I didn't know that. That's fine but you can still make Rhodes the featured RB even if he doesn't start. I think that's the best move for the Colts to make given how he's been superior to Addai this season.
Back it up with facts...Rhodes, in games where he's seen a remotely significant number of carries, has only bettered 4.0 YPC twice. In the games where he had 20+ carries, he averaged 3.3 YPC. He's scored 4 TDs rushing. Until Addai got injured, he didn't see more than 2 carries a game.Addai has bettered 4.0 YPC 4 times this season, despite injury. In the only game he received 20+ carries he had a 4.8 YPC. He's rushed for 5 TDs.62 of Rhodes attempts came in games where Addai was hurt. That's over 50% of his carries... when Addai has been healthy, Rhodes has been used sparingly, in better running situations.This last game, they each had ten carries, Addai averaged 2.6 YPC, Rhodes 31. Interestingly though, 8 of Rhodes carries totalled -3 yards, he had 2 17 yard carries, otherwise he was awful, and anyone who watched that game should have seen it.People here want to knock Addai, because they were all down on him when he was drafted and he totally outplayed the more favored guys, that's fine. Everyone can have an opinion. But don't start throwing out facts that simply aren't factual. The Colts already made the choice between Rhodes or Addai being the featured back, and they let Rhodes walk. Nothing this year has shown Rhodes to be the better RB either. Despite Addai's injuries, and his shouldering the load early in the season when the OL was trash and Manning was terrible, he is averaging .1 YPC less than Rhodes, and .6 higher YPR. Addai has more rush TDs, and they have nearly identical TD/carry ratios.If you want to knock Addai, knock his ability to stay healthy, not his talent. When he's been healthy he's been one of the best RBs in the league.