VaTerp
Footballguy
Yes, I'm playing a bit of devil's advocate here. I do think Sproles and F-Jax are good RBs to bring up for role comparison. Sproles is different though in that he is clearly the Saints go to RB in the passing game and no other RB on the Saints roster does what Bush does in Detroit. And F-Jax is producing with Spiller struggling, which is also not the case with Bush in Detroit.I see your point and I think you are making good points and playing devils advocate but let me give you an example.. Sproles is similar to Bell not in size but sorta in role. Bell may not run a ton of carries but will always get you 6 + catches and has a chance to put in a gl score so he should be able to put up top 10 numbers with or without bush..... I see where your coming from but Think fred Jackson but better.True but how long will a backup RB keep up top 10 status. Bush has clearly shown that when healthy he is a RB1. Can this offense continue to sustain two top FF Rbs? I'm not so sure.Smart people got on board a long time ago. Everyone is always scared to jump on the non sexy guy. I just like to jump on upside and production and he is producing. Say it any way you like but he is a top 7 RB in every league I'm in.
Bell is a great player to have on your roster considering the ROI thus far and his value both while Bush is in the lineup and especially when Reggie is out. But I just wonder how sustainable Bell's numbers are with Bush in the lineup and if some regression to the mean here is inevitable.
But I agree that Bell has a defined role and should remain an attractive option, especially in PPR. I'd like nothing more than to be able to lock him into my flex spot for the rest of the season. But I would also add that expecting 100 receptions (always get you 6 + catches) is too much and that's sort of why I think a tempering of expectations is in order here.
But we shall see.
Last edited by a moderator: