This would probably do it for me, and I have Fitz on a couple win-now teams.I've tried to pair a young guy with potential and a 19 second rounder. Guys like Goodwin, Doctson, Corey Coleman, D. Parker.
This would probably do it for me, and I have Fitz on a couple win-now teams.I've tried to pair a young guy with potential and a 19 second rounder. Guys like Goodwin, Doctson, Corey Coleman, D. Parker.
If it’s a PPR league, especially, that’s a steal.I actually managed to pick Edelman up yesterday for a 2019 3rd.....seemed a reasonable price to me.
It sure isIf it’s a PPR league, especially, that’s a steal.
Seems pretty reasonable. Not sure why they aren't biting but I certainly wouldn't up the offer.Looking to aquire. Do I need to give more? His trade value ranking on most sites is pretty low, including on this site. I would guess that's because there is no certainty he plays another year after this one.
Not close for me if I’m contending. I need Fitz’s 14 to 16 points per week, with the occasional blow-up. The others (outside Goodwin’s mini-run) haven’t shown enough to even warrant flexing. The second doesn’t move the needle. I’m on Team Larry until the end.This would probably do it for me, and I have Fitz on a couple win-now teams.
Solid analysis. What is also interesting to me that in addition to Bradford being solid but far from spectacular (if we can agree to that general characterization) his skill set, tendencies, and arm strength seem to benefit the exact kind of receiver Larry is now (superb possession receiver thriving on volume). And there isn't a clear obvious choice as to who would really usurp Fitz's touches and opportunity this year.I guess it depends on what kind of average that you mean.
Bradford can make some great throws at times. Couldn't have thrown it any better than that, and some difficult throws at times too.
He is pretty smart as well. Good at reading coverage. He can get the ball out quicker because of generally good pre snap reads.He does check down too much and isn't aggressive enough with giving covered receivers a chance to make a play on the ball. This isn't that bad if the overall offensive is good and has players who are good at generating YAC but it was a major complaint of Vikings fans in 2016 when the offensive line was soooo bad of course Bradford is trying to get the ball out right away and that usually means a shorter read.
I suppose people consider Eli Manning a bunch of other QBs average. The thing about Manning and Bradford though is when they are on they are playing pretty much perfect football. They can make some great throws that some QB in the league can't.
Bradford won't stay healthy, but not sure i'm too worried if they go to Rosen. Can see Rosen using Fitz as a security blanket and think he'd still be gold in ppr.My favorite non-49er of all time.
Fantasy wise, he is going to be a bit more expensive this year it seems. Have done multiple MFL 12 teamers and he seems to go in that mid 3rd range, which is still great value if he puts up another 100 catch season, which I fully expect him to do, but last year, he was someone you could grab in the late 4th, early 5th on a regular basis.
If Bradford stays healthy and plays a full 16 game season (I know, I know), a top 5 finish in PPR wouldn't really surprise me. Bradford loves throwing to the slot receivers and I can't envision many games where Fitz doesn't see 10 plus targets. Palmer seemed to forget about him for long stretches at times, which I don't see happening with Bradford.
I’m not sure I agree with Palmer forgetting about him. He had 164 and 150 targets in Palmer’s last two healthy years, which were good for 7th and 11th in the NFL. That’s pretty good for a WR in his 30’s.My favorite non-49er of all time.
Fantasy wise, he is going to be a bit more expensive this year it seems. Have done multiple MFL 12 teamers and he seems to go in that mid 3rd range, which is still great value if he puts up another 100 catch season, which I fully expect him to do, but last year, he was someone you could grab in the late 4th, early 5th on a regular basis.
If Bradford stays healthy and plays a full 16 game season (I know, I know), a top 5 finish in PPR wouldn't really surprise me. Bradford loves throwing to the slot receivers and I can't envision many games where Fitz doesn't see 10 plus targets. Palmer seemed to forget about him for long stretches at times, which I don't see happening with Bradford.
Ouch! New coach, bad offensive line, questionable QB. Seems like Larry is destined to fall from grace this season. Hope I’m wrong.Boy do I need him with Baldwin and Gordon my other 2 starters.
Agree. Love the guy but he went a full two rounds earlier on Sunday than last year. Not that 3.4 in a 14 team PPR is bad value, but not great value like the last couple years.Huge fan, always have been. Got him as my WR4 last year (Julio, Evans, Tyreek) but I just can't justify his price this year. He's going to have to drop in my draft in Saturday if he's going to end up on my roster.
I think Fitzgerald is a must start as usual.how are people feeling about him week 1 vs. Wash, with Sammy B?
Larry Fitzgerald exited Week 2 against the Rams with a hamstring injury.
He is officially questionable to return, but it does not make much sense to push him in a blowout. Fitzgerald went to the sidelines in the third quarter to get his hamstring/quad area retaped. He was able to get back in the game after that, but the issue was obviously bothering him. Arizona's offense is a disaster even with Fitzgerald, so it will likely be a black hole without him.
Sep 16 - 6:25 PM
Cardinals coach Steve Wilks expects Larry Fitzgerald (hamstring) to play Week 3 against the Bears.
The coach said he had to "help Larry help himself" by holding him out of the fourth quarter in Week 2, but it is unlikely Fitzgerald will allow himself to be sidelined this week. "We all know that it’s going to be tough to keep Larry off the field," Wilks said. "We’re going to do everything we can to make sure he is ready to go on Sunday with the treatment and the amount of reps he gets in practice." Sam Bradford's dreadful performance so far knocks Fitzgerald down a couple pegs, but his target share keeps him in the WR3 conversation.
Source: Cards Wire
Sep 18 - 11:24 AM
yeah hes benched for me until the offense shows some lifeTraded him even up before week 2 for Edelman as that owner lost Goodwin and needed someone right away. Not sure how this will pan out with the recent Gordon signing. In another league keeping Fitz on the bench this week and starting Cooks and Cole over him. Even starting Lindsay > Fitz in the Flex as of now. Arizona offense scares me. The hammy may or may not limit Fitz, but I have to see more before he get plugged back in, or not. Love the guy as a player and person.
I’m starting Willie Snead in his placeexpected to play, but is he startable given the potential recurrence of injury and the Bears D?
I didn't expect Bradford to be as bad as he has been.I thought Bradford would be an upgrade over Staton and Gabbert. Sheesh. Poor Larry. He deserves better.
Perhaps we see Rosen because of the Baker experience? Then bump Fitz back into the mix with DJ?expected to play, but is he startable given the potential recurrence of injury and the Bears D?
If you can wait one more week, it is probably worth it to see how the offense runs under Rosen. Rosen loves Kirk so I expect him to see a lot of targets, but if the offense is clicking, Fitz will still get his.I’m getting close to dumping him
his home and road splits seem to be almost identical: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FitzLa00/splits/Playing him as a high floor flex this week. Fitz gets his in home games 99% of the time and last week was that 1% so he’s due for a solid game.
Bradford was playing as bad as I’ve ever seen for a QB in an NFL game by last week, no way this isn’t an upgrade with Rosen. Hopefully a big one.
Last year had 68.2 total FPs in my 0.5 PPR league for away games.his home and road splits seem to be almost identical: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FitzLa00/splits/