child Molestors

by Patricia Wickland, PHD

2. The wife always knows and condones or even encourages his behavior.

Typically wives of child molesters are the last to know. Men who molest keep their activities secret and often threaten their victims not to tell or they will hurt their mothers or other family members.

This is only one source of many all over the web. I advise you to google "Wives of child molestors". You will find that my assertion that it is EXTREMELY unusual for the wife to know is correct. I am not saying it applies to this situation necessarily because there may be specific evidence otherwise. But for you and others to make the assumption based on "of course she had to know" is flat wrong.

 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
I think some people are curious why he didn't molest girls if he isn't gay. I get what you are saying and thanks to the article I just read, understand the clinical diagnosis, but for the average person, this is a very difficult thing to understand. I was off base until I read more.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
[That's really an awful thing to say.
:lmao: if this wasn't so sad.
You don't think it's awful to hope someone who committed no crime at all suffered a painful death? I don't want to party with you.
Texan, if what went on with the administration at PSU in light of what we are learning they knew and when, then I most assuredly do not want to party with you.Joe was human, but based on the aftermath of his actions, its hard to think that at best, he was putting the institution in front of the individual. At worst, he appears to have been more concerned with preserving his legacy than actually putting what he preached into action, as far as doing the right thing in a community. I'm guessing the reality is somewhere in between, but his legacy is his choices.
Joe Pa was not "the Administration". He reported it to them, it was up to them to follow up. For all he knew, they resolved the situation.
The Same guy who told them he would retire on his terms, not theirs, is not the adminstration?Ugh, I'm almost reluctant to go down this road, but to be kind your opinion on this matter is clouded and pathetic. The facts are there, and we knew JoePa KNEW of an accusation by McQueary. By his own admission. Furthermore, this squirrely guy still brought children around to events through the 2011 season. It is just asinine to think Joe didn't see smoke where there was fire, and that wasn't a part Sandusky's sudden departure. Joe knew enough to get him away from the program, but not enough to get him away from the kids.
So painfully obvious that this is how it went. Amazing how some choose to stay blind to it.
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know you guys were there at the time and privy to everything that went on. I thought you were just assuming things. My bad.
 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
Then why did he only diddle boys?
I don't know that he did.
 
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
Then why did he only diddle boys?
why does it matter?it's wrong whether it was little girls or little boys.
Of course it is. But if there's no homosexuality involved, then all kids should have been fair game to him, not 1/2 of them. As far as we know, each and every accuse was male.
 
I didn't think this thread could possibly drift into murkier water, but it certainly has. :unsure:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
can we go back to the Sandusky is not gay thing? I'm puzzled by this.
I don't buy it either, not that it particularly matters, but there would have to be obvious homosexual tendencies.
Why? Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder which manifests itself as an interest in children as sex objects. It has nothing to do with how the pedophiles relate to adults sexually except that some pedophiles have no interest in adults sexually.
Then why did he only diddle boys?
I don't know that he did.
Let's go on what we do know. As of now, each accuser is male. If we, unfortunately, find a female victim, then it's open to debate about the psychiatric disorder being the problem.I look at it as a man who was ashamed of what he was and only acted upon his urges with people that he had authority over. Children that were, to a point, dependent upon him and in no position to tell him what he was doing is wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top