What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

LA DODGERS 2009 THREAD (1 Viewer)

Don't expect Maddux back

DANA POINT, Calif. -- Greg Maddux, the eighth winningest pitcher in major league history, is almost certain to retire, his agent, Scott Boras, said tonight."He hasn't made a final decision, but for now it is doubtful he will play (any longer)," Boras said at the GM Meetings. "As it stands now, he is not going to play."Maddux is a certain Hall of Famer. He won four Cy Young awards in a row from 1992-95. Maddux is 355-227. He began last season with the Padres and finished up working mainly out of the pen for the NL West champion Dodgers.Only Warren Spahn with 367 wins has more victories in what is considered the live ball period of baseball, since 1920, than Maddux.
As I said in the other thread this could very well be a negotiating ploy on Boras's part. If Maddux is done, congratulations on a great career. Until I hear it out of Maddux I won't believe he is done.
 
Don't expect Maddux back

DANA POINT, Calif. -- Greg Maddux, the eighth winningest pitcher in major league history, is almost certain to retire, his agent, Scott Boras, said tonight.

"He hasn't made a final decision, but for now it is doubtful he will play (any longer)," Boras said at the GM Meetings. "As it stands now, he is not going to play."

Maddux is a certain Hall of Famer. He won four Cy Young awards in a row from 1992-95. Maddux is 355-227. He began last season with the Padres and finished up working mainly out of the pen for the NL West champion Dodgers.

Only Warren Spahn with 367 wins has more victories in what is considered the live ball period of baseball, since 1920, than Maddux.
As I said in the other thread this could very well be a negotiating ploy on Boras's part. If Maddux is done, congratulations on a great career. Until I hear it out of Maddux I won't believe he is done.
What would he hope to accomplish by stating he is going to retire? Maddux is a 5 inning .500 pitcher these days. he was relegated to the pen for the playoffs. I think his time is up. One of the greatest pitchers of my generation. Congrats on all he has done. He is going out with another gold glove award. He will make a great pitching coach for a team.
Dodgers decline Penny's option

It's hard to say if I agree with this or not without knowing the health of his arm. Based on this season, I can't fault the Dodgers for doing this. But I could see him being a bargain for some other team in 2009 if his arm is okay.
Penny and Sheets are great pitchers when not hurt. They are just to hurt to pay that kind of cash too. More durable then Prior though!!!If he proves to be healthy, Penny will get some good money. If he comes cheap LA may want him back.

 
3 yrs / $72M (including the team option third year) for Manny :thumbup:
I'm good with that deal, especially given the third year is a team option. I read that Manny made the Dodgers 10-15 mil this year in the small time he was with the team. If he makes the team an extra 10 mil a year on a full season, they are only really spending 15 mil on him. His hitting is worth that. I like keeping the years low and think this would be the perfect agreement from the Dodgers' perspective. I don't think Manny will take it. I think he might compromise to a three-year contract without the team option.
 
3 yrs / $72M (including the team option third year) for Manny :jawdrop:
I'm good with that deal, especially given the third year is a team option. I read that Manny made the Dodgers 10-15 mil this year in the small time he was with the team. If he makes the team an extra 10 mil a year on a full season, they are only really spending 15 mil on him. His hitting is worth that. I like keeping the years low and think this would be the perfect agreement from the Dodgers' perspective. I don't think Manny will take it. I think he might compromise to a three-year contract without the team option.
Euphus, where did you see that? on the dodger site it talks about an initial offer of two years at $55 million I am good with both offers. But I dont think Manny will take it. Or should I say Boras wont take it. He is talking 6 years, a contract that pays him until he is 42 like Bonds and ARod got...article:DANA POINT, Calif. -- The Dodgers have made their initial offer to free-agent left fielder Manny Ramirez, Ned Colletti, their general manager, said on Wednesday afternoon as the second day of this year's annual General Managers Meetings came to a close. The offer -- believed to be in the neighborhood of two years at $55 million -- was extended to Ramirez's agent, Scott Boras, on Tuesday night as the two sides met for the only time during the meetings, which end on Thursday.
 
3 yrs / $72M (including the team option third year) for Manny

:lmao:
I'm good with that deal, especially given the third year is a team option. I read that Manny made the Dodgers 10-15 mil this year in the small time he was with the team. If he makes the team an extra 10 mil a year on a full season, they are only really spending 15 mil on him. His hitting is worth that. I like keeping the years low and think this would be the perfect agreement from the Dodgers' perspective. I don't think Manny will take it. I think he might compromise to a three-year contract without the team option.
Euphus, where did you see that? on the dodger site it talks about an initial offer of two years at $55 million I am good with both offers. But I dont think Manny will take it. Or should I say Boras wont take it. He is talking 6 years, a contract that pays him until he is 42 like Bonds and ARod got...

article:

DANA POINT, Calif. -- The Dodgers have made their initial offer to free-agent left fielder Manny Ramirez, Ned Colletti, their general manager, said on Wednesday afternoon as the second day of this year's annual General Managers Meetings came to a close.

The offer -- believed to be in the neighborhood of two years at $55 million -- was extended to Ramirez's agent, Scott Boras, on Tuesday night as the two sides met for the only time during the meetings, which end on Thursday.
I guess the $72M was somebody extrapolating the $55M/2 over a third year. To clarify:
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/

Just did a phone interview for ESPNNews. Those guys seem to think it's two years and an option. That probably means the total guarantee is something LESS than $72 million, because it would only include the buyout of the option year.
I suspect there's more than a little speculating going on here. But it's pretty obvious the Dodgers are serious about keeping Manny and that he's going to get paid.
 
Don't expect Maddux back

DANA POINT, Calif. -- Greg Maddux, the eighth winningest pitcher in major league history, is almost certain to retire, his agent, Scott Boras, said tonight."He hasn't made a final decision, but for now it is doubtful he will play (any longer)," Boras said at the GM Meetings. "As it stands now, he is not going to play."Maddux is a certain Hall of Famer. He won four Cy Young awards in a row from 1992-95. Maddux is 355-227. He began last season with the Padres and finished up working mainly out of the pen for the NL West champion Dodgers.Only Warren Spahn with 367 wins has more victories in what is considered the live ball period of baseball, since 1920, than Maddux.
As I said in the other thread this could very well be a negotiating ploy on Boras's part. If Maddux is done, congratulations on a great career. Until I hear it out of Maddux I won't believe he is done.
What would he hope to accomplish by stating he is going to retire? Maddux is a 5 inning .500 pitcher these days. he was relegated to the pen for the playoffs. I think his time is up. One of the greatest pitchers of my generation. Congrats on all he has done. He is going out with another gold glove award. He will make a great pitching coach for a team.
Boras is telling prospective teams you better make it worth his while to play next year otherwise he wont be around. If Maddux is retiring he will make a statement. When his agent is making statements it is because he is setting the stage. Especially when that agent is Scott Boras.
 
Don't expect Maddux back

DANA POINT, Calif. -- Greg Maddux, the eighth winningest pitcher in major league history, is almost certain to retire, his agent, Scott Boras, said tonight."He hasn't made a final decision, but for now it is doubtful he will play (any longer)," Boras said at the GM Meetings. "As it stands now, he is not going to play."Maddux is a certain Hall of Famer. He won four Cy Young awards in a row from 1992-95. Maddux is 355-227. He began last season with the Padres and finished up working mainly out of the pen for the NL West champion Dodgers.Only Warren Spahn with 367 wins has more victories in what is considered the live ball period of baseball, since 1920, than Maddux.
As I said in the other thread this could very well be a negotiating ploy on Boras's part. If Maddux is done, congratulations on a great career. Until I hear it out of Maddux I won't believe he is done.
What would he hope to accomplish by stating he is going to retire? Maddux is a 5 inning .500 pitcher these days. he was relegated to the pen for the playoffs. I think his time is up. One of the greatest pitchers of my generation. Congrats on all he has done. He is going out with another gold glove award. He will make a great pitching coach for a team.
Boras is telling prospective teams you better make it worth his while to play next year otherwise he wont be around. If Maddux is retiring he will make a statement. When his agent is making statements it is because he is setting the stage. Especially when that agent is Scott Boras.
Thats my point, there really is no stage for Maddux. No team is going to break the bank to get him. I realize Boras is delusional but it doesnt make sense. The FA market for pitchers is pretty good, Maddux is a 5th/ spot starter these days.
 
Young Dodgers making an impact

Heralded pitching prospects knocking on door in L.A.

By Jonathan Mayo / MLB.com

Before the 2008 season began, MLB.com took an in-depth look at every big league team's Minor League system. Now it's time to recap and analyze all 30 organizations, from top prospects to the recent Draft class.

Those young, upstart Dodgers. We've been hearing about the Baby Blues for a while now, haven't we? Considering the team made it to the NLCS, it seems they're living up to the hype.

The Dodgers once again received an influx of talent from their farm system to help them reach the postseason. With Blake DeWitt, Clayton Kershaw and other contributors pitching in, Los Angeles showed that its pipeline is far from dry.

There is more to come, with several prospects nearly ready to step into larger roles. There might be a bit of a waiting period after that, but rest assured the Dodgers' scouting and player development folks won't let it last long.

Organizational Players of the Year

MLB.com Preseason Picks

Blake DeWitt, 3B: We predicted DeWitt would turn the corner and show more consistent power. He spent 117 games in Los Angeles and was a fairly consistent performer on the big stage.



James McDonald, RHP: We thought McDonald would continue to refine his pitching skills and steadily move up the Dodgers' ladder. Mission accomplished: he finished second in the organization in strikeouts and third in ERA before making his big-league debut and earning a spot on the Dodgers' postseason roster.

MLB.com Postseason Selections

John Lindsey, 1B: While not a prospect per se, it's hard to ignore what the 31-year-old did in 2008. Lindsey finished third among full-season hitters in the organization with a .316 average while leading in homers (26) and tying for the lead with 100 RBIs. He finished eighth in the Pacific Coast League with a .964 OPS, seventh with a .407 OBP and tied for fifth in RBIs.

James McDonald, RHP: After posting a 3.19 ERA in 22 Double-A starts, he moved briefly to Triple-A and had a 3.63 ERA over 22 1/3 innings before getting the call to the big leagues. Combined, he held Minor League hitters to a .223 average and struck out exactly one batter per inning.

Climbed the Ladder

Ivan DeJesus, SS: In previous seasons, DeJesus had shown signs of a greater offensive upside than his father. It all began to click in 2008: his .324 average was second-best in the organization among full-season hitters and placed him fifth in the Southern League. He led the circuit with a .419 on-base percentage and finished the year with a 23-game hitting streak. He also went 16-for-18 in stolen-base attempts.

Blake DeWitt, 3B: Despite starting the season in the big leagues, few thought he'd spend the majority of the season there. But he played well at second and third and held his own by hitting .264. He did hit .306 in 27 Minor League games, but it seems apparent that his days as a Minor Leaguer are now over.

Clayton Kershaw, LHP: We had a sneaking suspicion the 21-year-old lefty would spend a good chunk of the 2008 season in the big leagues. He had a 1.91 ERA in 61 1/3 Southern League innings, but showed he belonged in the big leagues with a 4.26 ERA over 107 2/3 innings. He actually was at his best in September, when he won three games and had a 3.45 ERA. Once he improves his command, the sky is the limit.

James McDonald, RHP: Just to add to the above accolades, McDonald went a combined 11 1/3 big-league innings (regular and postseason combined) without allowing a run.

Kept Their Footing

Josh Bell, 3B: Bell seemed poised to have a breakout season in 2008 after arriving in camp in the best shape of his career. Playing in the California League at age 21, he got off to a decent start, hitting .273 over his first 51 games. Then he was shut down for the year to undergo preventative knee surgery, so he earns an incomplete for the season. He should be 100 percent in 2009.

Scott Elbert, LHP: In many ways, Elbert is performing well beyond expectations. He missed nearly all of the 2007 season following shoulder surgery. He returned in June as part of Double-A Jacksonville's bullpen. He was so effective there -- 2.40 ERA, .157 average against, 46 Ks in 41 1/3 innings -- the Dodgers gave him some time in the big leagues. He'll be just 23 for most of the 2009 season and whether he's a reliever or a starter, it looks like he's back on the right track.

Andrew Lambo, OF: A fourth-round pick in 2007, Lambo had an outstanding debut that summer in the Gulf Coast League, hitting .343 in 54 games. This year the outfielder was a Midwest League All-Star and hit .288 with 15 homers and 79 RBIs at that level before earning a late promotion up two levels to Jacksonville. He went 14-for-36 (.389) in eight games there and has performed well in the Arizona Fall League. Expectations will be high next season.

Josh Wall, RHP: The 2005 second-rounder's numbers don't look that impressive -- 9-6, 6.28 ERA, .297 batting average against -- and it certainly wasn't a step forward from his 2007 campaign in the Midwest League. The question is how much of it can be chalked up to pitching in the California League. That's not an excuse, as many pitchers have excelled in that hitter-friendly environment, but we're willing to cut the 6-foot-6 21-year-old some slack and see how he bounces back in 2009.

Slipped a Rung

James Adkins, LHP: The finesse lefty went straight to full-season ball after being taken in the supplemental first-round of the 2007 Draft. Pitching at Class A Advanced Inland Empire and Double-A Jacksonville in his first full season, he went 6-11 with a 5.16 ERA. He actually pitched a bit better in Double-A, particularly in the final month, but with a .287 batting average against and 66 walks in 125 2/3 innings, he allowed too many baserunners and was far too hittable.



Chris Withrow, RHP: Withrow hasn't had the introduction to pro ball the Dodgers were hoping for when they took him in the first round of the 2007 Draft. His 2008 debut was delayed initially by an injured hand that was cut by a snorkeling mask (don't ask). When he was about ready to return, a sore elbow shut him down. He ultimately threw four innings with Inland Empire in August, but he'll have to start all over again next spring.



On the Radar

Victor Garate, RHP: Garate led all Dodgers full-season pitchers with a 2.79 ERA while also topping the system with 150 Ks in 116 innings. In his first season with the Dodgers, Garate dominated the Midwest League (1.85 ERA, .215 average against, 103 Ks in 77 2/3 innings) to earn a promotion to the California League. He made seven starts there and had a 4.70 ERA in 38 1/3 innings while fanning 47.



Steve Johnson, RHP: If you're looking for a good comeback story, here's a decent choice. Johnson started Great Lakes' home opener in 2007 but missed a large chunk of that season with a shoulder injury. He returned to Great Lakes to start 2008 and promptly went 9-2 with a 2.34 ERA over 13 starts. He started the Midwest League All-Star Game and was promoted to Inland Empire shortly thereafter. The California League wasn't kind once it adjusted to Johnson (he had a 2.57 ERA in four July starts, then 8.74 in five Aug. outings), but he's just 21 and seems to be on the right path.

Brent Leach, LHP: A sixth-round pick in 2005, Leach has moved slowly up the Dodgers ladder, first making the transition from starting to relieving in 2006. He has spent parts of three seasons in Class A Advanced ball before finally moving up to Double-A this year, where he pitched well. Leach finished second overall in the organization with 15 saves, and had a 2.60 ERA and a .219 average against. This came a year after tossing just 20 innings due to a muscle tear in his side. Now the Dodgers have to decide if he warrants a spot on their 40-man roster.



Xavier Paul, OF: A fourth-round pick in 2003, Paul turned in another solid yet unspectacular season at age 23, hitting .316 in Triple-A. He also stole 17 bases, but didn't receive a September callup, so it will be interesting to see what his future looks like in a Dodgers uniform.

2008 Draft Recap



1. Ethan Martin, RHP: Things didn't start well for Martin, who tore the meniscus in his right knee during a fielding drill and did not pitch last summer. He was healthy in time for instructs and began to show why the Dodgers took him with the 15th overall pick.

2. Josh Lindblom, RHP: The big right-hander out of Purdue excelled as a short reliever in his final college season, but the Dodgers are transitioning him to a starting role. So far, so good. He made nine starts in total -- eight for Great Lakes and then one up two levels with Jacksonville -- and finished with a combined 2.12 ERA. He allowed just 19 hits (.157 average) while striking out 37 and walking only five in 34 total innings.

3. Kyle Russell, OF: The Texas outfielder may have cost himself some money by not signing as a Draft-eligible sophomore in 2007 after setting a Longhorns record for home runs. His loss may be the Dodgers' gain as Russell hit .279 with 11 homers, 46 RBIs and a .534 slugging percentage for Ogden in his debut. That earned him a spot on the Pioneer League postseason All-Star team, though he'll have to cut down on his strikeouts (82 in 61 games) as he moves up.

Others of Note: SS Devaris Gordon (fourth round) is the son of big-league reliever Tom Gordon. He hit .331 in 60 games for Ogden and also stole 18 bases. He was third in the Pioneer League in average and sixth in stolen bases. ... 2B Tony Delmonico (sixth round) hit .340 with 11 homers and 39 RBIs in 35 games for Ogden, finishing with a 1.159 OPS (.443 OBP + .716 SLG). ... LHP Cole St. Clair (seventh round), out of Rice, pitched well in Ogden's bullpen. The southpaw racked up five saves and a 3.18 ERA while striking out 22 in 17 innings. ... RHP Nathan Eovaldi made seven appearances, almost all in the Gulf Coast League, and allowed just one earned run in 10 2/3 innings. He struck out 11 and held hitters to a .189 average. ... 3B Austin Yount (12th round), Robin's nephew, hit .301 in 33 games for Ogden.
 
sadly looks like furcal may be heading to Oakland and Beimel may be signing elsewhere too. I really havent heard what the market for Manny is so i am hoping he is coming back to LA.

such a lack of reports and rumors out of la i am getting worried.

 
Torre killed the Pettite to LA rumors saying its not going to happen.

Furcal rejected Oakland's offer, maybe a return to LA for a decent price?

Hoffman to LA has surfaced. Provide leadership and veteran pressence with Maddox retiring?

Casey Blake seems to be on the want list and might return to LA. 2 year deal? That would be solid. He played a great third, leaves DeWitt at 2nd. Casey is a good 6th or 7th hitter.

 
Torre killed the Pettite to LA rumors saying its not going to happen.Furcal rejected Oakland's offer, maybe a return to LA for a decent price?Hoffman to LA has surfaced. Provide leadership and veteran pressence with Maddox retiring?Casey Blake seems to be on the want list and might return to LA. 2 year deal? That would be solid. He played a great third, leaves DeWitt at 2nd. Casey is a good 6th or 7th hitter.
Wonder why the Dodgers aren't making more of a run at Furcal? I'm glad the A's offered 4 yrs 35M, wonder if LA could bring him in for 3/35 or 4/40. That seems worth it to me. He's had some injuries, but I think there is a good chance his next three years will be better health-wise than his previous three. Not too excited about Hoffman. His changeup is still money, but his fastball has really slowed down. He was very hittable last year, and Petco is as pitcher friendly as it gets.Casey Blake for 2 years seems smart. I think last year was a very good year for him, but he's solid and has a little pop. The Dodgers need Manny. I hate to say it, but without that big bat in the middle of their lineup, they're just not near as good on offense. And no one should know that better than the Dodgers, who have went years without much power. It's a tricky negotiation, but I hope it works out.. CC would be outstanding as well, but this is one time where I think the offensive signing is more important.
 
Torre killed the Pettite to LA rumors saying its not going to happen.Furcal rejected Oakland's offer, maybe a return to LA for a decent price?Hoffman to LA has surfaced. Provide leadership and veteran pressence with Maddox retiring?Casey Blake seems to be on the want list and might return to LA. 2 year deal? That would be solid. He played a great third, leaves DeWitt at 2nd. Casey is a good 6th or 7th hitter.
Wonder why the Dodgers aren't making more of a run at Furcal? I'm glad the A's offered 4 yrs 35M, wonder if LA could bring him in for 3/35 or 4/40. That seems worth it to me. He's had some injuries, but I think there is a good chance his next three years will be better health-wise than his previous three. Not too excited about Hoffman. His changeup is still money, but his fastball has really slowed down. He was very hittable last year, and Petco is as pitcher friendly as it gets.Casey Blake for 2 years seems smart. I think last year was a very good year for him, but he's solid and has a little pop. The Dodgers need Manny. I hate to say it, but without that big bat in the middle of their lineup, they're just not near as good on offense. And no one should know that better than the Dodgers, who have went years without much power. It's a tricky negotiation, but I hope it works out.. CC would be outstanding as well, but this is one time where I think the offensive signing is more important.
looks like the signed Blake for 3 years. I like it. He played an excellent 3rd and is a 20 hr guy who also gives them veteran leadership in the clubhouse. Dewitt stays at 2nd where he did a superb job. They also signed Loretta to play a less injured Nomar role. He can fill in at all 4 infield spots and is decent off the bench. Furcal and Manny should be priorities. I would love CC but they need hitting more then pitching. They have some promising pitchers in the minors and a 4th or 5th starter like pettite or r johnson wouldnt be too bad. I dont think they sign either aging veteran though unless pettite comes to town.
Please no on Hoffman. Please.
He is done as a full time closer but still has good stuff. As a mentor to Broxton and a leader in the pen why not?I will miss Beimel though.
 
I'd really like to see the Dodgers get Manny for 3 years/$65-70 mil, Furcal for 3 years/$36 mil and trade Kemp and a few mid-level minor league players for Peavey.

 
If the Giants outbid the Dodgers in a three year deal, I'd be upset. There's no chance the Dodgers should let Ramirez goes elsewhere unless another team offers him something in the four year $100M category.

 
See ya Fat Andrew

Probably Colletti's worst signing ever. I say probably only because he's got Schmidt on his resume as well.
If Schmidt can get healthy at all, he could still pay off as a 4th or 5th starter. I still hold out hope anyway.The failure of Jones is primarily on Jones in my book, not Colletti. How a guy could take the attitude that he's somehow a better player not working out during an offseason when he's a FA is simply mind blowing. He's a fat, lazy POS and he frankly should return the money the Dodgers paid him because he did about as much as I did to be worthy of that spot in their lineup.

 
G Mota returns to give some bullpen help.

Brad Ausmus is the new backup catcher. I am not sure on this though but they need someone. Martin can not do another 140+ games behind the plate. He needs to play 120 or so. He can DH in AL parks but mostly they need to keep better care of him over the season. Ausmus is a solid backup plan. Call me crazy, I actually thought LoDuca may be a decent candidate for the backup role. We shall she how Ausmus does...

Reports LA is talking to P Jon Garland. Garland, who was 14-8 with the Angels in 2008 and has won 106 Major League games at 29 without ever missing a start, is among the most desirable starting pitchers left in the marketplace.

He would be a solid #4 guy. Lowe light since he eats innings and will give you a lot of starts.

NOW GET OFF YOUR ### AND SIGN MANNY

 
Wolf Makes Sense For Dodgers

By Alex Walsh [January 25 at 7:03pm CST]

Yesterday, we did a write-up on a Gammons post that said Randy Wolf, Jon Garland and Braden Looper were all receiving similar offers in the $5MM-a-year range. A report this evening conflicts with that notion.

Tony Jackson of the L.A. Daily News says Garland does not fit the Dodgers' budget, but Wolf does. In reference to Wolf, Jackson writes: "Sounds to me like this is the guy the Dodgers are going to end up with."
McCourt is broke guys, there's not going to be any big signings.
 
Wolf Makes Sense For Dodgers

By Alex Walsh [January 25 at 7:03pm CST]

Yesterday, we did a write-up on a Gammons post that said Randy Wolf, Jon Garland and Braden Looper were all receiving similar offers in the $5MM-a-year range. A report this evening conflicts with that notion.

Tony Jackson of the L.A. Daily News says Garland does not fit the Dodgers' budget, but Wolf does. In reference to Wolf, Jackson writes: "Sounds to me like this is the guy the Dodgers are going to end up with."
McCourt is broke guys, there's not going to be any big signings.
#### you're right, I wasn't even thinking about that. He's heavily leveraged in real estate, right? What's the story exactly?
 
Here's the info

37755484.jpg


No Manny, But McCourts Have New $46 Million Homes

Barbra Streisand could easily afford to live in Malibu. And thanks to you, so can Dodger owners Jamie and Frank McCourt.

Public relations and timing are just not the strong suits of Frank and Jamie McCourt. No matter how many hard lessons they learn.

While the nation wallows in a recession, and while their baseball team balks at bringing in Manny Ramirez or a front line starting pitcher, the McCourts bought a new house. Actually, two new houses, adjacent ones in Malibu.

For $46 million.

Just before free agency opened, Jamie posed a question to Dodger fans (through an LA Times column): Would it be better to spend $50 million on a slugging outfielder or for baseball diamonds in the inner city? That’s a legitimate and serious question worth discussing.

But it’s hard to be serious when the McCourts then turn around and spend just about that much on their homes.

It’s America and the McCourts made their money on real estate investment (what, you thought they bought the Dodgers to own a baseball team and not valuable land?). They can and should own as many homes as they can afford. Good on them.

But like the Big Three auto executives flying private jets to Washington to ask for a bailout, the McCourts do not get to decry the economics of baseball while buying some of the richest property in California as a place to live part time. That is hypocritical, at best.

But, sadly, that’s what we’ve come to expect from the McCourts.

Copyright NBC Local Media
Nice read, good to see that they're spending so much on "the inner city."
 
Wolf Makes Sense For Dodgers

By Alex Walsh [January 25 at 7:03pm CST]

Yesterday, we did a write-up on a Gammons post that said Randy Wolf, Jon Garland and Braden Looper were all receiving similar offers in the $5MM-a-year range. A report this evening conflicts with that notion.

Tony Jackson of the L.A. Daily News says Garland does not fit the Dodgers' budget, but Wolf does. In reference to Wolf, Jackson writes: "Sounds to me like this is the guy the Dodgers are going to end up with."
McCourt is broke cheap guys, there's not going to be any big signings.
Fixed.I haven't liked the McCourts as owners since they first came on the scene, as their purchase of the team cost us a shot at Vladimir Guerrero (instead leading to J.D. Drew as a consolation prize a year later). If they sign Manny, I'll be happy to squash my dislike of them. However, anything short of that will have me absolutely livid and getting ready to get on the "When Vin Scully leaves, I'm done with the Dodgers" train.

 
We need to get caught up. They offered Manny 1 year, $25M with a deadline over the weekend which expired. Reports were that Boras was meeting with Coletti yesterday to further discuss options.

Not much else happening.

 
My guess is the dodgers arent going to spend any money because of those $50M dollar houses they just built and since they bought the dodgers entirely on credit that will definitely reflect this years roster

 
Would love to see Artie Moreno get involved and sign Manny. He is trying to creep on the the LA market obviously and this would be one of the few signings that could push the needle in the vain. The Manny-mania in LA last year was huge. He'd rake in Anaheim plus benefit from the DH. Angels were players for CC and Tex. They have the cash. And the Red Sox are the team the Halos always have trouble with.

I know Manny is a headache but he is worth it. 3 years at 68-70/mill seems like a reasonable deal for both sides.

 
Would love to see Artie Moreno get involved and sign Manny. He is trying to creep on the the LA market obviously and this would be one of the few signings that could push the needle in the vain. The Manny-mania in LA last year was huge. He'd rake in Anaheim plus benefit from the DH. Angels were players for CC and Tex. They have the cash. And the Red Sox are the team the Halos always have trouble with.I know Manny is a headache but he is worth it. 3 years at 68-70/mill seems like a reasonable deal for both sides.
The Angels have flatly stated that they're not interested in Manny. I'm still suspicious that this might happen, and it would be a coup for the Angels for all of the reasons stated.
 
He is staying in California, that is for sure.

I'm thinking something like below.

1-Giants

2-Dodgers

3-Angels

 
We need to get caught up. They offered Manny 1 year, $25M with a deadline over the weekend which expired. Reports were that Boras was meeting with Coletti yesterday to further discuss options. Not much else happening.
Boras declined the offer almost immediatly after it was offered. Then started making dumb comments about teams playing chicken with him...
He is staying in California, that is for sure.I'm thinking something like below.1-Giants2-Dodgers3-Angels
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.The Angels could surprise and sign him but they have denied being interested, as have the Mets and Yankees.I still think he is LA. If Boras wasnt an idiot he would of countered the 1 and 2 year offers with 3 years 25 per. I think LA would do it. 3 years is better then the 5 or 6 boras clains he wants. 1- Dodgers2- Angels3- sit out/retire/whatever4- Giants
 
oh and it looks like Wolf is returning to LA.

Dodgers sign Wolf to one-year deal

Return of left-hander will help bolster young rotation for LA

General manager Ned Colletti said he hasn't had any talks on Ramirez in the last two days, but he was pleased to announce the signing of Wolf, who received a one-year deal for $5 million guaranteed plus an additional $3 million in incentives.

The return of Wolf, who pitched for the Dodgers in 2007, has been one of the "other" winter-long goals of the club after losing veteran starters Derek Lowe, Brad Penny and Greg Maddux.

Wolf, 12-12 last year while splitting time between San Diego and Houston, pitched well for the Dodgers in the first half of '07 (9-6), but he missed the second half of the season with lingering shoulder problems that required surgery.

"We took a long look at it," Colletti said when asked about Wolf's health. "He made a lot of starts last year (33) and pitched a lot of innings (190 1/3). You never know until later. As far as we can tell, he's healthier than two years ago."

Wolf rebounded well enough from that shoulder surgery following the year with the Dodgers for the Astros to make a three-year offer to keep him shortly after the 2008 season ended, but the club quickly withdrew the offer as the economic climate worsened.

His Dodgers incentives are keyed to performance and durability, with an additional $500,000 at each of these innings totals: 170, 180, 185, 190, 195 and 200. Wolf last threw 200 innings in 2003.

Wolf joins a rotation with tentative starters Chad Billingsley (recovering from a broken leg), Hiroki Kuroda and Clayton Kershaw. Another spot likely is to be contested by a group that includes Jason Schmidt, Claudio Vargas, Eric Stults, Ramon Troncoso and Shawn Estes.

Wolf gives the Dodgers rotation a second left-hander, but more importantly he provides a seasoned professional and leader of an otherwise very young staff. He's also local, a graduate of El Camino Real High School in Woodland Hills and Pepperdine University in Malibu, where he schooled after declining to sign with the Dodgers when they took him in the 25th round of the 1994 First-Year Player Draft.

The Phillies drafted him in the second round in 1997, and he was in the Major Leagues two years later. Wolf pitched eight Major League seasons for Philadelphia, when he was healthy. His 2005 and '06 seasons were interrupted by elbow problems that required Tommy John elbow ligament replacement to solve.

Wolf, 32, has a 90-78 record over 10 seasons in the Major Leagues. He was an All-Star in 2003, when he went 16-10. He's a strikeout pitcher, extremely tough against left-handed hitters and helps himself at the plate. Wolf's older brother, Jim, is a Major League umpire.

Wolf had been hoping to secure a multiyear deal from the Mets, but they signed Oliver Perez earlier this week.

Wolf joins Mark Loretta, Guillermo Mota, Brad Ausmus and Vargas as free agents signed by the Dodgers this winter. Colletti said he'd still like to add a relief pitcher. Former Dodgers hurler Dennys Reyes has been rumored high on the target list.

As for the free agent who they've been unable to sign, Colletti said he has not spoken with agent Scott Boras since Wednesday, when both sides reaffirmed their positions on length of contract, which remains the largest obstacle to a deal.

Colletti said he's "sure we'll speak again." He would not speculate on a date when the Dodgers would move on without Ramirez.

 
B Maverick said:
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.
1. Link that the Giants would only spend 15 mil per? They've said they'll sign him on their terms, but I haven't seen any numbers like that thrown around. 2. Giants sign Manny they're favorites in the NL west. As it is they've improved and to say they're not anywhere near winning is way off.
 
B Maverick said:
We need to get caught up. They offered Manny 1 year, $25M with a deadline over the weekend which expired. Reports were that Boras was meeting with Coletti yesterday to further discuss options. Not much else happening.
Boras declined the offer almost immediatly after it was offered. Then started making dumb comments about teams playing chicken with him...
He is staying in California, that is for sure.I'm thinking something like below.1-Giants2-Dodgers3-Angels
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.The Angels could surprise and sign him but they have denied being interested, as have the Mets and Yankees.I still think he is LA. If Boras wasnt an idiot he would of countered the 1 and 2 year offers with 3 years 25 per. I think LA would do it. 3 years is better then the 5 or 6 boras clains he wants. 1- Dodgers2- Angels3- sit out/retire/whatever4- Giants
Anyone who thinks he is going to sit out instead of "settling" to play for SF does not have a good handle on things, IMO.
 
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.
1. Link that the Giants would only spend 15 mil per? They've said they'll sign him on their terms, but I haven't seen any numbers like that thrown around. 2. Giants sign Manny they're favorites in the NL west. As it is they've improved and to say they're not anywhere near winning is way off.
Thats what the reports were, approx 15 mill is all they want to spend. And they came out recently and said they wont do a multiyear deal either.
We need to get caught up. They offered Manny 1 year, $25M with a deadline over the weekend which expired. Reports were that Boras was meeting with Coletti yesterday to further discuss options. Not much else happening.
Boras declined the offer almost immediatly after it was offered. Then started making dumb comments about teams playing chicken with him...
He is staying in California, that is for sure.I'm thinking something like below.1-Giants2-Dodgers3-Angels
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.The Angels could surprise and sign him but they have denied being interested, as have the Mets and Yankees.I still think he is LA. If Boras wasnt an idiot he would of countered the 1 and 2 year offers with 3 years 25 per. I think LA would do it. 3 years is better then the 5 or 6 boras clains he wants. 1- Dodgers2- Angels3- sit out/retire/whatever4- Giants
Anyone who thinks he is going to sit out instead of "settling" to play for SF does not have a good handle on things, IMO.
SF for 1 year at 15 mill or LA for 1 year at 25? he wont settle for the SF offer. Do i think he sits out? no. Do i think he takes less to play in SF for a year? No. Who needs a handle?
 
Well, in one day the Dodgers have lost their leverage in both Dunn and Abreu.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.
1. Link that the Giants would only spend 15 mil per? They've said they'll sign him on their terms, but I haven't seen any numbers like that thrown around. 2. Giants sign Manny they're favorites in the NL west. As it is they've improved and to say they're not anywhere near winning is way off.
Thats what the reports were, approx 15 mill is all they want to spend. And they came out recently and said they wont do a multiyear deal either.
I don't see a link anywhere in there.
 
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.
1. Link that the Giants would only spend 15 mil per? They've said they'll sign him on their terms, but I haven't seen any numbers like that thrown around. 2. Giants sign Manny they're favorites in the NL west. As it is they've improved and to say they're not anywhere near winning is way off.
Thats what the reports were, approx 15 mill is all they want to spend. And they came out recently and said they wont do a multiyear deal either.
I don't see a link anywhere in there.
dont need a link. Its all "reportedly" anyway. besides, cant link talk radio and espn tv... Just because you cant read it doesnt mean its not true.And do you really believe SF is going to come anywhere close to the offers LA has made? Do you think Boras is going to allow his client to take anything less then the 20 mill options he got manny out of in boston, esp if LA offered 25??
 
He wont go to SF, they wont offer more then 15mill per and arent anywhere near winning.
1. Link that the Giants would only spend 15 mil per? They've said they'll sign him on their terms, but I haven't seen any numbers like that thrown around. 2. Giants sign Manny they're favorites in the NL west. As it is they've improved and to say they're not anywhere near winning is way off.
Thats what the reports were, approx 15 mill is all they want to spend. And they came out recently and said they wont do a multiyear deal either.
I don't see a link anywhere in there.
dont need a link. Its all "reportedly" anyway. besides, cant link talk radio and espn tv... Just because you cant read it doesnt mean its not true.And do you really believe SF is going to come anywhere close to the offers LA has made? Do you think Boras is going to allow his client to take anything less then the 20 mill options he got manny out of in boston, esp if LA offered 25??
While the Dodgers remain the odds on favorite, I think it's pretty clear the market has been continually trending down for the past year. What was offered in July or December isn't relevant unless the same offers are on the table today. At this point, I'd expect Manny to sit out most of Spring Training and see if injuries, suspensions or perceived problems make him more valuable. It's not like he needs a month in Arizona to get in shape and work his batting eye.Of course, he'll probably sign tomorrow :confused:
 
Well, in one day the Dodgers have lost their leverage in both Dunn and Abreu.
On the other hand, today's signings set the market rate bar pretty low for Manny and Boras
And they also remove two more teams that could potentially make an offer for Manny. Manny's leverage is shrinking too. Who else can Boras now credibly claim is interested?
 
Congrats on getting O dog. He was one of my favorite players. Lots of injuries have held him back. As sorry as I am to see him leave he is getting old and his best is behind him. I also think he screwed up pretty bad with his contract. He could have stayed with the D backs for more but he thought he could get more and now he has less. In the long run this could be really good for the Dbacks. The doggers got an aging 2nd baseman on the downside of his career and we got the doggers 17th first round pick. Win win for Dbacks.

According to MLB.com, Orlando Hudson’s new deal with the Dodgers is for one year and $3.38 million, with another $4.6 million in incentives.

It makes us wonder how we should feel about it.

From what we understand, before the 2008 season, the Diamondbacks offered Hudson a four-year deal worth about $29 million. It would have been for roughly $5 million in ’08 and $24 million for the next three years -- his first three free-agent years.

Apparently, Hudson responded with a huge counteroffer, a deal so unrealistic that it actually upset people with the Diamondbacks. Hudson wound up avoiding arbitration in 2008 with a $6.25 million deal, and you know how his offseason unfolded.

On the one hand, you could say Hudson tried to break the bank and lost out, big time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not sure how I feel on Hudson. At 31 he is hardly getting old, but now they have Hudson and Dewitt at 2nd. Rumors of Dewitt to 3rd and blake to left if manny doesnt sign doesnt excite me. Hudson is a .300/10 hr guy, not the power they need. With Loretta on board as utility guy that leaves dewitt out when manny signs.

Hudson and Furcal may make a top duo up the middle but Dewitt had a great end of the year there too.

Still need to sign manny to make this year worth anything

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top