offdee
Footballguy
Background facts:
- Couple divorced
- The ex husband is a legit con artist type (all kinds of shady and can't believe a word he says)
- A vehicle awarded to the wife in divorce settlement
- Legal docs state that the ex husband is responsible for continuing to make all auto loan payments / pay it off
- The original loan is somehow connected to the ex-husband's parents...so any missed payments, etc would affect his parent's credit I'm guessing (there is some tie that forces the husband to keep making these payments). The ex husband has no money so we know he is not making the monthly loan payments on his own....his parents are we're guessing to keep it current and not affect their credit.
- Wife's lawyer said she should get the van title in her possession and signed over to her (presently the title is in the husband's possession)
- Husband said he will give her the title and noted that both the wife's name and the husband's dad's name are presently on the title....and asked the wife if she would agree to removing the husband's dad's name from the title cuz "I'd really like to get him off of that" and he promises to continue making the payments. (again, this guy's word means absolutely nothing and he's more than willing to screw her over whenever he can)
She wants to make sure the husband keeps making the payments (as directed in legal docs), but she also wants the title in her possession and be considered the primary and only owner of this vehicle. Does the ex's father's name on the title have any bearing to tieing him to the auto loan payments? If he was removed from the title, would that somehow remove him from ties to this vehicle in regards to forcing them to continue paying the loan?
The goal here is to protect the wife (this vehicle is her only means of transportation and has 3 little kids...losing it somehow or being stuck making the payments on it would be crippling for her)....what's the correct way to handle this to protect her?
She's going to talk to her lawyer about this as well, but wanted to get some insights here as well for my own knowledge. Appreciate any thoughts.
- Couple divorced
- The ex husband is a legit con artist type (all kinds of shady and can't believe a word he says)
- A vehicle awarded to the wife in divorce settlement
- Legal docs state that the ex husband is responsible for continuing to make all auto loan payments / pay it off
- The original loan is somehow connected to the ex-husband's parents...so any missed payments, etc would affect his parent's credit I'm guessing (there is some tie that forces the husband to keep making these payments). The ex husband has no money so we know he is not making the monthly loan payments on his own....his parents are we're guessing to keep it current and not affect their credit.
- Wife's lawyer said she should get the van title in her possession and signed over to her (presently the title is in the husband's possession)
- Husband said he will give her the title and noted that both the wife's name and the husband's dad's name are presently on the title....and asked the wife if she would agree to removing the husband's dad's name from the title cuz "I'd really like to get him off of that" and he promises to continue making the payments. (again, this guy's word means absolutely nothing and he's more than willing to screw her over whenever he can)
She wants to make sure the husband keeps making the payments (as directed in legal docs), but she also wants the title in her possession and be considered the primary and only owner of this vehicle. Does the ex's father's name on the title have any bearing to tieing him to the auto loan payments? If he was removed from the title, would that somehow remove him from ties to this vehicle in regards to forcing them to continue paying the loan?
The goal here is to protect the wife (this vehicle is her only means of transportation and has 3 little kids...losing it somehow or being stuck making the payments on it would be crippling for her)....what's the correct way to handle this to protect her?
She's going to talk to her lawyer about this as well, but wanted to get some insights here as well for my own knowledge. Appreciate any thoughts.
Last edited by a moderator: