What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Looting in Missouri after cops shoot 18 year old (7 Viewers)

Needless (allegedly) tragedy combined with senseless crime (very definitely) makes for an interesting discussion here in the FFA. I don't think anyone seriously commenting in this thread is happy a young man died, but I don't think anyone in here was at the scene either. Unfortunately we won't know what really happened for a while, assuming the courts and investigators do their job. The one thing we do know for sure is the looting is ridiculous. I don't care who was killed or why. It's a shame these people have so little respect for their community they would participate in such madness. My feeling is that lack of respect is part of the problem in the first place.
I feel the same way about Bank of America.
I feel the same way about right wingers.
Just not about the looters. That makes sense coming from a pagan communist such as yourself.
That would be quite a trick
He used to call me a "fake Jew" and call me gay/a woman. At least he now realizes that I don't consider those things insults.
I'm not trying to insult you, Tobes; honest. I mean, it's not like you have a snide comment for nearly everything I post.

 
Needless (allegedly) tragedy combined with senseless crime (very definitely) makes for an interesting discussion here in the FFA. I don't think anyone seriously commenting in this thread is happy a young man died, but I don't think anyone in here was at the scene either. Unfortunately we won't know what really happened for a while, assuming the courts and investigators do their job. The one thing we do know for sure is the looting is ridiculous. I don't care who was killed or why. It's a shame these people have so little respect for their community they would participate in such madness. My feeling is that lack of respect is part of the problem in the first place.
[SIZE=10.5pt]You are probably correct. Lack of respect from both sides. Police toward Citizens and Citizens toward Police. [/SIZE]

 
jon_mx said:
urbanhack said:
jon_mx said:
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
Why are there black neighborhoods then?

Why can't more blacks move out of their bad neighborhoods?

 
jon_mx said:
urbanhack said:
jon_mx said:
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
Why are there black neighborhoods then?
Seriously? Do you have comprehension of US history?

 
Needless (allegedly) tragedy combined with senseless crime (very definitely) makes for an interesting discussion here in the FFA. I don't think anyone seriously commenting in this thread is happy a young man died, but I don't think anyone in here was at the scene either. Unfortunately we won't know what really happened for a while, assuming the courts and investigators do their job. The one thing we do know for sure is the looting is ridiculous. I don't care who was killed or why. It's a shame these people have so little respect for their community they would participate in such madness. My feeling is that lack of respect is part of the problem in the first place.
You are probably correct. Lack of respect from both sides. Police toward Citizens and Citizens toward Police.
Definitely.

 
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
Why are there black neighborhoods then?
Seriously? Do you have comprehension of US history?
Convenient that you avoided my second question. Seriously?

 
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
You have some awesome guilt going on, congrats....
Awesome alternative reality going on, condolences.....

 
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
Why are there black neighborhoods then?
Seriously? Do you have comprehension of US history?
Convenient that you avoided my second question. Seriously?
This was your second question, right?

Why can't more blacks move out of their bad neighborhoods?
I assume he "avoided" it because he didn't think it was a serious question. It's not a serious question, is it? Please tell me it's not.

 
Nothing wrong with stop and frisk... As a New Yorker, I would have zero issue if I was ever stopped to be frisked, no homo....

Last year I was randomly selected to have a bag searched while getting on the subway, I was actually running late and still didn't mind.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
He looks young. If he's in college or lives with roommates I think it would be tough to hold that against his dad.

Go crazy with it though. Maybe you can get a local riot going.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?

 
FYI, Ferguson, where this happened, is one of the worst areas of the St. Louis metropolitan area. I had a bunch of relatives who grew up there decades ago, and it was a good area then, but it has gone way downhill in the last 20 years, and last night was a prime example of this. Sad. Very sad.
No it isn't. There has been a lot of money invested and redevelopment the last 15 years or so. It's terrible this kid lost his life and it's terrible for a city that has been making a big come back.
I don't want to quibble over what is and what isn't the worst area in the area, but while Ferguson has dressed it up a bit over the years (the big shopping center at W. Florissant and Lucas and Hunt, although that might be Jennings...cannot remember), crime is still not good there from what I have know, and their schooling system is off the charts bad. A co-worker with two young children actually moved out of that area last year (she lived just off Chambers, where a lot of that stuff last night happened) because, in her words, "she couldn't raise her kids any longer in an area where they heard gunfire every night." Sure, North City, other parts of North County and parts of South City are probably worse, but Ferguson is still not a place, prior to this weekend, I'd feel safe walking up and down the street. :shrug:
Sheesh
Should I happily skip down the street in neighborhoods that report high crime and where hearing gunfire is commonplace?
Watch the news and tell me Ferguson isn't a rough area.
:rolleyes: @ gunfire being commonplace. Again, I lived 1/4 mile from the city limits and just a couple of miles from downtown Ferguson and it was A LOT worse then than it is now. You didn't hear gun shots on any kind of regular basis. I don't know if I ever heard gun shots actually and I lived there 9 years.

Go here, skip to the 9:50 mark on what a ghetto it is. It's simply untrue. Maybe you guys are just scared of black people.

I'm ####### done with this cluster#### of a thread. :finger: to a lot of you.

 
Needless (allegedly) tragedy combined with senseless crime (very definitely) makes for an interesting discussion here in the FFA. I don't think anyone seriously commenting in this thread is happy a young man died, but I don't think anyone in here was at the scene either. Unfortunately we won't know what really happened for a while, assuming the courts and investigators do their job. The one thing we do know for sure is the looting is ridiculous. I don't care who was killed or why. It's a shame these people have so little respect for their community they would participate in such madness. My feeling is that lack of respect is part of the problem in the first place.
I feel the same way about Bank of America.
I feel the same way about right wingers.
Just not about the looters. That makes sense coming from a pagan communist such as yourself.
:lmao:

 
FYI, Ferguson, where this happened, is one of the worst areas of the St. Louis metropolitan area. I had a bunch of relatives who grew up there decades ago, and it was a good area then, but it has gone way downhill in the last 20 years, and last night was a prime example of this. Sad. Very sad.
No it isn't. There has been a lot of money invested and redevelopment the last 15 years or so. It's terrible this kid lost his life and it's terrible for a city that has been making a big come back.
I don't want to quibble over what is and what isn't the worst area in the area, but while Ferguson has dressed it up a bit over the years (the big shopping center at W. Florissant and Lucas and Hunt, although that might be Jennings...cannot remember), crime is still not good there from what I have know, and their schooling system is off the charts bad. A co-worker with two young children actually moved out of that area last year (she lived just off Chambers, where a lot of that stuff last night happened) because, in her words, "she couldn't raise her kids any longer in an area where they heard gunfire every night." Sure, North City, other parts of North County and parts of South City are probably worse, but Ferguson is still not a place, prior to this weekend, I'd feel safe walking up and down the street. :shrug:
Sheesh
Should I happily skip down the street in neighborhoods that report high crime and where hearing gunfire is commonplace?
Watch the news and tell me Ferguson isn't a rough area.
:rolleyes: @ gunfire being commonplace. Again, I lived 1/4 mile from the city limits and just a couple of miles from downtown Ferguson and it was A LOT worse then than it is now. You didn't hear gun shots on any kind of regular basis. I don't know if I ever heard gun shots actually and I lived there 9 years.

Go here, skip to the 9:50 mark on what a ghetto it is. It's simply untrue. Maybe you guys are just scared of black people.

I'm ####### done with this cluster#### of a thread. :finger: to a lot of you.
Regarding the gunfire, I was just repeating what a co-worker said, regarding her reason for leaving Ferguson a year ago.

I never used the word ghetto, nor would I. I simply said it was one of the worst areas in the St. Louis area, and then later amplified that by saying that there are worse areas, but I still wouldn't feel safe there, based on what a) I've heard about that area from other people, and b) the high crime rate.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because the people of Ferguson seem to have a long-running problem with the police. So while the protests were kicked off by the shooting, I think the overall image of the police department is incredibly important to the people down there who think they're being treated unfairly.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
Hmm. The "guilt-tinged leftist mind," you say? And they all work the same way? Well you do seem like an expert in objectivity and not jumping to conclusions. Thanks for your insight!

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.
So you're saying they will jump to conclusions?

 
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
Excellent post, Jackstraw.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.
So you're saying they will jump to conclusions?
They might.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.
So you're saying they will jump to conclusions?
They might.
Honestly I'm just trying to figure out why it was brought up or why it's relevant at all, aside from an attempt to stir up racial divides.

Say a guy works at a restaurant, and the restaurant's owner's stupid kid has a jacked up pickup truck with a confederate flag in the bed - does that have any bearing at all on the restaurant worker?

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.
So you're saying they will jump to conclusions?
They might.
Honestly I'm just trying to figure out why it was brought up or why it's relevant at all, aside from an attempt to stir up racial divides.

Say a guy works at a restaurant, and the restaurant's owner's stupid kid has a jacked up pickup truck with a confederate flag in the bed - does that have any bearing at all on the restaurant worker?
If patrons think there's a pattern of racist treatment from the restaurant staff, it might. And if my daughter put a Confederate flag on her truck some day, I wouldn't act shocked if people thought I had something to do with her views.

 
Honestly I'm just trying to figure out why it was brought up or why it's relevant at all, aside from an attempt to stir up racial divides.

Say a guy works at a restaurant, and the restaurant's owner's stupid kid has a jacked up pickup truck with a confederate flag in the bed - does that have any bearing at all on the restaurant worker?
If patrons think there's a pattern of racist treatment from the restaurant staff, it might. And if my daughter put a Confederate flag on her truck some day, I wouldn't act shocked if people thought I had something to do with her views.
I think that's quite a leap, personally. We still have no idea of any details of the police officer, correct? Do we know for certain that he's in fact white?

As to your second sentence, sure that makes sense - the leap for me is that your view affect your coworkers, not your own daughter.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.
So you're saying they will jump to conclusions?
They might.
Honestly I'm just trying to figure out why it was brought up or why it's relevant at all, aside from an attempt to stir up racial divides.

Say a guy works at a restaurant, and the restaurant's owner's stupid kid has a jacked up pickup truck with a confederate flag in the bed - does that have any bearing at all on the restaurant worker?
Seems to me it was brought up to suggest the family might have something of a racist background or set of ideals (or they might just be huge Dukes of Hazzard fans).

 
Honestly I'm just trying to figure out why it was brought up or why it's relevant at all, aside from an attempt to stir up racial divides.

Say a guy works at a restaurant, and the restaurant's owner's stupid kid has a jacked up pickup truck with a confederate flag in the bed - does that have any bearing at all on the restaurant worker?
If patrons think there's a pattern of racist treatment from the restaurant staff, it might. And if my daughter put a Confederate flag on her truck some day, I wouldn't act shocked if people thought I had something to do with her views.
I think that's quite a leap, personally. We still have no idea of any details of the police officer, correct? Do we know for certain that he's in fact white?

As to your second sentence, sure that makes sense - the leap for me is that your view affect your coworkers, not your own daughter.
As I explained in an earlier comment, the Ferguson protests are about more than this single incident.

And yes, witnesses have said the officer was white. Of course, that might turn out not to be true. We'll see.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
I didn't jump to any. I'm talking about how I think something like this will be interpreted by the people on the street.
So you're saying they will jump to conclusions?
They might.
Honestly I'm just trying to figure out why it was brought up or why it's relevant at all, aside from an attempt to stir up racial divides.

Say a guy works at a restaurant, and the restaurant's owner's stupid kid has a jacked up pickup truck with a confederate flag in the bed - does that have any bearing at all on the restaurant worker?
Seems to me it was brought up to suggest the family might have something of a racist background or set of ideals (or they might just be huge Dukes of Hazzard fans).
Who's family? The shooter (who we still know next to nothing about, correct?), or the family of the Police Chief?

As for the Dukes of Hazzard comment - I completely accidentally have dogs named Luke and Beau (Bo). Am I racist, too?

 
Christopher Hayes ‏@chrislhayes 45m

I interviewed the key witness to the Michael Brown shooting last night. The police haven't. Think about that.
Maybe, just maybe, the police don't view him as a key witness. Maybe they know something you and Mr. Hayes don't. Maybe they are covering something up, who knows. But a page-click generating comment from an openly biased "news source" is really just, I don't know, riot inciting until there are some actual facts to talk about.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seems to me it was brought up to suggest the family might have something of a racist background or set of ideals (or they might just be huge Dukes of Hazzard fans).
Who's family? The shooter (who we still know next to nothing about, correct?), or the family of the Police Chief?

As for the Dukes of Hazzard comment - I completely accidentally have dogs named Luke and Beau (Bo). Am I racist, too?
Pretty much. Don't be ridiculous, guy. Family of the cop. And no way it's "completely accidentally."

 
Seems to me it was brought up to suggest the family might have something of a racist background or set of ideals (or they might just be huge Dukes of Hazzard fans).
Who's family? The shooter (who we still know next to nothing about, correct?), or the family of the Police Chief?

As for the Dukes of Hazzard comment - I completely accidentally have dogs named Luke and Beau (Bo). Am I racist, too?
Pretty much. Don't be ridiculous, guy. Family of the cop. And no way it's "completely accidentally."
The flag thing isn't from the family of the cop in the shooting, it's from the family of the police chief - which is why I don't think it's particularly relevant.

And yes, it's completely accidentally. My wife has had a border collie named Luke (named after "cool hand Luke") since he was a few weeks old, and he's now 10. 2 weeks ago we adopted a 12 year old "senior rescue" border collie (yes, we have a thing for the breed) named Beau (pronounced Bo). We now have dogs with the names of the Dukes of Hazzard, by complete accident.

 
Seems to me it was brought up to suggest the family might have something of a racist background or set of ideals (or they might just be huge Dukes of Hazzard fans).
Who's family? The shooter (who we still know next to nothing about, correct?), or the family of the Police Chief?

As for the Dukes of Hazzard comment - I completely accidentally have dogs named Luke and Beau (Bo). Am I racist, too?
Pretty much. Don't be ridiculous, guy. Family of the cop. And no way it's "completely accidentally."
The flag thing isn't from the family of the cop in the shooting, it's from the family of the police chief - which is why I don't think it's particularly relevant.

And yes, it's completely accidentally. My wife has had a border collie named Luke (named after "cool hand Luke") since he was a few weeks old, and he's now 10. 2 weeks ago we adopted a 12 year old "senior rescue" border collie (yes, we have a thing for the breed) named Beau (pronounced Bo). We now have dogs with the names of the Dukes of Hazzard, by complete accident.
I stand corrected. Do they slide over the hood of your vehicles when you take them for a ride?

 
I just don't believe in today's world of hyper-sensitivity towards racism that institutionalized racism exists anywhere except very small pockets. Any policy which even hints of racism is weeded out.
OK. :lmao:
show me the policies.
NYC stop and frisk comes to mindThat was fairly recent wasn't it?
It is a policy which effectively has reduced crime in high crime areas. There is no racism behind the policies. So far the voters of New York (mostly black voters) have voted for people in favor of these policies and the polices have survived legal challenges to date. It is an area of debate whether the loss of freedom is worth the results, but I don't see it as proof of institutionalized racism. The policy is well known and is supported by many minorities.
I could shoot speeders in the head when I pull them over and it would effectively reduce speeding. Doesn't make it right. How in the world can you say there is no racism behind policies when they pick particular races to profile. That statement is absurd. Plus reductions in crime in NYC mirror other areas where crime has dropped without stop and frisk.

It's amazing how people can be so obtusely blind to the black experience. I'm not excusing looting or any other crime for that matter. But if you think the deck isn't stacked against black people with the amount of evidence in the justice system; with the policies banks and other financial institutions have in minority neighborhoods; with the education system etc etc there's nothing at this point that can possibly change your mind. It's so evident to me it doesn't even merit debate. But here we are.

Think to yourself why there are even black neighborhoods in the first place. You think a lot of those people wouldn't move to better neighborhoods if they could? You think there's no housing discrimination? If you can't see that stuff that's plain as day your just a putz who has no idea what he's talking about.

My background is such that I've lived with minorities of all stripes. I've heard there stories. I've been out with them and experienced it first hand. I was ten times the thug that someof my black friends ever thought about being and somehow the trouble would find them. Like some kind of magic. I keep thinking for why that is and I just can't understand it. People like Jon "whitesplain" to me that racism doesn't exist so it can't be that.
Excellent post, Jackstraw.
Bad post. All of things you describe happen for a reason, meaning there is causation. Let's start with you being 10x a thug. Give us all a break. What did you get away with due to your white skin? I personally know a lot of cops who have to patrol bad neighborhoods, many of those neighborhoods are black hoods. First off, yes they are looking for a profile, but guess what? Since everybody who lives in the neighborhood is black, that is not what they are looking for. They are looking for suspicious behavior. That is the person's fault if they fit the bill in that regard. People of all colors deal with every day. As far as the suburbs go, if I am traveling through a super ritzy hood in my beat up car, then I am taking a risk for being pulled over if I have a violation. It is not the cops fault that you have a violation!!!! If you have one they can pull you over. I am a white guy.... I got pulled over driving around at bar time for a ticky-tack b.s reason. Was the cop profiling me....of course, I was driving around at 3AM....does it change the fact that I had a violation,? NO!!!!!!! He has every right to pull me over, and if I have done something wrong, I will be in trouble.

As far as housing goes, why on earth would a bank loan money to somebody who they think cannot or even might not pay it back? That is absurd. Actually, I just read a post in this forum by a respected member who says he makes a lot of money and cannot get a loan for a house he wants to buy. I doubt he is black....if banks are racist, why did they not just loan him the money? After all, he is white and even makes alot of money! I guarantee you that if a black guy walks into a bank with 20% down, proof of a steady paycheck, and good credit history, he will get a loan, because those are the things needed for a loan!!!! It is not the bank's fault that there are many blacks who do not fit that description. You know whose fault it is? YOURS!!!!!! People like you constantly make excuses for blacks, you send them messages that of course they cannot be expected to act like everyone else...they are black...whatever that means.

Last point, the education system. I know you say you walk hand in hand with the blacks, but I have actually spent time in all kinds of urban schools including a few years in schools that are primarily black. Blacks are given the same opportunities that white and Hispanics have, but because we like to sit around and make excuses for all of the nutcases and anti-authoritarians around in our world, their schools suffer the most. If you go to a black private school where no excuses are tolerated and excellence is expected, I will show you a good school and those schools do exist. If you go to a typical inner city public school where we have to accept the fact that little Tyrone wants to kill everybody who looks at him sideways and just work with him, that is the reason the schools fail. But you have to begin to understand that little Tyrone is allowed to stay on because of people like you who always make excuses for his crazy and threatening demeanor. You have a classroom of 24 kids who are smart and ready to learn, combined with 4 or 5 kids who are basically psychotic and ruin it for everybody. And it is accepted by people like you because all you like to do is sit in your little suburban enclave and make excuses because the movie "Mississippi Burning" left a hole in your bleeding heart . Hell, you even prefaced your asinine screed with "I'm not excusing looting, but",,,,

BUT WHAT!?!?!?!?! You just did excuse it....you wrote a post giving us your perspective (as a white guy who has lots of black friends) on the black experience. If only we knew!!!!! All of the profiling!!! All of the loan denials!!! All of the teachers who didn't care!!!! Not only is your post nonsensical, it is an insult to the spirit of humanity!!!!

 
Seems to me it was brought up to suggest the family might have something of a racist background or set of ideals (or they might just be huge Dukes of Hazzard fans).
Who's family? The shooter (who we still know next to nothing about, correct?), or the family of the Police Chief?

As for the Dukes of Hazzard comment - I completely accidentally have dogs named Luke and Beau (Bo). Am I racist, too?
Pretty much. Don't be ridiculous, guy. Family of the cop. And no way it's "completely accidentally."
The flag thing isn't from the family of the cop in the shooting, it's from the family of the police chief - which is why I don't think it's particularly relevant.

And yes, it's completely accidentally. My wife has had a border collie named Luke (named after "cool hand Luke") since he was a few weeks old, and he's now 10. 2 weeks ago we adopted a 12 year old "senior rescue" border collie (yes, we have a thing for the breed) named Beau (pronounced Bo). We now have dogs with the names of the Dukes of Hazzard, by complete accident.
I stand corrected. Do they slide over the hood of your vehicles when you take them for a ride?
Everyone asks me that. Luke loves car rides, but we're not sure about Beau yet.

I brought it up to show an example of where people might jump to conclusions. If you hear that I have dogs named Luke and Bo, you might immediately think of the Duzes of Hazzard, and by association the Confederate flag, and by further association racism. Nothing could be further from the truth, at least in my case. Perhaps that flag isn't owned by the son of the police chief. Perhaps that isn't even the son of the police chief. Perhaps it is his son and it is his flag and he has it up to show his family heritage or of his thoughts on State's rights - nothing to do with racism.

 
Christopher Hayes ‏@chrislhayes 45m

I interviewed the key witness to the Michael Brown shooting last night. The police haven't. Think about that.
Not only that, but according to his lawyer, they have contacted the police department, offered an interview, and were declined.
How is that even possible?
Are you nuts? How many cops do you think they have? My guess is the reason they are not doing interviews is because the town has been under siege for the last 48 hours and they need every last person out on the front line.

 
I don't know but some crazy race-obsessed people are going to think his dad might be an important influence in his life.
Why would a flag owned by the son of a coworker/boss of the police offer in question in this shooting be of any importance at all?
Because this is how the guilt-tinged leftist mind works. Why maintain objectivity when you can jump to conclusions?
lol

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top