What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Labor Dispute Master Thread (3 Viewers)

Jay Glazer of FOXSports reports he is hearing the players will NOT vote because they haven't even seen what owners have done with changes players made to the owners' proposal.
 
I find it hard to believe the owners would pass a vote on a deal that De Smith never agreed to, or that De would send them back to Washington if negotiations were not done.

Not to mention the deal they voted on looked mooooooore than fair for the players, IMHO.

This is a issue of Kessler being cranky, and the NFLPA needs new lawyers.

How can anyone be on the players side if they vote no or dont vote?

 
I find it hard to believe the owners would pass a vote on a deal that De Smith never agreed to, or that De would send them back to Washington if negotiations were not done.Not to mention the deal they voted on looked mooooooore than fair for the players, IMHO.This is a issue of Kessler being cranky, and the NFLPA needs new lawyers.How can anyone be on the players side if they vote no or dont vote?
That the genius in what the owners did.
 
I understand that it has to be tough to communicate cohesive material to 1900 players in real-time, but they are all over the place at this point.

 
Players tweeting it is a power play and they agreed to something they never agreed to. Ridiculous
Eisen and Lombardi just discussing that there was NOTHING in the agreement that hadn't already been discussed. Players are out of their minds right now, running around like chickens with their heads cut off. De Smith needs to get this #### corralled (and players need to stop hitting "send" on their tweets).
 
I find it hard to believe the owners would pass a vote on a deal that De Smith never agreed to, or that De would send them back to Washington if negotiations were not done.Not to mention the deal they voted on looked mooooooore than fair for the players, IMHO.This is a issue of Kessler being cranky, and the NFLPA needs new lawyers.How can anyone be on the players side if they vote no or dont vote?
Kessler trying for glory. Between NFL and NBA, he is getting kicked around.
 
I find it hard to believe the owners would pass a vote on a deal that De Smith never agreed to, or that De would send them back to Washington if negotiations were not done.

Not to mention the deal they voted on looked mooooooore than fair for the players, IMHO.

This is a issue of Kessler being cranky, and the NFLPA needs new lawyers.

How can anyone be on the players side if they vote no or dont vote?
Kessler trying for glory. Between NFL and NBA, he is getting kicked around.
Apparently, he's just doing what he was hired to do. :rolleyes:
 
It's hard to tell from the press reports if the owners just ratified an 'agreement' that contains clauses that the players never agreed to, or if they passed something they think reflects the final negotiations and the players just haven't seen it yet.

If it's the first option this thing might still blow up.

 
Players tweeting it is a power play and they agreed to something they never agreed to. Ridiculous
Eisen and Lombardi just discussing that there was NOTHING in the agreement that hadn't already been discussed. Players are out of their minds right now, running around like chickens with their heads cut off. De Smith needs to get this #### corralled (and players need to stop hitting "send" on their tweets).
The players are letting a lawyers run the room and run the NFLPA into the ground of a PR nightmare, if they continue to let this guy shoot for the fence.
 
Why? I think this may hurt the negotiations. It was a pretty underhanded move by the owners.
If De Smith was given exclusive bargaining powers by the 32 team reps and satisfied all of the issues laid out by them in negotiations with Goodell/owners, then it seems at best confusion by the players, and at worst, an underhanded last-minute power play by the NFLPA.
 
It appears at least one of the issues is that the owners effectively said the players have to reform as a union in order to sign the deal and make it happen, but the players do not want to stipulate to that.

 
I find it hard to believe the owners would pass a vote on a deal that De Smith never agreed to, or that De would send them back to Washington if negotiations were not done.Not to mention the deal they voted on looked mooooooore than fair for the players, IMHO.This is a issue of Kessler being cranky, and the NFLPA needs new lawyers.How can anyone be on the players side if they vote no or dont vote?
I'd need to see what they claim was put into the agreement that wasn't agreed to before I side one way or the other. It doesn't make any sense that the players would be doing this to get more. After the owners agreed, everyone expects the players to.
 
This all don't make sense.

If all the owners had to do to sway public opinion was agree to a fake deal, why now?

Person on conf call sent Mort a message that players are calm, having businesslike conversation. Won't decide on voting until they get a full document from league.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This all don't make sense. If all the owners had to do to sway public opinion was agree to a fake deal, why now?Person on conf call sent Mort a message that players are calm, having businesslike conversation. Won't decide on voting until they get a full document from league.
Has anyone updated Heath Evans about this?
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
 
Per Greg Aiello [paraphasing]: Owners voted on the provisions agreed to with players' bargaining group. Now, it's up to the players to approve what their representatives negotiated. :shrug:

 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
 
It appears at least one of the issues is that the owners effectively said the players have to reform as a union in order to sign the deal and make it happen, but the players do not want to stipulate to that.
Why the heck would the owners have gone through all of this if the players weren't willing to reform the union and give the owners the protection against the monopoly laws? :insane:If the players reject this on those grounds, then the owners should tell them to pound sand and see them in court. And I hope the players would get their clocks cleaned in court and end up with much less than they would get under this.
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Exactly correct. The #####ing and moaning may continue for a few hours but it will be ratified.
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
It would be insane for the owners to try to pull a fast one like that. There is 0% chance that they agreed to anything other than the deal negotiated with De Smith and the Executive Committee.
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
It would be insane for the owners to try to pull a fast one like that. There is 0% chance that they agreed to anything other than the deal negotiated with De Smith and the Executive Committee.
Why do you say that? If the owners did try to pull a fast one it seems to be working brilliantly right now. All of the pressure is on the players to approve the deal.
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
It is abundantly clear that the rank and file player reps are not on same page as their bargaining team. They will be soon enough.
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
It is abundantly clear that the rank and file player reps are not on same page as their bargaining team. They will be soon enough.
^^this
 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
It is abundantly clear that the rank and file player reps are not on same page as their bargaining team. They will be soon enough.
Isn't there always a segment of the workforce that doesn't like the deal their bargaining team negotiates? My dad used to be on the bargaining team for his teachers union, he hated it for that reason.
 
NFLPA* fears lawsuit from Vincent Jackson

Posted by Mike Florio on July 21, 2011, 9:16 PM EDT

Chargers receiver Vincent Jackson is represented by a couple of the hardest charging agents in the business. Neil Schwartz and Jonathan Feinsod have engineered, for example, the recent holdouts of Darrelle Revis and Roddy White. Also, they threatened litigation on Jackson’s behalf last year against the San Diego Union-Tribune based on the suggestion by Kevin Acee that Jackson was broke.

There’s talk in league circles that the NFLPA* fears they’ll be the next target of the Schwartz and Feinsod hardball tactics. Specifically, we’re told the NFLPA* is concerned it will be sued if Jackson’s role in the Brady antitrust lawsuit is settled without Jackson receiving $10 million.

That’s why the NFLPA* keeps pushing the issue — and that’s why it continues to be a roadblock in a process that now has plenty of them.

Only one man can put this issue to rest. And that’s Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, we’ll assume he wants $10 million.

Hopefully, I won’t be sued for expressing that opinion.

 
The owners just agreed to their own proposal, this thing is far from done.
The NFL and NFLPA lawyers have been working together to hammer out this deal for days now. To characterize it as the "owner's proposal" is lunacy. This is the deal that the owners and De Smith/NFL Players Executive Committee worked out.For the players to reject it now is insane. It's 100% obvious who is screwing up and screwing over the fans here.
Were you in the meetings and have you compared the documents agreed to between the NFLPA and the owners to the documents agreed to by the owners today? If not, your just speculating right now.
It would be insane for the owners to try to pull a fast one like that. There is 0% chance that they agreed to anything other than the deal negotiated with De Smith and the Executive Committee.
I wouldn't put it 0% which is why I don't have a problem with the players checking the fine print over night
 
Didn't take sides until this hour. Players are the morons here and D. Smith is King Moron. Players don't know details so isn't King Moron supposed to educate the minion morons. King Moron is a total tool.

 
NFLPA* fears lawsuit from Vincent JacksonOnly one man can put this issue to rest. And that’s Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, we’ll assume he wants $10 million.
He's been tweeting for two days that it's bull#### and he's not going to do anything to hang up the livelihood of almost 2000 players. But I guess Florio is the authority here...http://twitter.com/?q=vincent+jackson#!/VincentTJackson/status/This is interesting though:http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/07/21/the-nfl-lockout-is-still-on-and-heres-demaurice-smiths-email-to-the-players/
Here’s what DeMaurice Smith, executive director of the NFL Players Association, sent to the players tonight (via Jason Lisk):“All:As you know the Owners have ratified their proposal to settle our differences. It is my understanding that they are forwarding it to us.As you may have heard, they apparently approved a supplemental revenue sharing proposal. Obviously, we have not been a part of those discussions.As you know from yesterday, issues that need to be collectively bargained remain open, other issues such as workers compensation, economic issues and end of deal terms remain unresolved.There is no agreement between the NFL and the Players at this time. I look forward to our call tonight.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NFLPA* fears lawsuit from Vincent JacksonOnly one man can put this issue to rest. And thats Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, well assume he wants $10 million.
He's been tweeting for two days that it's bull#### and he's not going to do anything to hang up the livelihood of almost 2000 players. But I guess Florio is the authority here...
Vincent Jackson, "$10 million or have all my DUIS taken off my record."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
De Smith needs to get his house in order. The NFLPA* is in complete shambles where they don't know what's actually happening. I don't understand this backlash by them, the owners obviously negotiated a deal with De Smith yet the players are calling it a power play? Didn't the players intrust De Smith to negotiate on their behalf or is he now nothing more than a figurehead without any real power whatsoever? This thing is a mess and it's the players that are screwing it up.

 
NFLPA* fears lawsuit from Vincent JacksonOnly one man can put this issue to rest. And that’s Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, we’ll assume he wants $10 million.
He's been tweeting for two days that it's bull#### and he's not going to do anything to hang up the livelihood of almost 2000 players. But I guess Florio is the authority here...
Vincent Jackson, "$10 million or have all my DUI’S taken off my record."
He may have 'tweeted' that, but his agents and lawyers may have something else in mind.........."""Only one man can put this issue to rest. And that’s Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, we’ll assume he wants $10 million."""
 
Vincent Jackson, "$10 million or have all my DUI’S taken off my record."
LOL, just saw that on twitter too..VJax is a tool for sure but I think Florio is catching the dregs of a rumor that jumped the shark two days ago. Either way, total ####storm at this point, so disappointing.
He may have 'tweeted' that, but his agents and lawyers may have something else in mind.........."""Only one man can put this issue to rest. And that’s Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, we’ll assume he wants $10 million."""
You're quoting Florio's opinion, I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove.
 
Vincent Jackson, "$10 million or have all my DUI’S taken off my record."
LOL, just saw that on twitter too..VJax is a tool for sure but I think Florio is catching the dregs of a rumor that jumped the shark two days ago. Either way, total ####storm at this point, so disappointing.
He may have 'tweeted' that, but his agents and lawyers may have something else in mind.........."""Only one man can put this issue to rest. And that’s Vincent Jackson. If he truly wants nothing (as he supposedly said on an unverified Twitter page earlier this week), he needs to call a press conference and say so. Otherwise, we’ll assume he wants $10 million."""
You're quoting Florio's opinion, I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove.
yea, that was me on twitter...have florio's comment in """quotes""" (see full post above)
 
Listening to Heath Evans unable to say exactly what was "slipped in"; he (and all who are claiming it) is utterly clueless. This ish is over.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top