But, even Joe and David say you should tweak their numbers.
Understood. But at the end of the day, they're the experts and I'm not. Obviously they can't be right all the time, but I don't think it's unfair to question them when they do mess up. And when that happens, it's frustrating to have it shrugged off with "Well, it's your fault for not tweaking our projections so they'd have been right."
It IS your fault.THEY TELL YOU to tweak them.You are taking the risk in them being incorrect if you blindly follow what they project, and you have no complaint if what they project is wrong. They are NOT beholden to you to make their projections correct - they are only beholden to you to do the best job they can. If you are a lemming, you can't complain when you then follow the herd over the side of the cliff.It is precisely why they make it so simple that a 7 year old could change the numbers on the VBD and Draft Dominator tools.It is, I am sure, flattering to Joe and Dave that you think their projections, as is, are good enough. But, if you blindly follow those projecitons and make not a single alteration based on your own independent thought, you are using only half of the resources we provide. Furthermore, and the bigger sin,is that you are not learning this game and you are not improving your play. This site was designed to get fanatical about the game of fantasy football - not to have it spoon fed to you - not even if the dinner is David Dodds sauce served over Braised Steak Bryant.I understand the lazy attitude of giving someone twenty bucks to do tedious homework so you don't have to, but if you don't even glance at the homework before you turn it in and it is answering math problem with essays on Taoism, whose fault is it you got an F? Both of you, of course, but you share the bulk of the blame in not checking the work before taking the test. Think of the FBGuy draft tools as a template with most of the information filled in - all you have to do is figure who you like or don't like and tweak those players. If you simply looked at and tweaked the top-20 per position, you would have invested no more than another hour into making sure the players were projected as YOU wanted them to be rather than how everyoine else with the tool had them projected - you may have seen that Joe and Dvavid gave LT 80/700/3 in receiving numbers - and you may have thought (as I did) that the numbers would drop much farther than that - you'd have tweaked the document and found LT as the #2 and you would have had taken Priest instead - or whatever. Take responsibility for yourself and your draft - blame shifting aint gonna make you a better player, nor will it affect in ANY way how Joe and David do their projections.Joe and David will ALWAYS fess up when their projections turn out to be wrong - but they are not subject to criticism for making incorrect projections. If you don't even glance at their projections before relying on them for your draft, what do you really have to criticize, anyway - if their projections as is were sufficient at that time to stand in as your projections, you were as wrong as they were and you have, again, nothing to say. Noone gets it right 100% of the time, and for you to expect Joe and David to be subject to your criticism when they get it slightly wrong, you better coagh up quite a few more of those double sawbucks. And, really, what is this - LT as the #7 RB in week 7 instead of the #1 or #2 RB means you have a right to criticize them? Gimmee a break.